Advertisement

Apidologie

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 116–128 | Cite as

Measuring the sugar consumption of larvae in bumblebee micro-colonies: a promising new method for tracking food economics in bees

  • Ivan Řehoř
  • Lenka Macháčková
  • Alena Bučánková
  • Stanislava Matějková
  • Kateřina Černá
  • Jakub StrakaEmail author
Original article

Abstract

The consumption of sugar is an important part of the energy intake of social insect. Its monitoring provides information regarding the costs and efficiency of energy flow in a colony. This study aims at tracking the sugar flow from a sugar source to artificial bumblebee micro-colonies and at quantifying the amount of sugar consumed by the larvae. We developed a new method of sugar tracking that utilises an inert lanthanide complex (GdDOTA) dissolved in an aqueous sugar solution. The delayed defecation of bee larvae enabled the collection of all faeces from a cocoon. The amount of digested sugar corresponded to the amount of the lanthanide in the faeces, which was quantified using inductively coupled plasma spectrometric techniques. We highlight the possibility of the novel developed method to be extended for tracking the energy flow within a colony using up to 15 different metal markers without the necessity of killing individuals.

Keywords

marking technique lanthanide carbohydrate insect ICP-OES 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jiřina Száková (University of Life Sciences, Prague) and Jan Rohovec (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic) for preliminary measurements of the data and Jan Votava for help with statistical analysis. This project was supported by the Czech Science Foundation, project no. P506/10/0403 and project no. TA01020969 of the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic. Support to K.Č. was given by the SVV project (Integrative Animal Biology) no. SVV-2013-267 201.

Supplementary material

13592_2013_233_MOESM1_ESM.doc (25 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 25 kb)
13592_2013_233_MOESM2_ESM.doc (24 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 24 kb)
13592_2013_233_MOESM3_ESM.doc (24 kb)
ESM 3 (DOC 24 kb)
13592_2013_233_MOESM4_ESM.doc (24 kb)
ESM 4 (DOC 24 kb)
13592_2013_233_MOESM5_ESM.doc (59 kb)
ESM 5 (DOC 59 kb)

References

  1. Aime, S., Botta, M., Fasano, M., Marques, M.P.M., Geraldes, C.F.G.C., Pubanz, D., Merbach, A.E. (1997) Conformational and coordination equilibria on DOTA complexes of lanthanide metal ions in aqueous solution studied by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Inorg. Chem. 36(10), 2059–2068PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford, D.V. (1975) Bumblebees. Davis-Poynter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, J.D., Baugh, T.D. (1994) Use of complexed lanthanide and Group 3A metal anions as chemical tracers. Res. Discl. 366, 553Google Scholar
  4. Bousquet, J.C., Saini, S., Stark, D.D., Hahn, P.F., Nigam, M., Wittenberg, J., Ferrucci Jr., J.T. (1988) Gd-DOTA: characterization of a new paramagnetic complex. Radiol. 166(3), 693–698Google Scholar
  5. Cnaani, J., Schmid-Hempel, R., Schmidt, J.O. (2002) Colony development, larval development and worker reproduction in Bombus impatiens Cresson. Insectes Soc. 49(2), 164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeGrandi-Hoffman, G., Hagler, J. (2000) The flow of incoming nectar through a honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colony as revealed by a protein marker. Insectes Soc 47(4), 302–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giesen, C., Mairinger, T., Khoury, L., Waentig, L., Jakubowski, N., Panne, U. (2011) Multiplexed immunohistochemical detection of tumor markers in breast cancer tissue using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 83(21), 8177–8183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goulson, D. (2003) Bumblebees: Their Behaviour and Ecology. Oxford University Press Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagler, J.R., Jackson, C.G. (2001) Methods for marking insects: current techniques and future prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46(1), 511–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinrich, B. (2004) Bumblebee Economics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearns, C.A., Thomson, J.D. (2001) The Natural History of Bumblebees: A Sourcebook for Investigations. University Press of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  12. Merbach, A.E., Tóth, É. (2001) The Chemistry of Contrast Agents in Medical Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Michener, C.D. (1974) The Social Behavior of the Bees: A Comparative Study. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Michener, C.D. (2007) The Bees of the World, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Nienhaus, G.U. (2008) The green fluorescent protein: a key tool to study chemical processes in living cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 8992–8994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nixon, H.L., Ribbands, C.R. (1952) Food transmission within the honeybee community. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 140(898), 43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pendrel, B.A., Plowright, R.C. (1981) Larval feeding by adult bumble bee workers (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8(2), 71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pereboom, J.J.M. (2000) The composition of larval food and the significance of exocrine secretions in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Insectes Soc. 47(1), 11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Quezada-Euán, J., López-Velasco, A., Pérez-Balam, J., Moo-Valle, H., Velazquez-Madrazo, A., Paxton, R. (2011) Body size differs in workers produced across time and is associated with variation in the quantity and composition of larval food in Nannotrigona perilampoides (Hymenoptera, Meliponini). Insectes Soc. 58(1), 31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Regali, A., Rasmont, P. (1995) Nouvelles méthodes de test pour l’évaluation du régime alimentaire chez des colonies orphelines de Bombus terrestris (L) (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Apidologie 26(4), 273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rieckermann, J., Bares, V., Kracht, O., Braun, D., Gujer, W. (2007) Estimating sewer leakage from continuous tracer experiments. Water Res. 41(9), 1960–1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roulston, T.H., Cane, J.H. (2002) The effect of pollen protein concentration on body size in the sweat bee Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Apiformes). Evol. Ecol. 16(1), 49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roulston, T.H., Cane, J.H., Buchmann, S.L. (2000) What governs protein content of pollen: pollinator preferences, pollen–pistil interactions, or phylogeny? Ecol. Monogr. 70(4), 617–643Google Scholar
  24. Řehoř, I., Kubíček, V., Kotek, J., Hermann, P., Száková, J., Lukeš, I. (2011) Modification of nanocrystalline TiO2 with phosphonate- and bis(phosphonate)-bearing macrocyclic complexes: sorption and stability studies. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011(12), 1981–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. StatSoft Inc. (2011) STATISTICA (data analysis software system). www.statsoft.com
  26. Tautz, J. (2009) The Buzz about Bees: Biology of a Superorganism. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  27. Tholey, A., Schaumlöffel, D. (2010) Metal labeling for quantitative protein and proteome analysis using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Trends Anal. Chem. 29(5), 399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Řehoř
    • 1
  • Lenka Macháčková
    • 2
  • Alena Bučánková
    • 3
  • Stanislava Matějková
    • 1
  • Kateřina Černá
    • 2
  • Jakub Straka
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, v.v.i.Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Department of ZoologyCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.Agricultural Research, LtdTroubskoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations