Skip to main content
Log in

Monocrotophos, Its Toxic Effect (dermal) on Eisenia fetida (Savigny)

  • Original article
  • Published:
Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Driven by the need to improve productivity and to secure and sustainable global food supply, pesticides are constantly used by farmers. Among the pesticides, Monocrotophos is the most locally popular pesticide used by Indian farmers. Strenuous usage of this pesticide affects the soil dwelling organisms especially the earthworms which are more deleteriously affected. Hence an ecotoxicity study against the pesticide Monocrotophos was performed to determine the dermal toxicity of earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Methods

The standard paper contact test proposed by OECD (1984) was implemented and histological studies as evidence was performed to prove the effect of Monocrotophos on the tissues of earthworm.

Results

The acute dermal toxicity (LC50) of Monocrotophos on the earthworm, Eisenia fetida was determined as 0.0036 μg/cm2. Hence the Monocrotophos was categorized as “Super toxic” to earthworms. The histological studies showed heavy damages on the earthworm tissues such as epidermis, peritoneal epithelium, Chloragogen cells, longitudinal muscles, etc.

Conclusion

The study concluded that Monocrotophos is highly toxic to earthworms and furthermore studies on the acute and chronic toxicity with OECD soil is needed to assess the actual effect in soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ponge, J. F. The soil as an ecosystem. Biol. Fertil. Soil. 51, 645–648 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brito, M. G., Costa, C., Vendas, D. & Serranheira, F. Soil contamination and human health risk assessment at a former industrial site in a densely populated urban area. Proceeding: Conference on Modelling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies, Portugal (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Natal–da–Luz, T., Römbke, J. & Sousa, J. P. Avoidance tests in site–specific risk assessment–influence of soil properties on the avoidance response of collembola and earthworms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27, 1112–1117 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Silva, P. M. C. S. in Pesticide effects on earthworms. A tropical perspective (VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van den Brink, P. J. et al. in Environmental and human risk of pesticide use in Thailand and Sri Lanka (Results of a preliminary risk assessment. Alterra–report 789. MAMAS Report Series No. 3/2003) (Wageningen: Alterra, The Netherlands, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Damalas, C. A. & Eleftherohorinos, I. G. Pesticide Exposure, Safety Issues, and Risk Assessment Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Healt. 8, 1402–1419 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. US–EPA. Pesticide fact sheet No 72: monocrotophos, https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/tiff2png.cgi/91024KQL. PNG?–r+75+–g+7+D%3A%5CZYFILES%5CINDEX% 20DATA%5C86THRU90%5CTIFF% 5C00003461%5C91024KQL.TIF (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous. in Health implications from Monocrotophos use: a review of the evidence in India (WHO publications, Regional Office of South–East Asis: New Delhi, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts, B. L. & Dorough, H. W. Relative toxicities of chemicals to the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 3, 67–78 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao, J. V. & Kavitha, P. Toxicity of azodrin on the morphology and acetylcholinesterase activity of the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Environ. Res. 96, 323–327 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Filipek–Mazur, B., Mazur, K. & Gondek, K. Studies on fertilizer value of vermicomposts. Part II. The effect of vermicomposts composition of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej, Szczecin, 211, Rolnictw. 84, 297–302 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. OECD. Organization for Economic Co–operation and Development: OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Test No. 207: Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests, https://www.oecd–ilibrary.org/environment/test–no–207–earthworm–acute–toxicity–tests_9789264070042–en (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. OECD. Organisation for Economic Co–operation and Development: (OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/oecd. asp (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Humason, G. L. in Animal tissue techniques (W. H. Freeman and Company, USA, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zar, J. H. in Biostatistical Analysis (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Senthil Kumar Abbiramy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbiramy, S.K., Vinitha, V., Sangeetha, G. et al. Monocrotophos, Its Toxic Effect (dermal) on Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 10, 330–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-018-0381-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-018-0381-1

Keywords

Navigation