Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The shale revolution: Global gas and oil markets under transformation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shale gas and oil revolution has unexpectedly and forcefully begun to change the energy landscape in the USA. It is expected to spread beyond the USA, with far reaching implications for the global energy map, but also for the macroeconomy and politics of many countries. The purpose of this paper is to bring a better understanding to what prompted the revolution, to assess the production methods and associated environmental concerns, to speculate what can reasonably be expected in coming decades, and to sketch the full impact of a ripening shale revolution on the emerging economic and political policy choices for energy exporting and importing countries. We find that a large scale expansion can be expected in US shale gas and oil activities in the coming two decades. Globally, the shale leaders are likely to be countries that are already significant gas and oil producers. Setting up a policy framework to allow and promote shale development in a safe manner is a necessity for the launch of shale exploitation. The most important implication of a successful shale revolution would arguably be a downward pressure on gas and coal prices in regional markets and on the global oil price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abiteboul J (2012) “What is the Time Line for LNG Exports from the USA?”, presentation to the Flame Conference in Amsterdam

  • Aguilera RF, Ripple RD, Aguilera R (2012) Link between rocks, hydraulic fracturing, economics, environment, and the global gas portfolio. SPE Can Unconv Resour Conf, CURC 2:1044–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • BP (annual), BP Statistical Review of World Energy

  • Brantley SL and A Meyendorff (2013) “The Facts on Fracking”, The New York Times, March 13, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/opinion/global/the-facts-on-fracking.html

  • Burnham A, Han J, Clark CE, Wang M, Dunn JB, Palou-Rivera I (2012) Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. Environ Sci Technol 46:619–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAPP (2013) Canadian Natural Gas Production Forecast, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, April 13, http://www.capp.ca/forecast/Pages/default.aspx

  • CERI (2012) Canadian Oil Sands Supply Costs and Development Projects 2011-2045, Canadian Energy Research Institute Study 128, Calgary, Canada

  • Dahl CA (2004) International energy markets: understanding pricing, policies, and profits. PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  • DERA (2012) Energy study: reserves, resources and availability of energy resources 2012. Deutsche Rohstoffagentur, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebinger C and G Avasarala (2013) “The Case for US LNG Exports”, Oxford Energy Forum, Issue 91

  • EIA (2011a) Review of Emerging Resources: US Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays. Energy Information Administration, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2011) World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Outside the US

  • EIA (2013a) Annual energy outlook. Energy Information Administration, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2013b) Monthly energy review. Energy Information Administration, Washington DC, April

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2013c) Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources: an assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. Energy Information Administration, Washington DC, June

    Google Scholar 

  • EPRINC (2011) “Natural gas industry fakes the moon landing” briefing memorandum. Energy Policy Research Foundation, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EPRINC (2013) “Prospects for LNG Exports from North America”, presentation at JOGMEC Petroleum Seminar, Tokyo

  • Fan Gao (2012) “Will There Be a Shale Gas Revolution in China by 2020?”, NG61, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies

  • Fattouh B (2013) “The US Tight Oil Revolution: What Kind of a Revolution?”, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, presentation at the Saudi Association for Energy Economics

  • Fisher K and N Warpinski (2011) “Hydraulic fracture-height growth”, SPE paper 145949, Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Denver, Colorado: October 30 – November 2

  • FT Alphaville (2012) “US Shale Oil Abundance: Bernstein vs the IEA”, Financial Times Alphaville, November 19, http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2012/11/19/1266853/us-shale-oil-abundance-bernstein-vs-the-iea/

  • FT (2013) “Oil Tanker Trade Soars on Back of US Boom”, Financial Times

  • FT (2013) “Chevron back in Argentina with $1.2 billion deal”, Financial Times

  • GEA (2012) Global energy assessment: toward a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasset K and A Mathur (2013) “Benefits of Hydraulic Fracking”, Oxford Energy Forum, Issue 91

  • Howarth RV, R Santoro and AI Ingraffea (2011) “Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations”, Letter published with open access at Springerlink.com

  • Hunter T (2011) Regulation of shale, coal seam and tight gas activities in Western Australia. Bond University, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2009) World energy outlook. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2011a) Medium term oil and gas markets. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2011b) Are we entering the golden age of gas? International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2012a) World energy outlook. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2012b) Medium term oil market report. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2013) Resources to reserves. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IHS (2012) America’s energy future: the unconventional oil and gas revolution and the US economy. Englewood, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, M Griffin, C Hendrickson, P Jaramillo, J VanBriesen and A Venkatesh (2011), “Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas”, Environmental Research Letters 6 (3)

  • Martin A (2009) “Appropriate Hydraulic Fracture Technologies for Mature Oil and Gas Formations”, SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program, 2008-2009 Season

  • Maugeri L (2013) “The Shale Oil Boom: A US Phenomenon”, Discussion Paper #2013-05, Harvard Kennedy School

  • Medlock KB (2012), “Shale Gas, Emerging Fundamentals, and Geopolitics”, Presentation at James A Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University

  • NERA Economic Consulting (2012) Macroeconomic Impacts of LNG Exports from the United States, Washington D.C., USA

  • Nicot JP, Scanlon BR (2012) Water use for shale gas production in Texas, US. Environ Sci Technol 46:3580–3586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orangi A, NR Nagarajan, MM Honarpour and J Rosenzweig (2011) “Unconventional Shale Oil and Gas – Condensate Reservoir Production, Impact of Rock, Fluid, and Hydraulic Fractures”, SPE Paper 140536, SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Woodlands, Texas

  • O’Sullivan F, Paltsev S (2012) Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Res Lett 7(4)

  • PGC (2013) Potential Gas Committee Press release, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Co

  • Platts (2013) “US DOE approves Dominion Cove Point plans to export LNG to non-FTA countries”, Platts McGraw Hill Financial

  • Polish Ministry of Treasury (2013) Economic News, Warsaw

  • Ripple RD (2011) “There’s more to coalseam gas than Gasland”, The Conversation, May 26, http://theconversation.com/theres-more-to-coal-seam-gas-than-gasland-1477

  • Robinson D and X Qinhua (2013) “OIES-Renmin Roundtable Conference on Implications for China of North American Energy Independence: Summary of Discussions”, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies and Renmin University of China, Beijing

  • Rystad Energy (2012) North American Shale Analysis, Oslo, Norway, http://www.rystadenergy.com/ResearchProducts/NASAnalysis

  • Schlumberger (2013) Conventional Sandstone Stimulation, Schlumberger Ltd, Houston, http://www.slb.com/services/completions/stimulation/sandstone.aspx

  • SPE News (2013) “Australian shale potential No. 1”, SPE News Australasia, May 21, http://www.spenewsaustralasia.org/article.aspx?p=1&id=2020

  • Stevens P (2012) The “shale gas revolution”: developments and changes. Chatham House Briefing Paper, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker A (2012) “The New Power Map, World Politics After the Boom in Unconventional Energy”, Foreign Affairs

  • US DOE (2011) Shale Gas Production Subcommittee Second Ninety Day Report, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, US Department of Energy, Washington DC

  • Vihma A (2013) “The Shale Gas Boom”, FIIA Briefing Paper 122, Helsinki

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto F. Aguilera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aguilera, R.F., Radetzki, M. The shale revolution: Global gas and oil markets under transformation. Miner Econ 26, 75–84 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-013-0042-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-013-0042-4

Keywords

Navigation