Health Endowment at Birth and Variation in Intergenerational Economic Mobility: Evidence From U.S. County Birth Cohorts
New estimates of intergenerational economic mobility reveal substantial variation in the spatial distribution of opportunity in the United States. Efforts to explain this variation in economic mobility have conspicuously omitted health despite it being a key pathway for the transmission of economic position across generations. We begin to fill this gap in the literature by examining the relationship between health endowment at birth and intergenerational economic mobility across county birth cohorts in the United States, drawing on estimates from two population-level data sets. Exploiting variation across counties and over time, we find a negative relationship between the incidence of low-weight births and the level of economic mobility as measured in adulthood for the county birth cohorts in our sample. Our results build on a large and growing literature detailing the role of early childhood health in the transmission of economic status across generations and suggest that the incidence of low-weight births is negatively associated with intergenerational economic mobility.
KeywordsBirth weight Mobility Inequality Health
The authors thank Christopher Jencks, Jason Beckfield, Bruce Western, Lisa Berkman, Ichiro Kawachi, and Simo Goshev for their comments and support. Cassandra Robertson thanks the Doris Duke Fellowship for the Promotion of Child Wellbeing for their generous support. This research was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars program and a core grant to the Center for Demography and Ecology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison (P2C HD047873).
- Almond, D., Chay, K. Y., & Lee, D. S. (2005). The costs of low birth weight. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1031–1083.Google Scholar
- Chetty, R., & Hendren, R. (2017). The effects of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility II: County-level estimates (NBER Working Paper No. 23002). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., Saez, E., & Turner, N. (2014b). Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility. American Economic Review, 104(5), 141–147.Google Scholar
- Currie, J. (2011). Inequality at birth: Some causes and consequences. American Economic Review, 101(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
- Figlio, D. N., Guryan, J., Karbownik, K., & Roth, J. (2013). The effects of poor neonatal health on children’s cognitive development (NBER Working Paper No. 18846). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Leigh, J., & Liu, E. (2016). Maternal education, parental investment and non-cognitive skills in rural China (NBER Working Paper No. 22233). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Royer, H. (2009). Separated at girth: US twin estimates of the effects of birth weight. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(1), 49–85.Google Scholar
- Solon, G. R. (1992). Intergenerational income mobility in the United States. American Economic Review, 82, 393–408.Google Scholar
- Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, D. J. (1992). Regression toward mediocrity in economic stature. American Economic Review, 82, 409–429.Google Scholar