Skip to main content

The Schooling of Offspring and the Survival of Parents

Abstract

Contemporary stratification research on developed societies usually views the intergenerational transmission of educational advantage as a one-way effect from parent to child. However, parents’ investment in their offspring’s schooling may yield significant returns for parents themselves in later life. For instance, well-educated offspring have greater knowledge of health and technology to share with their parents and more financial means to provide for them than do their less-educated counterparts. We use data from the 1992–2006 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to examine whether adult offspring’s educational attainments are associated with parents’ survival in the United States. We show that adult offspring’s educational attainments have independent effects on their parents’ mortality, even after controlling for parents’ own socioeconomic resources. This relationship is more pronounced for deaths that are linked to behavioral factors: most notably, chronic lower respiratory disease and lung cancer. Furthermore, at least part of the association between offspring’s schooling and parents’ survival may be explained by parents’ health behaviors, including smoking and physical activity. These findings suggest that one way to influence the health of the elderly is through their offspring. To harness the full value of schooling for health, then, a family and multigenerational perspective is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Using data from the General Social Survey, Pampel (2005) estimated that among whites, the percentage of ever having smoked peaks for cohorts born 1923–1938. This corresponds well to the main HRS cohort in this analysis: those born 1931–1941. Indeed, a large portion of our sample was born during the early era of smoking. The HRS sample used in this article has a median year of birth of 1934, and more than 45 % of the parents in our sample were born between 1923 and 1938.

  2. 2.

    We use “HRS” to refer to all Health and Retirement Study (HRS) cohorts.

  3. 3.

    Although we consider wealth as a covariate in preliminary analyses, wealth is not included in the models depicted in this article. Parents have the choice either to invest their wealth in their offspring’s schooling and receive the benefit of highly educated offspring in later life, or to hold onto their wealth and use this money to help themselves as they see fit. Wealth is therefore endogenous to offspring’s schooling and may confound the results of this study.

  4. 4.

    This data set (RAND-HRS Data, Version J) is produced by the RAND Center for the Study of Aging, with funding from the National Institute on Aging and the Social Security Administration, Santa Monica, CA (March 2010).

  5. 5.

    We control for current spouse’s educational attainment in order to adjust for another aspect of the respondent’s current socioeconomic status. The correlation for husband’s and wife’s schooling is .60.

  6. 6.

    In these analyses, we include only respondents’ and spouses’ biological, adopted, and stepchildren.

  7. 7.

    Details regarding drops and recoding of the child roster data are available in Online Resource 1.

  8. 8.

    Another way of thinking about offspring’s education as it affects parents is in terms of three component parts: the average offspring’s education (as described herein), the number of offspring from whom parents receive educational benefit, and the number of years that parents were exposed to adult offspring. Parents who have children early will have more years of educational exposure than parents who have their children later, and there may be important benefits associated with each additional year of exposure. In addition, parents with the same average education of offspring may fare differently depending on how many adult offspring they have. In preliminary analyses, we calculated a variable that we termed “cumulative educational exposure” (CEE), which was measured as CEE = number of adult offspring × mean years of education × total years of exposure to adult offspring. However, we found that average educational attainment of offspring was the main factor guiding the association between offspring’s schooling and parental mortality, and we therefore consider only offspring’s attainments in this article.

  9. 9.

    Questions asking about vigorous activity were not asked of the 1993 AHEAD respondents. This variable is treated as missing for these respondents in that wave.

  10. 10.

    Online Resource 2 contains additional details regarding smoking and exercise question wording and availability across waves.

  11. 11.

    In results not shown here, we also included wealth as an additional family-level socioeconomic control. The results from the model with wealth are very similar to those from Model 5 with income alone.

  12. 12.

    In analyses not displayed here, we examined whether the relationship between offspring’s schooling and parental mortality varies by parents’ educational attainment and age. We found no interaction effect of offspring’s and parents’ own educational attainments. More- and less-educated parents benefit to similar degrees from having more-educated offspring. In addition, we found that the association between offspring’s schooling and mortality weakens as parents age.

  13. 13.

    In supplemental analyses, we also incorporated information on health behaviors in our cause-specific hazard models and found that smoking and exercise behaviors explain some of the relationship between offspring’s schooling and parental cause of death, especially lung cancer deaths. (See Table S3.1 in Online Resource 3.) This confirms that these health behaviors play an important role in smoking-related deaths in particular.

  14. 14.

    We thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this to our attention.

References

  1. Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 843–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonsang, E. (2009). Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? Journal of Health Economics, 28, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle, M. H., Sanford, M., Szatman, P., Merikangas, K., & Offord, D. R. (2001). Familial influences of substance use by adolescents and young adults. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92, 206–209.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, M., Mazzocco, M., Scholz, J. K., Seshadri, A. (2006). Tied transfers (Online working paper). Madison: Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin–Madison.

  5. Chang, V. W., & Lauderdale, D. S. (2009). Fundamental cause theory, technological innovation, and health disparities: The case of cholesterol in the era of statins. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2249–2258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Compton, J., & Pollak, R. A. (2009). Proximity and coresidence of adult children and their parents: Description and correlates (Online working paper). Retrieved from http://jenni.uchicago.edu/Spencer_Conference/Representative%20Papers/Pollak_Proximity%20and%20Coresidence.pdf

  9. Couch, K. A., Daly, M. C., & Wolf, D. A. (1999). Time? Money? Both? The allocation of resources to older parents. Demography, 36, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B: Methodological, 34, 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cox, D. R. (1975). Partial likelihood. Biometrika, 62, 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duncan, C., Jones, K., & Moon, G. (1999). Smoking and deprivation: Are there neighborhood effects? Social Science & Medicine, 48, 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eggebeen, D. J., & Hogan, D. P. (1990). Giving between generations in American families. Human Nature, 1, 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elo, I. T. (2009). Social class differentials in health and mortality: Patterns and explanations in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elwert, F., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). The effect of widowhood on mortality by the causes of death of both spouses. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 2092–2098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Escobedo, L. G., & Peddicord, J. P. (1996). Smoking prevalence in US birth cohorts: The influence of gender and education. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 231–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrence, R. G. (1989). Deadly fashion: The rise and fall of cigarette smoking in North America. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Field, E., & de la Roca, J. (2005). Are there upward intergenerational education spillovers? The influence of children’s schooling on parents’ smoking cessation. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

  20. Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal, 337, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giles, J., & Mu, R. (2007). Elderly parent health and the migration decisions of adult children: Evidence from rural China. Demography, 44, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glied, S., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2008). Technological innovation and inequality in health. Demography, 45, 741–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamil-Luker, J., & O’Rand, A. M. (2007). Gender differences in the link between childhood socioeconomic conditions and heart attack risk in adulthood. Demography, 44, 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayward, M. D., & Gorman, B. K. (2004). The long arm of childhood: The influence of early-life social conditions on men’s mortality. Demography, 41, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henretta, J. C., Hill, M. S., Li, W., Soldo, B. J., & Wolf, D. A. (1997). Selection of children to provide care: The effect of earlier parental transfers. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52, 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hogan, D. P., Eggebeen, D. J., & Clogg, C. C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1428–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuh, D., Hardy, R., Langenberg, C., Richards, M., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2002). Mortality in adults aged 26–54 years related to socioeconomic conditions in childhood and adulthood: Post war birth cohort study. British Medical Journal, 325, 1076–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang, J., McCarthy, J. F., Jain, A., Krause, N., Bennett, J. M., & Gu, S. (2000). Socioeconomic gradient in old age mortality in Wuhan, China. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, S222–S233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1995). ’Til death do us part: Marital disruption and mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1131–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Link, B. G. (2008). Epidemiological sociology and the social shaping of population health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49, 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo, Y., Hawkley, L. C., Waite, L. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lutfey, K., & Freese, J. (2005). Toward some fundamentals of fundamental causality: Socioeconomic status and health in the routine clinic visit for diabetes. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1326–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lye, D. N. (1996). Adult child-parent relationships. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lynch, S. M. (2003). Cohort and life-course patterns in the relationship between education and health: A hierarchical approach. Demography, 40, 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mare, R. D. (1990). Socioeconomic careers and differential mortality among older men in the United States. In J. Vallin, S. D’Souza, & A. Palloni (Eds.), Comparative studies of mortality and morbidity: Old and new approaches to measurement and analysis (pp. 362–387). London, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mare, R. D., & Palloni, A. (1988). Couple models for socioeconomic effects on the mortality of older persons (Working Paper 88-07). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology.

  37. McGarry, K. (1998). Caring for the elderly: The role of adult offspring. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Inquiries in the economics of aging (pp. 133–163). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. McGarry, K., & Schoeni, R. F. (1995). Transfer behavior in the health and retirement study. Journal of Human Resources, 30(Suppl.), S184–S226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. S., Stroup, D. F., & Gerberding, J. L. (2004). Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1238–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pampel, F. C. (2005). Diffusion, cohort change, and social patterns of smoking. Social Science Research, 34, 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Phelan, J. C., Link, B. G., & Tehranifar, P. (2010). Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities theory, evidence, and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(Suppl. 1), S28–S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Preston, S. H. (1984). Offspring and the elderly: Divergent paths for America’s dependents. Demography, 21, 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Preston, S. H., & Wang, H. (2006). Sex mortality differences in the United States: The role of cohort smoking patterns. Demography, 43, 631–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rajan, K. B., Lerouz, B. G., Peterson, A. V., Bricker, J. B., & Anderson, M. R. (2003). Nine-year prospective association between older siblings’ smoking and offspring’s daily smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rende, R., Slomkowski, C., Lloyd-Richardson, E., & Niaura, R. (2005). Sibling effects on substance use in adolescence: Social contagion and genetic relatedness. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 611–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rogers, R. G., Nam, C. B., & Hummer, R. A. (1995). Demographic and socioeconomic links to cigarette smoking. Social Biology, 42, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schoeni, R. F. (1997). Private interhousehold transfers of money and time: New empirical evidence. Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 423–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Seeman, T. E., Berkman, L. F., Kohout, F., LaCroix, A., Glynn, R., & Blazer, D. (1993). Intercommunity variations in the association between social ties and mortality in the elderly: A comparative analysis of three communities. Annals of Epidemiology, 3, 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Seeman, T. E., Lusignolo, T. M., Albert, M., & Berkman, L. (2001). Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. Health Psychology, 20, 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Silverstein, M., Conroy, S. J., Wang, H., Giarrusso, R., & Bengtson, V. L. (2002). Reciprocity in parent-child relations over the adult life course. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, S3–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith, J. P., & Kington, R. (1997). Demographic and economic correlates of health in old age. Demography, 34, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Smith, K. R., & Zick, C. D. (1994). Linked lives, dependent demise? Survival analysis of husbands and wives. Demography, 31, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spitze, G., & Logan, J. R. (1990). Sons, daughters, and intergenerational social support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 420–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stoller, E. P. (1983). Parental caregiving by adult offspring. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 851–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Torssander, J. (2013). From child to parent? The significance of children’s education for their parents’ longevity. Demography, 50, 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zick, C. D., & Smith, K. R. (1991). Marital transitions, poverty, and gender differences in mortality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zimmer, Z., Hermalin, A. I., & Lin, H. S. (2002). Whose education counts? The added impact of adult-child education on physical functioning of older Taiwanese. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, S23–S32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zimmer, Z., Martin, L. G., Ofstedal, M. B., & Chuang, Y. L. (2007). Education of adult offspring and mortality of their elderly parents in Taiwan. Demography, 40, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars program and the UCLA Interdisciplinary Relationship Science Program sponsored by the National Science Foundation for their financial support. The authors also benefited from facilities and resources provided by the California Center for Population Research at UCLA (CCPR), which receives core support (R24-HD041022) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). We are grateful to Suzanne Bianchi, Jennie Brand, Arun Karlamangla, Kathleen McGarry, James Raymo, Teresa Seeman, Judith Seltzer, and Ken Smith for helpful advice as we developed the article. Previous versions of this article were presented at the 2008 Research Committee 28 Conference on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC28), Florence, Italy; at the 2009 Population Association of America (PAA), Detroit, MI; and at the 2010 American Sociological Association (ASA), Atlanta, GA.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther M. Friedman.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1

(DOCX 43 kb)

Online Resource 2

(DOCX 73 kb)

Online Resource 3

(DOCX 95 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friedman, E.M., Mare, R.D. The Schooling of Offspring and the Survival of Parents. Demography 51, 1271–1293 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0303-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Education
  • Mortality
  • Intergenerational
  • Survival analysis