Abstract
Given the alarming rate of environmental degradation, the contribution of technology development in preserving the ecosystem is crucially important to be analyzed. In addition, since the informal sectors are not included in the official statistics and may be disadvantaged in adopting technological advances, their impact on the environmental quality should be also carefully considered. Thus, this paper examines the direct effect of technological innovation on environmental quality as well as the interaction effect between technological innovation and informal economy. We employ advanced panel quantile regression for 27 OECD countries from 1995 to 2015. The empirical results indicate that the impact of technological innovation on ecological footprint is favorable but heterogeneous across quantiles. The magnitude of impact intensifies as the ecological footprint increases from the lower to middle quantiles of the distribution and then reverts to the average level at the upper quantiles. The shadow economy exerts a negative effect from the middle to upper quantiles of the ecological footprint distribution. Further, higher informality diminishes the favorable effect of technological progress on the environment. The policymakers should strengthen basic conditions for the establishment and adoption of environmental-related technologies as well as tailor environmental policies for the ongoing transition from the informal to the formal sectors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Data availability
All data analyzed during this study are available and freely collected from public sources.
References
Ahmad M, Khan Z, Rahman ZU, Khattak SI, Khan ZU (2021) Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective. Econ Innov New Technol 30(1):89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1684643
Ahmed K (2020) Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries. J Environ Manage 274:111209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111209
Ali U, Li Y, Yánez Morales VP, Hussain B (2021) Dynamics of international trade, technology innovation and environmental sustainability: evidence from Asia by accounting for cross-sectional dependence. J Environ Planning Manage 64(10):1864–1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1846507
Álvarez-Herránz A, Balsalobre D, Cantos JM, Shahbaz M (2017) Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy 101:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030
Anwar A, Siddique M, Dogan E, Sharif A (2021) The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Renewable Energy 164:956–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.128
Baloch A, Shah SZ, Rasheed S, Rasheed B (2021) The impact of shadow economy on environmental degradation: empirical evidence from Pakistan. GeoJournal 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10354-6
Balsalobre D, Álvarez A, Cantos JM (2015) Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(7):4881–4892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3121-3
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Chiappetta Jabbour CJ, Driha OM (2019) The role of energy innovation and corruption in carbon emissions: evidence based on the EKC hypothesis (pp. 271–304). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-5_11
Bento AM, Jacobsen MR, Liu AA (2018) Environmental policy in the presence of an informal sector. J Environ Econ Manag 90:61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.03.011
Biswas AK, Farzanegan MR, Thum M (2012) Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: theory and evidence. Ecol Econ 75:114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.007
Brown JR, Martinsson G, Petersen BC (2012) Do financing constraints matter for R&D? Eur Econ Rev 56(8):1512–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.007
Buhari D, Lorente DB, Ali Nasir M (2020) European commitment to COP21 and the role of energy consumption, FDI, trade and economic complexity in sustaining economic growth. J Environ Manage 273(August):111146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111146
Canay IA (2011) A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. Economet J 14(3):368–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2011.00349.x
Canh NP, Schinckus C, Thanh SD, Chong FHL (2021) The determinants of the energy consumption: a shadow economy-based perspective. Energy 225:120210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120210
Chan AL-C (2012) Innovation activity and corporate financing: evidence from a developing economy. Applied Financial Economics 22(20):1665–1678. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.667547
Chen H, Hao Y, Li J, Song X (2018) The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: theory and empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 195:200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.206
Chen MA (2016) The informal economy: recent trends, future directions. New Solut 26(2):155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048291116652613
Chen M, Sinha A, Hu K, Shah MI (2021) Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 164(October 2020):120521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120521
Chen M, Sinha A, Hu K, Shah MI (2021) Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 164:120521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120521
Chen W, Lei Y (2018) The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: new evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renewable Energy 123:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.026
Cheng C, Ren X, Wang Z (2019) The impact of renewable energy and innovation on carbon emission: an empirical analysis for OECD countries. Energy Procedia 158:3506–3512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.919
Cheng C, Ren X, Dong K, Dong X, Wang Z (2021) How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management 280(November 2020):111818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111818
Cheng Y, Awan U, Ahmad S, Tan Z (2021) How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 162(October 2020):120398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398
Chien F, Ajaz T, Andlib Z, Chau KY, Ahmad P, Sharif A (2021) The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: a step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy 177:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.101
Chu LK (2021a) Determinants of ecological footprint in OCED countries : do environmental-related technologies reduce environmental degradation? Environ Sci Pollut Res 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17261-4
Chu LK (2021b) Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: new evidence from economic complexity. Appl Econ Lett 28(7):612–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1767280
Chu LK, Hoang DP (2021) The complementarity of income equalization and innovation for more effective emission reduction. J Environ Manage 284(January):112007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112007
Chu LK, Le NTM (2021) Environmental quality and the role of economic policy uncertainty, economic complexity, renewable energy, and energy intensity: the case of G7 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15666-9
Dada JT, Ajide FM, Sharimakin A (2021) Shadow economy, institutions and environmental pollution: insights from Africa. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 18(2):153–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-12-2020-0105
Danish, Ulucak R (2021) Renewable energy, technological innovation and the environment: a novel dynamic auto-regressive distributive lag simulation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 150:111433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111433
Dauda L, Long X, Mensah CN, Salman M (2019) The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15028–15038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04891-y
De Marchi V, Grandinetti R (2013) Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: the case of Italian manufacturing firms. J Knowl Manag 17(4):569–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2013-0121
Destek MA, Manga M (2021) Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(17):21991–22001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2
Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Elgin C, Öztunali O (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve for the informal sector of Turkey (1950–2009). Panoeconomicus 61(4):471–485. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1404471E
Elgin C, Oztunali O (2014) Pollution and informal economy. Econ Syst 38(3):333–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2013.11.002
Erzurumlu SS, Erzurumlu YO (2013) Development and deployment drivers of clean technology innovations. J High Technol Managem Res 24(2):100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2013.09.001
Fernández E, Junquera B, Ordiz M (2003) Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14(4):634–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519032000057628
Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian MD, Wagner N, Gorini R (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energ Strat Rev 24:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
Gray PE (1989) The paradox of technological development. In: Ausubel JH, Sladovich HE (eds) Technology and environment. Washington, DC, National Academy Press
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Guariglia A, Liu P (2014) To what extent do financing constraints affect Chinese firms’ innovation activities? Int Rev Financ Anal 36:223–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.01.005
Hall A, Bockett G, Taylor S, Sivamohan MV, Clark N (2001) Why research partnerships really matter: innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Dev 29(5):783–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00004-3
Hart K (2008) Informal economy. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 221–229
Hsu C-C, Zhang Y, Ch P, Aqdas R, Chupradit S, Nawaz A (2021) A step towards sustainable environment in China: the role of eco-innovation renewable energy and environmental taxes. J Environ Manage 299(August):113609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113609
Hussain M, Dogan E (2021) The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS. J Clean Prod 304:127059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127059
Hussain M, Mir GM, Usman M, Ye C, Mansoor S (2020) Analysing the role of environment-related technologies and carbon emissions in emerging economies: a step towards sustainable development. Environmental Technology (united Kingdom) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1788171
Huynh CM (2020) Shadow economy and air pollution in developing Asia: what is the role of fiscal policy? Environ Econ Policy Stud 22(3):357–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-019-00260-8
Khan A, Muhammad F, Chenggang Y, Hussain J, Bano S, Khan MA (2020a) The impression of technological innovations and natural resources in energy-growth-environment nexus: a new look into BRICS economies. Sci Total Environ 727:138265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138265
Khan H, Khan I, Binh TT (2020b) The heterogeneity of renewable energy consumption, carbon emission and financial development in the globe: a panel quantile regression approach. Energy Rep 6:859–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.002
Khan H, Khan I, Kim Oanh LT, Lin Z (2020c) The dynamic interrelationship of environmental factors and foreign direct investment: dynamic panel data analysis and new evidence from the globe. Math Probl Eng 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2812489
Khan H, Weili L, Khan I (2021a) Environmental innovation, trade openness and quality institutions: an integrated investigation about environmental sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y
Khan H, Weili L, Khan I (2021b) Institutional quality, financial development and the influence of environmental factors on carbon emissions: evidence from a global perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16626-z
Khan H, Weili L, Khan I, Han L (2021c) The effect of income inequality and energy consumption on environmental degradation: the role of institutions and financial development in 180 countries of the world. Environ Sci Pollut Res 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17278-9
Khan H, Weili L, Khan I, Khamphengxay S (2021d) Renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and environmental degradation: a panel data analysis of developing and developed countries. Math Probl Eng 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6691046
Khan H, Weili L, Khan I, Oanh L, thi K. (2021e) Recent advances in energy usage and environmental degradation: Does quality institutions matter? A worldwide evidence. Energy Rep 7:1091–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.085
Khan I, Han L, Khan H (2021f) Renewable energy consumption and local environmental effects for economic growth and carbon emission: evidence from global income countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16651-y
Khan I, Han L, Khan H, Kim Oanh LT (2021g) Analyzing renewable and nonrenewable energy sources for environmental quality: dynamic investigation in developing countries. Math Probl Eng 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3399049
Koçak E, Ulucak ZŞ (2019) The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(14):14328–14338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04712-2
Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
Kumar S, Managi S (2009) Energy price-induced and exogenous technological change: assessing the economic and environmental outcomes. Resource and Energy Economics 31(4):334–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.05.001
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 45(1):1–28
Lassa JA (2019) Negotiating institutional pathways for sustaining climate change resilience and risk governance in Indonesia. Climate 7(8):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7080095
Lin M, Chou K (2018) The environmental policy stringency in Taiwan and its challenges on green economy transition. Develop Soc 47(20):477–502. https://doi.org/10.21588/dns/2018.47.3.007
Medina L, Schneider F (2018) Shadow economies around the world: what did we learn over the last 20 years ?. IMF Working Papers
Mensah CN, Long X, Dauda L, Boamah KB, Salman M, Appiah-Twum F, Tachie AK (2019) Technological innovation and green growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economies. J Clean Prod 240:118204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118204
Mushtaq A, Chen Z, Ud Din N, Ahmad B, Zhang X (2020) Income inequality, innovation and carbon emission: perspectives on sustainable growth. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 33(1):769–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1734855
Nguyen CP, Su TD (2021) When ‘uncertainty’ becomes ‘unknown’: influences of economic uncertainty on the shadow economy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, apce.12336. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12336
Nkengfack H, Kaffo Fotio H, Totouom A (2020) How does the shadow economy affect environmental quality in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Estimations. J Knowledge Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00685-7
OECD (2016) How stringent are environmental policies? OECD, 16. http://www.oecd.org/economy/greeneco/How-stringent-are-environmental-policies.pdf
OECD (2017) Shining light on the shadow economy: opportunities and threats
OECD (2021) Environment at a Glance Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris,. https://doi.org/10.1787/ac4b8b89-en
Pan Y, Chen Q, Zhang P (2020) Does policy uncertainty affect corporate environmental information disclosure: evidence from China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 11(5):903–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2018-0298
Pang J, Li N, Mu H, Zhang M (2021) Empirical analysis of the interplay between shadow economy and pollution: with panel data across the provinces of China. J Clean Prod 285:124864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124864
Pang J, Mu H, Zhang M (2020) Interaction between shadow economy and pollution: empirical analysis based on panel data of northeast China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(17):21353–21363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08641-3
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Economet Rev 34(6–10):1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
Powell D (2016) Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. Available at:. http://works.bepress.com/david_powell/1/
Qayyum U, Sabir S, Anjum S (2021) Urbanization, informal economy, and ecological footprint quality in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15111-x
Qi S, Peng H, Zhang X, Tan X (2019) Is energy efficiency of Belt and Road Initiative countries catching up or falling behind? Evidence from a panel quantile regression approach. Appl Energy 253(July):113581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113581
Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4(2):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212
Salman M, Long X, Dauda L, Mensah CN, Muhammad S (2019) Different impacts of export and import on carbon emissions across 7 ASEAN countries: a panel quantile regression approach. Sci Total Environ 686:1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.019
Şenhaz Z, Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S (2021) Dynamic effects of shadow economy and environmental pollution on the energy stock prices: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(7):8520–8529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11226-9
Shao X, Zhong Y, Liu W, Yi R, Li M (2021) Modeling the effect of green technology innovation and renewable energy on carbon neutrality in N-11 countries ? Evidence from advance panel estimations. J Environ Manage 296(June):113189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113189
Sohag K, Begum RA, Abdullah SMS, Jaafar M (2015) Dynamics of energy use, technological innovation, economic growth and trade openness in Malaysia. Energy 90:1497–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.101
Sohail MT, Ullah S, Majeed MT, Usman A, Andlib Z (2021) The shadow economy in South Asia: dynamic effects on clean energy consumption and environmental pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(23):29265–29275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12690-7
Ulyssea G (2010) Regulation of entry, labor market institutions and the informal sector. J Dev Econ 91(1):87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.07.001
United Nations Department of Economic, & Affairs and S (2009) Climate change: technology development and technology transfer. http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/resources/res_pdfs/publications/sdt_tec/tec_technology_dev.pdf
Wang H, Wei W (2020) Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: the optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies. Energy Economics 87:104510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104510
Wang K, Yan M, Wang Y, Chang CP (2020a) The impact of environmental policy stringency on air quality. Atmos Environ 231(March):117522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117522
Wang L, Chang H-L, Rizvi SKA, Sari A (2020b) Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries? J Environ Manage 270:110829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110829
Wang Z, Bui Q, Zhang B, Pham TLH (2020c) Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint: an investigation of the G7 countries. Sci Total Environ 743:140741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140741
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Xie Z, Wu R, Wang S (2021) How technological progress affects the carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from national panel quantile regression. J Clean Prod 307:127133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127133
Yang L, Li Z (2017) Technology advance and the carbon dioxide emission in China–empirical research based on the rebound effect. Energy Policy 101:150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.020
Zhang YJ, Jin YL, Chevallier J, Shen B (2016) The effect of corruption on carbon dioxide emissions in APEC countries: a panel quantile regression analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 112:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.027
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors of this paper contribute equally to the planning, executions, analysis, and writing tasks.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chu, L.K. The impact of informal economy on technological innovation–ecological footprint nexus in OECD countries: new evidence from panel quantile regression. J Environ Stud Sci 12, 515–533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00756-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00756-y
Keywords
- Ecological footprint
- Informal economy
- Quantile regression
- Technological innovation