Advertisement

WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 249–280 | Cite as

How to make blue growth operational? A local and regional stakeholders perspective in Greece

  • Stella Sofia I. KyvelouEmail author
  • Dimitrios G. Ierapetritis
Article

Abstract

The so-called blue growth is gaining importance in European policy making since it is expanding its relevance beyond traditional economic sectors to new and rapidly developing ones that present significant potential of innovation. This paper seeks to identify the most important factors that can be driving forces of blue growth, taking the example of Greece that being currently in a post-memorandum era, is obliged, in order to meet its engagements, to accelerate with economic growth in general, by untapping also local and regional blue growth potentials and by using MSP to facilitate the growth of its maritime economy. With the aim to put forward concrete policy proposals to boost and make operational blue growth in Greece in a multi-actor perspective, a field survey was designed and conducted with participating representatives of 24 “development companies” operating at local and regional level, all over the country. The method used was the one of environmental scanning (SWOT analysis, etc.). The survey highlighted the strengths and weaknesses as well as the opportunities, the risks and the many challenges that outline prospects and practical aspects of blue growth in the Greek regional space. The results and key findings of the primary research are discussed, highlighting the most important areas of strategy for promoting blue growth at a local level by the development companies including balancing he protection of the marine environment (ecosystem-based management) and economic growth, safeguarding maritime jobs, promoting entrepreneurial discovery through the Regional Strategy for Smart Specialisation, enforcement of maritime law, promoting biotechnology research and the creation of maritime clusters. Finally, policy proposals are presented to support blue entrepreneurship, which may be one of the cutting edges of the country’s new development model.

Keywords

Blue growth Europe Greece Development companies Local development Blue entrepreneurship Regional policy 

Notes

References

  1. Agapiou A, Lysandrou V, Hadjimitsis D (2017) The Cyprus coastal heritage landscapes within marine spatial planning process. J Cult Herit 23:28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbesgaard M (2018) Blue growth: savior or ocean grabbing? J Peasant Stud 45(1):130–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1377186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boonstra WJ, Valman M, Björkvik E (2018) A sea of many colours – how relevant is blue growth for capture fisheries in the global north, and vice versa? Mar Policy 87:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourletidis D (2014) The strategic model of innovation clusters: implementation of Blue Ocean strategy in a typical Greek region. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 148:645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess MG, Clemence M, McDermott GR, Costello C, Gaines S (2018) Five rules for pragmatic blue growth. Mar Policy 87:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatzimpiros A (2016) Blue growth on the basis of land-sea interaction. In: St K (ed) Maritime spatial issues: maritime dimension of territorial cohesion, maritime spatial planning, sustainable blue growth. Ed.KRITIKI, AthensGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vet J-M, Edwards J, Bocci M (2016) Blue growth and smart specialisation: how to catch maritime growth through “value nets”, S3 Policy Brief Series No 17/2016Google Scholar
  8. Doumbia-Henry C (2016) Maritime, oceans and sustainability-a way forward. WMU J Marit Aff 15:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0100-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehlers P (2016) WMU J Marit Aff 15:187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0104-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eikeset AM, Mazzarella AB, Davíðsdóttir B, Klinger DH, Levin SA, Rovenskaya E, Stenseth NC (2018) What is blue growth? The semantics of “sustainable development” of marine environments. Mar Policy 87:177–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission (2017) Report on the blue growth strategy towards more sustainable growth and jobs in the blue economy, SWD (2017) 128 final, COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT, Brussels, 31.3.2017Google Scholar
  12. European Commission (2018a) EU budget: Commission proposes a new fund to invest in the maritime economy and support fishing communities, Press release Strasbourg, 12 June 2018, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4104_en.htm. Accessed 20 Jun 2019
  13. European Commission (2018b) Greece, Country profile, European Market Observatory for Fisheries and Aquaculture Products. www.ec.europa.eu/fisheries/market-observatory. Accessed 20 Jun 2019
  14. F.A.O. (2014) Global blue growth initiative and small island developing states (SIDS). Fisheries and Aquaculture Resources Use and Conservation Division (FIR), https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2236Global%20Blue%20Growth%20Initiative.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2019
  15. Gee K (2019) The Ocean Perspective. In: Zaucha J, Gee K (eds) Maritime spatial planning, past, present, future, Palgrave Macmillan pp. 23–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8
  16. Geneletti D, Bagli S, Napolitano P, Pistocchi A (2007) Spatial decision support for strategic environmental assessment of land use plans: a case study in southern Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:408–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hellenic Federation of Entreprises (S.E.V.) (2018) Regulation of Marine Space, Special report, Economy & Business, vol. 25, 28.03.18 [in Greek).Google Scholar
  18. Howard BC (2018) Blue growth: stakeholder perspectives. Mar Policy 87:375–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kern K, Gilek M (2015) Governing Europe’s marine environment: key topics and challenges. In: Gilek M, Kern K (eds) Governing Europe’s marine environment. Europeanization of Regional Seas or Regionalization of EU Policies?, 1st Edition Corbett Centre for Maritime Policy Studies Series, Ashgate PublishingGoogle Scholar
  20. Klinger DH, Eikeset AM, Davíðsdóttir B, Winter A-M, Watson JR (2018) The mechanics of blue growth: management of oceanic natural resource use with multiple, interacting sectors. Mar Policy 87:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuo-liang L, Shu-chen L (2008) A fuzzy quantified SWOT procedure for environmental evaluation of an international distribution centre. Inf Sci 178:531–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kyvelou S (ed) (2016) Maritime spatial issues: maritime dimension of territorial cohesion, maritime spatial planning, sustainable blue growth. KRITIKI, AthensGoogle Scholar
  23. Kyvelou S (2017) Maritime spatial planning as evolving policy in Europe: attitudes, challenges and trends. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 6(3):1–14Google Scholar
  24. Kyvelou S. (2019) Toward quality marine landscape plans, 22nd Council of Europe Meeting of the Workshops for the implementation of the European landscape Convention and International Congress Water, landscape and citizenship in the face of global change, Seville, 14-16 March 2019Google Scholar
  25. Lillebø AI, Pita C, Garcia Rodrigues J, Ramos S, Villasante S (2017) How can marine ecosystem services support the blue growth agenda? Mar Policy 81:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lloyd’s list Intelligence (2018) The world fleet 2015, A Snapshot of Regional Ownership,) Maritime intelligence/InformaFebruary, Infographic. https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL1121197/The-world-fleet-2015. Accessed 20 Jun 2019
  27. Marianou E (2016) The maritime dimension of European cohesion policy. In: Kyvelou S (ed) Maritime spatial issues: maritime dimension of territorial cohesion, maritime spatial planning, sustainable blue growth. Ed.KRITIKI, AthensGoogle Scholar
  28. Mulazzani L, Malorgio G (2017) Blue growth and ecosystem services. Mar Policy 85:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nikolaou EI, Ierapetritis D, Tsagarakis KP (2011) An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 18(1):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.543565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nitsopoulos SC, Psaraftis HN (2008) The role of Mediterranean short sea shipping in the EU transport chain: the case of Greece. WMU J Marit Aff 7(1):17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O.E.C.D. (2011) Towards green growth. OECD Multilingual Summaries, OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111318-en. Accessed 20 Jun 2019
  32. Papageorgiou M (2016) Marine spatial planning and the Greek experience. Mar Policy 74:18–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Papageorgiou M (2018) Underwater cultural heritage facing maritime spatial planning: legislative and technical issues. Ocean Coast Manag 165:195–202, ISSN 0964-5691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Papageorgiou M, Kyvelou S (2018) Aspects of marine spatial planning and governance: adapting to the transboundary nature and the special conditions of the sea. Eur J Environ Sci 8(1):31–37.  https://doi.org/10.14712/23361964.2018.5 Google Scholar
  35. Pinto H, Cruz AR, Combe C (2015) Cooperation and the emergence of maritime clusters in the Atlantic: analysis and implications of innovation and human capital for blue growth. Mar Policy 57:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soma K, Van den Burg Sander WK, Hoefnagel EWJ, Stuiver M, Van der Martijn HC (2018) Social innovation – a future pathway for blue growth? Mar Policy 87:363–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.008
  37. Soons Alfred HA (2004) Law enforcement in the ocean – an overview. WMU J Marit Aff 3(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Terrados J, Almonacid G, Hontoria L (2007) Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis and strategic planning tools: impact on renewable development. Renew Sust Energy Rev 11:1275–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsilimigkas G, Rempis N (2018) Marine uses, synergies and conflicts. Evidence from Crete Island, Greece. J Coast Conserv 22:235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0568-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Tatenhove J (2015) Marine governance: institutional capacity-building in a multi-level governance setting, in: Gilek M, Kern K (eds) Governing Europe’s marine environmentEnvironment, Europeanization of Regional Seas or Regionalization of EU Policies? 1st EditionCorbett Centre for Maritime Policy Studies Series, Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Visbeck M, Ulrike K-G, Neumann B, Rickels W, Schmidt J, van Doorn E, Nele M-L, Ott K, Quaas M (2014) Securing blue wealth: the need for a special sustainable development goal for the ocean and coasts. Mar Policy 48(C):184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang R (2011) The precautionary principle in maritime affairs. WMU J Marit Aff 10:143–165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-011-0009-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiswall FL (2004) The nature and future of maritime law, editorial. WMU J Marit Aff 3(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© World Maritime University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economic and Regional DevelopmentPanteion University of Social and Political SciencesAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations