Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 119–122 | Cite as

Association of an allele-specific marker with dehydration stress tolerance in foxtail millet suggests SiDREB2 to be an important QTL

  • Charu Lata
  • Manoj PrasadEmail author
Short Communication


Dehydration-responsive element binding (DREB) genes assist in improving stress tolerance of plants by activating the expression of several stress-responsive genes. Therefore, development of functional markers for useful alleles utilizing DREB genes is crucial for crop improvement strategies. Earlier we reported a synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with dehydration tolerance at 558th bp (an A/G transition) in the SiDREB2 gene of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) and developed an allele-specific marker (ASM) for SiDREB2. In the present study, we validated this ASM using a set of 122 foxtail accessions, of which 45 were investigated in an earlier study. The QTL associated with SiDREB2 contributed to ~20 % of the total phenotypic variation (PV) for relative water content (RWC) and this signified the importance of this QTL for dehydration tolerance in foxtail millet.


Allele-specific marker Dehydration stress Foxtail millet Marker-aided breeding SiDREB2 Single marker regression Single nucleotide polymorphism 



Dehydration Responsive Element Binding


Single Nucleotide Polymorphism


Allele-Specific Marker


Single Marker Regression


Relative Water Content


Quantitative Trait Loci


Poly Ethylene Glycol


Lipid Peroxidation



This study was supported by the Department of Biotechnology (Grant No. BT/PR9851/AGR/02/521/2007), Govt. of India, New Delhi and core grant from the National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India. Dr. Charu Lata acknowledges Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India for the INSPIRE Faculty award [IFA-11LSPA-01]. We thank Dr. Swarup K Parida and Mr. Mehanathan Muthamilarasan, NIPGR, New Delhi for critically reading the manuscript. We are thankful to NBPGR, Hyderabad and UAS, GKVK, Bangalore, India for providing the seed materials.

Supplementary material

13562_2013_193_MOESM1_ESM.doc (334 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 Description of 122 foxtail millet accessions along with the level of RWC at control and 24 h duration of dehydration stress, respectively; their allelic information and group position obtained by structure analysis. (DOC 334 kb)


  1. Anderson JR, Asp T, Lu YC, Kloiber-Maitz M, Ouzonova M, Luebberstedt T (2009) Development and mapping of gene-tagged SNP markers in laccases of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Breed 128:423–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Aus J Biol Sci 15:413–428Google Scholar
  3. Garcés-Claver A, Fellman SM, Gil-Ortega R, Jahn M, Arnedo-Andrés MS (2007) Identification, validation and survey of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with pungency in Capsicum spp. Theor Appl Genet 115:907–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hussain SS, Kayani MA, Amjad M (2011) Transcription factors as tools to engineer enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Am Inst Chem Eng 27:297–306Google Scholar
  5. Kearsey MJ, Hyne V (1994) QTL analysis: a simple marker regression approach. Theor Appl Genet 89:698–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lata C, Sahu PP, Prasad M (2010) Comparative transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) during dehydration stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 393:720–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lata C, Bhutty S, Bahadur RP, Majee M, Prasad M (2011) Association of an SNP in a novel DREB2-like gene SiDREB2 with stress tolerance in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.)]. J Exp Bot 62:3387–3401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lata C, Prasad M (2012) Validation of an allele-specific marker associated with dehydration stress tolerance in a core set of foxtail millet accessions. Plant Breed. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2012.01983.x
  9. Lata C, Prasad M (2011) Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J Exp Bot 62:4731–4748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li YM (1997) Drought-resistant mechanism and genetic expression of foxtail millet. In: Li YM (ed) Foxtail millet breeding. Agricultural Press, Beijing, pp 433–434Google Scholar
  11. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Price A, Steele K, Townend J, Gorham J, Audebert A, Jones M, Courtois B (1999) Mapping roots and shoot traits in rice: experience in UK, IRRI and WARDA. In: Ito O, O’Toole JC, Hardy B (eds) Genetic improvement of rice for water-limited environments. IRRI, Philippines, pp 257–273Google Scholar
  13. Rajalakshmi S, Parida A (2012) Halophytes as a source of genes for abiotic stress tolerance. J Plant Biochem Biotech 21:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smart RE, Bingham GE (1974) Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiol 53:258–260PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Witcombe JR, Hollington PA, Howarth CJ, Reader S, Steele KA (2008) Breeding for abiotic stresses for sustainable agriculture. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:703–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:247–273PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Centre on Plant BiotechnologyNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations