Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Higher yield, profit and soil quality from organic farming of elephant foot yam

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alternative agricultural systems, like organic farming, that are less chemical intensive, less exploitative and environment friendly are gaining popularity. Elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson) is an important starchy tuberous vegetable with high nutritive and medicinal values. Since information on the organic farming of tuberous vegetables is scanty, field experiments were conducted in this crop at the Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, India, over a 5-year period. The impact of organic, conventional, traditional and biofertilizer production systems on growth, yield, quality, soil physico-chemical properties and economics were evaluated in elephant foot yam. Our results show that organic farming favoured canopy growth, corm biomass and lowered collar rot disease. Dry matter and starch contents of organic corms were significantly higher than those of conventional corms by 7% and 13%, respectively. Organic corms had 12% higher crude protein and 21% significantly lower oxalate contents. The content of K, Ca and Mg in corms were slightly higher, by 3–7% under organic farming. After 5 years of farming, the organic plots showed significantly higher pH, by 0.77 unit, and higher organic C by 19%. The exchangeable Mg, available Cu, Mn and Fe contents were also significantly higher. Organic management lowered the bulk density by 2.3%, improved the water-holding capacity by 28.4% and the porosity of soil by 16.5%. In short, organic farming proved superior and produced 20% higher yield (57.097 t ha−1) over conventional practice (47.609 t ha−1). The net profit was 28% higher and an additional income of Indian Rs. 47,716 ha−1 was obtained. Thus organic farming was found to be an eco-friendly management strategy in elephant foot yam for sustainable yield of quality tubers and higher profit besides maintaining soil health. Technologies for organic production involving farmyard manure incubated with bioinoculants, green manuring, neem cake, biofertilizers and ash were also standardized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews SS, Mitchell JP, Mancinelli R, Karlen DL, Hartz TK, Horwath WR, Pettygrove GS, Scow KM, Munk DS (2002) On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley. Agron J 94:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (1980) Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington DC., pp.169, 611–612, 1141

  • Barak P, Jobe B, Krueger AR, Peterson A, Laird A (1997) Effects of long term soil acidification due to nitrogen fertilizer inputs in Wisconsin. Plant Soil 197:61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chhonkar PK (2008) Organic farming and its relevance in India. In: Tarafdar JC, Tripathi KP, Mahesh K (eds) Organic agriculture. Scientific Publishers Jodhpur, India, pp 5–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark MS, Horwath WR, Shennan C, Scow KM (1998) Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low-input farming systems. Agron J 90:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colla G, Mitchell JP, Joyce BA, Huyck LM, Wallender WW, Temple SR, Hsiao TC, Poudel DD (2000) Soil physical properties and tomato yield and quality in alternative cropping systems. Agron J 92:924–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chem 28:350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt RA (1997) A comparative analysis of the effects of organic and conventional farming systems on soil structure. Biol Agric Hort 14:139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RP, Dakshinamoorthy C (1980) Procedures for physical analysis of soil and collection of agrometeorological data. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves JC, Adl MS, Warman PR, Rupasinghe HPV (2008) The effects of organic and conventional nutrient amendments on strawberry cultivation: fruit yield and quality. J Sci Food Agric 88:2669–2675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabeerathumma S, Mohan KB, Nair PG (1987) Nutrient uptake and their utilization by yams, aroids and coleus. Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Technical Bulletin Series-10

    Google Scholar 

  • KAU (2002) Kerala Agricultural University, package of practices recommendations: crops. Directorate of Extension, Mannuthy, Thrissur, pp 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra BS, Misra A, Chilana K, Kumar A, Singh SP (2006a) Growth and yield of Basmati rice under organic mode during initial years of conversion in relation to nutrient management practices. J Ecofriendly Agric 1(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra BS, Singh SP, Rajesh A, Vishwakarma VK, Bhushan C, Kumar A, Singh RK, Kumar A, Chilana K, Pandey CS (2006b) Performance of lentil, chickpea and wheat under organic mode during initial years of conversion in relation to nutrient management practices. J Ecofriendly Agric 1(2):105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei C, Yahua S, Zhengguo O, Qirong S (2002) Amelioration of aluminium toxicity with pig manure in an acid red soil. Plant Nutr Fert Sci 8(2):176

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153:375–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison,Wisconsin, USA, p 1159, Agronomy series no. 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper JR, Barrett DM (2008) Effects of organic and conventional production systems on quality and nutritional parameters of processing tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric 89:177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper CS (1970) Plant and soil analysis. Hans publications, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakaran C, Pitchai GJ (2002) Effect of different organic nitrogen sources on pH, total soluble solids, titrable acidity, reducing and non reducing sugars, crude protein and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruits. J Soils and Crops 12(2):160–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash YS, Bhadoria PBS, Rakshit A (2002) Comparative efficacy of organic manures on the changes in soil properties and nutrient availability in an alfisol. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 50(2):219–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan B, Ranjit KQ, Ganapathy MNK, Hudson JB (2006) Effect of conventional, organic and biodynamic farming systems in tea. J Plantation Crops 34:330–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Reganold JP, Glover JDP, Andrews K, Hinman HR (2001) Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410:926–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regu A, Deepa VC, Sundaram KA (1999) Study on Soorana (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius) The king of tubers. In: Balagopalan C, Nayar TVR, Sundaresan S, Premkumar T, Lakshmi KR (eds) Tropical Tuber Crops in Food Security and Nutrition. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, pp 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rembialkowska E (2007) Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J Sci Food Agric 87:2757–2762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2008) SAS users guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Scow KM, Somasco O, Gunapala N, Lau S, Venette R, Ferris H, Miller R, Shenman C (1994) Transition from conventional to low-input agriculture changes soil fertility and biology. California Agric 48:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava AK, Singh S, Shivankar VJ, Das AK, Rao CN (2006) Organic citrus status. National Research Centre for Citrus, Nagpur, Maharashtra

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale EA, Lampkin NH, Hovi M, Keating R, Lennartsson EKM, Macdonald DW, Padel S, Tattersall FH, Wolfe MS, Watson CA (2001) Agronomic and environmental implications of organic farming systems. Adv Agron 70:261–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suja G (2008) Strategies for organic production of tropical tuber crops. In: Venkateswarlu B, Balloli SS, Ramakrishna YS (eds) Organic farming in rainfed agriculture: opportunities and constraints. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, p 185

    Google Scholar 

  • Suja G, Nayar TVR, Potty VP, Sundaresan S (2006) Organic farming: a viable strategy for high yield and quality tuber crop production. Indian Hort 51(6):4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain T, Hillis WE (1955) The phenolic constituents of Prumus domestica 1. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J Sci Food Agric 10:963–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Timonin MI (1940) The interaction of higher plants and soil microorganisms I. Microbial population of the rhizosphere of seedlings of certain cultivated plants. Canadian J Res 181:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Director, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute for providing facilities for carrying out the research work and Mr. M. Manikantan Nair and Mrs. K. S. Sudha Devi, Technical Officers, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute for the chemical and biochemical analyses, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, 695 017, Kerala, India

    Girija Suja, Sukumaran Sundaresan, Kuzhivilayil Susan John, Janardanan Sreekumar & Raj Sekhar Misra

Authors
  1. Girija Suja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sukumaran Sundaresan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kuzhivilayil Susan John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Janardanan Sreekumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Raj Sekhar Misra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Girija Suja.

About this article

Cite this article

Suja, G., Sundaresan, S., John, K.S. et al. Higher yield, profit and soil quality from organic farming of elephant foot yam. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 755–764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0058-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0058-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation