Mineral Economics

, Volume 31, Issue 1–2, pp 35–59 | Cite as

Neither Dutch nor disease?—natural resource booms in theory and empirics

Original Paper
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

For several decades, economists have endeavored to determine whether a sudden surge in mineral and energy extraction activity poses an albatross or boon to an economy. The “Dutch disease” version of the resource curse originates in a traditional model postulating that extensive mineral and energy production induces inter-sectoral adjustments among traded and non-traded industries and that these adjustments tend to crowd out traditional export industries such as manufacturing. This can be acutely detrimental to the long-run growth of an economy when the traditional industries produce positive learning by doing externalities. This chain of events is so frequently cited as being evident in resource-based economies that it has become stylized wisdom. This paper reviews whether modern theoretical models and empirical evidence actually support the Dutch disease. Overall, we find that the Dutch disease is by no means theoretically predicted or empirically evident within resource-based economies.

Keywords

Dutch disease Learning by doing Natural resources Resource curse Booming sector Economic growth 

JEL codes

O13 Q32 Q33 Q43 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.

References

  1. Ahrend R, de Rosa D, Tompson W (2007) Russian manufacturing and the threat of ‘Dutch disease’—a comparison of competitiveness developments in Russian and Ukrainian industry. Working Paper 540, OECD Economics DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Rawashdeh R, Maxwell P (2013) Jordan, minerals extraction and the resource curse. Resour Policy 38(2):103–112Google Scholar
  3. Alcott H, Keniston D (2017) Dutch disease or agglomeration? The local economic effects of natural resource booms in modern America. Forthcoming, Rev Econ StudGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexeev M, Conrad R (2009) The elusive curse of oil. Rev Econ Stat 91(3):586–598Google Scholar
  5. Algieri B (2011) The Dutch disease: evidences from Russia. Econ Chang Restruct 44(3):243–277Google Scholar
  6. Aragón FM, Rud JP (2013) Natural resources and local economic development: evidence from a Peruvian gold mine. Am Econ J Econ Pol 5(2):1–25Google Scholar
  7. Beine M, Coulombe S, Vermeulen W (2015) Dutch disease and the mitigation effect of migration: evidence from Canadian provinces. Econ J 125(528):1574–1615Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin NC, Devarajan S, Weiner RJ (1989) The Dutch disease in a developing country: oil reserves in Cameroon. J Dev Econ 30(1):71–92Google Scholar
  9. Beverelli C, Dell’Erba S, Rocha N (2011) Dutch disease revisited. Oil discoveries and movements of the real exchange rate when manufacturing is resource-intensive. IEEP 8(2):139–153Google Scholar
  10. Bjerkholt O, Lorentsen L, Strøm S (1981) Using the oil and gas revenues: the Norwegian case. In: Barker T, Brailovsky V (eds) Oil or industry?: Energy, industrialisation and economic policy in Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Bjørnland H (1998) The economic effects of North Sea oil on the manufacturing sector. Scottish J Polit Econ 45(5):553–585Google Scholar
  12. Bjørnland HC, Thorsrud LA (2016) Boom or gloom? Examining the Dutch disease in two-speed economies. Econ J 126:2219–2256Google Scholar
  13. Black D, McKinnish T, Sanders S (2005) The economic impact of the coal boom and bust. Econ J 115(502):444–471Google Scholar
  14. Brown JP (2014) Production of natural gas from shale in local economies: a resource blessing or curse? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Econ Rev First Quarter 119–147Google Scholar
  15. Bruno M, Sachs J (1982) Energy and resource allocation: a dynamic model of the Dutch disease. Rev Econ Stud 49(5):845–859Google Scholar
  16. Brunstad RJ, Dyrstad JM (1997) Booming sector and wage effects: an empirical analysis on Norwegian data. Oxf Econ Pap 49(1):89–103Google Scholar
  17. Buiter WH, Purvis DD (1982) Oil, disinflation and export competitiveness: a model of the Dutch disease. In: Bhandari J, Putnam B (eds) Economic interdependence and flexible exchange rates. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Butkiewicz JL, Yanikkaya H (2010) Minerals, institutions, openness, and growth: an empirical analysis. Land Econ 86(2):313–328Google Scholar
  19. Bye T, Cappelen Å, Eika T, Gjelsvik E, Olsen Ø (1994) Noen konsekvenser av petroleumsvirksomheten for norsk økonomi [some consequences of the petroleum activities on the Norwegian economy]. Oslo: Statistics Norway Report 94(1)Google Scholar
  20. Cairnes JE (1921) The Australian episode. In: Taussig FW (ed) Selected readings in international trade and tariff problems. Ginn & Company, Boston, pp 81–104Google Scholar
  21. Cappelen Å, Eika T, Holm I (2000) Resource Booms: Curse or Blessing? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Oslo, Statistics NorwayGoogle Scholar
  22. Carbone JC, McKenzie KJ (2016) Going Dutch? The impact of falling oil prices on the Canadian economy. Can Public Policy 42(2):168–180Google Scholar
  23. Carrington WJ (1996) The Alaskan labor market during the pipeline era. J Polit Econ 104(1):186–218Google Scholar
  24. Caselli F, Michaels G (2013) Do oil windfalls improve living standards? Evidence from Brazil. Am Econ J Appl Econ 5(1):208–238Google Scholar
  25. Cassing JH, Warr PG (1985) The distributional impact of a resource boom. J Int Econ 18:301–319Google Scholar
  26. Corden WM (1981a) The exchange rate, monetary policy and North Sea oil: the economic theory of the squeeze on tradables. Oxf Econ Pap 33:23–46Google Scholar
  27. Corden WM (1981b) Exchange rate protection. In: Cooper RN et al (eds) The international monetary system under flexible exchange rates. Ballinger, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Corden WM (1982) Exchange rate policy and the resources boom. Econ Rec 58:18–31Google Scholar
  29. Corden WM (1984) Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: survey and consolidation. Oxf Econ Pap 36(3):359–380Google Scholar
  30. Corden WM (1996) James Meade 1907–1995. Econ Rec 72:172–174Google Scholar
  31. Corden WM, Neary JP (1982) Booming sector and de–industrialisation in a small open economy. Econ J 92(368):825–848Google Scholar
  32. Cuddington JT (1989) Commodity export booms in developing countries. World Bank Res Obs 4:143–165Google Scholar
  33. Cust J, Poelhekke S (2015) The local economic impacts of natural resource extraction. Ann Rev Resour Econ 7:251–268Google Scholar
  34. Davis GA (1995) Learning to love the Dutch disease: evidence from the mineral economies. World Dev 23(10):1765–1779Google Scholar
  35. Davis GA (1998) The minerals sector, sectoral analysis, and economic development. Resour Policy 24(4):217–228Google Scholar
  36. Davis GA (2009) Extractive economies, growth and the poor. In: Richards JP (ed) Mining, society, and a sustainable world. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, pp 37–60Google Scholar
  37. Davis GA (2011) The resource drag. Int Econ Econ Policy 8(2):155–176Google Scholar
  38. Davis GA (2013) Replicating Sachs and Warner’s working papers on the resource curse. J Dev Stud 49(12):1615–1630Google Scholar
  39. Davis GA, Tilton JE (2005) The resource curse. Nat Res Forum 29(3):233–242Google Scholar
  40. Davis GA, Vásquez Cordano AL (2013) The fate of the poor in growing mineral and energy economies. Resour Policy 38:138–151Google Scholar
  41. Deacon R (2011) The political economy of the natural resource curse: a survey of theory and evidence. Found Trends Microecon 7(2):113–207Google Scholar
  42. Devarajan S, DeMelo J (1987) Adjustment with a fixed exchange rate: Cameroon, Cote d’Ivoire, and Senegal. World Bank Econ Rev 1(3):447–488Google Scholar
  43. Dobrynskaya V, Turkisch E (2010) Economic diversification and Dutch disease in Russia. Post Commun Econ 22(3):283–302Google Scholar
  44. Domenech J (2008) Resource abundance and regional growth in Spain, 1860–2000. J Int Dev 20(8):1122–1135Google Scholar
  45. Dülger F, Kenan L, Burgaç A, Ballı E (2013) Is Russia suffering from Dutch disease? Cointegration with structural break. Resour Policy 38:605–612Google Scholar
  46. Eastwood RK, Venables AJ (1982) The macroeconomic implications of a resource discovery in an open economy. Econ J 92:285–299Google Scholar
  47. Eide E (1973) Virkninger av Statens Oljeinntekter pa Norsk Okonomi. Sosialokonomen 10:12–21 see also Institute of Economics Reprint Series No. 106, University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  48. Ellman M (1981) Natural gas, restructuring and re–industrialisation: the Dutch experience of industrial policy. In: Barker T, Brailovsky V (eds) Oil or industry?: energy, industrialisation and economic policy in Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Enders K, Herberg H (1983) The Dutch disease: causes, consequences, cure and calmatives. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 119(3):473–497Google Scholar
  50. Fardmanesh M (1991) Dutch disease economics and oil syndrome: an empirical study. World Dev 19(6):711–717Google Scholar
  51. Feltenstein A (1992) Oil prices and rural migration: the Dutch disease goes south. J Int Money Financ 11(3):273–291Google Scholar
  52. Fetzer T (2014) Fracking growth. CEP Discussion Paper No 1278, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  53. Findlay R (1995) Factor proportions, trade, and growth. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Fleming DA, Measham TG (2014) Local economic impacts of an unconventional energy boom: the coal seam gas industry in Australia. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 58:1–17Google Scholar
  55. Forsyth PJ (1986) Booming sectors and structural change in Australia and Britain: a comparison. In: Neary JP, van Wijnbergen S (eds) Natural resources and the macroeconomy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Forsyth PJ, Kay JA (1980) The economic implications of North Sea oil revenues. Fisc Stud 1(3):1–28Google Scholar
  57. Forsyth PJ, Kay JA (1981) Oil revenues and manufacturing output. Fisc Stud 2(2):9–17Google Scholar
  58. Frankel JA (2010) The natural resource curse: a survey. NBER Working Paper 15836Google Scholar
  59. Gelb AH (1985a) The impact of oil windfalls: comparative statics with an Indonesia-like model. World Bank Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar
  60. Gelb AH (1985b) Are oil windfalls a blessing or a curse? Policy exercises with an Indonesia-like model. World Bank Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar
  61. Gelb AH (1988) Oil windfalls: blessing or curse? Oxford UP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Gollom M (2012) Is Canada Suffering from ‘Dutch Disease’”? CBC News. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/05/18/f–dutch–disease–mulcair.html. Accessed 30 August 2013
  63. Gregory RG (1976) Some implications of the growth of the mineral sector. Aust J Agric Econ 20(2):71–91Google Scholar
  64. Gregory RG (2012) Living standards, terms of trade and foreign ownership: reflections on the Australian mining boom. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 56(2):171–200Google Scholar
  65. Gylfason T (2007) The international economics of natural resources and growth. Miner Energy Raw Mater Rep 22:7–17Google Scholar
  66. Gylfason T, Tryggvi TH, Zoega G (1999) A mixed blessing: natural resources and economic growth. Macroecon Dyn 3:204–225Google Scholar
  67. Haddad E, Giuberti AC (2011) Economic Impacts of Pre–Salt on a Regional Economy: The Case of Espirito Santo, Brazil. European Regional Science Association conference paperGoogle Scholar
  68. Harding T, Venables AJ (2010) Exports, imports and foreign exchange windfalls Oxcarre Research Paper, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Harding T, Venables AJ (2016) The implications of natural resource exports for nonresource trade. IMF Econ Rev 64(2):268–302Google Scholar
  70. Hasanov F (2013) Dutch disease and the Azerbaijan economy. Commun Post Commun Stud 46(4):463–480Google Scholar
  71. Helliwell JF (1981) Using Canadian oil and gas revenues in the 1980s: provincial and Federal Perspectives. In: Barker T, Brailovsky V (eds) Oil or industry?: energy, industrialisation and economic policy in Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Hjort J (2006) Citizen funds and Dutch disease in developing countries. Resour Policy 31(3):183–191Google Scholar
  73. Hodge D (2011) The exchange rate, Dutch disease and manufacturing in South Africa: what do the data say? ESSA Conference Paper. Economic Society of South Africa Biennial Conference http://www.essa2011.org.za/programme. Accessed 13 Sept 2013
  74. Holden S (2013) Avoiding the resource curse the case Norway. Energy Policy 63:870–876Google Scholar
  75. Howlett K, Walton D (2012) Redford's energy vision clashes with McGuinty's view of oil-sands benefits. Globe and Mail, Feb 27, 2012. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/redfords-energy-vision-clashes-with-mcguintys-view-of-oil-sands-benefits/article550667/. Accessed 30 Aug 2013
  76. Hunter T (2014) Law and policy frameworks for local content in the development of petroleum resources: Norwegian and Australian perspectives on cross-sectoral linkages and economic diversification. Miner Econ 27:115–126Google Scholar
  77. Hutchison MM (1994) Manufacturing sector resiliency to energy booms: empirical evidence from Norway, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Oxf Econ Pap 46(2):311–329Google Scholar
  78. Ismail K (2010) The structural manifestation of the ‘Dutch disease’: the case of oil exporting countries. International Monetary Fund Working Paper No 10/103Google Scholar
  79. Issa R, Lafrance R, Murray J (2008) The turning black tide: energy prices and the Canadian dollar. Can J Econ 41(3):737–759Google Scholar
  80. Jacob P (2013) Mongolia: Ulaanbaatar Wrestles with Dutch Disease Dilemma. Eurasianet.org. http://www.eurasianet.org/node/67372. Accessed 30 Aug 2013
  81. Jacobsen G, Parker D (2016) The economics aftermath of resource booms: evidence from boomtowns in the American West. Econ J 126(593):1092–1128Google Scholar
  82. Jahan-Parvar MR, Mohammadi H (2008) Oil prices and real exchange rates in oil–exporting countries: a bounds testing approach. MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  83. James AG (2015) The resource curse: a statistical mirage? J Dev Econ 114:55–63Google Scholar
  84. James AG (2016) The long-run vanity of Prudhoe Bay. Resour Policy 50:270–275Google Scholar
  85. James AG, James RG (2011) Do resource dependent regions grow slower than they should? Econ Lett 111(3):194–196Google Scholar
  86. James AG, Smith B (2017) There will be blood: crime rates in shale-rich U.S. counties. J Environ Econ Manag 84:125–152Google Scholar
  87. Jones R (1971) A three-factor model in theory, trade and history. In: Bhagwati J, Jones R, Mundell R, Vanek J (eds) Trade, balance of payments and growth: papers in Honor of Charles P. Kindleberger, North–Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  88. Kalcheva K, Oomes N (2007) Dutch disease: Does Russia have the symptoms? Working Paper 07/102. International Monetary Fund, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  89. Kaldor N (1981) The energy issues. In: Barker T, Brailovsky V (eds) Oil or industry?: energy, industrialisation and economic policy in Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Academic Press, London, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  90. Kamas L (1986) Dutch disease economics and the Colombian export boom. World Dev 14(9):1177–1198Google Scholar
  91. Kojo NC (2014) Demystifying Dutch disease. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 6981Google Scholar
  92. Komarek TM (2016) Labor market dynamics and the unconventional natural gas boom: evidence from the Marcellus region. Resour Energy Econ 45:1–17Google Scholar
  93. Koranchelian T (2005) The equilibrium real exchange rate in a commodity exporting country: Algeria’s experience. Working Paper 05/135. International Monetary Fund, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  94. Korhonen I, Juurikkala T (2009) Equilibrium exchange rates in oil-exporting countries. J Econ Financ 33(1):71–79Google Scholar
  95. Kremers J (1986) The Dutch disease in the Netherlands. In: Neary JP, van Wijnbergen S (eds) Natural resources and the macroeconomy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  96. Krugman P (1987) The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies. J Dev Econ 27:41–55Google Scholar
  97. Krzepkowski M, Mintz J (2013) Canadian Manufacturing Malaise: Three Hypotheses. SPP Research Papers, Volume 6, Issue 12, University of Calgary School of Public PolicyGoogle Scholar
  98. Kutan AM, Wyzan ML (2005) Explaining the real exchange rate in Kazakhstan, 1996–2003: is Kazakhstan vulnerable to the Dutch disease? Econ Syst 29(2):242–255Google Scholar
  99. Larsen ER (2006) Escaping the resource curse and the Dutch disease? Am J Econ Sociol 65(3):605–640Google Scholar
  100. Looney RE (1988) Oil revenues and viable development: impact of the ‘Dutch disease’ on Saudi Arabian diversification efforts. Arab Am Affairs 27:29–35Google Scholar
  101. Looney RE (1991) Diversification in a small oil-exporting economy: the impact of the Dutch disease on Kuwait’s industrialization. Resour Policy 17(1):31–41Google Scholar
  102. Maddock R, McLean I (1984) Supply–side shocks: the case of Australian gold. J Econ Hist 44(4):1047–1067Google Scholar
  103. Mahbub Morshed AKM, Turnovsky SJ (2004) Sectoral adjustment costs and real exchange rate dynamics in a two-sector dependent economy. J Int Econ 63(1):147–177Google Scholar
  104. Mainguy C (2011) Natural resources and development: the gold sector in Mali. Resour Policy 36(2):123–131Google Scholar
  105. Maniloff P, Mastromonaco R (2017) The local employment impacts of fracking: a national study. Resour Energy Econ 49:62–85Google Scholar
  106. Manski CF (2011) Policy analysis with incredible certitude. Econ J 121:261–289Google Scholar
  107. Marchand J (2012) Local labor market impacts of energy boom–bust–boom in Western Canada. J Urban Econ 71:165–174Google Scholar
  108. Marchand J, Weber J (2017) Local labor markets and natural resources: a synthesis of the literature. Forthcoming, J Econ SurvGoogle Scholar
  109. Matsuyama K (1992) Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. J Econ Theory 58(2):317–334Google Scholar
  110. McKinnon RI (1976) International transfers and non-traded commodities: the adjustment problem. In: Leipziger DM (ed) The International Monetary System and the Developing Nations. Agency for International Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  111. Meade JE, Russell EA (1957) Wage rates, the cost of living, and the balance of payments. Econ Rec 33(64):23–28Google Scholar
  112. Michaels G (2011) The long term consequences of resource-based specialisation. Econ J 121(551):31–57Google Scholar
  113. Mideska T (2013) The economic impact of natural resources. J Environ Econ Manag 64:277–289Google Scholar
  114. Mikesell RF (1997) Explaining the resource curse, with special reference to mineral-exporting countries. Resour Policy 23(4):191–199Google Scholar
  115. Mitton T (2016) The wealth of subnations: geography, institutions, and within-country development. J Dev Econ 118:88–111Google Scholar
  116. Mohammadi H, Jahan-Parvar M (2012) Oil prices and exchange rates in oil-exporting countries: evidence from TAR and M-TAR models. J Econ Financ 36(3):766–779Google Scholar
  117. Naim W, Tombe T (2013) Appreciate the Appreciation: Imported Inputs And Concern Over Dutch Disease. SPP Research Papers, Volume 6, Issue 13, University of Calgary School of Public PolicyGoogle Scholar
  118. Neary JP, Purvis DD (1982) Sectoral shocks in a dependent economy: long-run adjustment and short-run accommodation. Scand J Econ 84(2):229–253Google Scholar
  119. Neary JP, van Wijnbergen S (1986) Natural resources and the macroeconomy. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  120. Nülle GM (2016) Migrant labor supply in a booming non-renewable resource economy: cure and transmission mechanism for de-industrialization? Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado School of MinesGoogle Scholar
  121. Olusi JO, Olagunju MA (2005) The primary sectors of the economy and the Dutch disease in Nigeria. Pak Dev Rev 44(2):159–175Google Scholar
  122. Ouedraogo A (2016) Local economic impact of boom and bust in mineral resource extraction in the United States: a spatial econometrics analysis. Resour Policy 50:292–305Google Scholar
  123. Papyrakis E, Raveh O (2012) An empirical analysis of a regional Dutch Disease: the case of Canada. OxCarre Working Paper, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  124. Parcero OJ, Papyrakis E (2016) Income inequality and the oil resource curse. Resour Energy Econ 45(C):159–177Google Scholar
  125. Pegg S (2010) Is there a Dutch disease in Botswana? Resour Policy 35(1):14–19Google Scholar
  126. Pinto B (1987) Nigeria during and after the oil boom: a policy comparison with Indonesia. World Bank Econ Rev 1(3):419–445Google Scholar
  127. Priyati R (2009) Dutch disease economics: a case study of Indonesia. Econ J Emerg Mark 1(3):147–159Google Scholar
  128. Radetzki M (1990) A guide to primary commodities in the world economy. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  129. Radetzki M (2008) A handbook of primary commodities in the global economy. Cambridge UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  130. Radetzki M, Wårell L (2016) A handbook of primary commodities in the global economy, 2nd edn. Cambridge UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  131. Raveh O (2013) Dutch disease, factor mobility, and the Alberta effect: the case of federations. Can J Econ 46(4):1317–1350Google Scholar
  132. Roca AM (1999) Dutch disease and banana exports in the Colombian Caribbean, 1910–1950. Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, pp 2–32Google Scholar
  133. Rodríguez F, Rodrik D (2001) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross–national evidence. In: Bernanke BS, Rogoff K (eds) NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 261–338Google Scholar
  134. Rodriguez F, Sachs JD (1999) Why do resource-abundant economies grow more slowly? J Econ Growth 4(3):277–303Google Scholar
  135. Rodrik, Dani (2008) The real exchange rate and economic growth: theory and evidence. mimeo. Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  136. Roemer M (1985) Dutch disease in developing countries: swallowing bitter medicine. In: Lundahl M (ed) The primary sector and economic development. Croom Helm, London, pp 234–252Google Scholar
  137. Roemer M (1994) Dutch disease and economic growth: the legacy of Indonesia. Harvard Institute for International Development, Development Discussion Paper No 489, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  138. Rosenberg C, Saavalainen T (1998) How to deal with Azerbaijan’s oil boom? Policy strategies in a resource-rich transition economy. Working Paper 98/6, International Monetary Fund, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  139. Ross ML (1999) The political economy of the resource curse. World Polit 51(2):297–322Google Scholar
  140. Ross ML (2007) How mineral-rich states can reduce inequality. In: Macartan H, Sachs JD, Stiglitz JE (eds) Escaping the resource curse. Columbia UP, New York, pp 237–255Google Scholar
  141. Ross ML (2015) What have we learned about the resource curse? Ann Rev Polit Sci 18:239–259Google Scholar
  142. Rosser A (2006) The political economy of the resource curse: a literature survey. IDS Working Paper, no. 268, Institute of Development Studies, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  143. Rybczynski TM (1955) Factor endowment and relative commodity prices. Economica 22(88):336–341Google Scholar
  144. Sachs JD, Warner AM (1995) Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  145. Sachs JD, Warner AM (1997) Natural resource abundance and economic growth. Harvard Institute for International Development Working Paper, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  146. Sala-i-Martin X, Subramanian A (2003) Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria. NBER Working Papers 9804, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  147. Semuels A (2015) The stingiest state in the union. The Atlantic, August 31, 2015. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/08/alaska-budget-crisis/402775/
  148. Smith B (2015) The resource curse exorcised: evidence from a panel of countries. J Dev Econ 116:57–73Google Scholar
  149. Snape RH (1977) Effects of mineral development on the economy. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 21(3):147–156Google Scholar
  150. Spatafora N, Warner AM (1995) Macroeconomic and sectoral effects of terms-of-trade shocks—the experience of the oil-exporting developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  151. Spatafora N, Warner AM (1999) Macroeconomic and sectoral effects of terms-of-trade shocks—the experience of the oil-exporting developing countries. Working Paper 99/134, International Monetary Fund, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  152. Spilimbergo A (1999) Copper and the Chilean economy, 1960–98. Working Paper 99/57, International Monetary Fund, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  153. Stevens P (2003) Resource impact: curse or blessing? A literature survey. J Energy Lit 9(1):3–42Google Scholar
  154. Stevens P, Lahn G, Kooroshy J (2015) The resource curse revisited. Energy, Environment and Resources Research Paper, Royal Institute of International AffairsGoogle Scholar
  155. Stoeckel A (1979) Some equilibrium effects of mining growth on the economy. Aust J Agric Econ 23:1–22Google Scholar
  156. Timmer CP (1984) Energy and structural change in the Asia–Pacific region: the agricultural sector. In: Bautista RM, Naya S (eds) Energy and structural change in the Asia-Pacific region: Papers and Proceedings of the Thirteenth Pacific Trade and Development Conference, Philippine Institute for Development Studies and the Asian Development Bank, Manila, pp 51–72Google Scholar
  157. Torvik R (2001) Learning by doing and the Dutch disease. Eur Econ Rev 45(2):285–306Google Scholar
  158. Usui N (1996) Policy adjustments to the oil boom and their evaluation: the Dutch disease in Indonesia. World Dev 24(5):887–900Google Scholar
  159. Usui N (1997) Dutch disease and policy adjustments to the oil boom: a comparative study of Indonesian and Mexico. Resour Policy 23(4):151–162Google Scholar
  160. van der Muelen Rodgers Y (1998) Empirical investigation of one OPEC country’s successful non-oil export performance. J Dev Econ 55(2):399–420Google Scholar
  161. van der Ploeg F (2011a) Fiscal policy and Dutch disease. Int Econ Econ Policy 8(2):121–138Google Scholar
  162. van der Ploeg F (2011b) Natural resources: curse or blessing? J Econ Lit 49(2):366–420Google Scholar
  163. van der Ploeg F, Poelhekke S (2010) The pungent smell of ‘red herrings’: subsoil assets, rents, volatility and the resource curse. J Environ Econ Manag 60(1):44–55Google Scholar
  164. van der Ploeg F, Poelhekke S (2017) The impact of natural resources: survey of recent quantitative evidence. J Dev Stud 53(2):205–216Google Scholar
  165. van der Ploeg F, Venables AJ (2011) Harnessing windfall revenues: optimal policies for resource-rich developing economies. Econ J 121(55):1–30Google Scholar
  166. van Wijnbergen S (1982) Optimal capital accumulation and investment allocation over traded and non-traded sectors in oil producing countries. Mimeo. Development Research Center, The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  167. van Wijnbergen S (1984) The ‘Dutch disease’: a disease after all? Econ J 94(373):41–55Google Scholar
  168. Vermeulen WN (2011) External income, de–industrialisation and labour mobility. CREA Discussion Paper Series, Center for Research in Economic Analysis, University of LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  169. Weber JG (2012) The effects of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming. Energy Econ 34(5):1580–1588Google Scholar
  170. Weber JG (2014) A decade of natural gas development: the makings of a resource curse? Resour Energy Econ 37:168–183Google Scholar
  171. Weinstein AL (2014) Local labor market restructuring in the shale boom. J Regional Analysis and Policy 44(1):71–92Google Scholar
  172. Wick K, Bulte E (2009) The curse of natural resources. Ann Rev Resour Econ 1:139–156Google Scholar
  173. Wilson R (2016) Moving to economic opportunity: the migration response to the fracking boom. Department of Economics Working Paper, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  174. Wright G (1990) The origins of American industrial success, 1879–1940. Am Econ Rev 80:651–668Google Scholar
  175. Wright G, Czelusta J (2007) Resource-based growth past and present. In: Lederman D, Maloney WF (eds) Natural resources: neither curse nor destiny. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp 183–212Google Scholar
  176. Younger SD (1992) Aid and the Dutch disease: macroeconomic management when everybody loves you. World Dev 20(11):1587–1597Google Scholar
  177. Zalduendo J (2006) Determinants of Venezuela’s equilibrium real exchange rate. Working Paper 06/74, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona Department of RevenuePhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Division of Economics and BusinessColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations