Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 1–31 | Cite as

Sequential Neighborhood Effects: The Effect of Long-Term Exposure to Concentrated Disadvantage on Children’s Reading and Math Test Scores

  • Andrew L. Hicks
  • Mark S. Handcock
  • Narayan Sastry
  • Anne R. PebleyEmail author
Article

Abstract

Prior research has suggested that children living in a disadvantaged neighborhood have lower achievement test scores, but these studies typically have not estimated causal effects that account for neighborhood choice. Recent studies used propensity score methods to account for the endogeneity of neighborhood exposures, comparing disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged neighborhoods. We develop an alternative propensity function approach in which cumulative neighborhood effects are modeled as a continuous treatment variable. This approach offers several advantages. We use our approach to examine the cumulative effects of neighborhood disadvantage on reading and math test scores in Los Angeles. Our substantive results indicate that recency of exposure to disadvantaged neighborhoods may be more important than average exposure for children’s test scores. We conclude that studies of child development should consider both average cumulative neighborhood exposure and the timing of this exposure.

Keywords

Child Development Neighborhoods Residential histories Propensity function models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research began when all authors were affiliated with the California Center for Population Research (CCPR) at UCLA. We greatly appreciate support from CCPR under NICHD Center Grant P2C-HD041022 and from NICHD Grant R25HD076814. It is also partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF, SES-1357619, IIS-1546259) and the NICHD Grant R21HD075714. We are also grateful for assistance from Christine Peterson at RAND and Rachel Veerman at UCLA.

Supplementary material

13524_2017_636_MOESM1_ESM.docx (56 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 56 kb)
13524_2017_636_MOESM2_ESM.docx (145 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 145 kb)

