Skip to main content
Log in

Unexpected predominance of wine grower location over soil trafficability for vine management in southern France

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On a regional scale, many management concerns, such as agricultural planning and water contamination management, require information regarding the diversity and location of agricultural practices. One means of obtaining this information is to search for spatially explicit indicators that correspond to factors that drive agricultural practices. The objective of our study was to assess the role of soil trafficability on the distribution of soil surface management practices in a Mediterranean vine-growing region characterised by water contamination by herbicides. Soil surface management relies on different combinations of technologies such as shallow tillage, chemical weeding, and grass cover. We hypothesised that soils characterised by low trafficability were associated with the use of chemical weeding or grass cover in alleys that tractors use while spraying pesticides. Here, data on practices were collected by survey at the plot resolution. Soil trafficability was evaluated based on an expert classification of the soil units of a 1:25,000 soil map. Using classification trees, we tested the ability of the following three explanatory variables to determine the choice of practice: (1) the trafficability of the plot, (2) the percentage of plots with low trafficability within the vineyard of the farm holding, and (3) the wine grower residence place. Our results show that the trafficability classifies 59% of plots. The percentage of plots with low trafficability classifies 76% of plots. The wine grower residence place classifies 84% of the plots. Although the choice of practice correlated with soil trafficability, the residence place of the wine grower unexpectedly over-determined the practice choice. As a consequence, our findings evidence a spatial variability of the role of soil in the distribution of soil surface management practices. In addition, soil trafficability cannot be used as major indicator of the practice spatial distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubry C, Papy F, Capillon A (1998) Modelling decision-making process for annual crop management. Agr Syst 56:45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols N, Zinck JA (2003) Ethnopedology: a worldwide view on the soil knowledge of local people. Geoderma 111:171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biarnès A, Bailly JS, Boissieux Y (2009) Identifying indicators of the spatial variation of agricultural practices by a tree partitioning method: the case of weed control practices in a vine growing catchment. Agr Syst 99:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocca L, Morbidelli R, Melone F, Moramarco T (2007) Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy. J Hydrol 333:356–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerf M, Papy F, Angevin F (1998) Are farmers expert at identifying workable days for tillage? Agronomie 18:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compagnone C (2004) Agriculture raisonnée et dynamique de changement en viticulture bourguignonne: Connaissance et relations sociales. Recherches sociologiques 35:103–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Compagnone C (2010) Influence des dialogues professionnels sur les changements de pratiques des viticulteurs. Le progrès Agricole et viticole 2:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Conein B, Ferrand A, Lazega E (2004) (Eds) Connaissances et relations sociales, Recherches Sociologiques 3

  • Coulouma G (2008) Carte des sols de la basse vallée de la Peyne. Echellle 1/25000. Notice. UMR Lisah

  • Coulouma G, Boizard H, Trotoux G, Lagacherie P, Richard G (2006) Effect of deep tillage for vineyard establishment on soil structure: a case study in southern France. Soil Till Res 88:132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darré J-P, Le Guen Y, Lemery B (1989) Changement technique et structure professionnelle locale. Economie rurale 192–193:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbiez A, Matthews R, Tripathi B, Ellis-Jones J (2004) Perceptions and assessment of soil fertility by farmers in the mid-hills of Nepal. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droogers P, Fermont A, Bouma J (1996) Effects of ecological soil management on workability and trafficability of a loamy soil in the Netherlands. Geoderma 73:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl R (1997) Prediction of trafficability and workability from soil moisture deficit. Soil Till Res 40:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1976) A framework for land evaluation. Soil bulletin 32. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn H, Fleige H (2003) A method for assessing the impact of load on mechanical stability and on physical properties of soils. Soil Till Res 73:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World soil resources reports no.103, 2nd edn. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2009) Soils and food sufficiency. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bail M, Aubry C, Navarrete M, Vaucelle A (2006) Agronomie et qualité dans les filières de production végétale, in: Doré T, Le Bail M, Martin P, Ney B, Roger-Estrade J (eds), L'agronomie aujourd'hui, Quae éditions, Versailles, pp. 285–308

  • Leenhardt D, Angevin F, Biarnès A, Colbach N, Mignolet V (2010) Describing and locating cropping systems at a regional scale. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louchart X, Voltz M, Andrieux P, Moussa R (2001) Herbicide transport to surface waters at field and watershed scales in a Mediterranean vineyard area. J Environ Qual 30:982–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manna P, Basile A, Bonfante A, De Mascellis R, Terribile F (2009) Comparative land evaluation approaches: an itinerary from FAO framework to simulation modelling. Geoderma 150:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Mendoza Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L, Schindler U, Mirschel W, Shepherd TG, Ball BC, Helming K, Rogasik J, Eulenstein F, Wiggering H (2010) Assessing the productivity function of soils. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré N, Andrieux P, Louchart X, Biarnès A, Voltz M (2011) Predicting the spatio-temporal dynamic of soil surface characteristics after tillage. Soil Till Res 114:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul CL, Devries J (1979) Effect of soil–water status and strength on trafficability. Can J Soil Sci 59:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley B (2007) Tree: classification and regression tree, R package version 1.0-26. http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/CRAN/doc/packages/tree.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2011

  • Rounsevell MDA, Jones RJA (1993) A soil and agroclimatic model for estimating machinery work days: the basic model and climatic sensitivity. Soil Till Res 26:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun JI (2003) Predicting regional rice production in South Korea using spatial data and crop-growth modelling. Agr Syst 77:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Biarnès.

About this article

Cite this article

Biarnès, A., Coulouma, G. & Compagnone, C. Unexpected predominance of wine grower location over soil trafficability for vine management in southern France. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 661–671 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0052-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0052-y

Keywords

Navigation