, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 107–133 | Cite as

Marital Status and Mothers’ Time Use: Childcare, Housework, Leisure, and Sleep

  • Joanna R. PepinEmail author
  • Liana C. Sayer
  • Lynne M. Casper


Assumptions that single mothers are “time poor” compared with married mothers are ubiquitous. We tested theorized associations derived from the time poverty thesis and the gender perspective using the 2003–2012 American Time Use Surveys (ATUS). We found marital status differentiated housework, leisure, and sleep time, but did not influence the amount of time that mothers provided childcare. Net of the number of employment hours, married mothers did more housework and slept less than never-married and divorced mothers, counter to expectations of the time poverty thesis. Never-married and cohabiting mothers reported more total and more sedentary leisure time than married mothers. We assessed the influence of demographic differences among mothers to account for variation in their time use by marital status. Compositional differences explained more than two-thirds of the variance in sedentary leisure time between married and never-married mothers, but only one-third of the variance between married and cohabiting mothers. The larger unexplained gap in leisure quality between cohabiting and married mothers is consistent with the gender perspective.


Marital status Mothers Race/ethnicity Time use Gender 



Support was provided under Grant R24-HD041041 to the Maryland Population Research Center.

Supplementary material

13524_2018_647_MOESM1_ESM.docx (43 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 42 kb)


  1. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 137–173). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biblarz, T. J., & Stacey, J. (2010). How does the gender of parents matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird, C. E., & Rieker, P. P. (2008). Gender and health: The effects of constrained choices and social policies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bittman, M. (2002). Social participation and family welfare: The money and time costs of leisure in Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 36, 408–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L. C., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (2000). The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 79, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). American Time Use Survey user’s guide: Understanding ATUS 2003 to 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  18. Burgard, S. A., & Ailshire, J. A. (2013). Gender and time for sleep among U.S. adults. American Sociological Review, 78, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2010). The stalled revolution: Gender and time allocation in the United States. In B. Mousli & E.-A. Roustang-Stoller (Eds.), Women, feminism, and femininity in the 21st century: French and American perspectives (pp. 55–78). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Casper, L. M., Florian, S., Potts, C., & Brandon, P. D. (2016). Portrait of American grandparent families. In M. Harrington Meyer & Y. Abdul-Malak (Eds.), Grandparenting in the United States (pp. 109–132). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Christopher, K. (2012). Extensive mothering: Employed mothers’ constructions of the good mother. Gender & Society, 26, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clawson, D., & Gerstel, N. (2014). Unequal time: Gender, class, and family in employment schedules. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Cohen, P. N. (2014). The family: Diversity, inequality, and social change. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Cohn, D., Livingston, G., & Wang, W. (2014). After decades of decline, a rise in stay-at-home mothers. Retrieved from
  28. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cooke, L. P., & Baxter, J. (2010). “Families” in international context: Comparing institutional effects across western societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husbands’ participation in domestic labor. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Craig, L. (2005). The money or the care: A comparison of couple and sole parent households’ time allocation to work and children. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 40, 521–540.Google Scholar
  32. Craig, L. (2006). Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children. Gender & Society, 20, 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2013). Parental leisure time: A gender comparison in five countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 20, 329–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Crespo, C. J., Smit, E., Andersen, R. E., Carter-Pokras, O., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2000). Race/ethnicity, social class and their relation to physical inactivity during leisure time: Results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Damaske, S. (2011a). A “major career woman”? How women develop early expectations about work. Gender & Society, 25, 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Damaske, S. (2011b). For the family? How class and gender shape women’s work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Davis, S. N., Greenstein, T. N., & Gerteisen Marks, J. P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1246–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York, NY: Crown.Google Scholar
  39. DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. England, P. (1993). The separative self: Androcentric bias in neoclassical assumptions. In M. A. Ferber & J. A. Nelson (Eds.), Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics (pp. 39–55). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 420–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Flood, S., King, M., Ruggles, S., & Warren, J. R. (2015). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 4.0 [Data set]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
  44. Frey, B. S., Benesch, C., & Stutzer, A. (2007). Does watching TV make us happy? Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gerson, K. (2011). The unfinished revolution: Coming of age in a new era of gender, work, and family. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2009). Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labor. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  47. Grunow, D., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2012). What determines change in the division of housework over the course of marriage? International Sociology, 27, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 700–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hallberg, D., & Klevmarken, A. (2003). Time for children: A study of parent’s time allocation. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hancock, A.-M. (2004). The politics of disgust: The public identity of the welfare queen. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Henderson, K. A. (1990). The meaning of leisure for women: An integrative review of the research. Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hoffman, S. D. (2009). The changing impact of marriage and children on women’s labor force participation. Monthly Labor Review, 132(February), 3–14.Google Scholar
  54. Hook, J. L. (2017). Women’s housework: New tests of time and money. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Jann, B. (2008). The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. Stata Journal, 8, 453–479.Google Scholar
  57. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kendig, S. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2008). Single, cohabitating, and married mothers’ time with children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1228–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19(article 47), 1663–1692. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kimmel, J., & Connelly, R. (2006). Is mothers’ time with their children home production or leisure? (IZA Discussion Paper No. 2058). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  62. Kimmel, J., & Connelly, R. (2007). Mothers’ time choices: Caregiving, leisure, home production, and paid work. Journal of Human Resources, 42, 643–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  64. Levine, J. (2013). Ain’t no trust: How bosses, boyfriends, and bureaucrats fail low-income mothers and why it matters. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lichter, D. T., Sassler, S., & Turner, R. N. (2014). Cohabitation, post-conception unions, and the rise in nonmarital fertility. Social Science Research, 47, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Livingston, G. (2013). At grandmother’s house we stay: One-in-ten children are living with a grandparent. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  67. Macdonald, C. L. (2010). Shadow mothers: Nannies, au pairs, and the micropolitics of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  68. Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2002). First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? A research note. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 1065–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81, 999–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Maume, D. J., Sebastian, R. A., & Bardo, A. R. (2010). Gender, work-family responsibilities, and sleep. Gender & Society, 24, 746–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Milkie, M. A., Mattingly, M. J., Nomaguchi, K. M., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). The time squeeze: Parental statuses and feelings about time with children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 739–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miller, Y. D., & Brown, W. J. (2005). Determinants of active leisure for women with young children—An “ethic of care” prevails. Leisure Sciences, 27, 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nock, S. L., & Kingston, P. W. (1988). Time with children: The impact of couples’ work-time commitments. Social Forces, 67, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14, 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Wagstaff, A., & Lindelow, M. (2008). Analyzing health equity using household survey data: A guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  77. Ortyl, T. A. (2013). Long-term heterosexual cohabiters and attitudes toward marriage. Sociological Quarterly, 54, 584–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Passias, E., Sayer, L. C., & Pepin, J. R. (2017). Who experiences leisure deficits? Mothers’ marital status and leisure time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 1001–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Raley, S., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Sons, daughters, and family processes: Does gender of children matter? Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Raley, S., Bianchi, S. M., & Wang, W. (2012). When do fathers care? Mothers’ economic contribution and fathers’ involvement in child care. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1422–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ray, R. (2014). An intersectional analysis to explaining a lack of physical activity among middle class black women. Sociology Compass, 8, 780–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ray, R. (2015). Black people don’t exercise in my neighborhood: Relationship between perceived racial composition and leisure-time physical activity among middle class blacks and whites. Social Science Research, 66, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Gender as an organizing force in social relations: Implications for the future of inequality. In F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender? (pp. 265–287). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  84. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Salmon, J., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Schmitz, M. K. H., & Booth, M. (2000). Leisure-time, occupational, and household physical activity among professional, skilled, and less-skilled workers and homemakers. Preventive Medicine, 30, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sandberg, J. F., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Changes in children’s time with parents: United States, 1981–1997. Demography, 38, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sanik, M. M., & Mauldin, T. (1986). Single versus two parent families: A comparison of mothers’ time. Family Relations, 35, 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sayer, L. C. (2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces, 84, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sayer, L. C. (2010). Trends in housework. In J. K. Treas & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 19–38). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sayer, L. C. (2016). Trends in women’s and men’s time use, 1965–2012: Back to the future? In S. M. McHale, V. King, J. Van Hook, & A. Booth (Eds.), Gender and couple relationships (pp. 43–78). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sayer, L. C., England, P., Allison, P., & Kangas, N. (2011). She left, he left: How employment and satisfaction affect men’s and women’s decisions to leave marriages. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1982–2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sayer, L. C., & Fine, L. (2011). Racial-ethnic differences in U.S. married women’s and men’s housework. Social Indicators Research, 101, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sayer, L. C., Freedman, V. A., & Bianchi, S. M. (2015). Gender, time use, and aging. In L. K. George & K. F. Ferraro (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (8th ed., pp. 163–180). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  95. Schoen, R., & Cheng, Y. A. (2006). Partner choice and the differential retreat from marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Shaw, S. M. (2008). Family leisure and changing ideologies of parenthood. Sociology Compass, 2, 688–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1993). Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stewart, J. (2013). To Tobit or not Tobit? Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 38, 263–290.Google Scholar
  102. Stone, P. (2007). Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  103. Sweeney, M. M., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and the changing context of childbearing in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. U. S. Census Bureau. (2015). Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  106. van der Ploeg, H. P., Merom, D., Chau, J. Y., Bittman, M., Trost, S. G., & Bauman, A. E. (2010). Advances in population surveillance for physical activity and sedentary behavior: Reliability and validity of time use surveys. American Journal of Epidemiology, 172, 1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vernon, V. (2010). Marriage: For love, for money . . . and for time? Review of Economics of the Household, 8, 433–457.Google Scholar
  108. Vespa, J., Lewis, J. M., & Kreider, R. M. (2013). America’s families and living arrangements: 2012—Population characteristics (Report No. P20-570). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  109. Vickery, C. (1977). The time-poor: A new look at poverty. Journal of Human Resources, 12, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wearing, B., & Wearing, S. (1988). ‘All in a day’s leisure’: Gender and the concept of leisure. Leisure Studies, 7, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Weichselbaumer, D., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2005). A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 479–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Williams, K., Sassler, S., Frech, A., Addo, F., & Cooksey, E. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing, union history, and women’s health at midlife. American Sociological Review, 76, 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Zick, C. D., & Bryant, W. K. (1996). A new look at parents’ time spent in child care: Primary and secondary time use. Social Science Research, 25, 260–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna R. Pepin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Liana C. Sayer
    • 2
  • Lynne M. Casper
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations