Skip to main content
Log in

Muslim–Non-Muslim Locational Attainment in Philadelphia: A New Fault Line in Residential Inequality?

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

This study examines Muslim–non-Muslim disparities in locational attainment. We pool data from the 2004, 2006, and 2008 waves of the Public Health Management Corporation’s Southeastern Pennsylvania Household Survey. These data contain respondents’ religious identities and are geocoded at the census-tract level, allowing us to merge American Community Survey data and examine neighborhood-level outcomes to gauge respondents’ locational attainment. Net of controls, our multivariate analyses reveal that among blacks and nonblacks, Muslims live in neighborhoods that have significantly lower shares of whites and greater representations of blacks. Among blacks, Muslims are significantly less likely than non-Muslims to reside in suburbs. The Muslim disadvantages for blacks and nonblacks in neighborhood poverty and neighborhood median income, however, become insignificant. Our results provide support for the tenets of the spatial assimilation and place stratification models and suggest that Muslim–non-Muslim disparities in locational attainment define a new fault line in residential stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Pew Research Center (2015:46–49) used a multistep process of identifying Muslims through a combination of self-reported data on religious affiliation, census data on place of birth for foreign-born individuals, and data on religious composition by country.

  2. To create an indicator of whether the respondent identifies as a Muslim, we use the PHMC survey question, “What is your religious affiliation?”

  3. Similar to other research on locational attainment, we include only measures gauging the percentages non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black in the neighborhood, which gauge each end of the racial and ethnic hierarchy in residential attainment (e.g., Alba and Logan 1993; Logan et al. 1996; South et al. 2011).

References

  • Alba, R., Deane, G., Denton, N., Disha, I., McKenzie, B., & Napierala, J. (2014). The role of immigrant enclaves for Latino residential inequalities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1991). Variation on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in attainment of suburban residence. Demography, 28, 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1993). Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: An individual-level analysis of segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1388–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., Marzan, G., & Zang, W. (1999). Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburban and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review, 64, 446–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No. 07-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arab American Institute. (2008). The 2008 election: How Arab Americans will vote and why. Washington, DC: Arab American Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 931–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein, R. (2017). Muslims as outsiders, enemies, and others: The 2016 presidential election and the politics of religious exclusion. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 5, 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byng, M. (2008). Complex inequalities: The case of Muslim Americans after 9/11. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpusor, A. G., & Loges, W. E. (2006). Rental discrimination and ethnicity in names. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 934–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine, C. (2017). The racialization of Islam in the United States: Islamophobia, hate crimes, and “flying while brown.” Religions, 8(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8090165

  • Cort, D. A. (2011). Reexamining the ethnic hierarchy of locational attainment: Evidence from Los Angeles. Social Science Research, 40, 1521–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). (2009). The status of Muslim civil rights in the United States 2009: Seeking full inclusion. Washington, DC: CAIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). (2017). The empowerment of hate (Civil Rights Report). Washington, DC: CAIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, M. (2016, January 29). What it’s like for Muslims in Philly, “Mecca of the West.” Billy Penn. Retrieved from http://billypenn.com/2016/01/29/what-its-like-for-muslims-in-philly-mecca-of-the-west

  • Dilmaghani, M. (2017). Religious identity and real estate wealth accumulation: Evidence from Canada. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1364714

  • Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71, 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, P., Hartmann, D., Stewart, E., & Gerteis, J. (2016). Atheists and other cultural outsiders: Moral boundaries and the non-religious in the United States. Social Forces, 95, 607–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, G., & Farrell, C. R. (2016). Still large, but narrowing: The sizable decline in racial neighborhood inequality in metropolitan America, 1980–2010. Demography, 53, 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S., & Rosenbaum, E. (2007). Does suburban residence mean better neighborhood conditions for all households? Assessing the influence of nativity status and race/ethnicity. Social Science Research, 36, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, S. M., & Ghoshal, R. (2015). Arab American housing discrimination, ethnic competition, and the contact hypothesis. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660, 282–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, S., & Selod, S. (2015). The racialization of Muslims: Empirical studies of Islamophobia. Critical Sociology, 41, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammich, C., Hadaway, K., Houseal, R., Jones, D. E., Krindatch, A., Stanley, R., & Taylor, R. H. (2012). 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. Lenexa, KS: Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies. Retrieved from http://rcms2010.org/compare.php

  • Hogan, B., & Berry, B. (2011). Racial and ethnic biases in rental housing: An audit study of online apartment listings. City & Community, 10, 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, J. (2009). Residential patterns of Arab Americans: Race, ethnicity and spatial assimilation. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husain, A. (2017). Moving beyond (and back to) the black-white binary: A study of black and white Muslims’ racial positioning in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42, 589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. (2003). Religion and wealth: The role of religious affiliation and participation in early adult asset accumulation. Social Forces, 82, 175–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. (2008). Conservative protestants and wealth: How religion perpetuates asset poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1237–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80, 937–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., Matthews, S. A., Iceland, J., & Firebaugh, G. (2015). Residential inequality: Orientation and overview. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660, 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R. (2014). Separate and unequal in suburbia (Census Brief prepared for Project US2010). Retrieved from https://s4.ad.brown.edu/Projects/Diversity/data/report/report12012014.pdf

  • Logan, J. R., & Alba, R. D. (1993). Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography, 30, 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Alba, R. D., McNulty, T., & Fisher, B. (1996). Making a place in the metropolis: Locational attainment in cities and suburbs. Demography, 33, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Zhang, W., & Alba, R. D. (2002). Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67, 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69, 315–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (2008). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Tannen, J. (2015). A research note on trends in black hypersegregation. Demography, 52, 1025–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Tannen, J. (2018). Suburbanization and segregation in the United States: 1970–2010. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41, 1594–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadolny, T. L. (2016, May 31). Philadelphia schools add two Muslim holidays. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved from https://www.philly.com/philly/education/20160601_Philadelphia_schools_add_two_Muslim_holidays.html

  • National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA). (2017). The case for fair housing: 2017 fair housing trends report. Washington, DC: NFHA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, J., South, S. J., & Crowder, K. (2012). Metropolitan heterogeneity and minority neighborhood attainment: Spatial assimilation or place stratification? Social Problems, 59, 258–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2013). A portrait of Jewish Americans: Findings from a Pew Research Center Survey of U.S. Jews (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2015). The future of world religions: Population growth projections, 2010–2050 (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2016). Religious Landscape Study [Interactive tool]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/metro-area/philadelphia-metro-area/

  • Pew Research Center. (2017). U.S. Muslims concerned about their place in society, but continue to believe in the American dream: Findings from Pew Research Center’s 2017 survey of U.S. Muslims (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (1996). Immigrant America: A portrait (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quartagno, M., & Carpenter, J. (2019). jomo: A Package for Multilevel Joint Modelling Multiple Imputation [Software package]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jomo

  • Reardon, S. F., Bischoff, K., Owens, A., & Townsend, J. B. (2018). Has income segregation really increased? Bias and bias correction in sample-based segregation estimates. Demography, 55, 2129–2160. Data accessed from https://cepa.stanford.edu/content/has-income-segregation-really-increased-bias-and-bias-correction-sample-based-segregation-estimates

  • Rosenbaum, E., & Friedman, S. (2007). The housing divide: How generations of immigrants fare in New York’s housing market. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selod, S. (2015). Citizenship denied: The racialization of Muslim American men and women post-9/11. Critical Sociology, 41, 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Chavez, E. (2005). Migration and spatial assimilation among U.S. Latinos: Classical versus segmented trajectories. Demography, 42, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Pais, J. (2008). Inter-neighborhood migration and spatial assimilation in a multiethnic world: Comparing Latinos, blacks, and Anglos. Social Forces, 87, 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Pais, J. (2011). Metropolitan structure and neighborhood attainment: Exploring intermetropolitan variation in racial residential segregation. Demography, 48, 1263–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., Huang, Y., Spring, A., & Crowder, K. (2016). Neighborhood attainment over the adult life course. American Sociological Review, 81, 1276–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. A., Santos, R., Levy, D. K., Wissoker, D., Aranda, C., Pitingolo, R., & Urban Institute. (2013). Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012 (Report). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T.-C., Matthews, S. A., & Hillemeier, M. M. (2011). Is health care system distrust a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening? Evidence from Philadelphia. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 1297–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this research was provided by a grant to the Center for Social and Demographic Analysis at the University at Albany from NICHD (R24 HD044943). We thank Emily Rosenbaum, Tse-Chuan Yang, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, and Ruby Wang and Hui-Shien Tsao for their programming assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha Friedman.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM1

(PDF 115 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friedman, S., Yucel, R.M., Wynn, C.E. et al. Muslim–Non-Muslim Locational Attainment in Philadelphia: A New Fault Line in Residential Inequality?. Demography 56, 1327–1348 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00797-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00797-z

Keywords

Navigation