Skip to main content
Log in

Non-equilibrium Dynamics of a Double-well Bose–Einstein Condensate-dual Reservoir System

  • Atomic Physics
  • Published:
Brazilian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the dynamics of a two-site Bose–Einstein condensate subject to tunnelling coupling (which makes the system a bosonic Josephson junction), having on-site inter-particle interaction (making the system a small Bose–Hubbard model) and in contact with two separate heat baths, which makes the system lossy and potentially drives it into a non-equilibrium state with some heat current. The dynamical calculation of the system is done within the standard quantum generalized Langevin setting, and the heat baths are assumed to have non-zero memory time (Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process). We numerically calculated the time evolution of the population imbalance, coherence and entanglement of the system. We have shown inter-particle interaction, noise and dissipation induced by BEC atoms-reservoir interaction that are crucial in affecting the dynamics of the mentioned physical parameters. The study also indicates that quantumness (non-classicality) of the system is characterized by the interplay between dissipation and inter-particle interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.P. Chikkatur, Y. Shin, A.E. Leanhardt, D. Kielpinski, E. Tsikata, T.L. Gustavson, D.E. Pritchard, W. Ketterle, Science 296, 2193 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Shin, M. Saba, T.A. Pasquini, W. Ketterle, D.E. Pritchard, A.E. Leanhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 050405 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3164 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G.J. Milburn, J. Corney, E.M. Wright, D.F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4318 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Zapata, F. Sols and A.J. Leggett. Phys. Rev. A 57, 4318 (1998)

  6. B.D. Josephson, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, S.R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S.R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. A 59, 620 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Albiez, R. Gati, J. Følling, S. Hunsmann, M. Christiani, M.K. Oberthaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010402 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, C. Gross, M.K. Oberthaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 204101 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Ruostekoski, D.F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 58, R50 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Lazarou, G.M. Nikolopoulos, P. Lambropoulous, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40, 2511 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. G.M. Nikolopoulos, C. Lazarou, P. Lambropoulous, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 025301 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K.K. Rajagopal, S.V. Muniandy, Physica A 440, 118 (2015)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Khodorkovsky, G. Kurizki, A. Vardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 220403 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Boukobza, M. Chuchem, D. Cohen, A. Vardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180403 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Witthaut, F. Trimborn, S. Wimberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200402 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Trimborn, D. Witthaut, S. Wimberger, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 171001 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Trimborn, D. Witthaut and H. J. Korsch. Phys. Rev. A 79, 013608 (2009)

  20. F. Trimborn, D. Witthaut, H. Henning, G. Kordas, T. Geisel, S. Wimberger, Eur. Phys. J. D. 63, 63 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Witthaut, F. Trimborn, H. Henning, G. Kordas, T. Geisel, S. Wimberger, Phys. Rev. A 83, 06368 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Kordas, S. Wimberger, D. Witthaut, Phys. Rev. A 87, 043618 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Wang, L.B. Fu, X.X. Yi, Phys. Rev. A 75, 045601 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. K.K. Rajagopal, Physica A 429, 231 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Ghasemian, M.K. Tavassoly, Laser Physics 27, 095202 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Guarrera, P. Würtz, A. Ewerbeck, A. Vogler, G. Barontini, H. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 160403 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Barontini, R. Labouvie, F. Stubenrauch, A. Vogler, V. Guarrera, H. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 035302 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Kosloff, Entropy 15, 2100 (2013)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. P. Hofer et al., New J. Phys. 19, 123037 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. C.W. Gardiner, P. Zoller, Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. A.J. Leggett, Review of Modern Physics 73, 307 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. U. Weiss Quantum Dissipative Systems, 3d ed. World Scientific, Singapore. (2008)

  33. K. Lindenberg and B.J. West. The non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics of Open and Closed System. VCH New York. (1990)

  34. V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, D. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022123 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. G.E. Uhlenbeck, L.S. Ornstein, Phys. Rev. 36, 823 (1930)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. R.L.S. Farias, R.O. Ramos, L.A. da Silva, Brazilian J. Physics 38, 499 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. R.L.S. Farias, R.O. Ramos, L.A. da Silva, Comp. Phys. Comm. 180, 574 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. M.O. Scully, M.S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics, 6th edn. (Cambridge University Press, U.K., 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Y. Yamamoto and A. İmamoǵlu. Mesoscopic Quantum Optics John-Wiley and sons,Inc., New York (1999)

  40. K.K. Rajagopal, G. Ibragimov, Brazilian J. Physics 50, 178 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Hillary, M.S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. Lett 96, 050503 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Hillary, M.S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032333 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the wise reviewers for their careful review and fruitful suggestions in improving this manuscript. The work is done with very limited resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalai K. Rajagopal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

A Appendix

The Markovian (Mark) Model

We show the dynamics of the double-well BEC out-coupled to reservoirs model operating within the Markovian dissipation basis. Assumptions of the model is stated in Section 1. Substituting the memory-less dissipative kernels \(K_{\delta }(t)=Q_{1}\delta (t)\) and \(M_{\delta }(t)=Q_{2}\delta (t)\) in Eqs. (7) and (8), integrals of the dissipation terms drop out giving the following standard Markovian dissipative two-mode BEC dynamical equations in a straight forward way:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\hat{a}}{d\,t}&= (-i\omega -Q_{1})\hat{a}-i\,\Omega \hat{b}-iU\hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\hat{a} -i\tilde{F}_{a}(t) \end{aligned}$$
(28)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\hat{b}}{d\,t}&= (-i\omega -Q_{2})\hat{b}-i\,\Omega \hat{a}-iU\hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\hat{b} -i\tilde{F}_{b}(t)\,. \end{aligned}$$
(29)

where the noise term in the above equation is denoted by (\(\tilde{F}_{a}\), \(\tilde{F}_{a}\)) to distinguish with the non-Markovian noise terms (\(\hat{F}_{a}\),\(\hat{F}_{a})\). The two-point noise–noise correlations for the Markovian system [38, 39] are:

$$\begin{aligned} \langle \tilde{F}_{a}^{\dagger }(t')\tilde{F}_{a}(t^{''})\rangle&=Q_{1}N_{1}(\omega )\delta (t'-t'') \,, \end{aligned}$$
(30)
$$\begin{aligned} \langle \tilde{F}_{b}^{\dagger }(t')\tilde{F}_{b}(t'')\rangle&=Q_{2}N_{2}(\omega )\delta (t'-t'')\,, \end{aligned}$$
(31)

which can also be easily shown by utilizing Ohmic spectral function and definition of random noise term (see line below Eqs. 7 and 8). It needs to be mentioned that, Eqs. (30) and (31) indicate fluctuation–dissipation theorem (FDT) which implies that fluctuation due reservoir gives rise to the damping in the system. The calculation for the non-Mark FDT is more involved where one needs to compute them using Lorentzian spectral function.

Other physical parameters such as population of traps (\(n_{A}(t)=\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle\), \(n_{B}(t)=\langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle\)), coherence term (\(n_{AB}(t)=\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle\)) and other noise correlated terms can be obtained by computing their second-order moments using the above equation and applying the product rule 17. Doing some algebra, we obtain the following set of evolution equations:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle }{d\,t} = -2Q_{1}\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle + i\Omega \langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle -i\Omega \langle \,\hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{b} \rangle + \langle \tilde{F}^{\dagger }_{a}\hat{a}\rangle + \langle a^{\dagger }\tilde{F}_{a}\rangle \end{aligned}$$
(32)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle }{d\,t} = -2Q_{2}\langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle +i\Omega \langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle -i\Omega \langle \,\hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{a} \rangle + \langle \tilde{F}^{\dagger }_{b}\hat{b}\rangle +\langle b^{\dagger }\tilde{F}_{b}\rangle \end{aligned}$$
(33)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle }{d\,t}= & -(Q_{1}+Q_{2})\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle +i\Omega \langle \,\hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b} \rangle \\& -i\Omega \langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle +iU\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle (n_{A}-n_{B})\,. \end{aligned}$$
(34)

In the above set of equations, terms \(\langle \tilde{F}^{\dagger }_{a}\hat{a}\rangle = \langle a^{\dagger }\tilde{F}_{a}\rangle = [Q_{1}/2]N_{1}(\omega )\) and \(\langle \tilde{F}^{\dagger }_{b}\hat{b}\rangle = \langle b^{\dagger }\tilde{F}_{b}\rangle = [Q_{2}/2]N_{2}(\omega )\) were obtained using technique shown in [39]. The fourth-order moments generated in deriving Eq. (32)-(34) have been decorrelated by a basic relations \(<\hat{A}\hat{B}\hat{C}\hat{D}> \approx<\hat{A}\hat{B}> <\hat{C}\hat{D}>\), similar to Eqs. (18)-(24) of the non-Mark model. The set of dynamical equations above are governed by the trap frequency \(\omega\), tunnelling coupling constant \(\Omega\), inter-particle interaction strength U, dissipation strengths (\(Q_{1}\), \(Q_{2}\)) and the reservoir temperatures \((T_{1},T_{2})\). The comparison between noise non-Mark and the Mark is illustrated in the figures reported.

B The Mean-field (MF) Model

Redefining the macroscopic dynamics of the BECs within a Mean-Field approximation (MFA) by \(\alpha =\langle \,\hat{a}\,\rangle\), \(\alpha ^{*}=\langle \,\hat{a}^{\dagger }\,\rangle\), \(\beta =\langle \,\hat{b}\,\rangle\) and \(\beta ^{*}=\langle \,\hat{b}^{\dagger }\,\rangle\) with \(n(t)=|\alpha |^2+|\beta |^2=n_{A}(t)+n_{B}(t)\) denoting the total particle number at certain time t in the double-well. Following the condition on reservoir described in section (1), the noise of reservoir averages out to \(\langle \,\hat{F}_{a}\,\rangle\) and \(\langle \,\hat{F}_{b}\,\rangle\) zero for large system. Next we decorrelate the third-order correlation functions appearing on the right-hand side of Equations (7) and (8) by the relations \(\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\hat{a}\rangle\) \(\approx\) \(\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\rangle\) \(\langle \hat{a}\rangle\) \(\langle \hat{a}\rangle\) and \(\langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\hat{b}\rangle\) \(\approx\) \(\langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\rangle\) \(\langle \hat{b}\rangle\) \(\langle \hat{b}\rangle\). This approximation is equivalent to the Mean-Field approximation where the higher-order correlations are decorrelated into the form \(\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\hat{a}\rangle\) \(\approx\) \(\langle \hat{a}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle\) \(\langle \hat{a}\rangle =|\alpha |^2\alpha\) and \(\langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\hat{b}\rangle\) \(\approx\) \(\langle \hat{b}^{\dagger }\hat{b}\rangle\) \(\langle \hat{b}\rangle =|\beta |^2\beta\).

With these approximations, we obtain a closed set of coupled nonlinear differential equations describing our system of interest:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\alpha }{d\,t}&= -i\omega \alpha -i\Omega \beta -iU|\alpha |^{2}\alpha + \tilde{X}(t) \,, \end{aligned}$$
(35)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\beta }{d\,t}&= -i\omega \beta -i\Omega \alpha -iU|\beta |^{2}\beta + \tilde{Y}(t) \,, \end{aligned}$$
(36)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\tilde{X}}{dt}&= -\gamma \,\tilde{X}(t)-Q_{1}\gamma \,\alpha (t)\,, \end{aligned}$$
(37)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\tilde{Y}}{dt}&=-\gamma \,\tilde{Y}(t)-Q_{2}\gamma \,\beta (t) \,, \end{aligned}$$
(38)

where the last terms Eq. (35) and Eq. (36) are :

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{X}(t)&= -Q_{1}\gamma \int _{0}^{t}dt'\exp [-\gamma (t-t')]\,\alpha (t')\,, \end{aligned}$$
(39)
$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{Y}(t)&= -Q_{2}\gamma \int _{0}^{t}dt'\exp [-\gamma (t-t')]\,\beta (t')\,. \end{aligned}$$
(40)

Eqs.(35)- (40) are the essential equations for the non-Markovian Mean-Field model. Comparison between the noise correlated models shown in the reported figures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajagopal, K.K., Ibragimov, G. Non-equilibrium Dynamics of a Double-well Bose–Einstein Condensate-dual Reservoir System. Braz J Phys 51, 944–953 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-021-00904-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-021-00904-9

Keywords

Navigation