The Astonishing Population Averted by China’s Birth Restrictions: Estimates, Nightmares, and Reprogrammed Ambitions

Abstract

China launched an unprecedented program to control its population in 1971. Experts have dismissed the official estimate of 400 million births averted by this program as greatly exaggerated yet neglect to provide their own estimates. Counterfactual projections based on fertility declines in other countries suggest that China’s program-averted population numbered 360–520 million as of 2015. The low end of this range is based on Vietnam—China’s best national comparator, with a two-child program of its own—and the high end is based on a 16-country comparator selected, ironically, by critics of the official estimate. The latter comparator further implies that China’s one-child program itself averted a population of 400 million by 2015, three-quarters of the total averted population. All such estimates are projected to double by 2060, due mostly to counterfactual population momentum. These and other findings presented herein affirm the astonishing impact of China’s draconian policy choices and challenge the current consensus that rapid socioeconomic progress drove China’s fertility well below two children per family. International comparisons of fertility and income suggest instead that China’s very low fertility arrived two or three decades too soon. If China had not harshly enforced a norm of 1.5-children during the last quarter century, most mothers would have had two children, one-half birth higher than observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some experts propose that “later, longer, fewer” was largely voluntary (Basten and Gu 2013; Hesketh et al. 2005), enjoyed popular support (Zhao 2015), or was the “golden age” of China’s fertility transition (Wang and Cai 2010). Others emphasize its coercive elements (Lavely and Freedman 1990; Mosher 1983; Whyte et al. 2015), a view with which I agree.

  2. 2.

    Around 2001, scholar advocates resolved to eliminate one-child restrictions (Hvistendahl 2010), an agenda that attracted generous support (MacArthur Foundation 2005:46; 2008:40). After the full lifting of one-child quotas in 2015, advocates credited themselves with debunking government claims and criticized unspecified others in the academic community for misinforming policymakers, while themselves presenting conflicting narratives of the program’s impact (Wang et al. 2016:85; Zhao 2015). For example, Wang et al. (2016:85) claimed that, “while playing a limited role in reducing China’s population, the one-child policy . . . has created . . . perhaps as many as 100 million, of China’s 150 million one-child families.”

  3. 3.

    Despite the similarities, Vietnam was demographically unique for its severe shortage of males resulting from the War of Reunification (1965–1975) and its aftermath, which reduced Vietnam’s fertility because of spousal separation, excess male war deaths, incarcerated military officers, and postwar international outmigration of males (Goodkind 1997; Hirschman et al. 1995; Merli 2000).

  4. 4.

    The counterfactual ASFRs also omit China’s ASFRs in 1980 and 1986, instead gradually interpolating China’s ASFRs between 1970 and 2000 (raked annually to match counterfactual TFRs). This violation of ceteris paribus assumptions was required to avoid an overestimation of China’s averted population (of almost 10 % by 2015). Under one-child limits, China’s ASFRs by 1980 became tightly compressed among women in their 20s. Counterfactual TFR assumptions would have raked such compressed ASFRs much higher (at the expense of later childbearing), resulting in an unrealistic acceleration of population growth.

  5. 5.

    Similarly, Sen’s (1999) choice of Kerala as a fertility comparator—an outlier among Indian states with very high levels of education—underestimated China’s program impact.

  6. 6.

    If the intention of the one-child decree was to control population growth, why did China simultaneously relax the later marriage component of “later, longer, fewer”? Among possible answers, the most plausible seems to be that authorities reasoned (incorrectly) that later marriage was rendered demographically irrelevant after the one-child decree was implemented (Banister 1987:159–161).

  7. 7.

    I obtained similar estimates from projections starting in 1980, which required two new fertility trajectories to measure the marginal impact of one-child quotas versus the “later, longer, fewer” program then in place. As noted earlier, China’s fertility under the one-child program (the lower trajectory) would have been at least 15 % lower than observed in the 1980s had it not simultaneously relaxed the minimum age at marriage. Moreover, if China had not enacted the one-child program (the upper trajectory), the TFR should have rebounded toward counterfactual levels.

  8. 8.

    The calculation of “1.8” is informal. The prevalence of only-children is inferred based on past TFRs in urban and rural areas. If 70 % of parents in urban areas around 2013 were only-children, then only 10 % of urban couples were still subject to one-child limits (a 1.9-child norm). If 20 % of rural parents were only-children (and parents with a firstborn daughter were already exempt), then only one-third of rural couples were still subject to one-child limits (a 1.7-child norm).

References

  1. Aird, J. S. (1990). Slaughter of the innocents: Coercive birth control in China. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almond, D., Li, H., & Zhang, S. (2014). Land reform and sex selection in China (NBER Working Paper No. 19). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  3. Associated Press. (2014, January 9). Director Zhang Yimou fined $1.2 million for violating China’s strict children policy.

  4. Banister, J. (1987). China’s changing population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  5. Banister, J. (1992). Vietnam population dynamics and prospects (CIR Staff Paper No. 65). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  6. Basten, S., & Gu, B. (2013). Childbearing preferences, reform of family planning restrictions and the Low Fertility Trap in China (Oxford Centre for Population Research Working Paper No. 61). Oxford, UK: Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford.

  7. Basten, S., & Jiang, Q. (2014). China’s family planning policies: Recent reforms and future prospects. Studies in Family Planning, 45, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker, S. (2013). Has the world really survived the population bomb? (Commentary on “How the world survived the population bomb: Lessons from 50 years of extraordinary demographic history”). Demography, 50, 2173–2181.

  9. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., Hu, L., Liu, Y., Majhal, A., & Yip, W. (2010). The contribution of population health and demographic change on economic growth in China and India. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bloomberg News. (2015, November 8). The new Chinese birth control: Sky high cost of raising kids. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-08/the-new-chinese-birth-control-sky-high-costs-of-raising-kids

  11. Bongaarts, J., & Greenhalgh, S. (1985). An alternative to the one-child policy. Population and Development Review, 11, 585–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, L. R. (1995). Who will feed China? Wake-up call for a small planet. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.

  13. Cai, F., & Wang, D. (2005). China’s demographic transition: Implications for growth. In R. Garnaut & L. Song (Eds.), The China boom and its discontents (pp. 34–52). Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press.

  14. Cai, Y. (2010). China’s below replacement fertility: Government policy or socioeconomic development. Population and Development Review, 36, 419–440.

  15. Chan, A., Kerkvliet, B. J., & Unger, J. (1999). Transforming Asian socialism: China and Vietnam compared. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

  16. Coale, A. (1984). Rapid population change in China, 1952-1982. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  17. Congressional-Executive Commission on China. (2016). Prepared statement of Nicholas Eberstadt. In China’s new ‘‘two–child policy’’ and the continuation of massive crimes against women and children: Hearing before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, One Hundred Fourteenth Congress, First Session, December 3, 2015 (pp. 32–35). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved from https://chrissmith.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2015.12.03_chinas_new_two_child_policy_and_the_continuation_of_massive_crimes_against_women_and_children.pdf

  18. Demick, B. (2015, October 30). Judging China’s one-child policy. New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/chinas-new-two-child-policy

  19. Economist. (2013, May 4). China’s future: Xi Jinping and the Chinese dream. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21577070-vision-chinas-new-president-should-serve-his-people-not-nationalist-state-xi-jinping

  20. Economy, E. C., & Levi, M. (2014). By all means necessary: How China’s resource quest is changing the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  21. Feeney, G., Wang, F., Zhou, M., & Xiao, B. (1989). Recent fertility dynamics in China: Results from the 1987 one percent population survey. Population and Development Review, 15, 297–322.

  22. Feeney, G., & Yuan, J. (1994). Below replacement fertility in China? A closer look at recent evidence. Population Studies, 48, 381–394.

