Skip to main content
Log in

Development and utilization of analytical methods for rapid GM detection in processed food products: a case study for regulatory requirement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) food crops for desired traits have been approved in some of the countries. The approval status of a GM event varies from country to country. In India, Bt cotton is the only approved GM crop. So far, no GM food crop has got regulatory approval in the country, which may be considered as unauthorized GM (UGM) event in the Indian context. The entry of UGM events of food crops needs to be checked in the imported consignments as well as in the marketplace. In the present study, screening elements were identified based on the genetically modified organism (GMO) matrix developed as decision support system for 22 GM food crops approved globally. Three sets of multiplex PCR assays were developed and validated for GM detection in food crops and products: triplex PCR targeting control elements [Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter (P-35S), Figwort Mosaic Virus promoter (P-FMV), nopaline synthase terminator (T-nos)], triplex PCR targeting marker genes [aminoglycoside-3’-adenyltransferase (aadA), neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII), phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase (pat)] and duplex PCR targeting Bt genes (cry1Ab/Ac and cry2Ab2). Limit of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.5–0.01% for different targets, which is in compliance with the labelling threshold of many countries. The developed assays were utilized to check the GM status of apple and maize products along with an additional test for ctp2-cp4epsps for herbicide tolerance in maize. Based on the tests conducted, none of these samples were found positive for GM targets screened. These procedures could be efficiently employed as a part of GMO testing to trace GM contamination, if any, in both the imported as well as domestic food products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability Sstatement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed. All the data is included and provided in the main text of the manuscript or in the Supplementary Information.

Abbreviations

aadA :

Aminoglycoside-3′-adenyltransferase

cp4-epsps :

5-Enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase

CRM:

Certified reference material

CTAB:

Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

EU:

European Union

FSSAI:

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India

GM:

Genetically modified

GMO:

Genetically modified organism

LOD:

Limit of detection

nptII :

Neomycin phosphotransferase

P-35S :

Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter

pat :

Phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

P-FMV :

Figwort Mosaic Virus promoter

RM:

Reference material

T-nos :

Nopaline synthase terminator

UGM:

Unauthorized genetically modified

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the Director, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources for providing necessary facilities and resources.

Funding

The grant provided by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS: conceptualization, supervision, data curation, formal analysis, writing original draft; drafting of figures and tables; AP, KK: methodology, validation; PP: data analysis and compilation for GMO matrix; GR: administration, supervision, review of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, or conclusions, expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the concerned organization.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, M., Paliwal, A., Kaur, K. et al. Development and utilization of analytical methods for rapid GM detection in processed food products: a case study for regulatory requirement. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 32, 511–524 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-023-00832-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-023-00832-6

Keywords

Navigation