Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable growth revisited: technology, economics and policy

A contribution to the special section of Mineral Economics ‘Resources, energy and eco-innovation’

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of whether environmentally sustainable growth is a feasible aspiration and, if so, how it might be brought about and how the levels of such growth would relate to those currently being experienced. Given the substantial accumulating evidence of serious environmental degradation from current patterns of economic activity, it is clear that these will need to be substantially changed if the ability of the natural environment to support large human populations is to be sustained. Such changes will need to be brought about by strong, sustained policy. Evidence presented in the paper suggests that the technological means of transforming current activities exist, and further evidence is also presented that, given efficient policy, these technologies may be widely implemented with relatively low costs. The key issue is the nature, strength and consistency of the policy signal. While environmental tax reform emerges from the analysis as probably the most promising policy approach, the paper ends with a rather sombre conclusion that, despite this policy instrument’s benefits, there are a number of political reasons why it is likely to be difficult to introduce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Given the range of material covered, it has not been possible to refer to more than a small proportion of the relevant literature. Readers wanting to follow up the issues in more detail are referred to the extensive bibliographies in all the earlier articles.

  2. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0433:FIN:EN:PDF

  3. http://www.beyond-gdp.eu/

  4. http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/redefining-prosperity.html

  5. http://www.degrowth.eu/v1/index.php?id=119

  6. See http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/social/behaviour/

  7. See http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/lc_uk/valuation/valuation.aspx

  8. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/27/response-edf-nuclear-public-subsidy

References

  • Adriaanse A (1993) Environmental policy performance indicators. SDU, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen MS, Ekins P (eds) (2009) Carbon taxation: lessons from Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU, Warr B (2009) The economic growth engine: how energy and work drive material prosperity. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker T, Qureshi M, Köhler J (2006) The costs of greenhouse gas mitigation with induced technological change: a meta-analysis of estimates in the literature. Mimeo, Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker T, Ekins P, Junankar S, Pollitt H, Summerton P (2009) The competitiveness effects of European environmental fiscal reforms. Eur Rev Energy Mark 3(1):43–75

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS (1992) Functions of nature. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2006) Review of research on the influences on personal well-being and application to policy making. University of Sheffield. Report commissioned by Defra and available at http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?DocumentID=2430

  • Easterlin R (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: David PA, Reder MW (eds) Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (2003) Explaining happiness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:11176–11183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2000) Economic growth and environmental sustainability: the prospects for green growth. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2001) From green GNP to the sustainability gap: recent developments in national environmental economic accounting. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 3(1):61–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2009a) The rationale for and economic implications of dematerialisation, Ch.15. In: Bleischwitz R, Welfens P, Xiang Zhang Z (eds) Sustainable growth and resource productivity: economic and global policy issues. Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp 305–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2009b) Resource productivity, environmental tax reform and sustainable growth in Europe. Final report, October. Anglo-German Foundation, London, http://www.agf.org.uk/cms/upload/pdfs/R/2009_R2201_e_resource_productivity_environmental_tax_reform_and_sustainable_growth_in_europe.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2009c) The case for green fiscal reform. Final report of the Green Fiscal Commission, October. Green Fiscal Commission, London, http://www.greenfiscalcommission.org.uk/index.php/site/about/final_report/

  • Ekins P (2010) Eco-innovation for environmental sustainability: concepts, progress and policies. Special issue of International Economics and Economic Policy, Bleischwitz, R., Welfens, P. & Xiang Zhang, Z. (eds) International economics of resources and resource policy, vol.7 Nos. 2/3, August, pp.267-290, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10368-010-0162-z

  • Ekins P (2011a) System innovation for environmental sustainability: concepts, policies and political economy. In: Bleischwitz R, Welfens P, Xiang Zhang Z (eds) International economics of resource efficiency: eco-innovation policies for a green economy. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 51–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (2011b) Introduction to the issues and the book, Ch.1. In: Ekins P, Speck S (eds) 2011 Environmental tax reform: a policy for green growth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Simon S (1999) ‘The Sustainability Gap: a Practical Indicator of Sustainability in the Framework of the National Accounts’, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol.2, No.1, pp.32–58

  • Ekins P, Simon S (2001) Estimating sustainability gaps: methods and preliminary applications for the UK and the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 37(1):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Speck S (eds) (2011) Environmental tax reform: a policy for green growth. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Simon S, Deutsch L, Folke C, de Groot R (2003) A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. In: Special section of Ecological Economics, edited by Paul Ekins, Carl Folke & Rudolf de Groot, Vol.44 No.2-3, pp.165–185

  • Everett T, Ishwaran M, Ansaloni GP, Rubin A (2010) Economic growth and the environment. Defra Evidence and Analysis Series, Paper 2. DEFRA, London. http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/series/documents/paper2-economic-growth.pdf

  • Hueting R (1980) 1980 New scarcity and economic growth. North Holland, Amsterdam, Dutch edition first published 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueting R (1986) ‘An Economic Scenario for a Conserver Economy’ in Ekins, P. Ed. 1986 The Living Economy: a New Economics in the Making, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp.242–256

  • IEA (International Energy Agency) (2008) Energy technology perspectives 2008. IEA, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T (2009) Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K, Beise M, Blazejczak J, Edler D, Haum R, Jänicke M, Löw T, Petschow U, Rennings K (2005) Lead Markets for Environmental Innovations. ZEW Economic Studies Vol.27, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

  • Junginger M (2005) Learning in renewable energy technology development. PhD Thesis, Utrecht University

  • Junginger M, van Sark W, Faaij A (eds) (2010) Technological learning in the energy sector. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard R (2005) Happiness: lessons from a new science. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • HMG (Her Majesty’s Government) (2009) Low carbon industrial strategy. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file52002.pdf

  • McAllister F (2005) Wellbeing concepts and challenges. Discussion paper prepared for the Sustainable Development Research Network, available at http://admin.sd-research.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sdrnwellbeingpaper-final_000.pdf

  • McDonald A, Schrattenholzer L (2001) Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens W (1972) The limits to growth. Pan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J (1992) Beyond the limits: global collapse or a sustainable future. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillarisetti R, van den Bergh J (2010) Sustainable nations: what do aggregate indexes tell us? Environment. Dev Sustain 12(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Van Der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118, Fall

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes S, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socolow R, Hotinski R, Greenblatt J, Pacala S (2004) Solving the climate problem: technologies available to curb CO2 emissions. Environment 46(10):8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf

  • Strachan N, Kannan R (2008) Hybrid modelling of long-term carbon reduction scenarios for the UK. Energy Econ 30(6):2947–2963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh J (2011) Environmental and climate innovation: limitations, prices and policies. Papers on Economics and Evolution No.1023, January, Max Planck Institute of Economics Evolutionary Economics Group, Jena, ftp://papers.econ.mpg.de/evo/discussionpapers/2010-23.pdf

  • Victor P (2008) Managing without growth: slower by design, not disaster. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (World Wildlife Fund), Zoological Society of London, & Global Footprint Network (2006) Living planet report 2006. WWF, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • YCELP (Yale Centre for Environmental Law and Policy), Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), & The World Economic Forum (2005) 2005 environmental sustainability index. YCELP, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Ekins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekins, P. Sustainable growth revisited: technology, economics and policy. Miner Econ 24, 59–77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-011-0013-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-011-0013-6

Keywords

Navigation