Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A new framework for environmental education about energy transition: investment and the energy regulatory and industrial complex

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern societies depend upon fossil fuel–based energy systems for energy services, but, despite huge benefits, many negative environmental consequences have resulted from fossil fuels. The most important is climate change, caused by greenhouse gases emitted from production and use of fossil fuels. Over the past 50 years, environmental education has increasingly embraced the need for curriculum on climate change, but these curricular efforts have not delved deeply enough into building student knowledge and analytical skills about energy systems and the imperative transition away from fossil fuels. Based on political–ecological ideas, we propose a new framework for building environmental curriculum about energy and energy transitions: the Energy Regulatory and Industrial Complex (ERIC) with an embedded Energy Investment Cycle (EIC), a systemic perspective to help students focus on the key role of decision-making about energy investments. ERIC and EIC also bolster recognition of the components of energy systems, how they relate to each other, and the challenges of transforming an energy system. Environmental education involves a large variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives among instructors serving students at many levels and from different preparations. Accordingly, we do not attempt to provide exact instructions on how to use ERIC and EIC. Instead, our intention is to help faculty develop curricula for different disciplinary and interdisciplinary courses and degree programs. To that end, we conclude with brief illustrations of possible uses of ERIC and EIC. We argue that our proposed framework will stimulate better understanding of energy-environmental interactions and thereby promote constructive discussions about energy transitions away from fossil fuels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlborg H, Nightingale AJ (2018) Theorizing power in political ecology: the where of power in resource governance projects. J Polit Ecol 25:381–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson V, Johnson L (1997) Systems thinking basics: from concepts to causal loops. Pegasus Communications, Waltham, p 132

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold RD, Wade J (2015) A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Comput Sci 44:669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asiyanbi AP (2016) A political ecology of REDD+: Property rights, militarized protectionism, and carbonized exclusion in Cross River. Geoforum 77:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belu RG, Chiou R, Cioca LI (2017) Embedding renewable energy and sustainability concepts into engineering and technology curriculum. American Society for Engineering Education 2017 Annual Conference and Exposition. Columbus. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—28217

  • Belu RG (2017) Embedding Renewable Energy Concepts into Engineering Curriculum. American Society for Engineering Education, Paper ID #20318

  • Bennett A, Ravikumar A, Paltán H (2018) The political ecology of oil palm company-community partnerships in the Peruvian Amazon: deforestation consequences of the privatization of rural development. World Dev 109:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez V (2017) Electricity storage supporting PV competitiveness in a reliable and sustainable electric network. J Renew Sustain Energy 9:012301-1-012301–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie PM, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • California ISO (2021) Root cause analysis: mid-August 2020 extreme heat wave (Sacramento (?): California ISO), 131 pp

  • Carse A, Lewis JA (2016) Toward a political ecology of infrastructure standards: or, how to think about ships, waterways, sediment, and communities together. Environ Plan A 49(1):9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16663015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman EM, Eschenbach EA, Baker D (2005) Adding energy and power to environmental engineering curriculum with just-in-time teaching. Proceedings – 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, November 2005

  • Chassot S, Hampl N, Wüstenhagen R (2014) When energy policy meets free-market capitalists: the moderating influence of worldviews on risk perception and renewable energy investment decisions. Energy Res Soc Sci 3:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornea N, Ve´ron R, Zimmer A (2016) Clean city politics: an urban political ecology of solid waste in West Bengal, India. Environ Plann A 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16682028

  • Costanza R, Daly L, Fioramonti L et al (2016) The UN sustainable development goals and the dynamics of well-being, Solutions, January – February, pp 20–22, http://www.idakub.com/academics/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2016_Costanza_SDGs-Solutions.pdf, Accessed 19 Nov 2020

  • Cotton DRE, Miller W, Winter J, Bailey I, Sterling S (2015) Developing students’ energy literacy in higher education. Int J Sustain Higher Educ. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2013-0166?af=R

  • Deeming C, Smyth P (2018) Reframing global social policy: social investment for sustainable and inclusive growth. Policy Press, Chicago, p 350

    Google Scholar 

  • Delucchi MA, Jacobson MZ (2011) Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power: Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy 39:1170–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desha C, Hargroves K (2010) Surveying the state of higher education in energy efficiency, in Australian engineering curriculum. J Clean Prod 18(7):652–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap A (2020) Bureaucratic land grabbing for infrastructural colonization: renewable energy, L’Amassada, and resistance in southern France. Hum Geogr 00:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620918041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Brulle RJ (2015) Climate change and society: sociological perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, p 460

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durrans B, Whale J, Calais M (2020) Benchmarking a sustainable energy engineering undergraduate degree against curriculum frameworks and pedagogy standards from industry and academia. Energies 13(822):1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer C (2011) Developing an energy literacy curriculum in support of sustainability. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1801463

  • E2 (2021) Clean energy jobs america 2021: after a hard year, promise of unparalleled jobs growth. https://e2.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/E2-2021-Clean-Jobs-america-Report-04-19-2021.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2021

  • Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109–58,109th Congress (2005). https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ58/PLAW-109publ58.pdf

  • EnergyHQ (2021) Upstream? Midstream? Downstream? What’s the difference? Found at https://energyhq.com/2017/04/upstream-midstream-downstream-whats-the-difference/, 4 October

  • Epstein A (2014) The moral case for fossil fuels. Portfolio/Penguin, New York, p 248

    Google Scholar 

  • Forinash K III, Perkins JH, Whitten B (2021) Background, approaches, and resources for teaching energy in environmental studies. J Environ Stud Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00671-8

  • García-Olivares A (2015) Substitutability of electricity and renewable materials for fossil fuels in a post-carbon economy. Energies 8:13308–13343. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81212371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg T, Park TK (1994) Political ecology. J Polit Ecol 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JA, Zarger RK (2017) Toward political ecologies of environmental education. J Environ Educ 48(4):285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2020) World Energy Investment 2020 (Post WEO-2020 data update). World data. International Energy Agency, Paris. https://www.iea.org/articles/investment-estimates-for-2020-continue-to-point-to-a-record-slump-in-spending, Accessed 22 Nov 2020. Percent calculations by JHP

  • International Energy Agency (2021) Net zero by 2050: a roadmap for the global energy sector. International Energy Agency, Paris, 222 pp. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050, Accessed 3 Jun 2021

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, 104 pp

  • IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. IPCC, Geneva, 603 pp

  • IPCC (2021) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, Zhou B (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press. (Found at https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf, 9 August 2021

  • Jacobson MZ, Delucchi MA, Bazouin G et al (2015) 100% Clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energy Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee01283j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson SN, Stephens JC, White B (2019) Environmental education in transition: a critical review of recent research on climate change and energy education. J Environ Educ 50(3):160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandpal TC, Broman L (2014) Renewable energy education: a worldwide status review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:300–324

  • Karpouzoglou T, Marshall F, Mehta L (2018) Towards a peri-urban political ecology of water quality decline. Land Use Policy 70:485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittner N, Lill F, Kammen DM (2017) Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition. Nat Energy 2(9):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koohi-Fayegh S, Rosen MA (2020) A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments. J Energy Storage 27:101047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koonin SE (2021) Unsettled: what climate science tells us, what it doesn’t, and why it matters. BenBella Books Inc, Dallas, p 306

    Google Scholar 

  • “KSAT Explains: The ‘total breakdown’ of the Texas power grid” https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2021/04/06/ksat-explains-the-total-breakdown-of-the-texas-power-grid/, Accessed 28 May 2021

  • Ma J et al (2021) The 2021 battery technology roadmap. J Phys D Appl Phys 54(183001):1–44. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abd353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mälkki H, Paatero JV (2015) Curriculum planning in energy engineering education. J Clean Prod 106:292–299

  • Markey E et al (2019) Senate Resolution 59—recognizing the duty of the federal government to create a green new deal. Congressional Record, February 7, pp S1140–S1142

  • Masini A, Menichetti E (2013) Investment decisions in the renewable energy sector: an analysis of non-financial drivers. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80:510–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J, Thatcher J (2019) Visualizing new political ecologies: a critical data studies analysis of the World Bank’s renewable energy resource mapping initiative. Geoforum 102:242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, Hartford, p 240

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek D, Lloro-Bidart T (2017) Introduction: synthesizing a political ecology of education. J Environ Educ 48(4):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mena B (2021) Gov. Greg Abbott and other Republicans blamed green energy for Texas’ power woes. But the state runs on fossil fuels, The Texas Tribune, February 17, found at https://www.texastribune.org/2021/02/17/abbott-republicans-green-energy/, 6 October 2021

  • Meyer R (2019) So has the green new deal won yet? The Atlantic, November 15, https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/11/did-green-new-deal-win-look-after-one-year/602032/, Accessed 19 Nov 2020

  • Moore S (2019) Sustainable energy transformations, power, and politics: Morocco and the Mediterranean. Routledge, New York, p 276

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio-Cortez A et al (2019) Recognizing the duty of the federal government to create a green new deal. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/text, Accessed 19 Nov 2020

  • Patel NS (2017) Motivating teacher and student engagement with the environment through renewable energy education. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

  • Pecen R, Hall T, Chalkiadakis F, Zora A (2003) Renewable energy based capstone design applications for an undergraduate engineering technology curriculum. 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, November 2003

  • Perkins JH (1997) Geopolitics and the green revolution: wheat, genes, and the Cold War. Oxford University Press, New York, p 352

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins JH (2017) Changing energy: the transition to a sustainable future. University of California Press, Oakland, p 340

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins JH, Middlecamp C, Blockstein D et al (2014) Energy education and the dilemma of mitigating climate change. J Environ Stud Sci 4:354–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0189-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter TM (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 310

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P (2004) Political Ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, p 242

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul KM, Perkins JH (2014) Nuclear Power: Is it Worth the Risk? Invited chapter. In: Byrne J, Wang Y-D (eds) Green Energy Economies: The Search for Clean and Renewable Energy. Transaction Publishers, Herndon, NJ, pp 276–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul KM (2017) The Process Model of Displacement: A Case Study Analysis of Three Nuclear Technology Projects. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Delaware, Newark, DE

  • Smil V (2016) Energy transitions: global and national perspectives, 2nd edn. Praeger, Santa Barbara, p 282

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparber S (2021) Texas House targets power grid flaw that cut electricity to natural gas facilities and worsened February blackouts. Texas Tribune, https://www.texastribune.org/2021/04/19/texas-power-grid-failure-legislature-natural-gas/, Accessed 28 May 2021

  • Spiegel SJ (2017) EIAs, power and political ecology: Situating resource struggles and the techno-politics of small-scale mining. Geoforum 87:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapp WB et al (1968) The concept of environmental education. J Environ Educ 1(1):30–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139254.1969.10801479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC, Perkins JH, Sparks RE, Knox RA (2016) The challenge of climate change neoskepticism. Science 353:653–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes LC (2020) Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States. Oxford University Press, New York, p 318

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strantzali E, Aravossis K (2016) Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:885–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/, Accessed 21 Jun 2021

  • Wall Street Journal (2020) California’s Green Blackouts, p. A 16, Eastern edition

  • Weart S (2013) Rise of interdisciplinary research on climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci PNAS 110(Supplemental 1):3657–3664. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107482109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (a), GDP (current US$), found at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.GDI.FTOT.ZS, Accessed 22 Nov 2020

  • World Bank (b), Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP), found at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.GDI.FTOT.ZS, Accessed 22 Nov 2020

  • Wrigley EA (2010) Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 172

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA, USA

    Kathleen M. Saul & John H. Perkins

Authors
  1. Kathleen M. Saul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John H. Perkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John H. Perkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saul, K.M., Perkins, J.H. A new framework for environmental education about energy transition: investment and the energy regulatory and industrial complex. J Environ Stud Sci 12, 149–163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00730-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00730-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation