Abstract
This study examines how geopolitical forces motivate public support for foreign climate aid among US residents. This is timely: the US and other advanced economies have committed to large transfers of aid to developing economies in order to speed climate mitigation and adaptation, reflecting the deep climate injustice at the center of global climate policy. Using nationally representative data (n=917), our research advances the budding scholarship on foreign climate aid by using an experimental survey design that frames foreign climate aid in geopolitical terms by comparing US aid to that of (a) allied nations and (b) adversarial nations. We find that, relative to a baseline informational frame, comparing US aid levels to geostrategic allies (e.g., UK, France, Germany, and Japan) doubles support among US residents for providing greater aid levels. We also find that comparing US aid levels to a geostrategic competitor—in this case, China—does not increase support for foreign climate aid. In a secondary analysis, we find that the effect of comparison frame is isolated to Democrats, with Republicans showing no sign of increasing levels of support regardless of framing condition. These results indicate that it is possible to raise support for foreign climate aid among (Democratic) US residents, primarily by linking existing levels of support to geostrategic allies. These results suggest that donor competition between the US and its allies may provide activists and policymakers an opportunity to increase support for the US to meet its existing foreign climate aid obligations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available upon request to the author.
References
Achen CH, Bartels LM (2017) Democracy for realists: why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press
Agnone J (2007) Amplifying public opinion: the policy impact of the U.S. environmental movement. Soc Forces 85(4):1593–1620. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0059
Agyeman J, Schlosberg D, Craven L, Matthews C (2016) Trends and directions in environmental justice: from inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41(1):321–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052
Alesina A, Dollar D (2000) Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? J Econ Growth 5(1):33–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009874203400
Amenta E, Caren N, Olasky SJ (2005) Age for leisure? political mediation and the impact of the pension movement on U.S. old-age policy. Am Sociol Rev 70(3):516–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000308
Amsalem E, Zoizner A (2022) Real, but limited: a meta-analytic assessment of framing effects in the political domain. Br J Polit Sci 52(1):221–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000253
Andrews KT, Beyerlein K, Farnum TT (2016) The legitimacy of protest: explaining white southerners’ attitudes toward the civil rights movement. Soc Forces 94(3):1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov097
Auspurg K, Jäckle A (2017) First equals most important? Order effects in vignette-based measurement. Sociol Methods Res 46(3):490–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115591016
Bayram AB, Holmes M (2020) Feeling their pain: affective empathy and public preferences for foreign development aid. Eur J Int Rel 26(3):820–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119890915
Benegal SD, Scruggs LA (2018) Correcting misinformation about climate change: the impact of partisanship in an experimental setting. Clim Chang 148(1–2):61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2192-4
Bernauer T, McGrath LF (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 6(7):680–683. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2948
Biden J (2021) Remarks by President Biden before the 76th session of the United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Headquarters, New York City
Bolsen T, Druckman JN, Cook FL (2014) The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Polit Behav 36(2):235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
Brooks C, Manza J (2006) Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. Am Sociol Rev 71(3):474–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100306
Brooks C, Manza J (2007) Why welfare states persist: the importance of public opinion in democracies, New edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bugden D (2020) Does climate protest work? Partisanship, protest, and sentiment pools. Socius 6:2378023120925949. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120925949
Bugden D (2022) Denial and distrust: explaining the partisan climate gap. Clim Chang 170(3):34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03321-2
Buntaine MT, Prather L (2018) Preferences for domestic action over international transfers in global climate policy. J Exp Politic Sci 5(2):73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2017.34
Burstein P (1998) Bringing the public back in: should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy? Soc Forces 77(1):27–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/77.1.27
Burstein P, Linton A (2002) The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy: some recent evidence and theoretical concerns. Soc Forces 81(2):380–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0004
Carnegie A, Gaikwad N (2022) Public opinion on geopolitics and trade: theory and evidence. World Polit 74(2):167–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000265
Carty T, Kowalzig J, Zagema B (2020) 2020 Climate Shadow Report (OXFAM). OXFAM
Charness G, Gneezy U, Kuhn MA (2012) Experimental methods: between-subject and within-subject design. J Econ Behav Organ 81(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
Chilton AS, Milner HV, Tingley D (2020) Reciprocity and public opposition to foreign direct investment. Br J Polit Sci 50(1):129–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000552
Chong D, Druckman JN (2007) Framing theory. Annu Rev Polit Sci 10(1):103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
Chung E, Pechenkina AO, Skinner KK (2022) Competitors in aid: how international rivalry affects public support for aid under various frames. Polit Res Q. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221119986
Colgan JD, Miller NL (2022) The rewards of rivalry: U.S.-Chinese competition can spur climate progress essays. Foreign Aff 101(6):108–119
Dietrich S, Hyde SD, Winters MS (2019) Overseas credit claiming and domestic support for foreign aid. J Exp Polit Sci 6(3):159–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2019.12
Doell KC, Pärnamets P, Harris EA, Hackel LM, Van Bavel JJ (2021) Understanding the effects of partisan identity on climate change. Curr Opin Behav Sci 42:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.013
Doherty D, Bryan AC, Hanania D, Pajor M (2020) The public’s foreign aid priorities: evidence from a conjoint experiment. Am Politics Res 48(5):635–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X20939925
Erickson AS, Collins G (2021) Competition with china can save the planet: pressure, not partnership, will spur progress on climate change essays. Foreign Aff 100(3):136–149
Gaines BJ, Kuklinski JH, Quirk PJ, Peyton B, Verkuilen J (2007) Same facts, different interpretations: partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. J Polit 69(4):957–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x
Gilens M (2009) Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. University of Chicago Press
Guisinger A, Saunders EN (2017) Mapping the boundaries of elite cues: how elites shape mass opinion across international issues. Int Stud Q 61(2):425–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx022
Harris B, Gramer R, Tamkin E (2017) The end of foreign aid as we know it. Foreign Policy Retrieved April 14, 2023 (https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/24/u-s-agency-for-international-development-foreign-aid-state-department-trump-slash-foreign-funding/)
Heinrich T, Kobayashi Y (2020) How do people evaluate foreign aid to ‘nasty’ regimes? Br J Polit Sci 50(1):103–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000503
Heinrich T, Kobayashi Y, Long L (2018) Voters get what they want (when they pay attention): human rights, policy benefits, and foreign aid. Int Stud Q 62(1):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx081
Henson S, Lindstrom J (2013) ‘A mile wide and an inch deep’? Understanding public support for aid: the case of the United Kingdom. World Dev 42:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.07.004
Hurst K, Stern MJ (2020) Messaging for environmental action: the role of moral framing and message source. J Environ Psychol 68:101394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101394
Hurst R, Tidwell T, Hawkins D (2017) Down the rathole? Public support for US foreign aid. Int Stud Q 61(2):442–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx019
Kenworthy L (2009) The effect of public opinion on social policy generosity. Soc Econ Rev 7(4):727–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp014
Khan MR, Munira S (2021) Climate change adaptation as a global public good: implications for financing. Clim Chang 167(3–4):50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03195-w
Khan M, Robinson S-a, Weikmans R, Ciplet D, Timmons Roberts J (2020) Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens. Clim Chang 161(2):251–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02563-x
Kohno M, Montinola GR, Winters MS, Kato G (2021) Donor competition and public support for foreign aid sanctions. Polit Res Q 74(1):212–227
Landis F, Bernauer T (2012) Transfer payments in global climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 2(8):628–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1548
Lax JR, Phillips JH (2009) Gay Rights in the states: public opinion and policy responsiveness. Am Polit Sci Rev 103(3):367–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990050
Lee H-S (2019) Inequality and U.S. public opinion on foreign aid. World Affairs 182(3):273–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820019862268
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Rosenthal S, Kotcher J, Carmen J, Wang X, Goldberg M, Lacroix K, Marlon J (2021) Public Support for International Climate Action, March 2021. Climate Change Communication
Lewis JI (2020) Toward a new era of US engagement with China on climate change. Georget J Int Aff 21:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2020.0032
Lupia A (2006) How elitism undermines the study of voter competence. Crit Rev 18(1–3):217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443658
Martínez-Alier J (2002) Ecological debt and property rights on carbon sinks and reservoirs. Capital Nat Soc 13(1):115–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/104557502101245404
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52(2):155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
Milner HV, Tingley D (2013) Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: A Review Essay. Int Interact 39(3):389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2013.784090
Milner HV, Tingley D (2015) Sailing the water’s edge: the domestic politics of American foreign policy. In: Sailing the Water’s Edge. Princeton University Press
Milner HV, Tingley DH (2010) The political economy of U.S. foreign aid: American Legislators and the Domestic Politics of AID. Econ Polit 22(2):200–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2009.00356.x
Mitchell I, Ritchie E, Tahmasebi A (2021) Is climate finance towards $100 billion ‘new and additional. GCD Policy Paper 205:1–14
Morgenthau H (1962) A political theory of foreign aid*. Am Polit Sci Rev 56(2):301–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952366
Myles J (2006) Comment on Brooks and Manza, ASR, June 2006: Welfare States and Public Opinion. Am Sociol Rev 71(3):495–498
OECD (2020) Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2013-18. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/f0773d55-en
Paxton P, Knack S (2012) Individual and country-level factors affecting support for foreign aid. Int Polit Sci Rev 33(2):171–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512111406095
Pierson P (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Polit 48(2):143–179. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0004
Rasmussen A, Carroll BJ, Lowery D (2014) Representatives of the public? Public opinion and interest group activity. Eur J Polit Res 53(2):250–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12036
Rasmussen A, Mäder LK, Reher S (2018) With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion in advocacy success. Comp Pol Stud 51(2):139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695334
Roberts JT, Parks B (2006) A climate of injustice: global inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy. MIT Press
Roberts JT, Weikmans R (2017) Postface: fragmentation, failing trust and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance. Int Environ Agreem: Politics Law Econ 17(1):129–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9347-4
Roberts JT, Weikmans R, Robinson S-a, Ciplet D, Khan M, Falzon D (2021) Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance. Nat Clim Chang 11(3):180–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2
Rose S, Estes J (2021) The role of US aid in tackling climate change: context and questions for USAID and MCC. Center for Global Development
Schakel W, Burgoon B, Hakhverdian A (2020) Real but unequal representation in welfare state reform. Polit Soc 48(1):131–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219897984
Silver L, Huang C, Clancy L (2022) Negative views of China tied to critical views of its policies on human rights. In: Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project Retrieved April 11, 2023 (https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/06/29/negative-views-of-china-tied-to-critical-views-of-its-policies-on-human-rights/)
Sniderman PM, Stiglitz EH (2012) The reputational premium: a theory of party identification and policy reasoning. Princeton University Press
Soroka SN, Wlezien C (2010) Degrees of democracy: politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge University Press
Stimson JA, Mackuen MB, Erikson RS (1995) Dynamic representation. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):543–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082973
Uji A, Song J, Dolšak N, Prakash A (2021) Public support for climate adaptation aid and migrants: a conjoint experiment in Japan. Environ Res Lett 16(12):124073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3b7b
van der Linden S, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A (2015) Improving public engagement with climate change: five ‘best practice’ insights from psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(6):758–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598516
Weikmans R, Timmons Roberts J (2019) The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon? Clim Dev 11(2):97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1410087
Weikmans R, Timmons Roberts J, Baum J, Bustos MC, Durand A (2017) Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation aid projects are categorised. Dev Pract 27(4):458–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2017.1307325
Wolsko C, Ariceaga H, Seiden J (2016) Red, white, and blue enough to be green: effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol 65:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
Wood T (2019) Can information change public support for aid? J Dev Stud 55(10):2162–2176
Wood T, Hoy C, Pryke J (2021) The effect of geostrategic competition on public attitudes to aid. J Exp Polit Sci 8(3):285–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.27
Wood T, Hoy C (2022) Helping us or helping them? what makes foreign aid popular with donor publics? Econ Dev Cult Chang 70(2):567–586. https://doi.org/10.1086/713930
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was exempted by the authors’ institution for internal ethics review.
Competing interests
N/A.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bugden, D., Brazil, J. The role of geostrategic interests in motivating public support for foreign climate aid. J Environ Stud Sci 14, 803–813 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00900-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00900-w