Biomedical Engineering Letters

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 51–57 | Cite as

Towards a slime Mould-FPGA interface

  • Richard MayneEmail author
  • Michail-Antisthenis Tsompanas
  • Georgios Ch Sirakoulis
  • Andrew Adamatzky
Original Article



The plasmodium of slime mould

Physarum polycephalum

is a multinucleate single celled organism which behaves as a living amorphous unconventional computing substrate. As an excitable, memristive cell that typically assumes a branching or stellate morphology, slime mould is a unique model organism that shares many key properties of mammalian neurons. There are numerous studies that reveal the computing abilities of the plasmodium realized by the formation of tubular networks connecting points of interest. Recent research demonstrating typical responses in electrical behaviour of the plasmodium to certain chemical and physical stimuli has generated interest in creating an interface between

P. polycephalum

and digital logic, with the aim to perform computational tasks with the resulting device.


Through a range of laboratory experiments, wemeasure plasmodial membrane potential via a non-invasive method and use this signal to interface the organism with a digital system.


This digital system was demonstrated to perform predefined basic arithmetic operations and is implemented in a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). These basic arithmetic operations, i.e. counting, addition, multiplying, use data that were derived by digital recognition of membrane potential oscillation and are used here to make basic hybrid biologicalartificial sensing devices.


We present here a low-cost, energy efficient and highly adaptable platform for developing next-generation machine-organism interfaces. These results are therefore applicable to a wide range of biological/medical and computing/electronics fields.


Physarum polycephalum Digital electronics Machine-organism interface Unconventional computing 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1].
    Nakagaki T, Yamada H, Tóth A. Intelligence: maze-solving by an amoeboid organism. Nature. 2000; 407(6803):470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2].
    Adamatzky A. Bioevaluation of world tranport networks. World Scientific; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. [3].
    Adamatzky A. Physarum wires: self-growing self-repairing smart wires made from slime mould. Biomed Eng Lett. 2013; 3(4):232–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4].
    Mayne R, Adamatzky A. Towards hybrid nanostructure-slime mould devices. Nano LIFE. 2014; doi:  10.1142/S179398441450007X.Google Scholar
  5. [5].
    Whiting JGH, de Lacy Costello B, Adamatzky A. Towards slime mould chemical sensor: mapping chemical inputs onto electrical potential dynamics of Physarum polycephalum. Sensor Actuat B-Chem. 2014; doi:  10.1016/j.snb.2013.10.064.Google Scholar
  6. [6].
    Adamatzky A. Towards slime mould colour sensor: recognition of colours by Physarum polycephalum. Org Electron. 2013; 14(12):3355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7].
    Adamatzky A. Slime mould tactile sensor. Sensor Actuat BChem. 2013; 188:38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8].
    Adamatzky A. Slime mould electronic oscillators. Microelectron Eng. 2014; doi:  10.1016/j.mee.2014.04.022.Google Scholar
  9. [9].
    Gale E, Adamatzky A, de Lacy Costello B. Are slime mould living memristors? 2014; ArXiv:1306.3414.Google Scholar
  10. [10].
    Adamatzky A, Schubert T. Slime mold microfluidic logical gates. Mater Today. 2014; 17(2):86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11].
    Mayne R, Adamatzky A. Slime mould foraging behaviour as optically-coupled logical operations. Int J Gen Syst. 2015; 44(3):1–9.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12].
    Whiting JGH, de Lacy Costello B, Adamatzky A. Slime mould logic gates based on frequency changes of electrical potential oscillation. Biosyst. 2014; 124:21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13].
    Adamatzky A. Route 20, autobahn 7, and slime mold: approximating the longest roads in usa and germany with slime mold on 3-d terrains. IEEE T Cybern. 2014; 44:126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14].
    Tero A, Takagi S, Saigusa T, Ito K, Bebber DP, Fricker MD, Yumiki K, Kobayashi R, Nakagaki T. Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design. Science. 2010; 327(5964): 439–42.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15].
    Kishimoto U. Rhythmicity in the protoplasmic streaming of a slime mold, Physarum polycephalum. J Gen Physiol. 1958; 41(6):1223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16].
    Wohlfarth-Bottermann KE. Oscillating contractions i protoplasmic strands of physarum: simultaneous tensiometry of longditudinal and radial rhythms, periodicity analysis and temperature dependence. J Exp Biol. 1977; 67:49–59.Google Scholar
  17. [17].
    Adamatzky A, Jones J. On electrical correlates of Physarum polycephalum spatial activity: can we see physarum machine in the dark? Biophys Rev Lett. 2011; 6:29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18].
    Knowles DJ, Carlilie MJ. Growth and migration of plasmodia of the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum: the effect of carbohydrates, including agar. J Gen Microbiol. 1978. 108(1):9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19].
    Durham ACH, Ridgway EB. Control of chemotaxis in Physarum polycephalum. J Cell Biol. 1976; 69(1):218–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20].
    Kakiuchi Y, Takahashi T, Murakami A, Ueda T. Light irradiation induces fragmentation of the plasmodium, a novel photomorphogenesis in the true slime mold physarum polycehpalum. Photochem Photobiol. 2001; 73(3):324–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21].
    Nakagaki T, Yamada H, Ueda T. Modulation of cellular rhythm and photoavoidance by oscillatory irradiation in the physarum plasmodium. Biophys Chem. 1999; 82(1):23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22].
    Altera Corporation. Cyclone ii fpga starter development board reference manual. 2006. literature/manual/mnl_cii_starter_board_rm.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2015.Google Scholar
  23. [23].
    Tsuda S, Artmann S, Zauner K-P. The phi-bot: a robot controlled by a slime mould. In: A. Adamatzky A, Komosinski M, editors. Artificial life models in hardware. London: Springer; 2009. pp. 213–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24].
    Coster HGL, Chilcott TC, Coster ACF. Impedance spectroscopy of interfaces, membranes and ultrastructures. Bioelectroch Bioener. 1996; 40(2):79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering and Springer 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Mayne
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michail-Antisthenis Tsompanas
    • 2
  • Georgios Ch Sirakoulis
    • 2
  • Andrew Adamatzky
    • 1
  1. 1.Unconventional Computing GroupUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK
  2. 2.Laboratory of Electronics, Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringDemocritus University of ThraceXanthiGreece

Personalised recommendations