Abstract
Purpose
The scoliosis diagnosing system needs radio-graphic information in terms of spinal curvature estimated using Cobb’s definition. The evaluation process and treatment analysis depends on the reliability and reproducibility of the spine curvature in the frontal view.
Methods
Manual identification of end vertebrae and other anatomical features required for the estimation of spinal curvature causes variability and unreliability at higher rate. This paper proposes an automated system to extract the required anatomical features using customized filter. The customized filter used in this paper is a combination of anisotropic, sigmoid and differential filter. Combination of these filters automatically extracts the anatomical features in terms of required vertebral endplates. Automatic identification of these endplates eliminates the human intervention involved in the quantification of Cobb angle.
Results and Conclusions
Analysis of the results reveals significant difference between the observer variability between manual, computer assisted and computerized image understanding system in terms of inter and intra cross correlation coefficient ratio (ICCR).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Refrerences
Tanure MC, Pinheiro P, Oliveira AS. Reliability assessment of cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J. 2010; 10(9):769–74.
Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B. A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(5):593–607.
Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Polly DW Jr, O’Brien MF, Schroeder TM, Lenke LG. Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. Spine. 2005; 30(4):444–54.
Cobb R. Outline for study of scoliosis. In American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Instructional Course Lectures. St Louis, CV Mosby. 1948; 261–75.
Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM. Inter- and intra-observer reliability assessment of the cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(10):1587–92.
Jeffries BS, Tarlton M, De Smet AA, Dwyer SJ 3rd, Brower AC. Computerized measurement and analysis of scoliosis: a more accurate representation of the shape of the curve. Radiology. 1980; 134(2):381–5.
Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O’Brien MF. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006; 31(11):1240–6.
Cheung J, Wever DJ, Veldhuizen AG, Klein JP, Verdonck B, Nijlunsing R, Cool JC, Van Horn JR. The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital image of the scoliotic spine. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(6):535–42.
Allen S, Parent E, Khorasani M, Hill DL, Lou E, Raso JV. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Digit Imaging. 2008; 21(2):208–18.
Modi HN, Chen T, Suh SW, Mehta S, Srinivasalu S, Yang JH, Song HR. Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable cobb’s angle. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(1):52–8.
Segev E, Hemo Y, Wientroub S, Ovadia D, Fishkin M, Steinberg D, Hayek S. Intra and inter ob server reliability analysis of digital radiographic measurements for pediatric orthopedic parameters using a novel pacs integrated computer software program. J Child Orthop. 2010; 4(4):331–41.
Perona P, Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE T Pattern Anal. 1990; 12(7):629–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anitha, H., Karunakar, A.K. & Dinesh, K.V.N. Automatic extraction of vertebral endplates from scoliotic radiographs using customized filter. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 4, 158–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-014-0129-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-014-0129-z