Journal of Radiation Oncology

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 317–322 | Cite as

A pilot study to determine if the use of a virtual reality education module reduces anxiety and increases comprehension in patients receiving radiation therapy

  • Matthew Marquess
  • Shirley Pinegar Johnston
  • Noelle L. Williams
  • Carolyn Giordano
  • Benjamin E. Leiby
  • Mark D. Hurwitz
  • Adam P. Dicker
  • Robert B. Den
Original Research

Abstract

Objectives

Pre-treatment patient education has been shown to decrease anxiety and enhance comprehension. Our pilot study evaluates the impact of VERT™, a virtual environment education tool, on these endpoints.

Methods

Twenty-two patients with prostate cancer being treated with radiotherapy completed a 16-question comprehension/anxiety survey. Patients proceeded to VERT™, modeled after a flight simulator using realistic sounds and views. The test was then repeated. A power analysis determined that enrolling 20 patients achieves 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.89 with a Bonferroni-adjusted significance level of 0.003125 using a one-sided one-sample paired t test to analyze differences between individual pre/post-test scores. Descriptive statistics were reported and effect size was computed.

Results

Pre/post-test measures for all questions were statistically significant, favoring our hypothesis of improved education and reduced anxiety following virtual simulation except three measures of anxiety (low in both assessments). Baseline anxiety was highest for treatment precision, which also demonstrated the most significant pre/post-intervention improvement.

Conclusion

Decreased anxiety and improved comprehension influence patient-reported satisfaction and can contribute to quality assurance. Implementation of virtual simulation was successful in improving comprehension and reducing anxiety. Development of personalized, site-specific, clinic-based virtual modules is a long-term goal of this pilot study.

Keywords

Virtual reality Patient anxiety Comprehension Patient education 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Andersen BL, Tewfik HH (1985 Apr) Psychological reactions to radiation therapy: reconsideration of the adaptive aspects of anxiety. J Pers Soc Psychol 48(4):1024–1032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Häggmark C, Bohman L, Ilmoni-Brandt K et al (2001) Effects of information supply on satisfaction with information and quality of life in cancer patients receiving curative radiation therapy. Patient Educ Couns 45:173–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poroch D (1995) The effect of preparatory patient education on the anxiety and satisfaction of cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 18(3):206–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geinitz H, Marten-Mittag B, Schafer C et al (2012) Patient satisfaction during radiation therapy. Correlates and patient suggestions. Strahlenther Onkol 188:492–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamszus K, Verres R (1995) Social support of radiotherapy patients in emotional stress and crisis situations. Strahlenther Onkol 171(7):408–414 GermanPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ et al (1996) The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale APAIS. Anesth Analg 82:445–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halkett GKB et al (2013) Pilot randomised controlled trial of a radiation therapist-led educational intervention for breast cancer patients prior to commencing radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21.6:1725–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janis IL (1958) Psychological stress: psychoanalytic and behavioral studies of surgical patients. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zeguers M, de Haes HC, Zandbelt LC et al (2012) The information needs of new radiotherapy patients: how to measure? Do they want to know everything? And if not, why? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:418–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hahn CA, Fish LJ, Dunn RH et al (2005) Prospective trial of a video educational tool for radiation oncology patients. Am J Clin Oncol 28:609–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Harrison DE, Galloway S, Graydon JE et al (1999) Information needs and preference for information of women with breast cancer over a first course of radiation therapy. Patient Educ Couns 38:217–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sulé-Suso J, Finney S, Bisson J et al (2015) Pilot study on virtual imaging for patient information on radiotherapy planning and delivery. Radiography 21(3):273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Marquess
    • 1
  • Shirley Pinegar Johnston
    • 2
  • Noelle L. Williams
    • 3
  • Carolyn Giordano
    • 4
  • Benjamin E. Leiby
    • 5
  • Mark D. Hurwitz
    • 3
  • Adam P. Dicker
    • 3
  • Robert B. Den
    • 3
  1. 1.Radiation Therapy Program, Jefferson College of Health ProfessionsThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Medical Dosimetry Program, Jefferson College of Health ProfessionsThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Radiation OncologySidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Office of Institutional ResearchThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical CollegeThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations