Demography

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 149–180 | Cite as

Family Planning and Women’s and Children’s Health: Long-Term Consequences of an Outreach Program in Matlab, Bangladesh

Article

Abstract

We analyze the impact of an experimental maternal and child health and family planning program that was established in Matlab, Bangladesh, in 1977. Village data from 1974, 1982, and 1996 suggest that program villages experienced a decline in fertility of about 17 %. Household data from 1996 confirm that this decline in “surviving fertility” persisted for nearly two decades. Women in program villages also experienced other benefits: increased birth spacing, lower child mortality, improved health status, and greater use of preventive health inputs. Some benefits also diffused beyond the boundaries of the program villages into neighboring comparison villages. These effects are robust to the inclusion of individual, household, and community characteristics. We conclude that the benefits of this reproductive and child health program in rural Bangladesh have many dimensions extending well beyond fertility reduction, which do not appear to dissipate rapidly after two decades.

Keywords

Fertility Family planning Health and development Program evaluation Bangladesh 

References

  1. Abdullah, T., & Zeidenstein, S. (1979). Women’s reality: Critical issues for program design. Studies in Family Planning, 10, 344–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters, 80, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barham, T. (2009). Effects of family planning and child health interventions on adolescent cognitive functioning: Evidence from Matlab in Bangladesh (Working paper). Boulder: Health and Society Program, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1974). Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Economics of the family (pp. 81–90). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullinathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust difference-difference estimates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, L. C., Rahman, M., D’Souza, S., Chakraborty, J., Sarder, A. M., & Yunus, M. (1983). Mortality impact of an MCH-FP program in Matlab Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 14, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeGraff, D. S. (1991). Increasing contraceptive use in Bangladesh: The role of demand and supply factors. Demography, 28, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2008). Using randomization in developing economics research: A toolkit. In T. P. Schultz & J. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3895–3962). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  9. Fauveau, V. (Ed.). (1994). Women, children and health (ICDDR, B, Special Publication No. 35). Dhaka, Bangladesh: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research.Google Scholar
  10. Fauveau, V., Koenig, M. A., & Wojtyniak, B. (1991). Excess female deaths among Bangladesh children. International Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fauveau, V., Wojtuniak, B., Mostafa, G., Sarder, A. M., & Chakraborty, J. (1990). Perinatal mortality in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Epidemiology, 19, 606–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fogel, R. W. (2004). The escape from hunger and premature death, 1700–2100. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster, A., & Roy, N. (2000). The dynamics of education and fertility: Evidence from a family planning experiment (Working paper). Philadelphia, PA: Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  14. Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2001). Women’s health and pregnancy outcomes: Do services make a difference. Demography, 38, 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ICDDR,B, & Centre for Health and Population Research. (2004). Registration of health and demographic events. In Health and demographic surveillance system–Matlab (Vol. 35). Dhaka, Bangladesh: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research.Google Scholar
  16. Joshi, S., & Schultz, T. P. (2007). Family planning as an investment in development: Evaluation of a program’s consequences in Matlab, Bangladesh (Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 951). New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
  17. Koenig, M. A., Fauveau, V., Chowdhury, A. I., Chakraborty, J., & Khan, M. A. (1988). Maternal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: 1976–1985. Studies in Family Planning, 19, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koenig, M. A., Fauveau, V., & Wojtyniak, B. (1991). Mortality reductions from health interventions: The case of immunizations in Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 17, 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koenig, M. A., Khan, M. A., Wojtyniak, B., Clemens, J. D., Chakraborty, J., & Fauveau, V. (1990). Impact of measles vaccination on childhood mortality in rural Bangladesh. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 68, 441–447.Google Scholar
  20. Koenig, M. A., Rob, U., Kahn, M. A., Chakraborty, J., & Fauveau, V. (1992). Contraceptive use in Matlab, Bangladesh in 1990: Levels, trends and explanations. Studies in Family Planning, 23, 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhn, R., Rahman, O., & Menken, J. (2004). Relating self-reported and objective health indicators to adult mortality in Bangladesh (Working Paper PAC 2004–0004). Boulder, CO: Population Aging Center, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  22. LeGrand, T. K., & Phillips, J. F. (1996). The effect of fertility reductions on infant and child mortality: Evidence from Matlab in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 50, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menken, J., Duffy, L., & Kuhn, R. (2003). Childbearing and women’s survival in rural Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 29, 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Menken, J., & Phillips, J. F. (1990). Population change in a rural area of Bangladesh, 1967–87. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 510, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miguel, E. A., & Kremer, M. (2004). Worms: Identifying impacts of education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica, 72, 159–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mincer, J. (1963). Market prices, opportunity costs, and income effects. In C. Christ et al. (Eds.), Measurement in economics (pp. 67–82). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Muhuri, P. K. (1995). Health programs, maternal education and differential child mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 21, 813–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muhuri, P. K., & Menken, J. (1997). Adverse effects of next birth, gender, and family. Population Studies, 51, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muhuri, P. K., & Preston, S. H. (1991). Effects of family composition on mortality differentials by sex among children in Matlab, Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 17, 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Munshi, K., & Myaux, J. (2006). Social norms and the fertility transition. Journal of Development Economics, 80, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phillips, J., Stinson, W., Bhatia, S., Rahman, M., & Chakraborty, J. (1982). The demographic impact of family planning—Health Services Project in Matlab, Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 13, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phillips, J. F., Simmons, R., Koenig, M. A., & Chakraborty, J. (1988). Determinants of reproductive change in a traditional society: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 19, 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahman, O., Menken, J., Foster, A., & Gertler, P. (1999). Matlab [Bangladesh] Health and Socioeconomic Survey (MHSS), 1996. Ann Arbor, MA: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  34. Rahman, O., Menken, J., & Kuhn, R. (2004). The impact of family members on the self-reported health of older men and women in a rural area of Bangladesh. Aging and Society, 24, 903–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rahman, M., DaVanzo, J., Razzaque, A., Ahmed, K., & Hale, L. (2009, April). Demographic, programmatic, and socioeconomic correlates of maternal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh. Paper presented at annual meeting of Population Association of America, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1982). Governmental interventions and household behavior in a developing country: Anticipating the unanticipated consequences of social programs. Journal of Development Economics, 10, 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schultz, T. P. (1980). An economic interpretation of the decline in fertility in a rapidly developing country: Consequences of development and family planning. In R. A. Easterlin (Ed.), Population and economic change in developing countries (pp. 209–288). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schultz, T. P. (1981). Economics of population. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Schultz, T. P. (1992). Assessing family planning cost effectiveness. In J. F. Phillips & J. A. Ross (Eds.), Family planning programmes and fertility (pp. 78–105). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schultz, T. P. (1994). Human capital, family planning, and their effects on population growth. The American Economic Review, 84, 255–260.Google Scholar
  41. Schultz, T. P. (2002). Fertility transition: Economic explanations. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 5578–5584). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  42. Schultz, T. P. (2008). Population policies, fertility, women’s human capital, and child quality. In T. P. Schultz & J. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3249–3304). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  43. Schultz, T. P. (2010, April). Direct and indirect effects of a health and family planning quasi experiment in Matlab, Bangladesh: Gender and generational consequences. Paper presented at meetings of the Population Association of America, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  44. Simmons, G. B., Balk, D., & Faiz, K. K. (1991). Cost effectiveness analysis of family planning programs in rural Bangladesh: Evidence from Matlab. Studies in Family Planning, 22, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sinha, N. (2005). Fertility, child work, and schooling consequences of family planning programs. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54, 97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stewart, A. L., & Ware, J. E., Jr., Eds. (1992). Measuring functioning and well-being: The medical outcomes study approach. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Strauss, J., Gertler, P. J., Rahman, O., & Fox, K. (1995). Gender and life-cycle differentials in the patterns and determinants of adult health. In T. P. Schultz (Ed.), Investments in women’s human capital (pp. 171–213). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Strauss, J., & Thomas, D. (2008). Health over the life course. In T. P. Schultz & J. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3375–3474). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  49. Waaler, H. T. (1984). Height, weight, and mortality: The Norwegian experience. Actas Medica Scandinavica, 77(Suppl. 679), 1–56.Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organization (WHO). (1995). Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar
  51. World Health Organization (WHO). (2006). Child growth standards. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edmund E. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations