, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 341–359 | Cite as

How We Fall Apart: Similarities of Human Aging in 10 European Countries

  • Ana Lucia Abeliansky
  • Holger Strulik


We analyze human aging—understood as health deficit accumulation—for a panel of European individuals, using four waves of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE data set) and constructing a health deficit index. Results from log-linear regressions suggest that, on average, elderly European men and women develop approximately 2.5 % more health deficits from one birthday to the next. In nonlinear regressions (akin to the Gompertz-Makeham model), however, we find much greater rates of aging and large differences between men and women as well as between countries. Interestingly, these differences follow a particular regularity (akin to the compensation effect of mortality) and suggest an age at which average health deficits converge for men and women and across countries. This age, which may be associated with human life span, is estimated as 102 ± 2.6 years.


Aging Health deficit index Europe Gender differences Human life span 



We would like to thank Kenneth Harttgen, Arnold Mitnitski, and Sebastian Vollmer for helpful comments. This article uses data from SHARE Waves 1, 2, 4, and 5 (DOIs:,,,; see Börsch-Supan et al. (2013) for methodological details. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and FP7 (SHARE-PREP: N.211909, SHARE-LEAP: N. 227822, SHARE M4: N.261982). Additional funding from the German Ministry of Education and Research, the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01-AG09740-13S2, P01-AG005842, P01-AG08291, P30-AG12815, R21-AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG-BSR06-11, OGHA-04-064), and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see

Supplementary material

13524_2017_641_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (219 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 219 kb)


  1. Arking, R. (2006). The biology of aging: Observations and principles. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, R. E., & Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical theory of reliability and life testing: Probability models. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, S., Song, X., Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K. (2013). A limit to frailty in very old, community-dwelling people: A secondary analysis of the Chinese Longitudinal Health and Longevity Study. Age and Ageing, 42, 372–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird, C. E., & Rieker, P. P. (1999). Gender matters: An integrated model for understanding men’s and women’s health. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Börsch-Supan, A., Brugiavini, A., Jürges, H., Kapteyn, A., Mackenbach, J., Siegrist, J., & Weber, G. (Eds.). (2008). First results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (2004–2007). Starting the longitudinal dimension. Mannheim, Germany: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.Google Scholar
  6. Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., . . . Zuber, S. (2013). Data resource profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 992–1001. Google Scholar
  7. Börsch-Supan, A., & Jürges, H. (Eds.). (2005). The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe—Methodology. Mannheim, Germany: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.Google Scholar
  8. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brugiavini, A., Cavapozzi, D., Pasini, G., & Trevisan, E. (2013). Working life histories from SHARELIFE: A retrospective panel (SHARE Working Paper Series: 11-2013). Munich, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  10. Carey, J. R. (2003). Life span: A conceptual overview. Population and Development Review, 29, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carnes, B. A., & Olshansky, S. J. (2007). A realist view of aging, mortality, and future longevity. Population and Development Review, 33, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Case, A., & Paxson, C. (2005). Sex differences in morbidity and mortality. Demography, 42, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Contoyannis, P., Jones, A. M., & Rice, N. (2004). The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 473–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finch, C. E., & Pike, M. C. (1996). Maximum life span predictions from the Gompertz mortality model. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 51A, B183–B194.Google Scholar
  15. Finkelstein, M. S. (2008). Failure rate modeling for risk and reliability. London, UK: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Fries, J. F. (1980). Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gavrilov, L. A., & Gavrilova, N. S. (1991). The biology of human life span: A quantitative approach. London, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Gompertz, B. (1825). On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 115, 513–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80, 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gruber, S., Hunkler, C., & Stuck, S. (2014). Generating easy SHARE: Guidelines, structure, content and programming (SHARE Working Paper Series No. 17-2014). Munich, Germany: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  21. Harttgen, K., Kowal, P., Strulik, H., Chatterji, S., & Vollmer, S. (2013). Patterns of frailty in older adults: Comparing results from higher and lower income countries using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE). PLoS One, 8(10), e75847. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kulminski, A. M., Culminskaya, I. V., Ukraintseva, S. V., Arbeev, K. G., Land, K. C., & Yashin, A. I. (2008). Sex-specific health deterioration and mortality: The morbidity-mortality paradox over age and time. Experimental Gerontology, 43, 1052–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Makeham, W. M. (1860). On the law of mortality and the construction of annuity tables. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 8, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malter, F., & Börsch-Supan, A. (Eds.). (2013). SHARE Wave 4: Innovations & methodology. Munich, Germany: Mannheim Center for the Economics of Aging, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  25. Malter, F., & Börsch-Supan, A. (Eds.). (2015). SHARE Wave 5: Innovations & methodology. Munich, Germany: Mannheim Center for the Economics of Aging, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  26. Masoro, E. J. (2006). Are age-associated diseases an integral part of aging? In E. J. Masoro & S. N. Austad (Eds.), Handbook of the biology of aging (6th ed., pp. 43–62). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mitnitski, A. B., Mogilner, A. J., MacKnight, C., & Rockwood, K. (2002a). The accumulation of deficits with age and possible invariants of aging. Scientific World, 2, 1816–1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitnitski, A. B., Mogilner, A. J., MacKnight, C., & Rockwood, K. (2002b). The mortality rate as a function of accumulated deficits in a frailty index. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 123, 1457–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitnitski, A. B., Mogilner, A. J., & Rockwood, K. (2001). Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Scientific World, 1, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K. (2016). The rate of aging: The rate of deficit accumulation does not change over the adult life span. Biogerontology, 17, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Novoseltsev, V. N. (2006). Mathematical modeling in biology: Systems capable to live and die. Automation and Remote Control, 67, 835–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oeppen, J., & Vaupel, J. W. (2002). Broken limits to life expectancy. Science, 296, 1029–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olshansky, S. J., & Carnes, B. A. (1997). Ever since Gompertz. Demography, 34, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pena, F. G., Theou, O., Wallace, L., Brothers, T. D., Gill, T. M., Gahbauer, E. A., . . . Rockwood, K. (2014). Comparison of alternate scoring of variables on the performance of the frailty index. BMC Geriatrics, 14, 25.
  35. Rockwood, K., & Mitnitski, A. (2006). Limits to deficit accumulation in elderly people. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 127, 494–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rockwood, K., & Mitnitski, A. B. (2007). Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 62, 722–727.Google Scholar
  37. Romero-Ortuno, R. (2014). Frailty index in Europeans: Association with determinants of health. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 14, 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Romero-Ortuno, R., & Kenny, R. A. (2012). The frailty index in Europeans: Association with age and mortality. Age and Ageing, 41, 684–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schünemann, J., Strulik, H., & Trimborn, T. (2017). The gender gap in mortality: How much is explained by behavior? Journal of Health Economics, 54, 79–90.Google Scholar
  40. Strehler, B. L., & Mildvan, A. S. (1960). General theory of mortality and aging. Science, 132, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strulik, H., & Vollmer, S. (2013). Long-run trends of human aging and longevity. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 1303–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Theou, O., Brothers, T. D., Mitnitski, A., & Rockwood, K. (2013). Operationalization of frailty using eight commonly used scales and comparison of their ability to predict all-cause mortality. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61, 1537–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Verbeek, M., & Nijman, T. (1992). Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models. International Economic Review, 33, 681–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verbrugge, L. M. (1985). Gender and health: An update on hypotheses and evidence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 156–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waldron, I. (1993). Recent trends in sex mortality ratios for adults in developed countries. Social Science & Medicine, 36, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wardle, J., Haase, A. M., Steptoe, A., Nillapun, M., Jonwutiwes, K., & Bellisie, F. (2004). Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilmoth, J. R., & Robine, J. M. (2003). The world trend in maximum life span. Population and Development Review, 29, 239–257.Google Scholar
  48. Yashin, A. I., Begun, A. S., Boiko, S. I., Ukraintseva, S. V., & Oeppen, J. (2001). The new trends in survival improvement require a revision of traditional gerontological concepts. Experimental Gerontology, 37, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zheng, H. (2014). Aging in the context of cohort evolution and mortality selection. Demography, 51, 1295–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zheng, H., Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2011). Heterogeneity in the Strehler-Mildvan general theory of mortality and aging. Demography, 48, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations