Demography

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 1335–1360 | Cite as

Repeat Migration and Remittances as Mechanisms for Wealth Inequality in 119 Communities From the Mexican Migration Project Data

Article

Abstract

To evaluate the distributional impact of remittances in origin communities, prior research studied how migrants’ selectivity by wealth varies with migration prevalence in the community or prior migration experience of the individual. This study considers both patterns; it examines selectivity separately in low- and high-prevalence communities and for first-time and repeat migrants. Based on data from 18,042 household heads in 119 Mexican communities from the Mexican Migration Project, the analyses show that (1) first-time migrants in low-prevalence communities come from poor households, whereas repeat migrants in high-prevalence communities belong to wealthy households; and (2) higher amounts of remittances reach wealthy households. These results suggest that repeat migration and remittances may be mechanisms for wealth accumulation in the study communities. Descriptive analyses associate these mechanisms with increasing wealth disparities between households with and without migrants, especially in high-prevalence communities. The study, similar to prior findings, shows the importance of repeat migration trips, which, given sustained remittances, may amplify the wealth gap between migrants and nonmigrants in migrant-sending communities. The study also qualifies prior findings by differentiating between low- and high-prevalence communities and observing a growing wealth gap only in the latter.

Keywords

Migration Remittances Wealth inequality Mexico 

References

  1. Acosta, P. (2008). What is the impact of international remittances on poverty and inequality in Latin America? World Development, 36(1), 89–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acosta, P., Calderon, C., Fajnzylber, P., & Lopez, H. (2006). Remittances and development in Latin America. World Development, 29, 957–987.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, R. (1989). Worker remittances and inequality in rural Egypt. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 38(1), 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, R. (1992). The effects of migration and remittances on inequality in rural Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 31, 189–203.Google Scholar
  5. Adams, R. H., Jr. (1998). Remittances, investment, and rural asset accumulation in Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(1), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arroyo, J. A., & Berumen, S. S. (2000). Efectos sub-regionales de las remesas de emigrantes mexicanos en Estados Unidos. Comercio Exterior, 50, 340–349.Google Scholar
  7. Assies, W. (2008). Land tenure and tenure regimes in Mexico: An overview. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barham, B., & Boucher, S. (1998). Migration, remittances, and inequality: Estimating the net effects of migration on income distribution. Journal of Development Economics, 55, 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canales, A. I., & Montiel, I. A. (2004). Remesas e inversión productiva en comunidades de alta migración a Estados Unidos. El caso de Teocaltiche, Jalisco. Migraciones Internacionales, 2(3), 142–172.Google Scholar
  11. Castro, J., & Tuirán, R. (2000). Las remesas de los trabajadores emigrantes a Estados Unidos. Comercio Exterior, 50, 318–333.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1999). Cooperation and community economy and society in Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (2001). Transnational migration in rural Oaxaca, Mexico: Dependency, development, and the household. American Anthropologist, 103, 954–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. H. (2002). Social responses to migration among Mexican ethnic minorities: Outcomes in sending and receiving communities (Working paper series 3). Aalborg, Denmark: The Academy for Migration Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, J., & Rodriguez, L. (2005). Remittance outcomes in rural Oaxaca, Mexico: Challenges, options and opportunities for migrant households. Population, Space and Place, 11, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conway, D., & Cohen, J. (1998). Consequences of migration and remittances for Mexican transnational communities. Economic Geography, 74(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeWalt, B. R., & Rees, M. W. (1994). The end of agrarian reform in Mexico: Past lessons, future prospects. In Transformation of rural Mexico. Center for U.S-Mexican Studies, University of California–San Diego.Google Scholar
  18. Dinerman, I. (1978). Patterns of adaptation among households of US-bound migrants from Michoacán, Mexico. International Migration Review, 12, 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Durand, J. (1994). Más allá de la línea. Mexico: Fondo para la Cultura y las Artes.Google Scholar
  20. Durand, J., Kandel, W., Parrado, E. A., & Massey, D. S. (1996a). International migration and development in Mexican communities. Demography, 33, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Durand, J., & Massey, D. S. (1992). Mexican migration to the United States: A critical review. Latin American Research Review, 27(2), 3–42.Google Scholar
  22. Durand, J., Massey, D. S., & Zenteno, R. M. (2001). Mexican immigration to the United States: Continuities and changes. Latin American Research Review, 36, 107–127.Google Scholar
  23. Durand, J., Parrado, E. A., & Massey, D. S. (1996b). Migradollars and development: A reconsideration of the Mexican case. International Migration Review, 30, 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Firebaugh, G. (1999). Empirics of world income inequality. The American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1597–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Firebaugh, G. (2000). The trend in between-nation income inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldring, L. (1996). The changing configuration of property rights under Ejido reform. In L. Randall (Ed.), The reform of Mexican agrarian reform (pp. 271–287). New York: M.E. Sharp.Google Scholar
  27. Gonzalez, C. P. (1970). Democracy in Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hamilton, S. (2002). Neoliberalism, gender, and property rights in rural Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 37(1), 119–143.Google Scholar
  29. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoddinott, J. (1994). A model of migration and remittances applied to Western Kenya. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 459–476.Google Scholar
  31. Hoffman, K., & Centeno, M. A. (2003). The lopsided continent: Inequality in Latin America. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huber, E., Nielsen, F., Pribble, J., & Stephens, J. D. (2006). Politics and inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean. American Sociological Review, 71, 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, R. C. (1995). Ambivalent journey: US migration and economic mobility in North-Central Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, R. C. (1998). Remittances and inequality: A question of migration stage and geographic scale. Economic Geography, 74(1), 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koechlin, V., & Leon, G. (2007). International remittances and income inequality: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 8, 205–226.Google Scholar
  36. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.Google Scholar
  37. Lowell, B. L., & de la Garza, R. O. (2002). The development role of remittances in U.S. Latino communities and Latin America. In R. de la Garza & B. L. Lowell (Eds.), Sending money home: Hispanic remittances and community development (pp. 3–27). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  38. Lozano, F. A. (2003). Discurso oficial, remesas y desarrollo en México. Migración y Desarrollo, 1(1), 23–31.Google Scholar
  39. Lozano, F. A. (2007). Migración y desarrollo: Remesas y su impacto en la economía Mexicana. In M. I. Mateos (Ed.), Migración: Reconfiguración transnacional y flujos de población (pp. 135–144). Puebla, Mexico: Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla.Google Scholar
  40. Massey, D. S., & Espinosa, K. E. (1997). What's driving Mexico-U.S. migration? A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 102, 939–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Massey, D. S., Goldring, L., & Durand, J. (1994). Continuities in transnational migration: An analysis of nineteen Mexican communities. The American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1492–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Massey, D. S., & Parrado, E. A. (1998). International migration and business formation in Mexico. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 1–20.Google Scholar
  43. Massey, D. S., & Zenteno, R. M. (1999). The dynamics of mass migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 5328–5335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McKenzie, D., & Rapoport, H. (2007). Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: Theory and evidence from Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 84(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mines, R. (1981). Developing a community tradition of migration to the United States: A field study in rural Zacatecas, Mexico, and California Settlement Areas. In Monographs in US–Mexican studies no. 3: Program in United States–Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  46. Mines, R., & de Janvry, A. (1982). Migration to the United States and Mexican rural development: A case study. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mines, R., & Massey, D. S. (1985). Patterns of migration to the United States from two Mexican communities. Latin American Research Review, 20(2), 104–123.Google Scholar
  48. Mora, J. (2005). The impact of migration and remittances on distribution and dources of income (United Nations population division working paper). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  49. Morley, S. (2001). The income distribution problem in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Press.Google Scholar
  50. Munshi, K. (2003). Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the U.S. labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 549–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orrenius, P. (2006). The effect of U.S. border enforcement on the crossing behavior of Mexican migrants. In J. Durand & D. S. Massey (Eds.), Crossing the border: Research from the Mexican Migration Project (pp. 281–298). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Paige, J. M. (1997). Coffee and power: Revolution and the rise of democracy in Central America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rapoport, H., & Docquier, F. (2006). The economics of migrants’ remittances. In S.-C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of economics of reciprocity, giving and altruism (pp. 1135–1198). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  54. Ratha, D., & Xu, Z. (2008). Migration and remittances factbook 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reichert, J. (1981). The migrant syndrome: Seasonal US wage labor and rural development in central Mexico. Human Organization, 40(1), 56–66.Google Scholar
  56. Reichert, J. (1982). A town divided: Economic stratification and social relations in a Mexican migrant community. Social Problems, 29, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rempel, H., & Lobdell, R. A. (1978). The role of urban-to-rural remittances in rural development. Journal of Development Studies, 14, 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer, A., & Massey, D. S. (1998). The social process of undocumented border crossing among Mexican migrants. International Migration Review, 32, 561–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, R. C. (1998). Transnational localities: Community, technology and the politics of membership within the context of Mexico and U.S. migration. In M. P. Smith & L. E. Guarnizo (Eds.), Comparative urban community research (pp. 196–238). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Spencer, D. F., & Berk, K. T. (1981). A limited information specification test. Econometrica, 49, 1079–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65, 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stark, O., & Levhari, D. (1982). On migration and risk in LDCs. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 31, 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1991). Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation. The Economic Journal, 101, 1163–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stark, O., Taylor, J. E., & Yitzhaki, S. (1986). Remittances and inequality. The Economic Journal, 96, 722–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor, J. E. (1992). Remittances and inequality reconsidered: Direct, indirect, and intertemporal effects. Journal of Policy Modeling, 14, 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Taylor, J. E. (1999). The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration, 37(1), 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor, J. E., Adams, R. H., Jr., & Mora, J. (2009). Remittances, inequality and poverty: Evidence from rural Mexico. In J. Dewind & J. Holdaway (Eds.), Migration and development within and across borders: Research and policy perspectives on internal and international migration. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration and The Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
  68. Taylor, J. E., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Massey, D. S., & Pellegrino, A. (1996). International migration and community development. Population Index, 62, 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor, J. E., Rozelle, S., & de Brauw, A. (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: A new economics of migration perspective from China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(1), 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tuirán, R. G., & Santibáñez, J. R. (2006). El monto de las remesas familiares en México: ¿mito o realidad? Papeles de Población, 50, 147–169.Google Scholar
  71. Wiest, R. E. (1973). Wage-labor migration and the household in a Mexican town. Journal of Anthropological Research, 29, 180–209.Google Scholar
  72. Woodruff, C., & Zenteno, R. (2007). Migration networks and microenterprises in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 82, 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. World Bank. (2008). World Bank development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  74. Zenteno, R. M., & Massey, D. S. (1998). Especifidad versus representatividad: Enfoques metodologicos para el estudio de la migracion internacional. Estudios Demogroficos y Urbanos, 40, 75–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations