Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does Schooling Affect Women’s Desired Fertility? Evidence From Malawi, Uganda, and Ethiopia

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Demographic scholarship suggests that schooling plays an important role in transforming fertility preferences in the early stages of fertility decline. However, there is limited evidence on the relationship between schooling and fertility preferences that addresses the endogeneity of schooling. I use the implementation of Universal Primary Education (UPE) policies in Malawi, Uganda, and Ethiopia in the mid-1990s to conduct a fuzzy regression discontinuity analysis of the effect of schooling on women’s desired fertility. Findings indicate that increased schooling reduced women’s ideal family size and very high desired fertility across all three countries. Additional analyses of potential pathways through which schooling could have affected desired fertility suggest some pathways—such as increasing partner’s education—were common across contexts, whereas other pathways were country-specific. This analysis contributes to demographic understandings of the factors influencing individual-level fertility behaviors and thus aggregate-level fertility decline in sub-Saharan Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Primary schooling had a significant negative effect on pregnancy and marriage in Kenya (Duflo et al. 2012; Dupas 2011; Ferre 2009) and Nigeria (Osili and Long 2008), and a negative effect on total fertility in Malawi (Zanin et al. 2015). Secondary schooling had a negative effect on pregnancy and marriage in Malawi (Baird et al. 2010) and Kenya (Ozier 2010), and a negative effect on sexual debut in Uganda (Alsan and Cutler 2013). The literature has focused primarily on adolescent fertility outcomes rather than total fertility, likely because of the long time span needed to observe total fertility. Nonetheless, it is well documented that delays to fertility almost universally result in lower total fertility (Bongaarts 2002).

  2. The primary school gross enrollment rate is defined as total enrollment in primary school divided by the primary age school population. This figure can exceed 100 % if children over primary school age are still in primary school.

  3. I was unable to empirically investigate whether school affected fertility preferences of men because the association between exposure to UPE and years of schooling (the first stage) is not statistically significant for males in Malawi and Uganda. This is likely due to the greater benefit to girls than to boys from the removal of fees (World Bank 2009).

  4. Dates in the Ethiopian data are converted to the Gregorian calendar to ensure comparability with other countries.

  5. Major ethnolinguistic groups were those accounting for at least 10 % of the sample. I focused on ethnolinguistic background rather than ethnic group because of the large number of ethnic groups in these countries. Ethiopia and Uganda had approximately 80 and 40 ethnic groups listed in the DHS, respectively; thus, controlling for individual ethnic groups was problematic because of the small number of respondents in each group. Individual ethnic groups can be classified into broader ethnolinguistic groups sharing common linguistic and sociohistorical roots. Ethnolinguistic background captured ethnic diversity at a higher level of aggregation more suitable to this analysis.

  6. None of the women in the sample gave nonnumeric responses to ideal family size. This was consistent with Bachan and Frye’s (2013) finding that nonnumeric responses to ideal family size have decreased over time in Africa.

  7. I reran analyses using continuous variables that measured the frequency of watching television, reading a newspaper, and listening to radio. Results were substantively unchanged.

  8. In my final model, I did not include the control for time (birth cohort) in the first stage because this caused the birth cohort variable and exposure to UPE variable to be imprecise in the first stage in two of the three countries. This was not surprising given that the exposure to UPE variable was constructed using birth cohort (the simple correlation between exposure to UPE and birth cohort was .83 in Malawi, .82 in Uganda, and .84 in Ethiopia). Nonetheless, in the alternative model specification that controlled for time (birth cohort) in the first stage, exposure to UPE and birth cohort were jointly highly significant in the first stage in all three countries (p < .001), and the second-stage estimates were substantively unchanged (Table 5 in the appendix).

References

  • Ainsworth, M., Beegle, K., & Nyamette, A. (1996). The impact of women’s schooling on fertility and contraceptive use: A study of fourteen sub-Saharan African countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 10, 85–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Samarrai, S., & Zaman, H. (2007). Abolishing school fees in Malawi: The impact on education access and equity. Education Economics, 15, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsan, M. M., & Cutler, D. M. (2013). Girls’ education and HIV risk: Evidence from Uganda. Journal of Health Economics, 32, 863–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avenstrup, R., Liang, X., & Nellemann, S. (2004). Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi and Uganda: Universal primary education and poverty reduction (Research report). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Bachan, L., & Frye, M. (2013). The decline in non-numeric ideal family size: A cross-regional analysis. Unpublished manuscript, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA and University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

  • Baird, S., Chirwa, E., McIntosh, C., & Ozler, B. (2010). The short-term impacts of a schooling conditional cash transfer program on the sexual behavior of young women. Health Economics, 19, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, S., Garfein, R. S., McIntosh, C., & Ozler, B. (2012). Effect of a cash transfer programme for schooling on prevalence of HIV and herpes simplex type 2 in Malawi: A cluster randomised trial. Lancet, 379, 1320–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankole, A., Ahmed, F. H., Neema, S., Ouedraogo, C., & Konyani, S. (2007). Knowledge of correct condom use and consistency of use among adolescents in four countries in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 11, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankole, A., & Singh, S. (1998). Couples’ fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: Hearing the man’s voice. International Family Planning Perspectives, 24, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1981). Treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81, S279–S288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentaouet Kattan, R. (2006). Implementation of free basic education policy (Education Working Paper Series No. 7). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Bentaouet Kattan, R., & Burnett, N. (2004). User fees in primary education (Education for All Working Paper). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Bongaarts, J. (1994). The impact of population policies: Comment. Population and Development Review, 20, 616–620.

  • Bongaarts, J. (2002). The end of the fertility transition in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 28, 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. (2010). The causes of educational differences in fertility in sub-Saharan Africa (Poverty, Gender, and Youth Working Paper No. 20). New York, NY: The Population Council.

  • Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22, 639–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulatao, R. A. (1981). Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions. Demography, 18, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (1976). Toward a restatement of the demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2, 321–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (1980). Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline. Population and Development Review, 6, 225–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro Martin, T. (1995). Women’s education and fertility: Results from 26 Demographic and Health Surveys. Studies in Family Planning, 26, 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., & Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41, 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J. (1973). The demographic transition reconsidered. In Proceedings of the International Population Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 52–72). Liege, Belgium: IUSSP.

  • Cochrane, S. H. (1979). Fertility and education: What do we really know? (World Bank Staff Occasional Papers No. 26). Baltimore, MD and London, UK: The Johns Hopkins University Press for the World Bank.

  • Davies, M., & Macdowall, W. (2006). Health promotion theory. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. (2003). Does cost of schooling affect enrollment by the poor? Universal primary education in Uganda. Economics of Education Review, 22, 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewi, R. K., Suryadarma, D., & Suryahadi, A. (2013). The impact of expansion of television coverage on fertility: Evidence from Indonesia (SMERU Working paper). Jakarta, Indonesia: SMERU Research Institute.

  • Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2012). Education, HIV, and early fertility: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Unpublished manuscript, Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Economics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and Department of Economics, Harvard University Cambridge, MA.

  • Dupas, P. (2011). Do teenagers respond to HIV risk information? Evidence from a field experiment in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning, 6(3), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A., & Crimmins, E. (1985). The fertility revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferré, C. (2009). Age at first child: Does education delay fertility timing? The Case of Kenya (Policy Research Working Paper No. 4833). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Gallant, M., & Maticka-Tyndale, E. (2004). School-based HIV prevention programmes for African youth. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1337–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogan, L. (2008). Universal primary education and school entry in Uganda. Journal of African Economies, 18, 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayford, S. R. (2009). The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography, 46, 765–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayford, S. R., & Agadjanian, V. (2011). Uncertain future, non-numeric preferences and the fertility transition: A case study of rural Mozambique. African Population Studies, 25, 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiland, F., Prskawetz, A., & Sanderson, W. C. (2008). Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data. European Journal of Population, 24, 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, C. (1994). Why fertility changes. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., & Oster, E. (2009). The power of TV: Cable television and women’s status in India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1057–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Hanks, J. (2007). Natural intentions: Fertility decline in the African Demographic and Health Surveys. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1008–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadzamira, E., & Rose, P. (2003). Can free primary education meet the needs of the poor? Evidence from Malawi. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., & van de Walle, E. (1986). Lessons from the past: Policy implications of historical fertility studies. In A. J. Coale & S. C. Watkins (Eds.), The decline of fertility in Europe: The revised proceedings of a conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project (pp. 390–419). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravdal, Ø. (2002). Education and fertility in sub-Saharan Africa: Individual and community effects. Demography, 39, 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Ferrara, E., Chong, A., & Duryea, S. (2012). Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D. (1980). Aiming at a moving target: Period fertility and changing reproductive goals. Population Studies, 34, 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population, 25, 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. B., Kauffman, C. E., & Hewett, P. (2000). The spread of primary schooling in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for fertility change. Population and Development Review, 26, 483–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R. D., & Maralani, V. (2006). The intergenerational effects of changes in women's educational attainments. American Sociological Review, 71, 542–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. O. (1997). Explaining fertility transitions. Demography, 34, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & Oni, G. A. (1987). Desired family size and its determinants among urban Nigerian women: A two-stage analysis. Demography, 24, 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueston, K., Silverman, R., & Glassman, A. (2013). The efficacy of interventions to reduce adolescent childbearing in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. Studies in Family Planning, 44, 369–387.

  • Method, F., Ayele, T., Bonner, C., Horn, N., Meshesha, A., & Talore Abiche, T. (2010). Impact assessment of USAID’s education program in Ethiopia 1994–2009 (USAID Research Report). Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.

  • Moultrie, T. A., & Timaeus, I. M. (2014, May). Rethinking African fertility: The state in, and of, the future sub-Saharan African fertility decline. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston, MA.

  • Mouw, T. (2006). Estimating the causal effect of social capital: A review of the recent research. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olusanya, P. O. (1971). Status differentials in the fertility attitudes of married women in two communities in Western Nigeria. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 19, 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osili, U. O., & Long, B. T. (2008). Does female schooling reduce fertility? Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Development Economics, 87, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozier, O. (2010). The impact of secondary schooling in Kenya: A regression discontinuity analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

  • Pollak, R. A., & Watkins, S. C. (1993). Cultural and economic approaches to fertility: Proper marriage or mesalliance? Population and Development Review, 19, 467–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (1994). Desired fertility and the impact of population policies. Population and Development Review, 20, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (2013). The rebirth of education: Schooling ain’t learning. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, H., Briere, R., & Casterline, J. (Eds.). (1999). The role of diffusion processes in fertility change in developing countries. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, A. P., Hermalin, A. I., & Rosero-Bixby, L. (1993). A new look at the determinants of nonnumeric response to desired family size: The case of Costa Rica. Demography, 30, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, N. B. (1973). A critique of the National Fertility Study. Demography, 10, 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, N. B., & Westoff, C. F. (1967). The trend of expected parity in the United States: 1955, 1960, 1965. Population Index, 33, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., Wright, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2002). A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20, 518–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, 34, 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (1983). Do couples make fertility plans one birth at a time? Demography, 20, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1990). World declaration on education for all and framework for action to meet basic learning needs. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2014). Primary school survival statistics [Database]. Retrieved from http://data.uis.unesco.org/

  • Watkins, S. C. (1991). From provinces into nations: Demographic integration in Western Europe, 1870–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). Abolishing school fees in Africa: Lessons from Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, and Mozambique (Development Practice in Education report). Washington DC: The World Bank and UNICEF.

  • Yeatman, S., Sennott, C., & Culpepper, S. (2013). Young women’s dynamic family size preferences in the context of transitioning fertility. Demography, 50, 1715–1737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanin, L., Radice, R., & Marra, G. (2015). Modelling the impact of women’s education on fertility in Malawi. Journal of Population Economics, 28, 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Background support for this study was provided by the grant Team 1000+ Saving Brains: Economic Impact of Poverty-Related Risk Factors for Cognitive Development and Human Capital “0072-03” provided to the Grantee, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania by Grand Challenges Canada. I am grateful to Jere Behrman, Lawrence Wu, Delia Baldassarri, Jennifer Jennings, Amber Peterman, Florencia Torche, Paula England, Jennifer Hill, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Andrea Behrman.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Second-stage (ivreg) results of the effect of schooling on women's ideal number of children and desire for six or more children including controls for birth cohort in the first stage
Table 6 Naïve OLS estimation of the association between years of schooling and women’s ideal number of children and desire for six or more children
Table 7 Summary statistics of control variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Behrman, J.A. Does Schooling Affect Women’s Desired Fertility? Evidence From Malawi, Uganda, and Ethiopia. Demography 52, 787–809 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0392-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0392-3

Keywords

Navigation