Growth characteristics and flowering initiation of Phalaenopsis Queen Beer ‘Mantefon’ as affected by the daily light integral
- 57 Downloads
This study was conducted to determine the effects of daily light integral (DLI) levels with different photoperiods and light intensities on the growth and flowering initiation of Phalaenopsis plants. Five-month-old Phalaenopsis Queen Beer ‘Mantefon’ plants were treated with combinations of three photoperiods [8/16 (day/night, short day, SD), 12/12 (medium day, MD), and 16/8 h (long day, LD)] and three light intensities in the range of photosynthetically active radiation of 50, 100, and 200 μmol·m−2·s−1, resulting in DLI levels ranging from 1.44 to 11.52 mol·m−2·d−1 with warm-white LEDs at 28°C during the vegetative period. Additionally, 12-month-old plants were treated with combinations of three photoperiods [8/16 (day/night, SD), 8 + 8/8 (day-extension (DE); an extension with 10 μmol·m−2·s−1 for 8 h right after the SD), and 16/8 h (LD)] and three light intensities (75, 150, and 300 μmol·m−2·s−1), resulting in DLI levels ranging from 2.16 to 17.28 mol·m−2·d−1, at 20°C during the forcing period for flowering. During the vegetative period, plants showed a tendency of overgrowth in leaves, via the formation of long and narrow leaves, as the light intensity decreased, irrespective of the photoperiod. The number of new leaves, total leaf area, and shoot and root dry weights increased with increasing photoperiod and light intensity, implying an increase in the amount of light energy. During the forcing period, photoperiodic effects on flowering initiation were not observed, while increasing the light intensity increased the number of inflorescences and accelerated spiking. The DLI showed higher correlation coefficients with growth and flowering initiation characteristics than those of the photoperiod or light intensity alone. New leaf emergence, biomass accumulation, and spiking were enhanced as DLI levels increased, although these positive effects were gradually saturated. These findings indicated that the DLI is a major factor in the growth and flowering initiation of Phalaenopsis plants and increasing DLI levels can promote growth or flowering initiation of these plants. These findings will be useful in controlling light conditions to maximize the growth rate and shorten the cultivation time in Phalaenopsis cultivation.
KeywordsDLI Doritaenopsis Light intensity Orchid Photoperiod
This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through Advanced Production Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (114148–3).
KSK, HBL, JHL, and SKA conceived and designed the study. HBL, JHL, and JHP carried out the experiments. HBL and JHL analyzed the data. All authors contributed to data interpretation. HBL and JHL wrote the manuscript. KSK provided guidance on the whole study and improved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- An HR, Kwon OK, Lee SY, Park PH, Park PM, Choi I, Lee H, Yoo JH (2019) Breeding of yellow small-type Phalaenopsis ‘Yellow Scent’ with fragrance. Hortic Sci Technol 37:304–310Google Scholar
- Christenson EA (2001) Phalaenopsis: a monograph, Edn 1. Timber Press, Portland, pp 24–25Google Scholar
- De LC, Pathak R, Rao AN, Rajeevan PK (2014) Commercial orchids. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, Germany, pp 17–18Google Scholar
- Faust JE (2002) Light management in greenhouses. I. Daily light integral: a useful tool for the U.S. Floriculture Industry. https://www.firstintloriculture.org/pdfl2002-5 LightManagement pt l.pdf
- Hückstädt AB, Torre S (2013) Irradiance during vegetative growth phase affects production time and reproductive development of Phalaenopsis. Eur J Hort Sci 78:160–168Google Scholar
- Kim JK, Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Na J-K, Choi KY (2018) Effects of relative humidity and air injection on physiological and stomatal responses in Phalaenopsis during acclimatization. Hortic Sci Technol 36:193–201Google Scholar
- Lee HB, An SK, Lee SY, Kim KS (2017) Vegetative growth characteristics of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis plants under different artificial lighting sources. Hortic Sci Technol 35:21–29Google Scholar
- Lopez RG, Runkle ES, Wang YT, Blanchard MG, Hsu T (2007) Growing the best Phalaenopsis, part 3: temperature and light requirements, height, insect and disease control. Orchids 76:184–189Google Scholar
- Lüttge U (2008) Crassulacean acid metabolism. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
- Nose A, Heima K, Miyazato K, Murayama S (1986) Effects of daylength on CAM type CO2 and water vapour exchange of pineapple plants. Photosynthetica 20:20–28Google Scholar
- Rotor GB (1952) Daylength and temperature in relation to growth and flowering of orchids. Cornell Univ Agr Exp Sta Bull 885:3–45Google Scholar
- Sakanishi Y, Imanishi H, Ishida G (1980) Effect of temperature on growth and flowering of Phalaenopsis amabilis. Bul Univ Osaka Series B Agr Biol 32:1–9Google Scholar
- Van der Knaap N (2005) Cultivation guide Phalaenopsis: knowledge for professionals. Bleiswijk, The Netherlands, Anthura BV, p 176Google Scholar
- White J, Warrington IJ (1984) Effects of split-night temperatures, light, and chlormequat on growth and carbohydrates status of Pelargonium × hortorum. J Am Soc Hort Sci 109:458–463Google Scholar