Skip to main content

The relationships between social capital and concerns for climate change with increasing wildfire risks in rural communities in Central Oregon

Abstract

Though a global issue, climate change adaptation necessitates local action. For many rural communities, challenges to available capital, infrastructure and knowledge systems need to be identified to adequately address climate change adaptability. In this study, social capital and information networks are examined as local adaptation strategies to mitigate specific risks and vulnerabilities to wildfire. We examine survey data collected from 683 owner-occupied rural central Oregon households, where localized climate change manifestations present risks to residents through increased wildfire occurrence and severity. Results indicate that social network ties to professionals knowledgeable on climate change and/or wildfires have no statistical impact on perceptions of climate change or associated local risks. Such social network ties are, however, mediated by a social capital measure of governmental trust for climate change. Results also indicate residents with higher perceptions of adaptation capacity to mobilize for collective action had greater concern for localized risks while residents with higher views of community solidarity had less concern. Clarifying these relationships adds to our understanding of social networks, community level social capital, and concerns for generalized climate change versus localized manifestations of risk as adaptation strategies for forested rural communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. The non-response bias check was conducted with 10% of non-respondent’s after adjusting for undeliverable surveys. This survey was conducted over the phone and included a total of seven questions. More details are available in (add in after blind review).

  2. The weighting of the positions for the position generator has been omitted based on the lack of statistical difference between using the diversity index and the weighted diversity index. For additional review of this detail, please see (add in after blind review).

References

  • Abrams JB, Knapp M, Paveglio TB, Ellison A, Mosely C, Nielsen-Pincus M, Carroll MS (2015) Re-envisioning community-wildfire relations in the U.S. West as adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 20(3):34. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07848-200334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2010) Climate change, human well-being and insecurity. New Political Economy 15(2):275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903290912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climate Change 93:335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Barnett J, Brown K, Marshall N, O’Brien K (2013) Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 3(2):112–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich DP, Meyer AM (2015) Social capital and community resilience. Am Behav Sci 59(2):254–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong A, Stedman RC (2019) Understanding local environmental concern: the importance of place. Rural Sociol 84(1):93–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcus HR (2011) Heterogeneity of rural housing markets. In Marcouiller, D., Lapping M., and Furuseth O. (editors) Rural housing, exurbanization, and amenity-driven development: contrasting the “haves” and the “have nots”. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros AMG, Ager AA, day MA, Preisler HK, Spies TA, White E, Pabst RJ, Olsen KA, Platt E, Bailey JD, Bolte JP (2017) Spatiotemporal dynamics of simulated wildfire, forest management, and forest succession in Central Oregon, USA. Ecol Soc 22(1):24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08917-220124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin CE (2009) Bonding and bridging neighbourliness: an individual-level study in the context of health. Soc Sci Med 68(12):2129–2136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin O, Prell C (eds) (2011) Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomberg E (2017) Environmental politics in the Trump era: an early assessment. Environ Polit 26(5):956–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Borick CP, Rabe B (2012) Belief in global warming on the rebound: national survey of American public opinion on climate change. In Brookings: Issues in Governance Studies: https://www.brookings.edu/research/belief-in-global-warming-on-the-rebound-national-survey-of-american-public-opinion-on-climate-change/. Accessed 04 April 2018

  • Burt RB (2005) Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell S, Azuma D, Weyermann D (2004) Forests of Eastern Oregon: an overview. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmin J, Tierney K, Chu E, Hunter LM, Roberts JT, Shi L (2015) Adaptation to climate change. In: Dunlap RE, Brulle RJ (eds) Climate change and society: sociological perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 164–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S (eds) (2005) Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll M, Paveglio T (2016) Using community archetypes to better understand differential community adaptation to wildfire risk. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society B 371:20150344. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho A (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Underst Sci 16(2):223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley S (2006) The Northwest Forest Plan as a model for broad-scale ecosystem management: a social perspective. Conserv Biol 20(2):330–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure), S95-S120

  • Coon D (ed) (2007) Get organized, Oregon’s history: people, natural resources, agriculture. Oregon Agriculture in the Classroom Foundation, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer LA, Riley PJ, Kiger G (1991) Support and antagonism in social networks: effects of community and gender. J Soc Behav Pers 6(4):991–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer LA, Kennedy JJ, Krannich RS, Quigley TM (1993) Changing forest service values and their implications for land management decisions affecting resource-dependent communities. Rural Sociol 58:475–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton MM, Mote PW, Snover AK (2013) Climate change and the Northwest: implications for our landscape, waters and communities. Island Press, Washington D.C. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-512-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (1999) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Brulle RJ (2015) Climate change and society: sociological perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn CJ, Bailey JD (2015) Temporal fuel dynamics following high-severity fire in dry mixed conifer forests of the Eastern Cascades, Oregon, USA. Int J Wildland Fire 24(4):470–483. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Development for Central Oregon (2018) 2018 Central Oregon Economic Profile. EDCOINFO.Com. https://edcoinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018_EDCO_Economic_Profile.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2019

  • Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Chang 21:647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensor J, Berger R (eds) (2009) Understanding climate change adaptation: lessons from community-based approaches. Practical Action Publishing Ltd, Warwickshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint CG, Luloff AE (2005) Natural resource-based communities, risk and disaster: an intersection of theories. Soc Nat Resour 18(5):399–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint CG, Luloff AE, Theodori GL (2010) Extending the concept of community interaction to explore regional community fields. J Rural Social Sci 25(1):22–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora CB, Flora JL, Gasteyer SP (2016) Rural communities: legacy and change, 5th edn. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/. Accessed 31 Dec 2019

  • Fowler FJ Jr (2014) Survey research methods, 5th edn. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousands Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1:201–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider TM, Garkovich L (1994) Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment Rural Sociology. 59(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert C, Narayan D, Nyhan Jones V, Woolcock M (2004) Measuring social capital: an integrated questionnaire. The World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundman R (2007) Climate change and knowledge politics. Environ Polit 16(3):414–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Hällsten M, Edling C, Rydgren J (2017) Social capital, friendship networks, and youth unemployment. Soc Sci Res 61:234–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshaw HW, Tindall DB (2005) Social structure, identities, and values: a network approach to understanding people’s relationships to forests. J Leis Res 37:426–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins RL, Maurer K (2010) Bonding, bridging and linking: how social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Br J Soc Work 40(6):1777–1793

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein T (2012) Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessburg PF, Spies TA, Perry DA et al (2016) Tamm review: management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California. For Ecol Manag 366:221–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoult TF (1977) Dictionary of modern sociology. Littlefield, Adams & Co., Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourdequin M, Landres P, Hanson MJ, Craig DR (2012) Ethical implications of democratic theory for U.S. public participation in environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 35:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurteau MD, Liang S, Martin KL, North MP, Koch GW, Hungate BA (2016) Restoring forest structure and process stabilizes forest carbon in wildfire-prone southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecol Appl 26(2):382–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Vields CB, Barros V, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–32

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2019) Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Summary for policymakers. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/srccl/. Accessed 31 Dec 2019

  • Jacobs DB (2014) Utilizing relational and social network analysis to inform community-based climate change adaptation: a Central Oregon case study. Dissertation, Oregon State University. http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/55109. Accessed 31 Dec 2019

  • Jacobs DB, Cramer LA (2017) Applying information network analysis to fire-prone landscapes: implications for community resilience. Ecol Soc 22(1):52–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KM (2006) Demographic trends in rural and small town America. Reports on America, vol 1. Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JD, Bailey JD, Dunn CJ, Lindsay AA (2017) Historical fire-climate relationships in contrasting interior Pacific Northwest forest types. Fire Ecol 13(2):18–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly EC, Bliss JC (2012) From industrial ownership to multifunctional landscapes: tenure change and rural restructuring in Central Oregon. Soc Nat Resour 25(11):1085–1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2009) Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ climate change beliefs, attitudes, policy preferences, and actions. Yale University, New Haven. https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2009-Americans-Climate-Change-Beliefs-Attitudes-Policy-Preferences-and-Actions.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2019

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N, Hmielowski JD (2011) Climate change in the American Mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in November 2011. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/ClimateBeliefsNovember2011.pdf

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Hmielowski J (2012) Global warming’s six Americas, March 2012 and Nov. 2011. Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. New Haven. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Six-Americas-March-2012.pdf

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2015) Politics and global warming, fall 2015. Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, New Haven http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Politics-and-Global-Warming-Fall-2015-2.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2019

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Rosenthal S, Kotcher J, Ballew M, Goldberg M, Gustafson A (2018) Climate change in the American mind: December (2018) Yale University. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, New Haven. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/climate-change-in-the-american-mind-december-2018/. Accessed 31 Dec 2019.

  • Lin N (1999) Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1):28–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Erickson B (eds) (2008) Social capital: an international research program. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS (eds) (2001a) Social capital: theory and research. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Fu Y, Hsung R (2001b) The position generator: measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In: Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS (eds) Social capital: theory and research. Transaction Publishers, News Brunswick, pp 57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA (2000) Motivation, cognition, and action: an analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Appl Psychol Int Rev 49(3):408–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokocz E, Ryan R, Sadler AJ (2011) Motivations for land protection and stewardship: exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landsc Urban Plan 99(2):65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climate Change 77:73–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2009) Global warming’s six Americas 2009: an audience segmentation analysis. http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=889822. Accessed 10 December 2013

  • Mann ME, Hassol SJ (2017) Climate trumps everything: the new administration could cut greenhouse gases and achieve its economic goals all at once. Sci Am 316(2):8 http://www.meteo.psu.edu/holocene/public_html/Mann/articles/articles/SciAmMannHassolFeb17.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson VA, Enqvist JP, Stedman RC, Tengo M (2019) Sense of place in social-ecological systems: from theory to empirics. Sustain Sci 14:555–564

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociol Q 52:155–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead E, Roser-Renouf C, Rimal RN, Flora JA, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A (2012) Information seeking about global climate change among adolescents: the role of risk perceptions, efficacy beliefs, and parental influences. Atl J Commun 20:31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf R (2010) A historical look at La Pine, Oregon. In: La Pine Chamber of Commerce. http://www.lapine.org/documents/metcalf.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2014

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) A century of wildland fire research: contributions to long-term approaches for wildland fire management: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24792

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2011) Climate stabilization targets: emissions, concentrations, and impacts over decades to millennia. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Climate Change Research Institute (2010) Oregon climate assessment report. Oregon State University. www.occri.net/OCAR. Accessed 15 January 2014

  • Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (2010) The Oregon climate change adaptation framework. Oregon State, Salem http://www.lcd.state.or.us/LCD/docs/ClimateChange/Framework_Final.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2013

  • Oreskes N, Conway EM (2011) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Patchen M (2006) Public attitudes and behavior about climate change. Purdue Climate Change Research Center, Outreach Publication 0601. http://www.purdue.edu/discoverypark/climate/resources/docs/Patchen%20OP0601.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2014

  • Paveglio TB, Carroll M, Jakes PJ, Prato T (2012) Exploring the social characteristics of adaptive capacity to wildfire: insights from Flathead County, Montana. Hum Ecol Rev 19(2):110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevman.2013.08.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paveglio TB, Abrams J, Ellison A (2016a) Developing fire adapted communities: the importance of interactions among elements of local context. Soc Nat Resour 29(10):1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1132351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paveglio TB, Prato T, Edgeley C, Nalle D (2016b) Evaluating the characteristics of social vulnerability to wildfire: demographics, perceptions, and parcel characteristics. Environ Manag 58:534–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0719-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry DA, Hessburg PF, Skinner CN, Spies TA, Stephens SL, Taylor AH, Franklin JF, McComb B, Riegel G (2011) The ecology of mixed severity fire regimes in Washington, Oregon, and northern California. For Ecol Manag 26(5):703–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Research Center (2015) Coordinated Population Forecast for Deschutes County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB), and Area Outside UGBs 2015–2065. Population Research Center, Portland State University. https://www.pdx.edu/prc/sites/www.pdx.edu.prc/files/Deschutes_Forecast_Report_201506.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2019

  • Putnam RD, Feldstein LM (2003) Better together: restoring the American community. Simon and Schuster Paperbacks, New York

  • Rasker R, Gude PH, Gude JA, van den Noort J (2009) The economic importance of air travel in high-amenity rural areas. J Rural Stud 25:343–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Redshaw S, Ingham V (2018) ‘Neighborhood is if they come out and talk to you’: neighbourly connections and bonding social capital. J Sociol 54(4):557–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson RT, Erickson BH, Nosanchuk TA (1979) Community size, network structure, and the flow of information. Can J Sociol 4(4):379–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Roser-Renouf C, Atkinson L, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A (2016) The consumer as climate activist. Int J Commun 10:4759–4783 https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/4702-22464-1-PB.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker P, Johnson J (2017) Trump announces U.S. will exit Paris climate deal, sparking criticism at home and abroad. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-to-announce-us-will-exit-paris-climate-deal/2017/06/01/fbcb0196-46da-11e7-bcde-624ad94170ab_story.html?utm_term=.27dbdba1b018. Accessed 01 June 2017

  • Schneider SH (2009) Science as a contact sport: inside the battle to save Earth’s climate. National Geographic, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear MD (2017) Trump will withdraw U.S. from Paris climate agreement. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/climate/trump-paris-climate-agreement.html. Accessed 01 June 2017

  • Shepard S, Boudet H, Zanocco CM, Cramer LA, Tilt B (2018) Community climate change beliefs, awareness, and actions in the wake of the September 2013 flooding in Boulder County, Colorado. J Environ Stud Sci 8:312–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Siders AR (2019) Adaptive capacity to climate change: a synthesis of concepts, methods, and findings in a fragmented field. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.573

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen JFL (2016) Rural-urban differences in bonding and bridging social capital. Reg Stud 50(3):391–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Giesen TW, Swanson FJ, Franklin JF, Lach D, Johnson N (2010) Climate change adaptation strategies for federal forests of the Pacific northwest, USA: ecological, policy, and socio-economic perspectives. Landsc Ecol 25:1185–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, White EM, Kline JD, Fischer AP, Ager A, Bailey J, Bolte J, Koch J, Platt E, Olsen CS, Jacobs DB, Schindler B, Steel-Adams MM, Hammer R (2014) Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecol Soc 19(3):9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06584-190309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Scheller RM, Bolte JP (2018) Adaptation in fire-prone landscapes: interactions of policies, management, wildfire, and social networks in Oregon, USA. Ecol Soc 23(2):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Spracklen DV, Mickley LJ, Logan JA, Hudman RC, Yevich R, Flannigan MD, Westerling AL (2009) Impacts of climate change from 2000 to 2050 on wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations in the western United States. J Geophys Res 114(D20301). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010966

  • Stedman RC (2016) Subjectivity and social-ecological systems: a rigidity trap (and sense of place as a way out). Sustain Sci 11:891–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman RC, Connelly NA, Heberlein TA, Decker DJ, Shorna BA (2019) The end of the (research) world as we know it? Understanding and coping with declining response rates to mail surveys. Soc Nat Resour 32(10):1139–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1587127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel BS, Weber E (2001) Ecosystem management, decentralization, and public opinion. Glob Environ Chang 11:119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK et al (2013) Technical summary. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindall DB, Cormier J, Diani M (2012) Network social capital as an outcome of social movement mobilization: using the position generator as an indicator of social network diversity. Soc Networks 34:387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Interior and Department of Agriculture (2014) The national strategy: the final phase of the development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. In: Jewell S and Vilsack TJ (eds). http://www.doi.gov/news/upload/20140328_CSPhaseIIINationalStrategy_SurnameCopy_execSec_FINAL_v3.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2014

  • Van der Gaag M, Snijders TAB (2005) The resource generator: social capital quantification with concrete items. Soc Networks 27:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaske J (2008) Survey research and analysis: applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing, State College

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaske J, Needham MD (2008) Survey implementation, sampling, and weighting data. In: Vaske J (ed) Research survey research and analysis: applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture Publishing Inc., State College, pp 173–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EP (2003) Bringing society back in: grassroots ecosystem management, accountability and sustainable communities. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman B, Frank K (2001) Network capital in a multilevel world: getting support from personal communities. In: Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS (eds) Social capital: theory and research. Transaction Publishers, News Brunswick, pp 57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerling ALR (2016) Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20150178. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Governors’ Association (2010) Climate adaptation priorities for the western States: scoping report. In: Western Governors’ Association, Serving the Governors of 19 States and 3 U.S.-flag Pacific Islands. http://www.westgov.org/reports/cat_view/95-reports/238-2010. Accessed 12 June 2013

  • Wimberly M, Liu Z (2013) Interactions of climate, fire, and management in future forests of the Pacific northwest. For Ecol Manag http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112713006579#. Accessed 9 July 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derric B. Jacobs.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 613 kb).

Appendix

Appendix

Below is the survey sent to La Pine’s owner-occupied residents. The Survey for Greater Crescent is identical except for the cover page and some references to be explicit to Crescent, Gilchrist and Crescent Lake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, D.B., Cramer, L.A. The relationships between social capital and concerns for climate change with increasing wildfire risks in rural communities in Central Oregon. J Environ Stud Sci 10, 12–30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00584-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00584-7

Keywords

  • Social capital
  • Social networks
  • Climate change
  • Rural communities
  • Wildfires
  • Oregon