WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 351–363 | Cite as

Analysis of ship drifting in a narrow channel using Automatic Identification System (AIS) data

Article
  • 184 Downloads

Abstract

With maritime transportation has played an important role in global economy development, ship traffic has become more congested. Therefore, ships navigate under risk conditions, and thus maritime accidents have occurred frequently. Especially, ship passing through a narrow channel is even more dangerous. Because, the ships are easy to be affected by external forces such as wind and currents that can cause ship drifts. Many latent risks are present during navigation. In order for the development of a sensible and appropriate traffic model for the safety and efficiency ship navigation, this study has focused on the actual ship behavior to understand the ship drift in the Kurushima Strait, Japan, which is one of the most dangerous routes in Japan. The analysis of ship behavior was carried out using the Automatic Identification System (AIS) data. As a result, the ships drift was understood in detail, and the latent risk was unveiled when ships pass through the narrow route. Moreover, the risk areas were obtained and visualized by the ship drift behavior analysis. The obtained results can be applied to ensure safe navigation and the development of an eco-friendly and economy efficient for ship navigation.

Keywords

Maritime traffic Ship drift AIS data The actual behavior of ships Risk areas 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was financially supported by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society. Research number is 28-707.

References

  1. Gao X et al (2013) A study on analysis of actual situation of vessel traffic in Osaka Bay using AIS. Annual Journal of Civil Engineering in the Ocean 69:616–621 in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  2. IMO (2002) Guidelines for the installation of a shipborne automatic identification system (AIS). International Maritime Organization (IMO), LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Kose K, Takase S, Iijima Y (1998) Simulation studies on current effects in Kurushima Strait. The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation 99:247–254 in JapaneseCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Longo L, Stern F (2002) Effects of drift angle on model ship flow. Exp Fluids 32:558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. MAIA (2007) Maritime accidents in Naka Suido (Channel) and Noshi Suido (Channel) of the Kurushima Kaikyo (Strait). Marine Accident Inquiry Agency (MAIA). http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/kai/maiadigest/MD-4.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
  6. Makino H (2012) Analysis of ship refuge action in tsunami using AIS data: case of the 2011 East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Journal of shipping and. Ocean Eng 2:380–385Google Scholar
  7. Makino H (2013) Verification of the time tsunami attacked coasting ships using AIS—case of the 2011 East Japan tsunami. Journal of earth science and. Engineering 2:125–129Google Scholar
  8. Miyake R, Fukuto J, Hasegawa K (2015) Procedure for maritime traffic simulation with AIS data. TRANSNAV 9:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Montewka J, Hinz T, Kujala P, Matusiak J (2010) Probability modelling of vessel collisions. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 95:573–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mulyadi Y, Kobayashi E, Wakabayashi N, Wahyudi TP (2014) Development of ship sinking frequency model over subsea pipeline for Madura Strait using AIS data. WMU J Marit Affairs 13:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Okuyama Y, Hayafuji Y, Yoshida Y, Nakatsuji T (1978) A study on marine traffic behaviors (3rd report)—marine traffic survey in the broad expanse of water area-. PARI Report 17:119–133 in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  12. PIANC Report n° 121 (2014) Harbour approach channels design guidelines. http://www.pianc.org/publications.php. Accessed 12 September 2015
  13. Richardson P (1997) Drifting in the wind: leeway error in shipdrift data. Deep Sea Res Part 1 Oceanogr Res Pap 44:1877–1903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. WSC (2015) Some observations on port congestion, vessel size and vessel sharing agreements. World Shipping Council Partners in Trade. http://www.worldshipping.org/industry-issues/transportation-infrastructure/ Accessed 25 September 2015
  16. Xie Z, Yan J (2008) Kernel density estimation of traffic accidents in a network space. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32:396–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zwolan P, Czaplewski K (2013) Analysis of a real vessel and its simulation model behavior. Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin 36:196–199Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Maritime University 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate of Maritime SciencesKobe UniversityKobeJapan
  2. 2.Naval Architecture & Ocean EngineeringOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations