Advertisement

WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 359–377 | Cite as

ECDIS transitional period completion: analyses, observations and findings

  • David BrčićEmail author
  • Srđan Žuškin
  • Sanjin Valčić
  • Igor Rudan
IAMU Section Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

During the past three decades, the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) evolved from its initial purpose to a complex navigation support tool. The transition from paper to electronic charts represents a substantial step in navigation, contributing to the reduction of the navigator’s workload, ease of execution of navigational tasks and integrated information and data fusion. In the system handling, Masters and Officers of the Watch (OOWs) are experiencing various issues ranging in their nature. The proposed paper represents a segment of a systematically carried out research among ECDIS stakeholders. The aim of the ECDIS EHO (Experience, Handling and Opinion) research is the development of an educational framework and the improvement of the Maritime Education and Training (MET) processes. This is to be achieved through a specific approach, proper communication and subtle educational, practical and research activities that have developed through time and research segments accomplishment, always striving at the user-centred, often neglected issues and their solving. The research methodology has been described in the respective chapter, together with the questionnaire which represents one of the main research tools. This segment of the research refers to opinions and attitudes of Masters and OOWs towards ECDIS mandatory implementation period completion, as collected from the ECDIS EHO questionnaire. The answers to the questions regarding the system role as a justified replacement of paper charts and the features of the means of navigation when compared with another have been categorised and discussed. Individual knowledge has been examined concerning new technology perception and understanding of the ECDIS system. The analyses and answers processing and accompanying comments have revealed certain illogicalities referring to the acceptance of the system as a mandatory, primary and often only, means of navigation. The level of acceptance and opinions regarding two means of navigation features have differed among respondents, irrespectively of their seagoing experience, navigational rank, ECDIS experience and the level of education. The analyses have revealed the need for the adaptation of ECDIS Education and Training to a particular navigational rank regarding engagement with the system. A new approach of the targeting methodology has been introduced and conducted. Critical groups of respondents have been identified and elaborated further. The research has resulted in the organisation of a new ECDIS MET course at the Faculty of Maritime Studies of the University of Rijeka. Considering the obtained results and the ongoing system development, findings and solutions have been presented in the conclusion chapter, together with the means of their achievements and the further work.

Keywords

Maritime navigation Digital navigation Paperless vessels ECDIS Education and Training Knowledge transfer ECDIS EHO 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the officers of the navigational watch on their time and willingness for the fulfilment of this research, discussions and their opinions. The authors believe that their answers have an immense significance for the appropriateness of the research deliverables.

Funding information

This research has been financially supported by the University of Rijeka under the Faculty of Maritime Studies projects.

References

  1. Asyali E (2012) The role of ECDIS on improving situational awareness. In: Mercer R, Cross J, MccCulloch C (eds) Proceedings of 13th IAMU AGA conference. Memorial University of Newfoundland. Corner Brook, Canada, pp 123–136Google Scholar
  2. Brčić D, Žuškin S (2018) Towards paperless vessels: a master’s perspective. Pomorski zbornik - J Mar Trans Sci 55(1):183–199Google Scholar
  3. Brčić D, Kos S, Žuškin S (2015) Navigation with ECDIS: choosing the proper secondary positioning source. TransNav: Int J Mar Navig Saf Sea Trans 9(3):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brčić D, Kos S, Žuškin S (2016) Partial structural analysis of the ECDIS EHO research: the handling part. In: Rijavec R et al (eds) Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on electronics in transport. EAS & ITS, Slovenia, Ljubljana, pp 80–87Google Scholar
  5. Brčić D, Žuškin S, Barić M (2017) Observations on ECDIS education and training. In: Weintrit A (ed) Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. CRC Press, London, pp 29–36Google Scholar
  6. Brčić D, Žuškin S, Valčić S, Frančić V (2018) Implementation of the ECDIS system: an OOW perspective as an integral part of educational improvement. In: Grifoll M et al (eds) Proceedings of 19th IAMU AGA conference. UPC, Barcelona, pp 121–128Google Scholar
  7. Cole SJ, Asyali E (2018) Role of ECDIS training on improving situational awareness. In: Grifoll M et al (eds) Proceedings of 19th IAMU AGA conference. UPC, Barcelona, pp 165–172Google Scholar
  8. Danish Maritime Accident Investigation Board (DMAIB) (2018). http://www.dmaib.com/Sider/Home.aspx. Accessed 10 December 2018
  9. Edmonds D (1999) Feedback from users of electronic chart technology. J Navig 52(1):139–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Federal Bureau of Maritime Casualty Investigation (BSU) (2018). http://www.bsu-bund.de/EN [Accessed December 10th, 2018]
  11. French Marine Accident Investigation Office (BEAmer) (2018). Available from: http://www.beamer-france.org/index-en.html. Accessed 10 December 2018
  12. Hamilton AC, Nickerson BG (1982) The electronic chart. TR102. UNB, FrederictonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hecht H et al (2006) The electronic chart: functions, potential and limitation of a new marine navigation system. GITC, LemmerGoogle Scholar
  14. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2015) IEC 61174: electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) - operational and performance requirements, methods of testing and required test results, Edition 4.0. IEC, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  15. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) (2014a) IHO report on the results of the ECDIS survey conducted by BIMCO and Denmark. IHO, MonacoGoogle Scholar
  16. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) (2015a) New normative references for the type approval of ECDIS. Press release. IHO, MonacoGoogle Scholar
  17. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) (2015b) S-63: data protection scheme, Edition 1.2. IHO, MonacoGoogle Scholar
  18. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) (2017a) Information on IHO standards related to ENC and ECDIS. Version 1.1. IHO, MonacoGoogle Scholar
  19. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) (2017b) S-64: test data sets for ECDIS, edition 3.0. IHO, MonacoGoogle Scholar
  20. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) (2018) Current IHO ECDIS and ENC standards. https://www.iho.int/mtg_docs/enc/ECDIS-ENC_StdsIn_Force.htm Accessed 15 December 2018
  21. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (1995) A.817(19): performance standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS), IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (1996) MSC.64(67): adoption of new and amended performance standards. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (1998) MSC.86(70): new and amended performance standards for navigational equipment. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2004) NCSR 4/8: guidelines for the harmonized display of navigation information received via communications equipment. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2006) MSC.232(82): adoption of the revised performance standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS). IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2009a) NCSR 2/22/2: report on monitoring of ECDIS issues by IHO. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2010) MSC.1/Circ. 1391: operating anomalies identified within ECDIS. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2012) Model course 1.27: operational use of electronic chart display and information system. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2013) NAV 59/12/1: report on monitoring of ECDIS issues by IHO. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2014) International convention for the safety of life at sea, 1974 as amended. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2017a) MSC.1/Circ.1503 Rev.1: ECDIS – guidance for good practice. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2017b) STCW.7/Circ.24: international convention on standards of training, certification and watchkeeping for seafarers (STCW), 1978, as amended. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. International Maritime Organization IMO (2009b) MSC.282(86): adoption of amendments to the International Convention for the Safety Of Life At Sea, 1974. Annex 1. IMO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalnina R, Priednieks V (2016) Proficiency improvement method in maritime education. WMU J Marit Aff 16:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manuel EM (2017) Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU J Marit Aff 16:473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) (2018). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/marine-accident-investigation-branch. Accessed 1 October 2018
  37. Øvergård KI, Smit PN (2014) Effect of sea experience and computer confidence in ECDIS training. In: Martinez de Oses FX, Castells Sanabra M (eds) Proceedings of 6th international conference on maritime transport (MT14). UPC, Barcelona, pp 297–310Google Scholar
  38. Patraiko D (2016) Developing IMO S-mode for e-navigation. [presentation] International E-Navigation Underway Conference. Copenhagen, DMAGoogle Scholar
  39. Sabelis H (1999) Voyage planning in ECDIS. Int Hydrogr Rev 76(2):41–48Google Scholar
  40. The Nautical Institute (NI) (2015) Navigation accidents and their causes. The Nautical Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Weintrit A (2011) International recent issues about ECDIS, E-navigation and safety at sea: introduction. In: Weintrit A (ed) International recent issues about ECDIS, E-navigation and safety at sea. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weintrit A (2015) ECDIS issues related to the implementation of the carriage requirements in SOLAS convention. Arch Trans Syst Telematics 8(1):35–40Google Scholar
  43. Weintrit A, Stawicki K (2008) Operational requirements for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS). Risk of overreliance on ECDIS. Transport Problems 3(2):67–74Google Scholar
  44. Žuškin S, Valčić M, Rudan, I (2011) ECDIS system in function of sea environment protection. In: Radmilović Z et al. (eds) Proceedings of international conference on REACT - shaping climate friendly transport in europe: key findings and future directions, the faculty of transport and traffic engineering, Belgrade, pp. 146–153Google Scholar
  45. Žuškin S, Brčić D, Šabalja Đ (2013) A contribution to improving the standards of ECDIS training. Pomorstvo - Sci J Mar Res 27(1):131–148Google Scholar
  46. Žuškin S, Brčić D, Kos S (2016) Partial structural analysis of the ECDIS EHO research: the safety contour. In: Martinez de Oses FX, Castells Sanabra M (eds) Proceedings of 7th international conference on maritime transport. UPC, Barcelona, pp 246–262Google Scholar
  47. Žuškin S, Brčić D, Valčić S (2017) ECDIS possibilities for BWE adoption. TransNav: Int J Mar Navig Saf Sea Transp 11(3):477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© World Maritime University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Maritime StudiesUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia

Personalised recommendations