Skip to main content

Lower body motion analysis to detect falls and near falls on stairs

Abstract

Purpose

We present a methodology to automatically detect falls on stairs, an application of computer vision and machine learning techniques with major real-world importance. Falls on the stairs, in particular, are a common cause of injury among older adults. Comprehending the conditions under which accidents take place could significantly aid in the prevention of falls, support independent living, and improve quality of life.t.

Methods

We extract a set of features, composed of Fourier coefficients and entropy metrics of instantaneous velocities from 3D motion sensor data, to encode lower body motion during stair navigation. A supervised learning algorithm is then trained on manually annotated data simulated in a home laboratory.

Results

In our empirical analysis, the algorithm obtains high fall detection accuracy (< 92%) and a low false positive rate (5–7%). In contrast with previous research, we identify that motion of the hips, rather than that of the feet, is the best indicator of dangerous activity given the 3D trajectory of various lower body joints. It is also shown that entropy measures alone provide sufficient information to detect abnormal events on stairs.

Conclusions

The study of falls is difficult due to their exceedingly sparse nature; but an automatic non-contact fall detection system can assist in data collection by sieving through large quantities of data, e.g., from public stairways.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Population aging and development, Report by the Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. 2013.

  2. Marshall SW, Runyan CW, Yang J, Coyne-Beasley T, Waller AE, Johnson RM, Perkis D. Prevalence of selected risk and protective factors for falls in the home. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(1):95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinovitch S, Feldman F, Wan D, Aziz O, Sarraf T. Videobased recording of the cause of falls among older adults in long term care. Int Conf Soc Posture Gait Res. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Snoek J, Hoey J, Stewart L, Zemel RS, Mihailidis A. Automated detection of unusual events on stairs. Image Vision Comput. 2009; 27(1–2):153–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taati B, Snoek J, Mihailidis A. Video analysis for identifying human operation difficulties and faucet usability assessment. Neurocomputing. 2012; 100:163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taati B, Wang R, Huq R, Snoek J, Mihailidis A. Vision-based posture assessment to detect and categorize compensation during robotic rehabilitation therapy. IEEE Conf Biomed Robotic Biomechatronics. IEEE. 2012; 1607–13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belshaw M, Taati B, Giesbrecht D, Mihailidis A. Intelligent vision-based fall detection system: preliminary results from a real-world deployment. RESNA/ICTA: Rehabil Eng Technol Soc N Am–Int Conf Technol Aging. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belshaw M, Taati B, Snoek J, Mihailidis A. Towards a single sensor passive solution for automated fall detection. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 1773–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shotton J, Fitzgibbon A, Cook M, Sharp T, Finocchio M, Moore R, Kipman A, Blake A. Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. PROC CVPR IEEE. 2011: 1297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ni B, Wang G, Moulin P. RGBD-HuDaAct: A color-depth video database for human daily activity recognition. IEEE Int Conf Comp Vision W. 2011; 1147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sung J, Ponce C, Selman B, Saxena A. Human activity detection from RGBD images. AAAI W Pattern Activity Intent Recog. 2011; 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dolatabadi E, Taati B, Parra-Dominguez GS, Mihailidis A. A markerless motion tracking approach to understand changes in gait and balance: A case study. RESNA/ICTA: Rehabil Eng Technol Soc N Am–Int Conf Technol Aging. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stone EE, Skubic M. Passive in-home measurement of stride-tostride gait variability comparing vision and kinect sensing. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 6491–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taati B, Campos J, Griffiths J, Gridseth M, Mihailidis A. Vision-based categorization of upper body motion impairments and post-stroke motion synergies. Int J Disabil Hum De. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Czarnuch S, Cohen S, Parameswaran V, Mihailidis A. A realworld deployment of the coach prompting system. Amb Int Sm Env. 2013; 5(5):463–78.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kepski M, Kwolek B, Austvoll I. Fuzzy inference-based reliable fall detection using kinect and accelerometer. Artif Int Soft Comput, ser. Lect Notes Comput Sc. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. 2012; 7267:266–73.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mastorakis G, Makris D. Fall detection system using kinect’s infrared sensor. J Real-Time Imag Process. 2012; 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rougier C, Auvinet E, Rousseau J, Mignotte M, Meunier J. Fall detection from depth map video sequences. Lect Notes Comput Sc. 2011; 6719:121–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone E, Skubic M. Fall detection in homes of older adults using the microsoft kinect. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2014; (99):1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marzahl C, Penndorf P, Bruder I, Staemmler M. Unobtrusive fall detection using 3d images of a gaming console: concept and first results. Amb Assist Living. 2012; 135–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Gasparrini S, Cippitelli E, Spinsante S, Gambi E. A depth-based fall detection system using a Kinect sensor. Sensors. 2014; 14(2):2756–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Planinc R, Kampel M. Introducing the use of depth data for fall detection. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2013; 17(6):1063–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bian Z, Hou J, Chau L, Magnenat-Thalmann N. Fall detection based on body part tracking using a depth camera. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015; 19(2):430–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kepski M, Kwolek B. Human fall detection using kinect sensor, ser. Adv Soft Comp. 2013; 743–52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Webster D, Celik O. Systematic review of kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11(1):108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stone E, Skubic M. Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment. Amb Int Sm Env. 2011; 3(4):349–61.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dolatabadi E, Taati B, Mihailidis A. Vision-based approach for long-term mobility monitoring: Single case study following total hip replacement. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014; 51(7):1165–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Costa M, Peng CK, Goldberger AL, Hausdorff JM. Multiscale entropy analysis of human gait dynamics. Phys A Statistical Mech Appl. 2003; 330(1–2):53–60.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Georgoulis A, Moraiti C, Ristanis S, Stergiou N. A novel approach to measure variability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee during walking: the use of the approximate entropy in orthopaedics. J Clin Monitor Comput. 2006; 20:11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pansera M, Estrada J, Pastor L, Cancela J, Greenlaw R, Arredondo M. Multi-parametric system for the continuous assessment and monitoring of motor status in parkinson’s disease: An entropy-based gait comparison. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 1242–45.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Karmakar C, Khandoker A, Begg R, Palaniswami M, Taylor S. Understanding ageing effects by approximate entropy analysis of gait variability. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 1965–68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Khandoker A, Palaniswami M, Begg R. A comparative study on approximate entropy measure and poincare plot indexes of minimum foot clearance variability in the elderly during walking. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2008; 5(1):4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Parra-Dominguez GS, Taati B, Mihailidis A. 3d human motion analysis to detect abnormal events on stairs. Int Conf 3D Imag Model Process. Visual Transm. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Livne M, Sigal L, Troje NF, Fleet DJ. Human attributes from 3d pose tracking. Comput Vis Imag Und. 2012; 116(5):648–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shannon C, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pincus SM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. P Natl Acad Sci. 1991; 88(6):2297–301.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001; 45:5–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Mihailidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parra-Dominguez, G.S., Snoek, J., Taati, B. et al. Lower body motion analysis to detect falls and near falls on stairs. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 5, 98–108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-015-0179-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-015-0179-x

Keywords

  • Fall detection
  • Stairs
  • Ambient intelligence
  • Safety monitoring
  • RGB-D camera
  • Aging-in-place