References

  1. Aaronson, D. (1998). Using sibling data to estimate the impact of neighborhoods on children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 915–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarado, S. (2016). Delayed disadvantage: Neighborhood context and child development. Social Forces, 94, 1847–1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aneshensel, C. S., & Sucoff, C. A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briggs, X. d. S., & Keys, B. J. (2009). Has exposure to poor neighbourhoods changed in America? Race, risk and housing locations in two decades. Urban Studies, 46, 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brumback, B. A., Hernán, M. A., Haneuse, S. J., & Robins, J. M. (2004). Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 749–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burdick-Will, J., Ludwig, J., Raudenbush, S., Sampson, R. J., Sanbonmatsu, L., & Sharkey, P. (2011). Converging evidence for neighborhood effects on children’s test scores: An experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational comparison. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 255–276). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Clampet-Lundquist, S., & Massey, D. S. (2008). Neighborhood effects on economic self-sufficiency: A reconsideration of the moving to opportunity experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowder, K., & South, S. J. (2011). Spatial and temporal dimensions of neighborhood effects on high school graduation. Social Science Research, 40, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietz, R. D. (2002). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31, 539–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, G. J., & Murnane, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Duncan, G. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Assessing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development. Educational Psychologist, 34, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupere, V., Leventhal, T., Crosnoe, R., & Dion, E. (2010). Understanding the positive role of neighborhood socioeconomic advantage in achievement: The contribution of the home, child care, and school environments. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1227–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edin, K. (1991). Surviving the welfare system: How AFDC recipients make ends meet in Chicago. Social Problems, 38, 462–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eiland, L., & Romeo, R. (2013). Stress and the developing adolescent brain. Neuroscience, 249, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans, W. N., Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1992). Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 966–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foster, E. M., & McLanahan, S. (1996). An illustration of the use of instrumental variables: Do neighborhood conditions affect a young person’s chance of finishing high school? Psychological Methods, 1, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox, S. E., Levitt, P., & Nelson, C. A., III. (2010). How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture. Child Development, 81, 28–40.Google Scholar
  19. Gennetian, L. A., Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. F., Kling, J. R., Sciandra, M., Ludwig, J., . . . Kessler, R. C. (2012). The long-term effects of moving to opportunity on youth outcomes. Cityscape, 14(2), 137–167.Google Scholar
  20. Geronimus, A., Bound, J., & Ro, A. (2014). Residential mobility across local areas in the United States and the geographic distribution of the healthy population. Demography, 51, 777–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gobillon, L., Selod, H., & Zenou, Y. (2007). The mechanisms of spatial mismatch. Urban Studies, 44, 2401–2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 676–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harding, D. J., Gennetian, L., Winship, C., Sanbonmatsu, L., & Kling, J. R. (2011). Unpacking neighborhood influences on education outcomes: Setting the stage for future research. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 277–298). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1990). Generalized additive models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heckman, J. J. (2011). The economics of inequality: The value of early childhood education. American Educator, 35(1), 31–35.Google Scholar
  26. Hernán, M. Á., Brumback, B., & Robins, J. M. (2000). Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology, 11, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Imai, K., & van Dyk, D. A. (2004). Causal inference with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 854–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, M. I., & Mare, R. D. (2007). Cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements of neighborhood experience and their effects on children. Social Science Research, 36, 590–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janson, L., Fithian, W., & Hastie, T. J. (2015). Effective degrees of freedom: A flawed metaphor. Biometrika, 102, 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jargowsky, P. A., & El Komi, M. (2011). Before or after the bell? School context and neighborhood effects on student achievement. In H. B. Newburger, E. L. Birch, & S. M. Wachter (Eds.), Neighborhood and life chances: How place matters in modern America (pp. 50–72). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, R. C., & Schoeni, R. F. (2011). The influence of early-life events on human capital, health status, and labor market outcomes over the life course. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(3).  https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2521
  32. Jones, M., & Pebley, A. R. (2014). Redefining neighborhoods using common destinations: Social characteristics of activity spaces and home census tracts compared. Demography, 51, 727–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kunz, J., Page, M. E., & Solon, G. (2003). Are point-in-time measures of neighborhood characteristics useful proxies for children’s long-run neighborhood environment? Economics Letters, 79, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manski, C. F. (1995). Identification problems in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. McCoy, D. C., Raver, C. C., & Sharkey, P. (2015). Children’s cognitive performance and selective attention following recent community violence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGrew, K. S., Werder, J. K., & Woodcock, R. W. (1991). WJ-R technical manual: A reference on theory and current research. Chicago, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
  38. Morrison Gutman, L., McLoyd, V. C., & Tokoyawa, T. (2005). Financial strain, neighborhood stress, parenting behaviors, and adolescent adjustment in urban African American families. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pebley, A. R., & Sastry, N. (2004). Neighborhoods, poverty and children’s well-being. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social dimensions of inequality (pp. 119–146). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Peterson, C. E., Pebley, A. R., Sastry, N., Yuhas, K., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Hass, A. C., . . . Bitler, M. P. (2011). The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey, Wave 2. User’s guide and codebook (Working paper WR-240/20-LAFANS). Retrieved from www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2012/RAND_WR240.20.pdf
  41. Peterson, R. D., Krivo, L. J., & Harris, M. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pettit, B., & McLanahan, S. (2003). Residential mobility and children’s social capital: Evidence from an experiment. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 632–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips, M. (2011a). Ethnic and social class disparities in academic skills. In L. M. Stulberg & S. L. Weinberg (Eds.), Diversity in American higher education: Toward a more comprehensive approach (pp. 7–24). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Phillips, M. (2011b). Parenting, time use, and disparities in academic outcomes. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 207–228). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  45. Plotnick, R. D., & Hoffman, S. D. (1999). The effect of neighborhood characteristics on young adult outcomes: Alternative estimates. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 1–18.Google Scholar
  46. Quillian, L. (2003). How long are exposures to poor neighborhoods? The long-term dynamics of entry and exit from poor neighborhoods. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roksa, J., & Potter, D. (2011). Parenting and academic achievement: Intergenerational transmission of educational advantage. Sociology of Education, 84, 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sampson, R. J. (2008). Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 189–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sampson, R. J. (2011). Neighborhood effects, causal mechanisms, and the social structure of the city. In P. Demeulenaere (Ed.), Analytical sociology and social mechanisms (pp. 227–250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Felton, E. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sampson, R, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.Google Scholar
  55. Sampson, R. J., Sharkey, P., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2008). Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 845–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanbonmatsu, L., Kling, J. R., Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2006). Neighborhoods and academic achievement: Results from the moving to opportunity experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 649–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sastry, N. (2012). Neighborhood effects on children’s achievement: A review of recent research. In V. Maholmes & R. B. King (Eds.), Oxford handbook on child development and poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sastry, N., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Adams, J., & Pebley, A. R. (2006). The design of a multilevel survey of children, families, and communities: The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey. Social Science Research, 35, 1000–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sastry, N., & Pebley, A. R. (2003). Non-response in the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey (Labor and Population Working Paper No. DRU-2400/7-LAFANS). Retrieved from www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/drafts/2006/DRU2400.7.pdf
  60. Sastry, N., & Pebley, A. R. (2010). Family and neighborhood sources of socioeconomic inequality in children’s achievement. Demography, 47, 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sharkey, P. (2010). The acute effect of local homicides on children’s cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 11733–11738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sharkey, P., & Faber, J. W. (2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharkey, P. T., Tirado-Strayer, N., Papachristos, A. V., & Raver, C. C. (2012). The effect of local violence on children’s attention and impulse control. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2287–2293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  65. Shonkoff, J. P., Garner, A. S., Committee on the Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care, & Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232–e246.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Small, M. L., Jacobs, E. M., & Massengill, R. P. (2008). Why organizational ties matter for neighborhood effects: Resource access through childcare centers. Social Forces, 87, 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Solon, G., Page, M. E., & Duncan, G. J. (2000). Correlations between neighboring children in their subsequent educational attainment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stoll, M. A., & Covington, K. (2012). Explaining racial/ethnic gaps in spatial mismatch in the US: The primacy of racial segregation. Urban Studies, 49, 2501–2521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tigges, L. M., Browne, I., & Green, G. P. (1998). Social isolation of the urban poor. Sociological Quarterly, 39, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Timberlake, J. M. (2009). Effects of household and neighborhood characteristics on children’s exposure to neighborhood poverty and affluence. Social Science Research, 38, 458–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walker, S. P., Wachs, T. D., Grantham-McGregor, S., Black, M. M., Nelson, C. A., Huffman, S. L., . . . Richter, L. (2011). Inequality in early childhood: Risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet, 378, 1325–1338.Google Scholar
  72. Wheaton, B., & Clarke, P. (2003). Space meets time: Integrating temporal and contextual influences on mental health in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 68, 680–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wo, J. C. (2016). Community context of crime: A longitudinal examination of the effects of local institutions on neighborhood crime. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 1286–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wodtke, G. T. (2013). Duration and timing of exposure to neighborhood poverty and the risk of adolescent parenthood. Demography, 50, 1765–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wodtke, G. T., Harding, D. J., & Elwert, F. (2011). Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective. American Sociological Review, 76, 713–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew L. Hicks
    • 1
  • Mark S. Handcock
    • 2
  • Narayan Sastry
    • 3
  • Anne R. Pebley
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Health Care PolicyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.California Center for Population Research and Department of StatisticsUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Population Studies Center and Survey Research Center Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.California Center for Population Research and Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations