Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mortality From the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919: The Case of India

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Estimates of worldwide mortality from the influenza pandemic of 1918–1919 vary widely, from 15 million to 100 million. In terms of loss of life, India was the focal point of this profound demographic event. In this article, we calculate mortality from the influenza pandemic in India using panel data models and data from the Census of India. The new estimates suggest that for the districts included in the sample, mortality was at most 13.88 million, compared with 17.21 million when calculated using the assumptions of Davis (1951). We conclude that Davis’ influential estimate of mortality from influenza in British India is overstated by at least 24%. Future analyses of the effects of the pandemic on demographic change in India and worldwide will need to account for this significant downward revision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afkhami, A. (2003). Compromised constitutions: The Iranian experience with the 1918 influenza pandemic. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 77, 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, D. (2006). Is the 1918 influenza pandemic over? Long–term effects of in utero influenza exposure in the post–1940 U.S. population. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 672–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census of India. (Various years). Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.

  • Davis, K. (1951). The population of India and Pakistan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (1920). Annual report of the Sanitary Commissioner with the Government of India for 1918. Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (Various years). Annual report of the Sanitary Commissioner with the Government of India. Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.

  • Johnson, N. P. A. S., & Mueller, J. (2002). Updating the accounts: Global mortality of the 1918–1920 “Spanish” influenza pandemic. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 76, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, E. O. (1927). Epidemic influenza: A survey. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, I. (1973). Death in India, 1871–1921. The Journal of Asian Studies, 32, 639–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, I. (1974). Population and agriculture in northern India, 1872–1921. Modern Asian Studies, 8, 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, I. (1988). Plague, policy and popular unrest in British India. Modern Asian Studies, 22, 723–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, I. (1990). Population growth and mortality in British India Part II: The demographic revolution. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 27, 33–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marten, J. T. (1923). Census of India, 1921 (Vol. I, Part I) (Report). Calcutta, India: Superintendent of Government Printing.

  • Mazumder, B., Almond, D., Park, K., Crimmins, E. M., & Finch, C. E. (2010). Lingering prenatal effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic on cardiovascular disease. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, 1, 26–34. doi:10.1017/S2040174409990031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, I. D. (1986). The 1918–1919 influenza pandemic—The Indian experience. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 23, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morens, D. M., Taubenberger, J. K., & Fauci, A. S. (2009). The persistent legacy of the 1918 influenza virus. New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. D., & Pyle, G. (1991). The geography and mortality of the 1918 influenza pandemic. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 65, 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (2011a). SAS/ETS(R) 9.2 user’s guide: The PANEL procedure. Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/60372/HTML/default/viewer.htm#panel_toc.htm

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (2011b). SAS/STAT(R) 9.2 user’s guide : The MIXED procedure (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#mixed_toc.htm

  • Taubenberger, J. K., & Morens, D. M. (2006). 1918 influenza: The mother of all pandemics. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 12, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, J. I. (1971). A history of medicine in South Carolina 1900–1970. Columbia: South Carolina Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeatts, M. W. M. (1943). Census of india, 1941 (Vol. I, Part I) (Report). Simla, India: Government of India Press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible by Grant No. 1R21DA025917-01A1 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA. The authors would also like to thank participants of the XXXIII Annual Conference of the Indian Association for the Study of Population (IASP) held in Lucknow, India, in 2011, for their input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siddharth Chandra.

Appendices

Appendix 1: List of Districts Used in the Analysis (colonial spellings)

Name

Name

Name

Name

Name

Name

Agra

Budaun

Garhwal

Kanara

Muzaffarpur

Satara

Ahmedabad

Bulandshahr

Garo Hills

Kangra

Mymensingh

Saugor

Ahmednagar

Buldana

Gaya

Karachi

Nadia

Shahabad

Ajmer Merwara

Burdwan

Ghazipur

Karnal

Nagpur

Shahjahanpur

Akola

Cachar

Goalpara

Kheri

NainiTal

Shahpur

Aligarh

Calcutta

Godavari East

Khulna

Nasik

Sheikhupura

Allahabad

Cawnpore

Godavari West

Kistna

Nellore

Sholapur

Almora

Champaran

Gonda

Kolaba

Nilgiris

Sialkot

Ambala

Chanda

Gorakhpur

Koraput

Nimar

Sibsagar

Amraoti

Chhindwara

Gujranwala

Kurnool

Noakhali

Singhbhum

Amritsar

Chingleput

Gujrat

Lahore

North Arcot

Sitapur

Anantapur

Chittagong

Guntur

Lakhimpur

Nowgong

SouthArcot

Attock

Chittoor

Gurdaspur

Larkana

Pabna

South Kanara

Azamgarh

Coimbatore

Gurgaon

Lucknow

Palamau

Sukkur

Bahraich

Cuddapah

Hamirpur

Ludhiana

24 Parganas

Sultanpur

Bakarganj

Cuttack

Hardoi

Madras

Partabgarh

Surat

Balaghat

Dacca

Hazaribagh

Madura

Pilibhit

Sylhet

Balasore

Darbhanga

Hissar

Mainpuri

Poona

Tanjore

Ballia

Darjeeling

Hooghly

Malabar

Puri

Thana

Banda

Darrang

Hoshangabad

Malda

Purnea

TharParkar

Bankura

Dehra Dun

Hoshiarpur

Manbhum

Rae Bareli

Tinnevelly

BaraBanki

Dera Ghazi Khan

Howrah

Mandla

Raipur

Tippera

Bareilly

Dharwar

Hyderabad

Meerut

Rajshahi

Trichinopoly

Basti

Dinajpur

Jalaun

Mianwali

Ramnad

Unao

Belgaum

Drug

Jalpaiguri

Midnapore

Ranchi

Upper Sind Frontier

Bellary

East Khandesh

Jaunpur

Mirzapur

Rangpur

Vizagapatam

Betul

Etah

Jessore

Monghyr

Ratnagiri

Wardha

Bhagalpur

Etawah

Jhang

Montgomery

Rawalpindi

West Khandesh

Bhandara

Faridpur

Jhansi

Moradabad

Rohtak

Yeotmal

Bijapur

Farrukhabad

Jhelum

Multan

Saharanpur

 

Bijnor

Fatehpur

Jubbulpore

Murshidabad

Salem

 

Birbhum

Ferozepore

Jullundur

Muttra

Sambalpur

 

Bogra

Fyzabad

Kaira

Muzaffargarh

Santal Parganas

 

Broach and Panch Mahals

Ganjam

Kamrup

Muzaffarnagar

Saran

 

Appendix 2: Details of Random-Coefficients Models

As discussed previously, the general model estimated is

$$ LPO{{P}_{{it}}} = {{\pi }_{{0i}}} + {{\pi }_{{1i}}}{{T}_{t}} + {{\pi }_{{2i}}}FL{{U}_{t}} + {{\pi }_{{3i}}}{{T}_{t}}FL{{U}_{t}} + {{\varepsilon }_{{it}}}, $$

where i and t index districts and time in years. The coefficient estimates π 0i , π 1i , π 2i , and π 3i are defined as

$$ \matrix{ {{\pi_{{0i}}} = {\gamma_{{00}}} + {\zeta_{{0i}}}} \hfill \\ {{\pi_{{1i}}} = {\gamma_{{10}}} + {\zeta_{{1i}}}} \hfill \\ {{\pi_{{2i}}} = {\gamma_{{20}}} + {\zeta_{{2i}}}} \hfill \\ {{\pi_{{3i}}} = {\gamma_{{30}}} + {\zeta_{{3i}}}} \hfill , \\ }<!end array> $$

where it is assumed that

$$ {\varepsilon_{{ij}}}\sim N(0,\sigma_{\varepsilon }^2) $$

and

$$ \left[ {\matrix{ {{\zeta_{{0i}}}} \hfill \\ {{\zeta_{{1i}}}} \hfill \\ {{\zeta_{{2i}}}} \hfill \\ {{\zeta_{{3i}}}} \hfill \\ }<!end array> } \right] \sim N\left( {\left[ {\matrix{ 0 \hfill \\ 0 \hfill \\ 0 \hfill \\ 0 \hfill \\ }<!end array> } \right],\left[ {\matrix{ {\sigma_0^2} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{01}}}} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{02}}}} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{03}}}} \hfill \\ {{\sigma_{{10}}}} \hfill &{\sigma_1^2} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{12}}}} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{13}}}} \hfill \\ {{\sigma_{{20}}}} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{21}}}} \hfill &{\sigma_2^2} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{23}}}} \hfill \\ {{\sigma_{{30}}}} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{31}}}} \hfill &{{\sigma_{{32}}}} \hfill &{\sigma_3^2} \hfill \\ }<!end array> } \right]} \right). $$

The coefficients are modeled as varying randomly across districts, and the estimates reported in Table 1 are the mean coefficients across all districts. Details of these models are provided in SAS (2011b).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandra, S., Kuljanin, G. & Wray, J. Mortality From the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919: The Case of India. Demography 49, 857–865 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0116-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0116-x

Keywords

Navigation