Demography

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 1319–1350 | Cite as

Productivity, Rank, and Returns in Polygamy

Article
  • 512 Downloads

Abstract

This study sheds light on the development of family structures in a polygamous context with a particular emphasis on wife order, and offers an explanation for the association between outcomes of children and the status of their mothers among wives based on observable maternal characteristics. In a simple framework, I propose that selection into rank among wives with respect to female productivity takes place: highly productive women are more strongly demanded in the marriage market than less productive women, giving them a higher chance of becoming first wives. Furthermore, productivity is positively associated with a wife’s bargained share of family income to be spent on consumption and investment for herself and her offspring because of greater contributions to family income and larger outside options. The findings are empirically supported by a positive relationship between indicators of female productivity and women’s levels of seniority among wives, and by a concise replication of existing evidence relating wife order to children’s educational outcomes in household survey data from rural Ethiopia.

Keywords

Polygamy Rank Wife order Intrahousehold allocation Ethiopia 

References

  1. Akresh, R., Chen, J. J., & Moore, C. T. (2016). Altruism, cooperation, and efficiency: Agricultural production in polygynous households. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 64, 661–696.Google Scholar
  2. Aregu, L., Puskur, R., & Bishop-Sambrook, C. (2011, January). The role of gender in crop value chain in Ethiopia. Paper presented at the Gender and Market Oriented Agriculture Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82, S11–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family (Enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boserup, E. (1970). Woman’s role in economic development. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Carmichael, S. (2011). Marriage and power: Age at first marriage and spousal age gap in lesser developed countries. History of the Family, 16, 416–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham, S. A., Yount, K. M., Engelman, M., & Agree, E. (2013). Returns on lifetime investments in children in Egypt. Demography, 50, 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalton, J. T., & Leung, T. C. (2014). Why is polygyny more prevalent in Western Africa? An African slave trade perspective. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 64, 599–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old age pension and intra-household allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elbedour, S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Caridine, C., & Abu-Saad, H. (2002). The effect of polygamous marital structure on behavioral, emotional, and academic adjustment in children: A comprehensive review of the literature. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elson, D. (1995). Male bias in macro-economics: The case of structural adjustment (2nd ed.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ezeh, A. C. (1997). Polygyny and reproductive behavior in sub-Saharan Africa: A contextual analysis. Demography, 34, 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fafchamps, M., & Quisumbing, A. (2005). Marriage, bequests, and assortative matching in Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53, 347–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenske, J. (2015). African polygamy: Past and present. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, M. A. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, M. A., & Mace, R. (2007). Polygyny, reproductive success and child health in rural Ethiopia: Why marry a married man? Journal of Biosocial Science, 39, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gould, E. D., Moav, O., & Simhon, A. (2008). The mystery of monogamy. American Economic Review, 98, 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hames, R. (1996). Costs and benefits of monogamy and polygyny for Yanomamö women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacoby, H. G. (1995). The economics of polygyny in sub-Saharan Africa: Female productivity and the demand for wives in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 938–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kazianga, H., & Klonner, S. (2009). The intra-household economics of polygyny: Fertility and child mortality in rural Mali (MPRA Paper No. 12859). Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/12859
  22. Kazianga, H., & Wahhaj, Z. (2015, July). Norms of allocation within nuclear and extended-family households. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the meeting of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association and Western Agricultural Economics Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  23. La Ferrara, E. (2003). Kin groups and reciprocity: A model of credit transactions in Ghana. American Economic Review, 93, 1730–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 988–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mammen, K. (2009). All for one or each for her own: Do polygamous families share and share alike? (Working paper). Retrieved from http://www.qc-econ-bba.org/seminarpapers/3-29-12.pdf
  26. Meekers, D. (1992). The process of marriage in African societies: A multiple indicator approach. Population and Development Review, 18, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munro, A., Kebede, B., Tarazona-Gomez, M., & Verschoor, A. (2010). The lion’s share. An experimental analysis of polygamy in northern Nigeria (GRIPS Discussion Paper No. 10–27). Tokyo, Japan: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  28. Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Pitt, M. M., & Khandker, S. R. (1998). The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 958–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qian, N. (2008). Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1251–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strassman, B. I. (1997). Polygyny as a risk factor for child mortality among the Dogon. Current Anthropology, 38, 688–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strauss, J. (1990). Households, communities, and preschool children’s nutrition outcomes: Evidence from rural Côte d’Ivoire. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 38, 231–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strauss, J., & Mehra, K. (1990). Child anthropometry in Côte d’Ivoire: Estimates from two surveys, 1985 and 1986 (LSMS Working Paper No. 51). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  34. Tertilt, M. (2005). Polygyny, fertility, and savings. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 1341–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Timæus, I. M., & Reynar, A. (1998). Polygynists and their wives in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of five Demographic and Health Surveys. Population Studies, 52, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Udry, C., Hoddinott, J., Alderman, H., & Haddad, L. (1995). Gender differentials in farm productivity: Implications for household efficiency and agricultural policy. Food Policy, 20, 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United Nations (2004). World Population Monitoring 2002: Reproductive rights and reproductive health (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.02.XIII.14). New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations.Google Scholar
  38. Uusimaa, J., Moilanen, J. S., Vainionpää, L., Tapanainen, P., Lindholm, P., Nuutinen, M., . . . Majamaa, K. (2007). Prevalence, segregation, and phenotype of the mitochondrial DNA 3243A>G mutation in children. Annals of Neurology, 62, 278–287.Google Scholar
  39. Yohannes, S., Wondafrash, M., Abera, M., & Girma, E. (2011). Duration and determinants of birth interval among women of child bearing age in Southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11(38). doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-38

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Development Research (ZEFb)University of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations