Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Cost sensitivity, partisan cues, and support for the Green New Deal

  • Research and Theory
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Opponents of climate policy proposals frequently ground their objections in terms of costs. However, it is unclear whether these objections are persuasive to individuals considering whether to support such programs. Not only do people have difficulties in understanding large numbers, partisans in particular may place more weight on the originator of a given proposal—supporting it if their own party proposed it, and opposing it otherwise. We test these dynamics using a survey experiment that varied the costs associated with real-world climate policy proposals attributed to each of the two major US political parties, compared to a control group where no cost was made salient. Our study allows us to disentangle the effects of cost perception and partisan identity on policy preferences. We find little evidence that respondents are systematically sensitive to program cost. Rather, we find that climate policy preferences are shaped by partisan identities, with respondents showing little sensitivity towards increasing costs. The results provide reason for skepticism that cost-based objections to climate spending programs are persuasive at scale, after accounting for partisan cue-taking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Replication data and code are available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LEC7VD.

References

  • Ariely D, Huber J, Wertenbroch K (2005) When do losses loom larger than gains? J Market Res 42(2):134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballew, M., Verner, M., Rosenthal, S., Maibach, E., Kotcher, J., & Leiserowitz, A. (2023). Who is most supportive of the Inflation Reduction Act? Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/who-is-most-supportive-of-the-ira/

  • Benegal SD (2018) The impact of unemployment and economic risk perceptions on attitudes towards anthropogenic climate change. J Environ Stud Sci 8(3):300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist P, Mildenberger M, Stokes LC (2020) Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US. Environ Res Lett 15(5):054019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussalis C, Coan TG (2016) Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. Glob Environ Chang 36:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley-Trujillo R, Holman M, Sandoval A (2019) Hot districts, cool legislation: evaluating agenda setting in climate change bill sponsorship in US states. State Polit Policy Q 19(3):375–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley-Trujillo R, Poe J (2020) The importance of salience: public opinion and state policy action on climate change. J Publ Policy 40(2):280–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Clim Change 114(2):169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan T, Motta M, Sylvester S, Trujillo KL, Blackburn CC (2019) Parent psychology and the decision to delay childhood vaccination. Soc Sci Med 238:112407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell TH, Kay AC (2014) Solution aversion: on the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. J Pers Soc Psychol 107(5):809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlock, G., Mangan, E., & McElwee, S. (2018). A Green New Deal: a progressive vision for environmental sustainability and economic stability. Policy Report by Data for Progress. https://www.filesforprogress.org/pdfs/Green_New_Deal.pdf

  • Coppock A, McClellan OA (2019) Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Res Polit 6(1):2053168018822174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deiseroth, D. & Blank, L. (2021). Voters overwhelmingly support the Green New Deal. https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2021/4/19/voters-support-green-new-deal

  • Diamond E, Zhou J (2021) Whose policy is it anyway? Public support for clean energy policy depends on the message and the messenger. Environ Polit:1–25

  • Dunlap RE, Jacques PJ (2013) Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: exploring the connection. Am Behav Sci 57(6):699–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM, Yarosh JH (2016) The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the US. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58(5):4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan PJ (2013) Partisan priorities: how issue ownership drives and distorts American politics. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Egan PJ, Konisky DM, Mullin M (2022) Ascendant public opinion the rising influence of climate change on Americans’ attitudes about the environment. Public Opin Q

  • Egan PJ, Mullin M (2017) Climate change: US public opinion. Annu Rev Polit Sci 20:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan EJ (2021) Issue ownership and the priorities of party elites in the United States, 2004–2016. Party Polit 27(1):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firozi P. (2019) The Energy 202: how the hamburger became the GOP’s rallying cry against the Green New Deal. Washington Post, March 1, 2019.

  • Franta B (2021) Weaponizing economics: big oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay. Environ Polit:1–21

  • Galvin R, Healy N (2020) The Green New Deal in the United States: what it is and how to pay for it. Energy Res Soc Sci 67:101529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbach JM (2015) Polluting industries as climate protagonists: cap and trade and the problem of business preferences. Bus Polit 17(4):633–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guber DL (2013) A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. Am Behav Sci 57(1):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta K, Nowlin MC, Ripberger JT, Jenkins-Smith HC, Silva CL (2019) Tracking the nuclear ‘mood’in the United States: introducing a long term measure of public opinion about nuclear energy using aggregate survey data. Energy Policy 133:110888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson A, Rosenthal SA, Ballew MT, Goldberg MH, Bergquist P, Kotcher JE et al (2019) The development of partisan polarization over the Green New Deal. Nat Clim Chang 9(12):940–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim Chang 104(2):231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennes EP, Ruisch BC, Feygina I, Monteiro CA, Jost JT (2016) Motivated recall in the service of the economic system: the case of anthropogenic climate change. J Exp Psychol Gen 145(6):755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel-Fernandez A, Mildenberger M, Stokes LC (2019) Legislative staff and representation in Congress. Am Polit Sci Rev 113(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joselow, M. (2019). GOP Counteroffer to Green New Deal Pushes Innovation. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gop-counteroffer-to-green-new-deal-pushes-innovation/

  • Kahn ME, Kotchen MJ (2011) Business cycle effects on concern about climate change: the chilling effect of recession. Clim Chang Econ 2(03):257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane JV, Anson IG (2022) Deficit attention disorder: partisanship, issue importance and concern about government overspending. Polit Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09783-5

  • Kennedy B (2020) U.S. concern about climate change is rising, but mainly among democrats. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/04/16/u-s-concern-about-climate-change-is-rising-butmainly-among-democrats/

  • Kennedy, B., Funk, C. & Tyson, A. (2023). How Americans see Biden’s climate policies. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/06/28/2-how-americans-see-bidens-climate-policies/

  • Klar S, Krupnikov Y (2016) Independent politics. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kouri R, Clarke A (2014) Framing ‘green jobs’ discourse: analysis of popular usage. Sustain Dev 22(4):217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layzer JA (2012) Open for business: conservatives’ opposition to environmental regulation. MIT Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz GS (2012) Follow the leader?: How voters respond to politicians' policies and performance. University of Chicago Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck MS, Stegmaier M (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annu Rev Polit Sci 3(1):183–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., ... & Waterfield, T. (2018). Global warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of, 1(5).

  • McConnell K (2022) ‘The Green New Deal as partisan cue: evidence from a survey experiment in the rural US. Environ Polit:1–33

  • Merkley E, Stecula DA (2021) Party cues in the news: Democratic elites, Republican backlash, and the dynamics of climate skepticism. Br J Polit Sci 51(4):1439–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger M (2020) Carbon captured: how business and labor control climate politics. MIT Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger M, Lachapelle E, Harrison K, Stadelmann-Steffen I (2022) Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing. Nat Clim Chang:1–7

  • Mildenberger M, Marlon JR, Howe PD, Leiserowitz A (2017) The spatial distribution of Republican and Democratic climate opinions at state and local scales. Clim Chang 145(3):539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger M, Tingley D (2019) Beliefs about climate beliefs: the importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. Br J Polit Sci 49(4):1279–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery JM, Nyhan B, Torres M (2018) How conditioning on posttreatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. Am J Polit Sci 62(3):760–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullinix KJ, Leeper TJ, Druckman JN, Freese J (2015) The generalizability of survey experiments. J Exp Polit Sci 2(2):109–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulos JA (1988) Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe BG, Mills SB (2017) State energy policy in the Trump Era: insights from public opinion. J Environ Stud Sci 7:535–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross AD, Rouse SM, Mobley W (2019) Polarization of climate change beliefs: the role of the millennial generation identity. Soc Sci Q 100(7):2625–2640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider J, Schwarze S, Bsumek PK, Peeples J (2016) Under pressure: coal industry rhetoric and neoliberalism. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotto TJ, Reifler J, Hudson D (2017) We spend how much? Misperceptions, innumeracy, and support for the foreign aid in the United States and Great Britain. J Exp Polit Sci 4(2):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs L, Benegal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession?. Glob Environ Change 22(2):505–515

  • Sisco MR, Constantino SM, Gao Y, Tavoni M, Cooperman AD, Bosetti V, Weber EU (2023) Examining evidence for the finite pool of worry and finite pool of attention hypotheses. Glob Environ Chang 78:102622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes LC, Warshaw C (2017) Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States. Nat Energy 2(8):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JM (2018) The Republican reversal. Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, A. & Kennedy, B. (2020). Two-thirds of Americans think government should do more on climate. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/06/23/two-thirds-of-americans-think-government-should-do-more-on-climate/

  • Uscinski JE, Douglas K, Lewandowsky S (2017) Climate change conspiracy theories. Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller J (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge university press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Union College, Schenectady, USA

    Salil Benegal

  2. Duke University, Durham, USA

    Jon Green

Authors
  1. Salil Benegal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to this work in research design, data analysis, and manuscript writing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salil Benegal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 180 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benegal, S., Green, J. Cost sensitivity, partisan cues, and support for the Green New Deal. J Environ Stud Sci 14, 763–775 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00897-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00897-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation