The purpose of this study was to show somatotype and physical characteristic differences between elite taekwondo (TKD) athletes and non-athletes. Differences between weight divisions for Gyorugi and Poomsae athletes were also examined. In this study, we first observed 51 elite TKD athletes and 30 non-athletes. The participants were measured with the modified somatotype method of Heath-Carter, resulting in three kinds of somatotypes (endomorph, mesomorph, and ectomorph) and a balanced type (central type). The non-athletes consisted of eight endomorphic, eight mesomorphic, seven ectomorphic, and seven central types. The TKD athletes consisted of 26 ectomorphic, 14 mesomorphic, six central type, and four endomorphs. Subdividing the Gyorugi athletes somatotypes resulted in seven mesomorphectomorph, five balanced ectomorph, four mesomorphic ectomorph, four endomorphic ectomorph, three central types, two endomorphic mesomorph, two ectomorphic mesomorph, two balanced endomorph, one mesomorphic endomorph, and one mesomorphendomorph, And poomse athletes resulted in four balanced ectomorph, four balanced mesomorph, three central type, three mesomorph-endomorph, two endomorphic ectomorph, one mesomorph-ectomorph, one mesomorphic ectomorph, one endomorphic mesomorph, and one balanced endomorph, respectively. TKD athletes had tall, higher ectomorphic component values than the non-athletes. However, the athletes’ endomorphic and mesomorphic components were lower than in the non-athletes. Furthermore, Gyorugi athletes are taller and more frequently ectomorphic than Poomsae athletes. A lower weight division in Gyorugi athletes was positively correlated with a higher ectomorphic component, but negatively correlated with the endomorphic and mesomorphic components. The −80 kg class had the highest mesomorphic component value and the lowest endomorphic component value. Our study provides, in part, physical characteristics of TKD athletes to establish a reference for the study of sports health sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Cular, D., Munivrana, G. & Katić, R. Anthropological analysis of taekwondo-new methodological approach. Coll. Antropol. 37, 9–18 (2013).
Ziaee, V., Rahmani, S. H. & Rostami, M. Injury rates in Iranian taekwondo athletes; a prospective study. Asian J. Sports Med. 1, 23–28 (2010).
Lee, K. T. et al. Extensor hallucis longus tendon injury in taekwondo athletes. Phys. Ther. Sport. 10, 101–104 (2009).
Kazemi, M. et al. A profile of Olympic taekwondo competitors. J. Sports Sci. Med. 5, 114–121 (2006).
Cular, D., Krstulovic, S. & Janovic, M. The differences between medalists and non-medalists at the 2008 Olympic games taekwondo tournament. Hum. Mov. 12, 165–170 (2011).
Estevan, I. et al. Effect of Olympic weight category on performance in the roundhouse kick to the head in taekwondo. J. Hum. Kinet. 31, 37–43 (2012).
Noh, J. W., Kim, J. H. & Kim, J. Somatotype analysis of Korean wrestling athletes compared with non-athletes for sports health sciences. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 5, 163–168 (2013).
Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. A comparison of somatotype methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 24, 87–99 (1966).
Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. A modified somatotype method. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 27, 57–74 (1967).
Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. Growth and somatotype patterns of Manus children, territory of Papua and New Guinea: application of a modified somatotype method to the study of growth patterns. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 35, 49–67 (1971).
Charzewski, J., Glaz, A. & Kuzmicki, S. Somatotype characteristics of elite European wrestlers. Biol. Sport. 8, 213–221 (1991).
Krawczyk, B., Sklad, M. & Jackiewicz, A. Heath-carter somatotypes of athletes representing various sports. Biol. Sport. 14, 243–250 (1997).
Fong, S. S. & Ng, G. Y. Does taekwondo training improve physical fitness? Phys. Ther. Sport. 12, 100–106 (2011).
Sadowski, J. et al. Success factors in elite WTF taekwondo competitors. Arch. Budo. 3, 141–146 (2012).
Chaabène, H. et al. Physical and physiological profile of elite karate athletes. Sports Med. 42, 829–843 (2012).
Fritzsche, J. & Raschka, C. Sports anthropological investigations on somatotypology of elite karateka. Anthropol. Anz. 65, 317–329 (2007).
Koropanovski, N. et al. Anthropometric and physical performance profiles of elite karate kumite and kata competitors. J. Hum. Kinet. 30, 107–114 (2011).
Lewandowska, J. et al. Somatotype variables related to muscle torque and power in judoists. J. Hum. Kinet. 30, 21–28 (2011).
Sterkowicz-Przybycień, K. L., Sterkowicz, S. & Zarów, R. T. Somatotype, body composition and proportionality in polish top greco-roman wrestlers. J. Hum. Kinet. 28, 141–154 (2011).
Andreato, L. V. et al. Morphological profile of Brazilian jiu-jitsu elite athletes. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte. 8, 46–50 (2012).
Kanehisa, H., Kondo, M., Ikegawa, S. & Fukunaga, T. Body composition and isokinetic strength of professional Sumo wrestlers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 77, 352–359 (1998).
Lee, W. D., Lee, L. K., Kim, B. & Kim, J. Differences in body components and the significance of rehabilitation for taekwondo athletes compared to nonathletes. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Sci. 4, 203–208 (2012).
Yang, S. M. et al. Differences in body components and electrical characteristics between youth soccer players and non-athletes. Health. 5, 1010–1015 (2013).
Kim, J. H. et al. Change of muscular activity and dynamic stability of the knee joint due to excessive and repetitive jumping or cutting by female athletes. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24, 715–719 (2012).
These authors contributed equally to this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Noh, JW., Kim, JH. & Kim, J. Somatotype analysis of elite Taekwondo athletes compared to non-athletes for sports health sciences. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 5, 189–196 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-013-0178-1
- Somatotype analysis
- Taekwondo athletes
- Sports health sciences