Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulator training for maritime complex tasks: an experimental study

  • Article
  • Published:
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Training simulators are largely deployed to provide operators working within complex systems to instil adequate skills to handle normal and abnormal situations. Improved technology and higher computation power have significantly increased the use of training simulators in the training programs. The goal of this pilot study is to determine the design of training in order to prepare for complex tasks within the maritime domain. In this experimental study, students are trained to perform docking operations when ocean currents with increasing complexity are introduced in the training program. The effect of the training is evaluated by comparing two groups: one trained with homogenous currents and the other with heterogeneous currents. Objective performance measures are used to analyse the participants’ performance. The results indicate that when the participants were exposed to tasks with gradually increasing complexity, they performed better as compared to those who were exposed to complex tasks too early in the training. The results suggest that even though the technology and computational power provide for new possibilities in training simulators, new features that make the tasks more complicated should not be included too early in the training without sufficient investigation. It is also found that increasing functional fidelity of the simulation during training has resulted in the improved performance of the participants during the complex tasks (docking operations), as compared to those training with the highest fidelity from the beginning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bacchetti P (2010) Current sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternatives. BMC Med 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchetti P, Deeks SG, McCune JM (2011) Breaking free of sample size dogma to perform innovative translational research. Sci Transl Med 3:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf M, Schröder-Hinrichs J-U, Kataria A, Benedict K, Tuschling G (2016) Multidimensional simulation in team training for safety and security in maritime transportation. J Transp Saf Secur 8:197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2014.996932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg N, Storgård J, Lappalainen J (2013) The impact of ship crews on maritime safety publications of the Centre for Maritime Studies. Univ Turku A64:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (2012) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom N, Dekker S, van Winsen R, Nyce J (2009) Fidelity and validity of simulator training theoretical issues in ergonomics. Science 10:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220802368864

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker S (2003) When human error becomes a crime. Hum Factors Aerosp Saf 3:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Detsky AS (1990) Using cost-effectiveness analysis to improve the efficiency of allocating funds to clinical trials. Stat Med 9:173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DNV (2007), Statement of Compliance, DNV Id. No. 135908. Retrieved from:https://kongsberg.com/en/kongsberg-digital/maritime%20simulation/ksim%20navigation%20-page/. Accessed November 2017

  • Flin RH, O’Connor P, Crichton M (2008) Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non-technical skills. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii M, Asaki K, Kubono M, Hamada T (2015) Evaluation method of training scenario for ship manoeuvring simulator exercise in BRM training. Paper presented at the International Conference on Ship Manoeuvrability and Maritime Simulation, New Castle University, Newcastle upon Tyne

  • Gould KS, Røed BK, Saus E-R, Koefoed VF, Bridger RS, Moen BE (2009) Effects of navigation method on workload and performance in simulated high-speed ship navigation. Appl Ergon 40:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmervik KB, Kristensen NM, Staalstrøm A, Røed LP (2017) A simple approach to adjust tidal forcing in fjord models. Ocean Dyn 67:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ (2005) Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 27:10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karau SJ, Kelly JR (1992) The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. J Exp Soc Psychol 28:542–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 55:623–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T-e, Nazir S (2016) Exploring marine accident causation: a case study. Occup Saf Hyg IV:369–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge A (2014) The acquisition of knowledge and skills for taskwork and teamwork to control complex technical systems: a cognitive and macroergonomics perspective. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge A, Sauer J, Schüler K, Burkolter D (2009) Designing training for process control simulators: a review of empirical findings and current practices. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 10:489–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau Y-y, Ng AKY (2015) The motivations and expectations of students pursuing maritime education. WMU J Marit Aff 14:313–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-015-0075-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead PMP (2004) New technology and maritime training in the 21st century: implications and solutions for MET institutions. WMU J Marit Aff 3:139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03195056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir S, Hjelmervik K (2017) Advance use of training simulator in maritime education and training: a questionnaire study. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, pp 361–371

  • Nazir S, Manca D (2015) How a plant simulator can improve industrial safety. Process Saf Prog 34:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir S, Øvergård KI, Yang Z (2015a) Towards effective training for process and maritime industries. Proc Manuf 3:1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.409

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazir S, Sorensen LJ, Øvergård KI, Manca D (2015b) Impact of training methods on distributed situation awareness of industrial operators. Saf Sci 73:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikitakos N, Sirris I, Dalaklis D, Papachristos D, Tsoukalas VD (2016) Game-based learning for maritime education and training: the case of Trader of the World. WMU J Marit Aff 16:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0119-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki T, Kunieda C (2011) Development of a training support tool for marine pilot trainees. In: International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, pp 189–194

  • Øvergård KI, Nielsen AR, Nazir S, Sorensen LJ (2015) Assessing navigational teamwork through the situational correctness and relevance of communication. Proc Manuf 3:2589–2596

    Google Scholar 

  • Passosa C, Nazir S, Mol ACA, Carvalho PV (2016) Collaborative virtual environment for training teams in emergency situations. Chem Eng 53:217–222. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1653037

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne R, Koester T (2005) Methods and means for analysis of crew communication in the maritime domain. Arch Transp 17:193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Røed LP, Kristensen NM, Hjelmervik KB, Staalstrøm A (2016) A high-resolution, curvilinear ROMS model for the Oslofjord. FjordOs technical report No. 2. Norwegian Meteriological Institute

  • Rothblum AM (2000) Human error and marine safety. Paper presented at National Safety Council Congress and Expo, Orlando

  • Salas E, Bowers CA, Rhodenizer L (1998) It is not how much you have but how you use it: toward a rational use of simulatio to support aviation training. Int J Aviat Psychol 8:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Tannenbaum SI, Kraiger K, Smith-Jentsch KA (2012) The science of training and development in organizations: what matters in practice. Psychol Sci Public Interest 13:74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saus E-R, Johnsen BH, Eid J (2010) Perceived learning outcome: the relationship between experience, realism and situation awareness during simulator training. Int Marit Health 61:258–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellberg C (2016) Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. WMU J Marit Aff 16:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Voytkevich A, Bogdanecs A, Fernandez M (2015) Key performance indcators for assessing simulator task scenarios: paper presented at the International Conference on Ship Manoeuvrability and Maritime Simulation. New Castle University, Newcastle upon Tyne

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The experiments were performed in the SimStrøm research project in a cooperation between Kongsberg Maritime and the University College of Southeast Norway. The project was funded by the regional research fund Oslofjordfondet (research grant no. 248723). We would like to thank Stefan Backmann, Anders Nes and Svend Nordby for facilitating the experiments and for their valuable contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technology and Maritime Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, Notodden, Norway

    Karina Hjelmervik, Salman Nazir & Andreas Myhrvold

Authors
  1. Karina Hjelmervik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salman Nazir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Myhrvold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina Hjelmervik.

Ethics declarations

The experiment was performed in accordance to the ethical standards laid down in the 1991 Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed a consent form.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hjelmervik, K., Nazir, S. & Myhrvold, A. Simulator training for maritime complex tasks: an experimental study. WMU J Marit Affairs 17, 17–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0133-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0133-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation