WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 405–420 | Cite as

Evaluating air emission inventories and indicators from cruise vessels at ports

  • German De Melo Rodríguez
  • Enrique Martin-Alcalde
  • J.C. Murcia-González
  • Sergi Saurí
Article

Abstract

This paper provides an estimation of air emissions (CO2, NOX, SOX and PM) released by cruise vessels at the port level. The methodology is based on the “full bottom-up” approach and starts by evaluating the fuel consumed by each vessel on the basis of its individual port activities (manoeuvring, berthing and hoteling). The Port of Barcelona was selected as the site at which to perform the analysis, in which 125 calls of 30 cruise vessels were monitored. Real-time data from the automatic identification system (AIS), factor emissions from engine certificates and vessel characteristics from IHS Sea-web database were also collected for the analysis. The research findings show that the most appropriate indicators are inventory emissions per “port-time gross tonnage”, “port-time passenger” and “port time”. These emission indicators improve our understanding of cruise emissions and will facilitate the work that aims to estimate reliably and quickly the in-port ship emission inventories of cruise ports.

Keywords

Cruise vessel emissions Port-level Air pollution Emission inventories Emission indicators 

References

  1. Berechman J, Tseng P-H (2012) Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions: the case of Kaohsiung. Transport. Res. Part D 17:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corbett JJ, Kohler H (2003) Updated emissions from ocean shipping. J Geophys Res 108(D20):4650–4666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corbett JJ , Wang C, Firestone J (2007) Allocation and forecasting of the global ship emission. In: Proceedings of the Paper presented at Clean Air Task Force and Friends at the Earth International, Boston, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalsoren SB, Eide MS, Endresen O, Mjelde A, Gravir G, Isaksen ISA (2009) Update on emissions and environmental impacts from the international fleet of ships: the contribution from major ship types and ports. Atmos Chem Phys 9:2171–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Meyer P, Maes F, Volckaer A (2008) Emissions from international shipping in the Belgian part of the North Sea and the Belgian seaports. Atmos Environ 42:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dragovic B, Tzannatos E, Tselentis V, Mestrovic R, Skuric M (2015) Ship emissions and their externalities in cruise ports. Transport Res Part D 18(2). doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2015.11.007
  7. Endresen O, Sorgard E, Bakke J, Isaksen ISA (2004) Substantiation of a lower estimate for the bunker inventory: comment on “Updated emissions from ocean shipping” by James J. Corbett and Horst W. Koehler. J Geophys Res 109:D23302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Endresen O, Sorgard E, Behrens HL, Brett PO, Isaksen ISA (2007) A historical reconstruction of ships’ fuel consumption and emissions. J Geophys Res 112:D12301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Endresen O, Sorgard E, Sundet JK, Dalsoren SB, Isaksen ISA, Berglen TF, Gravir G (2003) Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact. J Geophys Res 108(D17):4560 D17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ENTEC (2002). Quantification of emissions from ships associated with ship movements between ports in the European Community. UK: Report prepared for the European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  11. ESPO (2003). Environmental code of practice. ESPO, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  12. Eyring V, Koehler HW, van Aardenne J, Lauer A (2005) Emission from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years. J Geophys Res 110(D17305):D17305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbs D, Rigot-Muller P, Mangan J, Lalwani C (2014) The role of sea ports in end-to end maritime transport chain emissions. Energy Pol. 64:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IAPH (2007). Resolution on clean air programs for ports. Second plenary session. 25th World Ports Conference of IAPH. Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. ICF (2006) Current methodologies and best practices in preparing port emission inventories. EPA, Fairfax, Virginia, USA. Final report for U.SGoogle Scholar
  16. IMO (2009) IMO GHG Study 2009. Micropress Printers, SuffolkGoogle Scholar
  17. IMO (2014) Third IMO GHG Study 2014. Micropress Printers, SuffolkGoogle Scholar
  18. Maragkogianni A, Papaefthimiou S (2015) Evaluating the social cost of cruise ships air emissions in major ports of Greece. Transport. Res. Part D 36:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McArthur DP, Osland L (2013) Ships in a city harbor: an economic valuation of atmospheric emissions. Transport Res Part D 21:4752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merk O (2014) Shipping emissions in ports. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, No. 2014-20. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Miola A, Ciuffo B, Giovine E, Marra M (2010) Regulating air emissions from ships: the state of the art on methodologies, technologies and policy options. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. JRC Reference Reports 60732, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  22. Moreno-Gutiérrez J, Calderay F, Saborido N, Boile M, Rodríguez Valero R, Durán-Grados V (2015) Methodologies for estimating shipping emissions and energy consumption: a comparative analysis of current methods. Energy 86:603–616Google Scholar
  23. Ng SK, Loh C, Lin C, Booth V, Chan JW, Yip AC, Lau AK (2012) Policy change driven by an AIS-assisted marine emissions inventory in Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta. Atmos Environ 76:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pallis T (2015) Cruise shipping and urban development: State of the art of the industry and cruise ports. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2015-14. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Prati MV, Costagliola MA, Quaranta F, Murena F (2015) Assessment of ambient air quality in the port of Naples. J Air Manage Ass 65(8) 970.979Google Scholar
  26. Saxe H, Larsen T (2004) Air pollution from ships in three Danish ports. Atmos Environ 38:4057–4067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schneekluth H, Bertram V (1998) Ship design for efficiency and economy. 2nd edition. Elsevier Ltd., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Song S (2014) Ship emissions inventory, social cost and eco-efficiency in Shanghai Yangshan port. Atmos Environ 82:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taylor DA (1996) Introduction to marine engineering. Elsevier Ltd., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Tichavska M, Tovar B (2015) Environmental cost and eco-efficiency from vessel emissions in Las Palmas Port. Transport Res Part E 83:126–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tupper EC (2013) Introduction to naval architecture. Fifth Edition. Elsevier Ltd, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Tzannatos E (2010a) Ship emissions and their externalities for the port of Piraeus–Greece. Atmos Environ 44:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tzannatos E (2010b) Cost assessment of ship emission reduction methods at berth: the case of the Port of Piraeus, Greece. Marit Pol Manage 37(4):427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Villalba G, Gemechu ED (2011) Estimating GHG emissions of marine ports—the case of Barcelona. Energy Pol 39:1363–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang C, Corbett JJ, Firestone J (2007) Modelling energy use and emissions from North American shipping: application of the ship traffic, energy, and environmental model. Environ Sci Technol 41(9):3226–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watson D (1998) Practical ship design. Elsevier Ocean Engineering Book Series, Vol 1. Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Whall, C., Stavrakaki, A., Ritchie, A., Green, C., Shialis, T., Minchin, W., Cohen, A., Stokes, R. (2007). Concawe. Ship emissions inventory: Mediterranean Sea. Entec UK Limited 47: 2007–7160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Maritime University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • German De Melo Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Enrique Martin-Alcalde
    • 2
  • J.C. Murcia-González
    • 1
  • Sergi Saurí
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Science and Nautical EngineeringUPC-BarcelonaTechBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Centre for Innovation in Transport (CENIT)UPC-BarcelonaTechBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations