We reexamine Rosenfeld’s (2010) study on the association between child outcomes and same-sex family structure. Using the same data set, we replicate and generalize Rosenfeld’s findings and show that the implications of his study are different when using either alternative comparison groups or alternative sample restrictions. Compared with traditional married households, we find that children being raised by same-sex couples are 35 % less likely to make normal progress through school; this difference is statistically significant at the 1 % level.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
A careful reader might notice that the sum of the increase in the sample size in columns 2 and 3 (680,448 and 75,554) is less than the increase when we relax both restrictions (894,140). The additional 138,138 children are those for whom both restrictions apply.
Cáceres-Delpiano, J. (2006). The impacts of family size on investment in child quality. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 738–754.
Conley, D., & Glauber, R. (2006). Parental educational investment and children’s academic risk estimates of the impact of sibship size and birth order from exogenous variation in fertility. Journal of Human Resources, 46, 722–737.
Eide, E., & Showalter, M. (2001). The effect of grade retention on educational and labor market outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 20, 563–576.
Rosenfeld, M. (2010). Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school. Demography, 47, 755–775.
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, D.W., Pakaluk, C. & Price, J. Nontraditional Families and Childhood Progress Through School: A Comment on Rosenfeld. Demography 50, 955–961 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0169-x
- School progress
- Gay and lesbian families