Advertisement

Apidologie

pp 1–4 | Cite as

Scientific note: first global report of a bee nest built only with plastic

  • Mariana L. AllasinoEmail author
  • Hugo J. Marrero
  • Jimena Dorado
  • Juan Pablo Torretta
Scientific note

Abstract

Agricultural plastic waste can alter wildlife diversity and behavior. Species survival will depend on their ability to adapt to new environmental conditions. In a seed-producing farm, a Megachile sp. nest made fully with plastic was found in a trap nest. This record represents the first one worldwide on revealing the use of plastic in the total construction of a bee nest.

Keywords

solitary bees plastic adaptive flexibility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Diego Vázquez for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and José Martín for allowing us to work in his field.

Author contributions

MLA and HJM conducted field sampling; MLA, HJM, JD, and JPT analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding information

This study was supported by the INTA fellowship Disp. No. 942/15, Res. No. 108/17, PRET VAyNE-1251510, PROFEDER-785140, and PANAPI-1112044.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Álvarez, L. J., Lucia, M., Durante, S., Pisonero, J., Abrahamovich, A. H. (2012). Occurrence of the exotic leafcutter bee Megachile (Eutricharaea) concinna (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in southern South America. An accidental introduction? J Apicult Res. 51, 221–226.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, D. K., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., Barlaz, M. (2009) Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos T RoySoc B. 364, 1985–1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briassoulis, D., Babou, E., Hiskakis, M., Scarascia, G., Picuno, P., Guarde, D., Dejean, C. (2013). Review, mapping and analysis of the agricultural plastic waste generation and consolidation in Europe. Waste Manage Res. 31(12), 1262–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Free, J. B. (1993). Insect pollination of crops. Acad. press, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  5. Garibaldi, L. A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Winfree, R., Aizen, M. A., Bommarco, R., Cunningham, S. A., et al. (2013). Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science. 339(6127), 1608–1611.Google Scholar
  6. Hemphill, D. D. (1993). Agricultural plastics as solid waste: what are the options for disposal? Hort Technology. 3(1), 70–73.Google Scholar
  7. IPBES. (2016). Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production [online] http://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/SPM_Pollinators_unedited%20advance.pdf.. Accessed 13 Oct 2018.
  8. Kambli, S. S., Aiswarya, M. S, Manoj, K., Varma, S., Ash, G., Rajesh, T. P., Sinu, P. A. (2017). Leaf foraging sources of leafcutter bees in a tropical environment: implications for conservation. Apidologie. 48, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, A. M., Vaissiere, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc London Ser B. 274(1608), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacIvor, J. S., Moore, A. E. (2013). Bees collect polyurethane and polyethylene plastics as novel nest materials. Ecosphere. 4(12), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Medler, J. T. (1966). A resin bee using trap-nests in Wisconsin, and a note on other resin bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Entomol News. 77, 228–230.Google Scholar
  12. Michener, C. D. (2000). The bees of the world, 1st edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  13. Nicholls, C. I., Altieri, M. A. (2013). Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agroecosystems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 33(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., Kunin, W. E. (2010). Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol. 25(6), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Richards, K. (1978). Comparisons of nesting materials used for the alfalfa leafcutter bee, Megachile pacifica (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Can Entomol. 110, 841–846.Google Scholar
  16. Rundlöf, M., Andersson, G. K., Bommarco, R., Fries, I., Hederström, V., Herbertsson, L., Smith, H. G. (2015). Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature. 521(7550), 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scarascia-Mugnozza, G., Sica, C., Russo, G. (2012). Plastic materials in European agriculture: actual use and perspectives. J Agr Eng Res. 42(3), 15–28.Google Scholar
  18. Sheffield, C. S. (2017). Unusual nesting behavior in Megachile (Eutricharaea) rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Journal of Melittology, (69),1–6.Google Scholar
  19. Shochat, E., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., McIntyre, N. E., Hope, D. (2006). From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 21(4), 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suárez-Rodríguez, M., López-Rull, I., Macías García, C. (2012). Incorporation of cigarette butts into nests reduces nest ectoparasite load in urban birds: New ingredients for an old recipe? Biol Lett. 9(1), 20120931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Suárez-Rodríguez, M., Montero-Montoya, R. D., Macías Garcia, C. (2017). Anthropogenic nest materials may increase breeding costs for urban birds. Front Ecol Evol. 5, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariana L. Allasino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hugo J. Marrero
    • 2
  • Jimena Dorado
    • 3
  • Juan Pablo Torretta
    • 4
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Agricultura Familiar Región CuyoINTASan JuanArgentina
  2. 2.Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de las Zonas SemiáridasCONICETBahía BlancaArgentina
  3. 3.Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas ÁridasCONICETMendozaArgentina
  4. 4.Cátedra de Botánica General, Facultad de AgronomíaUniversidad de Buenos Aires and CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations