, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 1195–1217 | Cite as

Contraception Use, Abortions, and Births: The Effect of Insurance Mandates

  • Karen MulliganEmail author


Beginning August, 2012, the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) required new private health insurance plans to cover contraceptive methods and counseling without requiring an insured’s copay. The ACA represents the first instance of federally mandated contraception insurance coverage, but 30 U.S. states had already mandated contraceptive insurance coverage through state-level legislation prior to the ACA. This study examines whether mandated insurance coverage of contraception affects contraception use, abortions, and births. I find that mandates increase the likelihood of contraception use by 2.1 percentage points, decrease the abortion rate by 3 %, and have an insignificant impact on the birth rate. The results imply a lower-bound estimate that the ACA will result in approximately 25,000 fewer abortions.


Contraception Insurance Mandates Abortions Affordable Care Act 



I am grateful to the Editor and two anonymous referees for comments that substantially improved this article. I am especially grateful to Jason Abrevaya, Daniel Hamermesh, Sandra Black, and Steve Trejo for their feedback and invaluable guidance. I also thank Mark Hayward, John Smith, and participants at the Labor lunch seminar at UT-Austin for their useful comments and feedback.


  1. Bitler, M., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Health disparities and infertility: Impacts of state-level insurance mandates. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 858–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bitler, M., & Schmidt, L. (2012). Utilization of infertility treatments: The effects of insurance mandates. Demography, 49, 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Culwell, K., & Feinglass, J. (2007). The association of health insurance with use of prescription contraceptives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 226–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2010). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2009 (Current Population Reports, No. P60-238). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  5. Finer, L., & Henshaw, S. (2006). Disparities in the rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gruber, J. (1994). State-mandated benefits and employer-provided health insurance. Journal of Public Economics, 55, 433–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton, B., & McManus, B. (2012). The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Economics, 21, 994–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henne, M., & Bundorf, K. (2008). Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertility and Sterility, 89, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, & Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET). (1999). Employer health benefits: 1999 Annual Survey. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, & Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET). (2003). Employer health benefits: 2003 Annual Survey. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, & Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET). (2010). Health insurance coverage in America, 2009. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, R., Darroch, J., & Henshaw, S. (2002). Contraceptive use among women having abortions in 2000–2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaestner, R., & Simon, K. (2002). Labor market consequences of state health insurance regulation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56, 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kearney, M., & Levine, P. (2009). Subsidized contraception, fertility, and sexual behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics, 9, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levine, P., Trainor, A., & Zimmerman, D. (1996). The effect of Medicaid abortion funding restrictions on abortions, pregnancies and births. Journal of Health Economics., 15, 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang, S., Grossman, D., & Phillips, K. (2011). Women’s out-of-pocket expenditures and dispensing patterns for oral contraceptive pills between 1996 and 2006. Contraception, 83, 528–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mellor, J. (1998). The effect of family planning programs on the fertility of welfare recipients: Evidence from Medicaid claims. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 866–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosher, W., & Jones, J. (2010). Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. (Vital and Health Statistics Report - Series 23, No. 29). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. National Conference of State Legislatures. (n.d.). Insurance coverage for contraception laws. Retrieved from
  20. Planned Parenthood. (n.d.). Birth control. Retrieved from
  21. Postlethwaite, D., Trussell, J., Zoolakis, A., Shabear, R., & Petitti, D. (2007). A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre- and post-benefit change. Contraception, 76, 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt, L. (2007). Effects of infertility treatment insurance mandates on fertility. Journal of Health Economics, 26, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sonfield, A., Gold, R., Frost, J., & Darroch, J. (2004). U.S. insurance coverage of contraceptives and the impact of contraceptive coverage mandates, 2002. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Trussell, J. (2011). Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception, 83, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wolfers, J. (2006). Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. American Economic Review, 96, 1802–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics & FinanceMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations