Abstract
Terminology pertaining to environmental and disaster management has long been subject to wide interpretation and vague definition. The term environmental disaster tends to be particularly ambiguous. Environmental disasters are often framed primarily in terms of their social and economic effects rather than their ecological impacts. The ambiguity of environmental disasters may be attributed largely to the general peripherality of environmental values. Evolving trajectories in disaster studies, including social constructivism and the vulnerability paradigm, do little to mitigate this ambiguity. A more meaningful and nuanced understanding of environmental disasters is needed and would include more explicit consideration of ecological impacts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aini MS, Fakhrul-Razi A (2010) Development of a socio-technical disaster model. Saf Sci 48:1286–1295
Bankoff G (2001) Rendering the world unsafe: ‘vulnerability’ as western discourse. Disasters 25(4):19–35
Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) (2004) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Bland LM, Rowland JA, Regan TJ, Keith DA, Murray NJ, Lester RE, Linn M, Rodriguez JP, Nicholson N (2018) Developing a standardized definition of ecosystem collapse for risk assessment. Front Ecol Environ 16(1):29–36
Brundtland G (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations General Assessmbly
Catton WR Jr, Dunlap RE (1978) Environmental sociology: a new paradigm. Am Sociol 13:41–49
Capistrano D, Samper C, Lee MJ, Raudsepp-Hearne C (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments: findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group of the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Washington. Island Press, D.C.
Dunlap RE (2008) Promoting a paradigm change reflections on early contributions to environmental sociology. Organ Environ 21(4):478–487
Freudenberg WR (1997) Contamination, corrosion and the social order: an overview. Curr Sociol 45(3):19–39
Furedi F (2007) The changing meaning of disaster. Area 39(4):482–489
Gaillard JC (2019) Disaster studies inside out. Disasters 43(S1):S7–S17
Hannigan J (1995) Environmental sociology: a social constructionist perspective. Routledge, N.Y
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248
Holopainen M, Toivonen M (2012) Weak signals: Ansoff today. Futures 44(3):198–205
Hughes TP, Linares C, Dakos V, van de Leemput IA, van Nes EH (2013) Living dangerously on borrowed time during slow, unrecognized regime shifts. Trends Ecol Evol 28(3):149–155
Irwin A (1995) Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge, New York
Marshall BK, Picou JS (2008) Postnormal science, precautionary principle, and worst cases: the challenge of twenty-first century catastrophes. Sociol Inq 78(2):230–247
Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J & Behrens III, WM (1972) The limits to growth universe books
Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, N.Y
Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopin G, Gutman P, Hammond A, Kates R, Swart R (2002) Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead Stockholm Environment Institute. Global Scenario Group, Boston, USA
Ravetz J (2004) The post-normal science of precaution. Futures 36(3):347–357
Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:6856
Shrivastava P (1995) Ecocentric management for a risk society. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):118–137
Taleb N (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House, NY
Tierney KJ (2007) From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annu Rev Sociol 33:503–525
Tierney KJ (2012) Disaster governance: social, political and economic dimensions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:341–363
Turner BJ (1976) The organizational and interorganizational development of disasters. Adm Sci Q 21:378–397
Vallero DA, Letcher TM (2012) Engineering risks and failures: lessons learned from environmental disasters. Leadersh Manag Eng 12(4):199–209
Vallero & Letcher (2013) Unraveling environmental disasters. Waltham, MA: Elsevier
Wijkman A & Rockstrom J (2012) Bankrupting nature: denying our planetary boundaries. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge
Worldwatch Institute (2013) State of the world 2013: is sustainability still possible? Island Press, Washington
Young N (2015) Environmental sociology for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, Don Mills
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulvihill, P.R. The ambiguity of environmental disasters. J Environ Stud Sci 11, 1–5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00646-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00646-1