Aassve, A., Burgess, S., Propper, C., & Dickson, M. (2006). Employment, family union and childbearing decisions in Great Britain. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169, 781–804.
Google Scholar
Andersson, G., & Philipov, D. (2002). Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptions of demographic behavior. Demographic Research, 7, 67–144. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.4
Article
Google Scholar
Andersson, G., Thomson, E., & Duntava, A. (2017). Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century. Demographic Research, 37, 1081–1230. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.35
Article
Google Scholar
Beaujouan, É. (2016). Second unions now more stable than first? A comparison of separation risks by union order in France. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 32, 293–321.
Google Scholar
Beaujouan, É., Berrington, A., Lyons-Amos, M., & Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2014). User guide to the Centre for Population Change GHS database 1979–2009 (Centre for Population Change Working Paper No. 47). Southampton, UK: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for Population Change, University of Southampton.
Google Scholar
Beaujouan, É., Brown, J. J., & Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2011). Reweighting the General Household Survey 1979–2007. Population Trends, 145, 119–145.
Google Scholar
Bernardi, F., & Martínez-Pastor, J.-I. (2011). Divorce risk factors and their variation over time in Spain. Demographic Research, 24, 771–800. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.31
Article
Google Scholar
Berrington, A., Beaujouan, É., Lyons-Amos, M., & Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2011). Evaluation of the partnership histories in the Centre for Population Change GHS time series dataset (ESRC Centre for Population Change Working Paper No. 12). Southampton, UK: ESRC Centre for Population Change, University of Southampton.
Google Scholar
Billari, F. C. (2006). Bridging the gap between micro-demography and macro-demography. In G. Caselli, J. Vallin, & G. Wunsch (Eds.), Demography: Analysis and synthesis: A treatise in population (Vol. 4, pp. 695–707). Burlington, MA: Academic Press (Elsevier).
Google Scholar
Billari, F. C. (2015). Integrating macro- and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change. Population Studies, 69(Suppl. 1), S11–S20.
Google Scholar
Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.
Google Scholar
Bumpass, L., & Raley, R. K. (1995). Redefining single-parent families: Cohabitation and changing family reality. Demography, 32, 97–109.
Google Scholar
Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Cherlin, A. J. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913–927.
Google Scholar
Chevan, A., & Sutherland, M. (2009). Revisiting Das Gupta: Refinement and extension of standardization and decomposition. Demography, 46, 429–449.
Google Scholar
Clarke, L., & Jensen, A.-M. (2004). Children’s risk of parental break-up: Norway and England/Wales compared. Acta Sociologica, 47, 51–69.
Google Scholar
Das Gupta, P. (1993). Standardization and decomposition of rates: A user’s manual (U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series No. P23-186). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
Goodman, A., & Greaves, E. (2010). Cohabitation, marriage and relationship stability (IFS Briefing Note No. BN107). London, UK: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Google Scholar
Härkönen, J., & Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501–517.
Google Scholar
Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, K. B. (2010). Age, relationship status, and the planning status of births. Demographic Research, 23, 365–398. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.13
Article
Google Scholar
Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J. M., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 western countries. Population and Development Review, 29, 47–71.
Google Scholar
Holland, J. A. (2013). Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29, 275–306. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.11
Article
Google Scholar
Holland, J. A. (2017). The timing of marriage vis-à-vis coresidence and childbearing in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research, 36, 609–626. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.20
Article
Google Scholar
Holland, J. A., Perelli-Harris, B., & Andersson, G. (2017). “Does marriage matter?” revisited: The stability, fertility and mortality of the Swedish 1989 Marriage Boom cohort (Stockholm Research Reports in Demography No. 2017:29). Stockholm, Sweden: Demography Unit, Department of Sociology, Stockholm University.
Google Scholar
Jensen, A.-M., & Clausen, S.-E. (2003). Children and family dissolution in Norway: The impact of consensual unions. Childhood, 10, 65–81.
Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19, 1663–1692. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.47
Article
Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Ruggles, S. (2013). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States (Working Paper No. 2013-01). Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center, University of Minneapolis.
Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Ruggles, S. (2014). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography, 51, 587–598.
Google Scholar
Kiernan, K. (1999). Childbearing outside marriage in western Europe. Population Trends, 98, 11–20.
Google Scholar
Kitagawa, E. M. (1955). Components of a difference between two rates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1168–1194.
Google Scholar
Klüsener, S. (2015). Spatial variation in non-marital fertility across Europe in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: Recent trends, persistence of the past, and potential future pathways. History of the Family, 20, 593–628.
Klüsener, S., Perelli-Harris, B., & Sánchez Gassen, N. (2013). Spatial aspects of the rise of nonmarital fertility across Europe since 1960: The role of states and regions in shaping patterns of change. European Journal of Population, 29, 137–165.
Google Scholar
Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 929–942.
Google Scholar
Lichter, D. T., Michelmore, K., Turner, R. N., & Sassler, S. (2016). Pathways to a stable union? Pregnancy and childbearing among cohabiting and married couples. Population Research and Policy Review, 35, 377–399.
Google Scholar
Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 247–260.
Google Scholar
Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989–1002.
Google Scholar
Manning, W. D., Smock, P. J., & Majumdar, D. (2004). The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 135–159.
Google Scholar
Matysiak, A., & Vignoli, D. (2009). Methods for reconciling the micro and the macro in family demography research: A systematization. Studia Demograficzne, 155, 98–109.
Google Scholar
Musick, K., & Michelmore, K. (2015). Change in the stability of marital and cohabiting unions following the birth of a child. Demography, 52, 1453–1485.
Google Scholar
Musick, K., & Michelmore, K. (2018). Cross-national comparisons of union stability in cohabiting and married families with children. Demography, 55, 1389–1421.
Google Scholar
Ní Bhrolcháin, M., Beaujouan, É., & Murphy, M. (2011). Sources of error in reported childlessness in a continuous British household survey. Population Studies, 65, 305–318.
Google Scholar
Ohlsson-Wijk, S. (2011). Sweden’s marriage revival: An analysis of the new-millennium switch from long-term decline to increasing popularity. Population Studies, 65, 183–200.
Google Scholar
Pelletier, D. (2016). The diffusion of cohabitation and children’s risks of family dissolution in Canada. Demographic Research, 35, 1317–1342. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.45
Article
Google Scholar
Perelli-Harris, B., & Bernardi, L. (2015). Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture: Introduction to special collection: “Focus on partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia.” Demographic Research, 33, 701–732. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.25
Google Scholar
Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., & Kubisch, K. (2010a). Harmonized histories: Manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories (MPIDR Working Paper No. WP2010-011). Rostock, Germany: Max Plank Institute for Demographic Research.
Google Scholar
Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Isupova, O.,... Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research, 31, 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34
Article
Google Scholar
Perelli-Harris, B., & Sánchez Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across western Europe. Population and Development Review, 38, 435–467.
Google Scholar
Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., & Berghammer, C. (2010b). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review, 36, 775–801.
Google Scholar
Poortman, A.-R., & Mills, M. (2012). Investments in marriage and cohabitation: The role of legal and interpersonal commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 357–376.
Google Scholar
Rackin, H., & Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2012). The role of pre- and postconception relationships for first-time parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 526–539.
Google Scholar
Rackin, H., & Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2018). Social class divergence in family transitions: The importance of cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 1271–1286.
Google Scholar
Raley, R. K., & Bumpass, L. L. (2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research, 8, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2003.8.8
Article
Google Scholar
Sánchez Gassen, N., & Perelli-Harris, B. (2015). The increase in cohabitation and the role of marital status in family policies: A comparison of 12 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 25, 431–449.
Google Scholar
Sassler, S. (2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491–505.
Google Scholar
Schnor, C. (2014). The effect of union status at first childbirth on union stability: Evidence from eastern and western Germany. European Journal of Population, 30, 129–160.
Google Scholar
Sobotka, T., & Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 85–138. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6
Article
Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.
Google Scholar
Thomson, E., & Eriksson, H. (2013). Register-based estimates of parents’ coresidence in Sweden, 1969–2007. Demographic Research, 29, 1153–1186. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.7
Article
Google Scholar
Thomson, E., & McLanahan, S. S. (2012). Reflections on “Family structure and child well-being: Economic resources vs. parental socialization.” Social Forces, 91, 45–53.
Thornton, A. (2005). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., De Wachter, D., & Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1. Demographic Research, 32, 723–774. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.24
Article
Google Scholar
Winkler-Dworak, M., Beaujouan, É., Di Giulio, P., & Spielauer, M. (2019). Simulating family life courses: An application for Italy, Great Britain, and Scandinavia (VID Working Paper 08/2019). Vienna, Austria: Vienna Institute of Demography, Division for Humanities and Social Sciences, Austrian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.oeaw.ac.at/fileadmin/subsites/Institute/VID/PDF/Publications/Working_Papers/WP2019_08.pdf
Wu, L. L., & Musick, K. (2008). Stability of marital and cohabiting unions following a first birth. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 713–727.
Google Scholar