Skip to main content
Log in

Leafcutter bee preference of plant saplings in plant nurseries: context for future research and conservation

  • Original article
  • Published:
Apidologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Global pollinator decline has prompted pollinator conservation initiatives. Plant nurseries exploited this opportunity by selling bee-friendly ornamental plants. Studies that analysed flower-pollinator networks questioned the suitability of ornamental plants for bee conservation. We evaluated plant nurseries from the perspective of the leaf-foraging habit of leafcutter bees. Leafcutter bees use leaves to construct brood chambers. We found evidence for leafcutter bees using the leaves of 9% of plant species (n = 238). Bees foraged ornamental and horticultural plant saplings similarly. Plant species preference was driven by plant clade and plant height. The proportion of plant saplings used by bees in the nurseries was associated with plant abundance and the proportion of ornamental plants. Results provide context for new perceptions toward ornamental plants and plant nurseries for pollinator conservation and restoration and ask questions on the ecology and evolution of leafcutter bee–plant interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data will be shared to the readers upon a genuine request.

Code availability

We used R program for all statistical analyses. Codes of the statistical models used in the present research can be obtained from the section “Statistical analyses”.


  • Ascher JS, Pickering J (2015) Discover life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). Available: Accessed 10 Mar 2023

  • Baldock KCR (2020) Opportunities and threats for pollinator conservation in global towns and cities. Curr Opin Insect Sci 38:63–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldock KCR et al (2019) A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities. Nat Ecol Evol 3:363–373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2020) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17.

  • Cecala JM, Wilson Rankin EE (2021a) Petals and leaves: quantifying the use of nest building materials by the world’s most valuable solitary bee. Ecology 103:e03584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cecala JM, Wilson Rankin EE (2021b) Pollinators and plant nurseries: how irrigation and pesticide treatment of native ornamental plants impact solitary bees. Proc R Soc B 288:20211287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An {R} companion to applied regression, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.

  • Garbuzov M, Ratnieks FLW (2014a) Listmania: the strengths and weaknesses of lists of garden plants to help pollinators. Bioscience 64:1019–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbuzov M, Ratnieks FLW (2014b) Quantifying variation among garden plants in attractiveness to bees and other flower-visiting insects. Funct Ecol 28:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbuzov M, Alton K, Ratnieks FLW (2017) Most ornamental plants on sale in garden centres are unattractive to flower-visiting insects. Peer J 5:e3066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haider M, Dorn S, Sedivy C, Müller A (2014) Phylogeny and floral hosts of a predominantly pollen generalist group of mason bees (Megachilidae: Osmiini). Biol J Linn Soc 111:78–91

  • Harmon-Threatt A (2020) Influence of nesting characteristics on health of wild bee communities. Annu Rev Entomol 65:39–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig F (2021) DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.4.

  • Image M et al (2022) Does agri-environment scheme participation in England increase pollinator populations and crop pollination services? Agric Ecosyst Environ 325:107755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambli̇ SS, Aiswarya MS, Manoj K, Varma S et al (2017) Leaf foraging sources of leafcutter bees in a tropical environment: Implications for conservation. Apidologie 48:473–482

  • Lentola A, David A, Abdul-Sada A, Tapparo A, Goulson D, Hill EM (2017) Ornamental plants on sale to the public are a significant source of pesticide residues with implications for the health of pollinating insects. Environ Pollut 228:297–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Litman JR, Danforth BN, Eardley CD, Praz CJ (2011) Why do leafcutter bees cut leaves? New insights into the early evolution of bees. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:3593–3600

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein DM, Matteson KC, Minor ES (2019) Evaluating the dependence of urban pollinators on ornamental, non-native, and ‘weedy’ floral resources. Urban Ecosyst 22:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIvor JS (2016) DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees. R Soc Open Sci 3:150623

  • MacIvor JS, Packer L (2015) “Bee hotels” as tools for native pollinator conservation: a premature verdict? PLoS ONE 10:e0122126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Majewska AA, Altizer S (2020) Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conserv Biol 34:15–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (2007) The bees of the world, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press

  • Nichols RN, Goulson D, Holland JM (2019) The best wildflowers for wild bees. J Insect Conserv 23:819–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts-Singer TL, Cane JH (2011) The Alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata: the world’s most intensively managed solitary bee. Annu Rev Entomol 56:221–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG et al (2005) Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecol Entomol 30:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG et al (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG et al (eds) (2016) IPBES: The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany

  • R Studio Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA.

  • Requier F, Leonhardt SD (2020) Beyond flowers: including non-floral resources in bee conservation schemes. J Insect Conserv 24:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedivy C, Dorn S, Widmer A, Müller A (2013) Host range evolution in a selected group of osmiine bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae): the Boraginaceae-Fabaceae paradox. Biol J Linn Soc 108:35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinu PA, Bronstein JL (2018) Foraging preferences of leafcutter bees in three contrasting geographical zones. Divers Distrib 24:621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinu PA, Jamal M, Shaji G et al (2022) Ornamental roses for conservation of leafcutter bee pollinators. Sci Rep 12:18700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner KA, Cowles RS, Nurse A, Eitzer BD (2019) Tracking pesticide residues to a plant genus using palynology in pollen trapped from honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) at ornamental plant nurseries. Environ Entomol 48:351–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Young BE, Schweitzer DF, Hammerson GA, Sears NA, Ormes MF, Tomaino AO (2016) Conservation and management of North American 380 Leafcutter bees. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia

Download references


PAS thanks SERB for a research grant (CRG/7170/AS) which partially met the travel costs of the project. We thank R. Ramasubbu for determining plant species. We also thank the two anonymous referees and Rajendran K.V. for their critical comments into the manuscript.


The work was supported by Science Engineering Research Board through a core research grant (7170) awarded to PAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



PAS conceived the study; PAS and VA conducted field work; VA curated data; PAS did analyses and wrote the manuscript that all authors have approved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Palatty Allesh Sinu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This is not applicable for the present research.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Manuscript editor: Mathieu Lihoreau

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 90 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinu, P.A., Aiswarya, V. Leafcutter bee preference of plant saplings in plant nurseries: context for future research and conservation. Apidologie 54, 55 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: