Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diverging Patterns of Union Transition Among Cohabitors by Race/Ethnicity and Education: Trends and Marital Intentions in the United States

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

The rise of cohabitation in family process among American young adults and declining rates of marriage among cohabitors are considered by some scholars as evidence for the importance of society-wide ideational shifts propelling recent changes in family. With data on two cohabiting cohorts from the NSFG 1995 and 2006–2010, the current study finds that marriage rates among cohabitors have declined steeply among those with no college degree, resulting in growing educational disparities over time. Moreover, there are no differences in marital intentions by education (or race/ethnicity) among recent cohabitors. We discuss how findings of this study speak to the changes in the dynamics of social stratification system in the United States and suggest that institutional and material constraints are at least as important as ideational accounts in understanding family change and family behavior of contemporary young adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 833–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L. (2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Cherlin, A. J. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2014). Labor’s love lost: The rise and fall of the working-class family in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitation. Social Science Research, 39, 766–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D. T., & Jencks, C. (2004). The spread of single-parent families in the United States since 1960 (Faculty Research Working Papers Series No. RWP04-008). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

  • Gerstel, N., & Clawson, D. (2014). Class advantage and the gender divide: Flexibility on the job and at home. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 395–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1991). New families, no families? The transformation of the American home. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, K. B. (2009). Marital intentions and the stability of first cohabitations. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 179–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, K. B. (2014). Trends in cohabitation outcomes: Compositional changes and engagement among never-married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 826–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s–2000s. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, G., & Joyner, K. (2004). Do race and ethnicity matter among friends? Sociological Quarterly, 45, 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19(article 47), 1663–1692. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. L. (2011, March–April). Cohabitation and trends in the structure and stability of children’s family lives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.

  • King, V., & Scott, M. E. (2005). A comparison of cohabiting relationships among older and younger adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jenson (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32, 669–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. J., & van de Kaa, D. (1986). Twee demografische transities? [Two demographic transitions?] In R. J. Lesthaeghe & D. van de Kaa (Eds.), Bevolking: Groei en krimp [Population: Growth and shrinkage] (pp. 9–24). Deventer, The Netherlands: Van Loghum Slaterus.

  • Levy, F. (1998). The new dollars and dreams: American incomes in the late 1990s. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Sassler, S., & Turner, R. N. (2014). Cohabitation, post-conception unions, and the rise in nonmarital fertility. Social Science Research, 47, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D. (2010). Trends in cohabitation: Twenty years of change, 1987–2008 (NCFMR Family Profiles report). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research, Bowling Green State University.

  • Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 247–260.

  • Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (1995). Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors. Demography, 32, 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2002). First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? A research note. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 1065–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R., & Tucker, M. (1992). Thinking for a living: Work, skills, and the future of the American economy. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. P. (2006). Trends in marital dissolution by women’s education in the United States. Demographic Research, 15(article 20), 537–560. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. P., Astone, N. M., & Peters, H. E. (2014). Fewer marriages, more divergence: Marriage projections for millennials to age 40 (Urban Institute research report). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

  • McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., & Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raley, R. K., & Bumpass, L. L. (2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research, 8(article 8), 245–260. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2003.8.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2002). The future of success: Working and living in the new economy. New York, NY: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, S., & Meiksins, P. (2008). Changing contours of work: Jobs and opportunities in the new economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vespa, J. (2014). Historical trends in the marital intentions of one-time and serial cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this research was previously presented at the 2014 meeting of the Population Association of America. We are grateful for helpful comments and suggestions by participants in the PAA session. This research was supported by grant, 5 R24HD042849, Population Research Center, and 5 T32HD007081, Training Program in Population Studies, awarded to the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Opinions reflect those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the granting agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Da-an Dist., Taipei City, 10617, Taiwan

    Janet Chen-Lan Kuo

  2. Department of Sociology and the Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    R. Kelly Raley

Authors
  1. Janet Chen-Lan Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Kelly Raley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Chen-Lan Kuo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, J.CL., Raley, R.K. Diverging Patterns of Union Transition Among Cohabitors by Race/Ethnicity and Education: Trends and Marital Intentions in the United States. Demography 53, 921–935 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0483-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0483-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation