Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 285–320 | Cite as

U.S. Mothers’ Long-Term Employment Patterns

  • Alexandra KillewaldEmail author
  • Xiaolin Zhuo
Article

Abstract

Previous research on maternal employment has disproportionately focused on the immediate postpartum period and typically modeled either cross-sectional employment status or time until a specific employment transition. We instead conceptualize maternal employment as a long-term pattern, extending the observation window and embedding employment statuses in temporal context. Using data from NLSY79 and sequence analysis, we document five common employment patterns of American mothers over the first 18 years of maternity. Three typical patterns revolve around a single employment status: full-time (36 %), part-time (13 %), or nonemployment (21 %); the other two patterns are characterized by 6 (15 %) or 11 (14 %) years of nonemployment, followed by a period of transition and then full-time employment. Analyses of the immediate postpartum period cannot distinguish between the nonemployment and reentry groups, which have different employment experiences and different prematernity characteristics. Next, we describe how mothers’ human capital, attitudes and cultural models, family experiences, and race/ethnicity are associated with the employment patterns they follow, elucidating that these characteristics may be associated not only with how much mothers work but also the patterning of their employment. Our results support studying maternal employment as a long-term pattern and employing research approaches that address the qualitative distinctness of these diverse patterns.

Keywords

Motherhood Employment Sequence analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by an Early Career Research Award from the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, and an early version of this manuscript was published as Upjohn Institute Working Paper 15-247 ( https://doi.org/10.17848/wp15-247). We are grateful to Siwei Cheng, Margaret Gough, Ian Lundberg, and Demography reviewers and editors for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The NLSY79 survey is sponsored and directed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and conducted by the Center for Human Resource Research at The Ohio State University. Interviews are conducted by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.

Supplementary material

13524_2018_745_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1.23 mb)
13524_2018_745_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (315 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 314 kb)

References

  1. Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Piccarreta, R. (2007). Strings of adulthood: A sequence analysis of young British women’s work-family trajectories. European Journal of Population, 23, 369–388.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, A., & Hrycak, A. (1990). Measuring resemblance in sequence data: An optimal matching analysis of musicians’ careers. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 144–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aisenbrey, S., & Fasang, A. E. (2010). New life for old ideas: The “second wave” of sequence analysis bringing the “course” back into the life course. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 420–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anyadike-Danes, M., & McVicar, D. (2010). My brilliant career: Characterizing the early labor market trajectories of British women from Generation X. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 482–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biemann, T., Zacher, H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Career patterns: A twenty-year panel study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blair-Loy, M. (1999). Career patterns of executive women in finance: An optimal matching analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1346–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (1997). Swimming upstream: Trends in the gender wage differential in the 1980s. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 393–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boushey, H. (2008). “Opting out?” The effect of children on women’s employment in the United States. Feminist Economics, 14(1), 1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700701716672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2017a). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 appendix 18: Work history data. Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://www.nlsinfo.org/content/cohorts/nlsy79/other-documentation/codebook-supplement/nlsy79-appendix-18-work-history-data
  12. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2017b). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 cohort, 1979–2014 (Rounds 1–26) [Data set]. Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  13. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2017c). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979: Retention & reasons for noninterview. Columbus: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://nlsinfo.org/content/cohorts/nlsy79/intro-to-the-sample/retention-reasons-noninterview
  14. Cha, Y. (2010). Reinforcing separate spheres: The effect of spousal overwork on men’s and women’s employment in dual-earner households. American Sociological Review, 75, 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damaske, S. (2011). For the family? How class and gender shape women’s work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Damaske, S., & Frech, A. (2016). Women’s work pathways across the life course. Demography, 53, 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desai, S., & Waite, L. J. (1991). Women’s employment during pregnancy and after the first birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review, 56, 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drobnič, S. (2000). The effects of children on married and lone mothers’ employment in the United States and (West) Germany. European Sociological Review, 16, 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eggebeen, D. J. (1988). Determinants of maternal employment for white preschool children: 1960–1980. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography, 46, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glass, J. (1988). Job quits and job changes: The effects of young women’s work conditions and family factors. Gender & Society, 2, 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glass, J. L., & Riley, L. (1998). Family responsive policies and employee retention following childbirth. Social Forces, 76, 1401–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halpin, B. (2010). Optimal matching analysis and life-course data: The importance of duration. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Han, S.-K., & Moen, P. (1999). Work and family over time: A life course approach. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 562, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hynes, K., & Clarkberg, M. (2005). Women’s employment patterns during early parenthood: A group-based trajectory analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kimmel, J. (1998). Child care costs as a barrier to employment for single and married mothers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klerman, J. A., & Leibowitz, A. (1994). The work-employment distinction among new mothers. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landivar, L. C. (2013). Labor force participation among Asian, black, Hispanic, and white mothers in 20 occupations. In M. H. Kohlman, D. B. Krieg, & B. J. Dickerson (Eds.), Notions of family: Intersectional perspectives (Vol. 17, pp. 263–286). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  29. Leibowitz, A., & Klerman, J. A. (1995). Explaining changes in married mothers’ employment over time. Demography, 32, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leibowitz, A., Klerman, J. A., & Waite, L. J. (1992). Employment of new mothers and child care choice: Differences by children’s age. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu, Y., Wang, J. S.-H., & Han, W.-J. (2017). Women’s short-term employment trajectories following birth: Patterns, determinants, and variations by race/ethnicity and nativity. Demography, 54, 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malo, M. A., & Muñoz-Bullón, F. (2003). Employment status mobility from a life-cycle perspective: A sequence analysis of work-histories in the BHPS. Demographic Research, 9(article 7), 119–162.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2003.9.7 Google Scholar
  33. McGinn, K. L., Ruiz Castro, M., & Lingo, E. L. (2018). Learning from mum: Cross-national evidence linking maternal employment and adult children’s outcomes. Work, Employment and Society. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760167
  34. Morrill, M. S., & Morrill, T. (2013). Intergenerational links in female labor force participation. Labour Economics, 20, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parker, K., & Wang, W. (2013). Modern parenthood: Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/03/FINAL_modern_parenthood_03-2013.pdf
  36. Reddy, C. K., & Vinzamuri, B. (2013). A survey of partitional and hierarchical clustering algorithms. In C. C. Aggarwal & C. K. Reddy (Eds.), Data clustering: Algorithms and applications (pp. 87–110). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shafer, E. F. (2011). Wives’ relative wages, husbands’ paid work hours, and wives’ labor-force exit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simonson, J., Gordo, L. R., & Titova, N. (2011). Changing employment patterns of women in Germany: How do baby boomers differ from older cohorts? A comparison using sequence analysis. Advances in Life Course Research, 16, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taniguchi, H., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (2002). Women’s employment exit and reentry: Differences among whites, blacks, and Hispanics. Social Science Research, 31, 432–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vandenheuvel, A. (1997). Women’s roles after first birth: Variable or stable? Gender & Society, 11, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wellington, A. J. (1994). Accounting for the male/female wage gap among whites: 1976 and 1985. American Sociological Review, 59, 839–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wenk, D., & Garrett, P. (1992). Having a baby: Some predictions of maternal employment around childbirth. Gender & Society, 6, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yoon, Y.-H., & Waite, L. J. (1994). Converging employment patterns of black, white, and Hispanic women: Return to work after first birth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations