Skip to main content
Log in

Birds of a Feather: Social Bases of Neighborhood Formation in Newark, New Jersey, 1880

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

This study examines the bases of residential segregation in a late nineteenth century American city, recognizing the strong tendency toward homophily within neighborhoods. Our primary question is how ethnicity, social class, nativity, and family composition affect where people live. Segregation is usually studied one dimension at a time, but these social differences are interrelated, and thus a multivariate approach is needed to understand their effects. We find that ethnicity is the main basis of local residential sorting, while occupational standing and, to a lesser degree, family life cycle and nativity also are significant. A second concern is the geographic scale of neighborhoods: in this study, the geographic area within which the characteristics of potential neighbors matter in locational outcomes of individuals. Studies of segregation typically use a single spatial scale, often one determined by the availability of administrative data. We take advantage of a unique data set containing the address and geo-referenced location of every resident. We conclude that it is the most local scale that offers the best prediction of people’s similarity to their neighbors. Adding information at larger scales minimally improves prediction of the person’s location. The 1880 neighborhoods of Newark, New Jersey, were formed as individuals located themselves among similar neighbors on a single street segment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, R., & Logan, J. (1992). Analyzing locational attainments: Constructing individual-level regression models using aggregate data. Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 367–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R., Logan, J., & Stults, B. (2000). How segregated are middle-class African Americans? Social Problems, 47, 543–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1992). Streetwise: Race, class, and changes in an urban community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L., & Rees, P. (1969). The factorial ecology of Calcutta. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 445–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bider, F., & Reimers, D. (1995). All the nations under heaven: An ethnic and racial history of New York City. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, E. (2014). How population structure shapes neighborhood segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 119, 1221–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, E., & Mare, R. (2006). Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 667–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, E., & Mare, R. (2012). Methodological issues in the analysis of residential preferences and residential mobility. Sociological Methodology, 42, 103–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1925). The growth of the city: Introduction to a research project. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 1–46). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaix, B. (2009). Geographic life environments and coronary heart disease: A literature review, theoretical contributions, methodological updates, and a research agenda. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001). Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: A methodological note. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, N., & Massey, D. (1988). Residential segregation of blacks, Hispanics, and Asians by socioeconomic status and generation. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 797–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, R. D. (2002). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31, 539–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, J. O. (1979). Transportation and the shaping of the physical environment in an urban place: Newark, 1820–1900 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). New York University, New York, NY.

  • Duncombe, W., Robbins, M., & Wolf, D. (2001). Retire to where? A discrete choice model of residential location. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, A. J. (1995). Moving day. In K. T. Jackson (Ed.), The encyclopedia of New York City (pp. 778–779). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2111–2124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grannis, R. (2009). From the ground up: How the layered stages of neighbor networks translate geography into neighborhood effects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberg, T. (Ed.). (1981). Philadelphia: Work, space, family and group experience in the nineteenth century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S., & Duncan, G. (1988). Multinomial and conditional logit discrete-choice models in demography. Demography, 25, 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1974). Symbolic communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J., & Wilkes, R. (2006). Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class, and residential segregation. Social Problems, 53, 248–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jargowsky, P. (1996). Take the money and run: Economic segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. American Sociological Review, 61, 984–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. H., & Holloway, S. R. (2001). Scaling ethnic segregation: Causal processes and contingent outcomes in Chinese residential patterns. GeoJournal, 53, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusenbach, M. (2008). A hierarchy of urban communities: Observations on the nested character of place. City & Community, 7, 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R., Matthews, S. A., & O’Sullivan, D. (2008). Beyond the census tract: Patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. American Sociological Review, 73, 766–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1963). Ethnic patterns in American cities. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Alba, R., & Zhang, W. (2002). Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67, 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Jindrich, J., Shin, H., & Zhang, W. (2011). Mapping America in 1880: The Urban Transition Historical GIS Project. Historical Methods, 44, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Stults, B., & Farley, R. (2004). Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: Two decades of change. Demography, 41, 1–22.

  • Mare, R., & Bruch, E. (2003). Spatial inequality, neighborhood mobility, and residential segregation (California Center for Population Research Working Paper, No. 003-03). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Massey, D. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69, 315–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in economics (pp. 105–135). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. In A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickers, & J. W. Weibull (Eds.), Spatial interaction theory and planning models (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. D. (1968). The neighborhood. In R. D. McKenzie (Ed.), On human ecology (pp. 73–83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1921)

  • O’Sullivan, D. (2005, November). Impacts of neighbourhood scale on the dynamics of segregation. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.business.otago.ac.nz/sirc/conferences/2005/06_osullivan.pdf

  • Popper, S. H. (1952). Newark, N. J. 1890–1910: Chapters in the evolution of an American metropolis (Unpublished doctoral thesis). New York University, New York, NY. (Original work published 1921)

  • Quillian, L. (2015). A comparison of traditional and discrete-choice approaches to the analysis of residential mobility and locational attainment. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660, 240–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S., Matthews, S. A., O’Sullivan, D., Lee, B. A., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R., & Bischoff, K. (2008). The geographic scale of metropolitan racial segregation. Demography, 45, 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1990). Metropolis: From the division of labor to urban form. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevky, E., & Bell, W. (1961). Social area analysis. In G. A. Theodorson (Ed.), Studies in human ecology (pp. 226–335). New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobek, M. (1996). Work, status, and income: Men in the American occupational structure since the late nineteenth century. Social Science History, 20, 169–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, S. E., & Logan, J. R. (2013). Using high-resolution population data to identify neighborhoods and establish their boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Arsdol, M. D., Jr., Camilleri, S. F., & Schmid, C. F. (1958). The generality of urban social area indexes. American Sociological Review, 23, 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. B. (1962). Streetcar suburbs: The process of growth in Boston 1870–1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wepman, D. (2002). Immigration: From the founding of Virginia to the closing of Ellis Island. New York, NY: Fact on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1987). American neighborhoods and residential differentiation. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunz, O. (1982). The changing face of inequality: Urbanization, industrial development, and immigrants in Detroit, 1880–1920. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Eastern Sociological Societies, April 2010, and RC28 meeting at Chinese University of Hong Kong, May, 2012. This research was supported by research grants from National Science Foundation (0647584) and National Institutes of Health (1R01HD049493-01A2). The Population Studies and Training Center at Brown University (R24 HD041020) provided general support. The authors have full responsibility for the findings and interpretations reported here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Logan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Logan, J.R., Shin, Hj. Birds of a Feather: Social Bases of Neighborhood Formation in Newark, New Jersey, 1880. Demography 53, 1085–1108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0487-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0487-5

Keywords

Navigation