  23. Goodkind, D. (1992). Estimates of averted Chinese births, 1971–1990: Comparisons of fertility decline, family planning policy, and development in six Confucian societies (Research School of Social Sciences Working Papers in Demography No. 38). Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.

  24. Goodkind, D. (1993). New zodiacal influences on Chinese family formation: Taiwan, 1976. Demography, 30, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goodkind, D. (1995). Vietnam’s one-or-two child policy in action. Population and Development Review, 21, 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodkind, D. (1996). Abortion in Vietnam: Measurement, puzzles, and concerns. Studies in Family Planning, 25, 342–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goodkind, D. (1997). The Vietnamese double marriage squeeze. International Migration Review, 31, 108–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodkind, D. (2011). Child underreporting, fertility, and sex ratio imbalance in China. Demography, 48, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goodkind, D. (2015). The claim that China’s fertility restrictions contributed to the use of prenatal sex selection: A sceptical reappraisal. Population Studies, 69, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goodkind, D. (2017, April). 540 million and growing: How demographers missed the astonishing population averted by China’s birth planning restrictions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, IL.

  31. Greenhalgh, S. (2003). Science, modernity, and the making of China’s one-child policy. Population and Development Review, 29, 163–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Greenhalgh, S. (2008). Just one child: Science and policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Greenhalgh, S. (2010). Cultivating global citizens: Population in the rise of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  34. Gu, B., & Cai, Y. (2011). Fertility prospects in China (Expert Paper No. 2011/14). New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

  35. Gu, B., & Wang, F. (Eds.). (2009). An experiment of eight million people: Reports from areas with a two-child policy. Beijing: China Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gu, B., Wang, F., Guo, Z., & Zhang, E. (2007). China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review, 33, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Haughton, J., & Haughton, D. (1995). Son preference in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 26, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hesketh, T., Li, L., & Zhu, W. (2005). The effect of China’s one-child family policy after 25 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 1171–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hirschman, C., Preston, S., & Vu, M. L. (1995). Vietnamese casualties during the American War: A new estimate. Population and Development Review, 21, 783–812.

  40. Hvistendahl, M. (2010). Has China outgrown the one-child policy? Science, 329, 1458–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2015). World economic outlook database. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org

  42. Johnson, K. A. (2016). China’s hidden children: Abandonment, adoption, and the human costs of the one-child policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  43. Jones, G., Straughan, P. T., & Chan, A. (2009). Very low fertility in Pacific Asian countries. In G. Jones, P. Tay Straughan, & A. Chan (Eds.), Ultra-low fertility in Pacific Asia: Trends, causes and policy issues (pp. 1–22). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

  44. Keefer, P. (2007). Dancing with giants: China, India, and the global economy. In L. A. Winters & S. Yusuf (Eds.), Governance and economic growth in China and India (pp. 189–217). Singapore: World Bank and Institute of Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lam, D. (2011). How the world survived the population bomb: Lessons from 50 years of extraordinary demographic history. Demography, 48, 1231–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lavely, W., & Freedman, R. (1990). The origins of the Chinese fertility decline. Demography, 27, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liang, Z. (1979, December). Dui woguo jinhou jishinian renkou fazhan zhanlüe de jidian yijian [Several opinions on China’s population development strategy in the next few decades]. Paper presented at the Population Conference, Chengdu City, China.

  48. Liang, Z. (1985, July). Guanyu wanhun wanyu jia jiange shengyu shidian de jidian shuoming [Explanations of the “late marriage, late childbearing plus spacing” birth experiment]. Speech at the Plenary Meeting of Cadres on making arrangements for the implementation of the “late marriage and late childbearing plus spacing” birth experiment in Yicheng County, Shanxi, China.

  49. MacArthur Foundation. (2005). Report on activities. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

  50. MacArthur Foundation. (2008). Report on activities. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

  51. Merli, M. G. (1998). Underreporting of birth and infant deaths in rural China: Evidence from field research in one county of northern China. China Quarterly, 155, 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Merli, M. G. (2000). Socioeconomic background and war mortality during Vietnam’s wars. Demography, 37, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Merli, M. G., & Morgan, S. P. (2011). Below replacement fertility preferences in Shanghai. Population (English version), 66, 519–542.

  54. Merli, M. G., & Smith, H. L. (2002). Has the Chinese family planning policy been successful in changing fertility preferences? Demography, 39, 557–572.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Morgan, S. P., Guo, Z., & Hayford, S. R. (2009). China’s below-replacement fertility: Recent trends and future prospects. Population and Development Review, 35, 605–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mosher, S. W. (1983). Broken earth: The rural Chinese. London, UK: Free Press.

  57. Nie, Y., & Wyman, R. J. (2005). The one-child policy in Shanghai: Acceptance and internalization. Population and Development Review, 31, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Olesen, A. (2011, October 27). Experts challenge China’s 1-child population claim. Associated Press. http://archive.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2011/10/27/chinas_touting_of_1_child_rules_draws_challenges/

  59. People’s Daily Online. (2011, October 27). 400 million births prevented by one-child policy. China Society. Retrieved from http://en.people.cn/90882/7629166.html

  60. Pielke, R. A., Jr. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  61. Retherford, R. D., Choe, M., Chen, J., Li, X., & Cui, H. (2005). How far has fertility in China really declined? Population and Development Review, 31, 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Scharping, T. (2003). Birth control in China 1949–2000: Population policy and demographic development. London, UK: Routledge.

  63. Scott, J. M. (2008). Threats to biological diversity: Global, continental, local. Moscow: U.S. Geological Survey, Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife, Research Unit, University of Idaho.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

  65. Sen, A. (2015, November 2). Women’s progress outdid China’s one-child policy. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com

  66. Short, S., & Zhai, F. (1998). Looking locally at China’s one-child policy. Studies in Family Planning, 29, 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Smith, H. L. (1994). Nonreporting of births or nonreporting of pregnancies? Some evidence from four rural counties of north China. Demography, 31, 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Smith, H. L., Tu, P., Merli, M. G., & Hereward, M. (1997). Implementation of a demographic and contraceptive surveillance system in four counties in North China. Population Research and Policy Review, 16, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Song, J., & Li, G. (1980). Quantitative research on the problem of population development. Economic Research, 2. (in Chinese)

  70. Tien, H. Y. (1983). China: Demographic billionaire. Population Bulletin, 38(2).

  71. Tien, H. Y. (1991). China’s strategic demographic initiative. New York, NY: Praeger.

  72. United Nations. (2015). World population prospects: The 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables (Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241). New York, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

  73. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). International programs: International data base (Revised July 9). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  74. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2003). Human development report 2003. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  75. Wang, F. (2013, November 19). Bringing an end to a senseless policy: China’s “one-child” rule should be scrapped. New York Times. Accessed from www.nytimes.com

  76. Wang, F., & Cai, Y. (2010). Siyi zhongguoren shi zenmo shaoshengde? [How could China have 400 million averted births?]. Zhongguo Gaige, 7, 85–88. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wang, F., Cai, Y., & Gu, B. (2013). Population, policy, and politics: How will history judge China’s one-child policy? Population and Development Review, 38(Suppl. 1), 115–129.

  78. Wang, F., Gu, B., & Cai, Y. (2016). The end of China’s one-child policy. Studies in Family Planning, 47, 83–86.

  79. Wang, F., & Mason, A. (2005). Demographic dividend and prospects for economic development in China. Paper presented at the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Social and Economic Implications of Changing Population Age Structures, Mexico City, Mexico.

  80. Wang, J. (2006). Estimation of the effects of China’s birth control policy since 1972. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 5, 23–32. (in Chinese)

  81. Wei, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Reexamination of the Yicheng two-child policy. China Journal, 72, 98–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. White, T. (2006). China’s longest campaign: Birth planning in the People’s Republic, 1949–2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  83. Whyte, M. K., Connelly, M., & Mirsky, reply by Kristof, N. D. (2016, June 9). China’s missing children: An exchange. New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/06/09/chinas-missing-children-an-exchange/

  84. Whyte, M. K., & Gu, S. Z. (1987). Popular response to China’s fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 13, 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Whyte, M. K., Wang, F., & Cai, Y. (2015). Challenging myths about China’s one-child policy. China Journal, 74, 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Wolf, A. (1986). The preeminent role of government intervention in China’s family revolution. Population and Development Review, 12, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Womack, B. (2006). China and Vietnam: The politics of asymmetry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  88. Womack, B. (2009). Vietnam and China in an era of economic uncertainty. Asia-Pacific Journal, 36(2). Retrieved from http://apjjf.org/-Brantly-Womack/3214/article.html

  89. Woodside, A. (1988). Vietnam and the Chinese model—A comparative study of Nguyen and Ch’ing civil government in the first half of the nineteenth century (Harvard East Asian Monographs 140). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  90. World Bank. (2016). World Bank databank. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

  91. Xinhua. (1991). Decision on stepping up family planning work. Translated in Foreign Broadcast Information Services. FBIS: CHI-91-119, 33-36.

  92. Xinhua. (2006, March 21). Family planning policy helps prevents 400 million births. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-03/21/content_4328179.htm

  93. Xinhua. (2013, December 28). China formally allows more couple to have second child. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-12/28/c_133002754.htm

  94. Xinhua. (2015, October 29). China to allow two children for all couples. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-10/29/c_134763645.htm

  95. Yang, K., Chen, S., & Wei, J. (2000). Zhongguo jihua shengyu xiaoyi yu touru [The costs and benefit of china’s birth planning]. Beijing, China: People’s Press.

  96. Zeng, Y., Tu, P., Gu, B. C., Xu, Y., Li, B. H., & Li, Y. P. (1993). Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China. Population and Development Review, 19, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Zhang, G. Y., & Zhao, Z. W. (2005). Reexamining China’s fertility puzzle: Data collection and quality over the last two decades. Population and Development Review, 32, 293–321.

  98. Zhang, L., & Yang, X. (1992). China’s population policy. Beijing Review, 35(15), 17–18.

  99. Zhao, X. (1991). How many births were averted in the past 20 years? Paper prepared for the presentation at the International Seminar on Fertility and Contraception of China, Beijing, China.

  100. Zhao, Z. W. (2015). Closing a sociodemographic chapter of Chinese history. Population and Development Review, 41, 681–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Zhao, Z. W., & Chen, W. (2011). China’s far below replacement fertility and its long-term impact: Comments on the preliminary results of the 2010 census. Demographic Research, 25(article 26), 819–836. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.26

  102. Zheng, Z., Cai, Y., Wang, F., & Gu, B. (2009). Below-replacement fertility and childbearing intention in Jiangsu Province, China. Asian Population Studies, 5, 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Zhu, M. (1982). Agricultural production responsibility system and the work of family planning in the rural area. Renkou Yanjiu, 5, 27–31. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is a revision of a Working Paper in Demography at the Australian National University (Goodkind 1992) and reflects the views of the author alone. It does not represent the views of any other institution or organization. The author’s fieldwork in the 1990s in Vietnam, China, and other parts of Confucian Asia was made possible by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. The author gratefully acknowledges the reviewers and Editors of Demography for their extensive comments and guidance, as well as helpful feedback from Christophe Guilmoto, Siri Tellier, Hania Zlotnick, and Peter Donaldson.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Goodkind.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Demographic change parameters used for the projection of China’s population, and total fertility rates for the counterfactual projections

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goodkind, D. The Astonishing Population Averted by China’s Birth Restrictions: Estimates, Nightmares, and Reprogrammed Ambitions. Demography 54, 1375–1400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0595-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • China
  • Birth planning
  • Fertility transition
  • One-child policy
  • Coercion