Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 55, Issue 6, pp 2205–2228 | Cite as

Intergenerational Transmission of Multipartner Fertility

  • Trude LappegårdEmail author
  • Elizabeth Thomson
Article

Abstract

Using data from administrative registers for the period 1970–2007 in Norway and Sweden, we investigate the intergenerational transmission of multipartner fertility. We find that men and women with half-siblings are more likely to have children with more than one partner. The differences are greater for those with younger versus older half-siblings, consistent with the additional influence of parental separation that may not arise when one has only older half-siblings. The additional risk for those with both older and younger half-siblings suggests that complexity in childhood family relationships also contributes to multipartner fertility. Only a small part of the intergenerational association is accounted for by education in the first and second generations. The association is to some extent gendered. Half-siblings are associated with a greater risk of women having children with a new partner in comparison with men. In particular, maternal half-siblings are more strongly associated with multipartner fertility than paternal half-siblings only for women.

Keywords

Multipartner fertility Intergenerational transmission Family stability Register data 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway (202442/S20) and the Swedish Research Council through support for the Linneaeus Center for Social Policy and Family Dynamics in Europe (SPaDE) as well as by Stockholm University Demography Unit and Statistics Norway Research department. The register collection, Sweden in Time – Activities and Relations (STAR) is supported in part by grants from the Swedish Research Council. We are grateful for research assistance on the Swedish data from Jani Turunen. The findings and views reported in this article are those of the authors alone.

References

  1. Amato, P. R. (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 628–640.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1038–1051.Google Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R., & Kane, J. B. (2011). Parents’ marital distress, divorce, and remarriage: Links with daughters’ early family formation transitions. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 1073–1103.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, G. (2002). Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS countries. Demographic Research, 7(article 7), 343–364.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson, G., Thomson, E., & Duntava, A. (2017). Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century. Demographic Research, 37(article 35), 1081–1230.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axinn, W. G., Clarkberg, M. E., & Thornton, A. (1994). Family influences on family-size preferences. Demography, 31, 65–79.Google Scholar
  7. Barber, J. S. (2000). Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: Mothers’ preferences for family and non-family behavior. Social Forces, 79, 319–348.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, J. S. (2001). The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women. Social Science Research, 30, 219–247.Google Scholar
  9. Bressan, P., Colarelli, S. M., & Cavalieri, M. B. (2009). Biologically costly altruism depends on emotional closeness among step but not half or full sibling. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 118–132.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, M. J., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multipartnered fertility among urban U.S. parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 718–732.Google Scholar
  11. Carlson, M. J., & Meyer, D. R. (2014). Family complexity: Setting the stage. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 6–11.Google Scholar
  12. Cherlin, A. J. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634–650.Google Scholar
  13. Cherlin, A. J., Kiernan, K. E., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (1995). Parental divorce in childhood and demographic outcomes in young adulthood. Demography, 32, 299–318.Google Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A. J., & Seltzer, J. A. (2014). Family complexity, the family safety net, and public policy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 231–239.Google Scholar
  15. Cooksey, E. C., & Fondell, M. M. (1996). Spending time with his kids: Effects of family structure on fathers’ and children’s lives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 693–707.Google Scholar
  16. Cools, S., & Hart, R. K. (2017). The effect of childhood family size on fertility in adulthood: New evidence from IV estimation. Demography, 54, 23–44.Google Scholar
  17. Diekmann, A., & Engelhardt, H. (1999). The social inheritance of divorce: Effects of parent’s family type in postwar Germany. American Sociological Review, 64, 783–793.Google Scholar
  18. Diekmann, A., & Schmidheiny, K. (2013). The intergenerational transmission of divorce: A fifteen-country study with the fertility and family survey. Comparative Sociology, 12, 211–235.Google Scholar
  19. D’Onofrio, B. M., & Lahey, B. B. (2010). Biosocial influences on the family: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 762–782.Google Scholar
  20. Dronkers, J., & Härkönen, J. (2008). The intergenerational transmission of divorce in cross-national perspective: Results from the Fertility and Family Surveys. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 62, 273–288.Google Scholar
  21. Evenhouse, E., & Reilly, S. (2004). A sibling study of stepchild well-being. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 248–276.Google Scholar
  22. Feng, D., Giarrusso, R., Bengtson, V. L., & Frye, N. (1999). Intergenerational transmission of marital quality and marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 451–463.Google Scholar
  23. Fomby, P., & Bosick, S. J. (2013). Family instability and the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1266–1287.Google Scholar
  24. Fomby, P., Musick, K., & Cross, C. J. (2018, April). Change in children’s family complexity and instability in the United States, 1970–2015. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  25. Furstenberg, F. F. (2014). Fifty years of family change: From consensus to complexity. Annals of the American Association for the Political and Social Sciences, 654, 12–30.Google Scholar
  26. Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., & King, R. B. (1999, April). Multipartnered fertility sequences: Documenting an alternative family form. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  27. Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., Levine, J. A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1990). The children of teenage mothers: Patterns of early childbearing in two generations. Family Planning Perspectives, 22, 54–61.Google Scholar
  28. Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (1988). Do mutual children cement bonds in stepfamilies? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 687–698.Google Scholar
  29. Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (2006). Patterns of exchange and intergenerational responsibilities after divorce and remarriage. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 265–278.Google Scholar
  30. Ginther, D., & Pollak, R. (2004). Family structure and children’s educational outcomes: Blended families, stylized facts, and descriptive regressions. Demography, 41, 671–696.Google Scholar
  31. Glenn, N. D., & Kramer, K. B. (1987). The marriages and divorces of the children of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 811–825.Google Scholar
  32. Gray, E., & Evans, A. (2008). The limitations of understanding multi-partner fertility in Australia. People and Place, 16(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
  33. Guzzo, K. B. (2014). New partners, more kids: Multiple-partner fertility in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 66–86.Google Scholar
  34. Guzzo, K. B., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2007). Multipartner fertility among American men. Demography, 44, 583–601.Google Scholar
  35. Halpern-Meekin, S., & Tach, L. (2008). Heterogeneity in two-parent families and adolescent well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 435–451.Google Scholar
  36. Harcourt, K., Adler-Baeder, F., Erath, S., & Pettit, G. (2015). Examining family structure and half-sibling influence on adolescent well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 250–272.Google Scholar
  37. Härkönen, J., Bernardi, F., & Boertien, D. (2017). Family dynamics and child outcomes: An overview of research and open questions. European Journal of Population, 33, 163–184.Google Scholar
  38. Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection. Demography, 43, 53–77.Google Scholar
  39. Hofferth, S. L., & Anderson, K. G. (2003). Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 213–232.Google Scholar
  40. Hofferth, S. L., & Goldscheider, F. (2010). Family structure and the transition to early parenthood. Demography, 47, 415–437.Google Scholar
  41. Högnäs, R. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2012). “Like parent, like child?”: The intergenerational transmission of nonmarital childbearing. Social Science Research, 41, 1480–1494.Google Scholar
  42. Holland, J. A., & Thomson, E. (2011). Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: Quantum and tempo effects, 1950–99. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 65, 115–128.Google Scholar
  43. Kahn, J. R., & Anderson, K. A. (1992). Intergenerational patterns of teenage fertility. Demography, 29, 39–57.Google Scholar
  44. Kalmijn, M. (2015). Father-child relations after divorce in four European countries: Patterns and determinants. Comparative Population Studies, 40, 251–276.Google Scholar
  45. Kalmijn, M., & Poortman, A.-R. (2006). His or her divorce? The gendered nature of divorce and its determinants. European Sociological Review, 22, 201–214.Google Scholar
  46. Kohler, H.-P., Rodgers, J. L., & Christiansen, K. (1999). Is fertility behavior in our genes? Findings from a Danish twin study. Population and Development Review, 25, 253–288.Google Scholar
  47. Kolk, M. (2014). Multigenerational transmission of family size in contemporary Sweden. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 68, 111–129.Google Scholar
  48. Lappegård, T., & Rønsen, M. (2013). Socioeconomic differentials in multipartner fertility among Norwegian men. Demography, 50, 1135–1153.Google Scholar
  49. Lappegård, T., Rønsen, M., & Skrede, K. (2011). Fatherhood and fertility. Fathering, 9, 103–120.Google Scholar
  50. Lyngstad, T. H., & Engelhardt, H. (2009). The influence of offspring’s sex and age at parents’ divorce on the intergenerational transmission of divorce, Norwegian first marriages 1980–2003. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 63, 173–185.Google Scholar
  51. Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Sykes, J. B. (2014). Family complexity among children in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 48–65.Google Scholar
  52. Manning, W. D., Smock, P. J., & Majumdar, D. (2004). The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 135–159.Google Scholar
  53. Marsiglio, W. (1992). Stepfathers with minor children living at home: Parenting perceptions and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 195–214.Google Scholar
  54. McLanahan, S., & Bumpass, L. (1988). Intergenerational consequences of family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 130–152.Google Scholar
  55. McLanahan, S., & Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 257–276.Google Scholar
  56. Meyer, D. R., Cancian, M., & Cook, S. T. (2005). Multiple-partner fertility: Incidence and implications for child support policy. Social Service Review, 79, 577–601.Google Scholar
  57. Murphy, M., & Knudsen, L. B. (2002). The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: The effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 56, 235–248.Google Scholar
  58. Murphy, M., & Wang, D. (2001). Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population, 17, 75–96.Google Scholar
  59. Pollet, T. V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176–185.Google Scholar
  60. Pope, H., & Mueller, C. W. (1976). The intergenerational transmission of marital instability: Comparisons by race and sex. Journal of Social Issues, 32(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  61. Raley, S., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Does gender of children matter? Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 401–421.Google Scholar
  62. Riise, B. S., Dommermuth, L., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2016). Intergenerational transmission of timing of first birth in Norway. European Societies, 18, 47–69.Google Scholar
  63. Rijken, A. J., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 63, 71–85.Google Scholar
  64. Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  65. Sobotka, T. (2008). Does persistent low fertility threaten the future of European populations? In J. Surkyn, P. Deboosere, & J. van Bavel (Eds.), Demographic challenges for the 21st century (pp. 27-89). Brussels, Belgium: VUB Press.Google Scholar
  66. Statistics Sweden. (2013). Barnafödande i nya relationer [Having children in new relationships] (Demografiska Rapporter No. 2013:2). Stockholm, Sweden: Statistics Sweden, Forecast Institute.Google Scholar
  67. Steenhof, L., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2008). Intergenerational transmission of age at first birth in the Netherlands for birth cohorts born between 1935 and 1984: Evidence from municipal registers. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 62, 69–84.Google Scholar
  68. Stewart, S. (2005a). Boundary ambiguity in stepfamilies. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1002–1029.Google Scholar
  69. Stewart, S. (2005b). How the birth of a child affects involvement with stepchildren. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 461–473.Google Scholar
  70. Strow, C., & Strow, B. (2008). Evidence that the presence of a half-sibling negatively impacts a child’s personal development. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67, 177–206.Google Scholar
  71. Sundström, M. (2013). Growing up in a blended family or stepfamily: What is the impact on education? (SOFI Working Paper 2/2013). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  72. Sweeney, M. (2007). Stepfather families and the emotional well-being of adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48, 33–49.Google Scholar
  73. Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2014). Genetic relatedness predicts contact frequencies with siblings, nieces and nephews: Results from the Generational Transmission in Finland Surveys. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 5–11.Google Scholar
  74. Teachman, J. D. (2004). The childhood living arrangements of children and the characteristics of their marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 86–111.Google Scholar
  75. Thomson, E. (2014). Family complexity in Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 245–258.Google Scholar
  76. Thomson, E., Hanson, T. L., & McLanahan, S. S. (1994). Family structure and child well-being: Economic resources vs. parent socialization. Social Forces, 73, 221–242.Google Scholar
  77. Thomson, E., Hoem, J. M., Vikat, A., Buber, I., Fuernkranz-Prskawetz, A., Toulemon, L., . . . Kantorova, V. (2002). Childbearing in stepfamilies: Whose parity counts? In E. Klijzing & M. Corijn (Eds.), Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe: Insights and lessons from comparative research (Vol. II, pp. 87–99). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.Google Scholar
  78. Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., & Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway and Sweden. Demography, 51, 485–508.Google Scholar
  79. Thomson, E., Mosley, J., Hanson, T. L., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Remarriage, cohabitation and changes in mothering. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 370–380.Google Scholar
  80. Tillman, K. H. (2008a). Coresident sibling composition and the academic ability, expectations, and performance of youth. Sociological Perspectives, 51, 679–711.Google Scholar
  81. Tillman, K. H. (2008b). “Non-traditional” siblings and the academic outcomes of adolescents. Social Science Research, 37, 88–108.Google Scholar
  82. Turunen, J. (2014). Adolescent educational outcomes in blended families: Evidence from Swedish Register Data. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 55, 568–589.Google Scholar
  83. Turunen, J., & Kolk, M. (2017, November). The prevalence of half-siblings over the demographic transition in Northern Sweden 1750–2007. Paper presented at the IUSSP International Population Conference, Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  84. Vikat, A., Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 53, 211–225.Google Scholar
  85. Washington, C. (2018, April). The effects of family structure transitions on young adults’ union instability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  86. White, L., & Riedmann, A. (1992). When the Brady Bunch grows up: Step/half- and fullsibling relationships in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 197–208.Google Scholar
  87. Wolfinger, N. H. (1999). Trends in the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Demography, 36, 415–420.Google Scholar
  88. Wolfinger, N. H. (2000). Beyond the intergenerational transmission of divorce: Do people replicate the patterns of marital instability they grew up with? Journal of Family Issues, 21, 1061–1086.Google Scholar
  89. Wolfinger, N. H. (2005). Understanding the divorce cycle: The children of divorce in their own marriages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Wolfinger, N. H. (2011). More evidence for trends in the intergenerational transmission of divorce: A completed cohort approach using data from the General Social Survey. Demography, 48, 581–592.Google Scholar
  91. Wu, L. L. (1996). Effects of family instability, income, and income instability on the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review, 61, 386–406.Google Scholar
  92. Wu, L. L., & Martinson, B. C. (1993). Family structure and the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review, 58, 210–232.Google Scholar
  93. Zartler, U. (2011). Reassembling family ties after divorce. In E. Widmer & R. Jallinoja (Eds.), Families and kinship in contemporary Europe: Rules and practices of relatedness (pp. 178–191). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Human GeographyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Research DepartmentStatistics NorwayOsloNorway
  3. 3.Demography Unit, Department of SociologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Center for Demography and Ecology, Department of SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations