Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing the impact of conservation marketing using psychology: a research agenda

  • Articles with Attitude
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conservation marketing draws upon social marketing and psychology to address the human dimensions of biodiversity loss. Behavioural scientists with expertise in conservation psychology can contribute to the design of research projects in this field that utilize a variety of methodologies (quantitative and qualitative), formal application for approval of methodology and procedure through relevant human and animal research ethics committees, and implementation and evaluation of projects or campaigns that are based on psychological principles of persuasion, attitude, and behavior change with the aim of protecting biodiversity. Interdisciplinary projects utilizing best practice in conservation psychology, community-based social marketing, and conservation marketing are likely to lead to improved outcomes, such as reductions in human consumption patterns and other unsustainable behaviors and increases in community engagement. A closer relationship between conservation psychology and conservation marketing will lead to publications of research in high-impact peer-reviewed journals, offering practical recommendations for conservation practitioners, as well as reaching laypeople. Importantly, communicating successes and failures of different approaches, projects or campaigns will help conservation practitioners, conservation educators, tourism operators, community groups, policy-makers, and other stakeholders make informed decisions and design effective conservation marketing campaigns based on evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Action control. Springer, pp 11–39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(4):665–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander SM, Quinn MS (2011) Coyote (Canis latrans) interactions with humans and pets reported in the Canadian print media (1995–2010). Hum Dimens Wildl 16(5):345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A, Walters RH (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice-hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya S, Wogan GO, Swartz B, Quental TB et al (2011) Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471(7336):51–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis K, Honey-Rosés J, Börner J, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Ferraro PJ, Lapeyre R, Persson UM, Pfaff A, Wunder S (2016) Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conserv Lett 9(1):58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman MH (2006) Climate change as a predictable surprise. Clim Chang 77(1–2):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett NJ, Roth R, Klain SC, Chan KM, Clark DA, Cullman G et al (2017) Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conserv Biol 31(1):56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S, Myers G (2015) Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. Wiley

  • Clayton S, Litchfield C, Geller ES (2013) Psychological science, conservation, and environmental sustainability. Front Ecol Environ 11(7):377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde DA, Flesness N, Colchero F, Jones OR, Scheuerlein A (2011) An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331(6023):1390–1391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola DP (2005) “Gripped by fear” Public risk (mis) perception and the Washington, DC sniper. Disaster Prev Manag 14(1):32–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffett RG (2017) Influence of social media marketing communications on young consumers’ attitudes. Young Consum 18(1):19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora JA, Maibach EW, Maccoby N (1989) The role of media across four levels of health promotion intervention. Annu Rev Public Health 10(1):181–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Game ET, Meijaard E, Sheil D, McDonald-Madden E (2014) Conservation in a wicked complex world; challenges and solutions. Conserv Lett 7(3):271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford A Jr (2009) Cultural, cognition and human action. J Socio-Econ 38(1):13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R, Nilsson A (2014) Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int J Psychol 49(3):141–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Evolution and cognition (paper)

  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 82(4):581–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happer C, Philo G (2016) New approaches to understanding the role of the news media in the formation of public attitudes and behaviours on climate change. Eur J Commun 31(2):136–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye J (2014) Risk perception: theories, strategies, and next steps. Campbell Institute National Safety Council, Itasca

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe H (2003) Risk: from perception to social representation. Br J Soc Psychol 42(1):55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU, Chellam R (2009) Carnivore conservation at the crossroads. Oryx 43(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen P, Kerr G, Schultz DE, McColl R, Pals H (2014) The elaboration likelihood model: review, critique and research agenda. Eur J Mark 48(11/12):2033–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunzig R (2011) Population 7 billion. Natl Geogr 219(1):32–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee PC, Priston NE (2005) Human attitudes to primates: perceptions of pests, conflict and consequences for primate conservation. Commensalism and Conflict: The Human-Primate Interface 4:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield CA (2013) Rhino poaching: apply conservation psychology. Science 340(6137):1168–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield CA, Lowry R, Dorrian J (2018) Recycling 115,369 mobile phones for gorilla conservation over a six-year period (2009-2014) at Zoos Victoria: a case study of ‘points of influence’and mobile phone donations. PLoS One 13(12):e0206890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loboguerrero AM, Campbell BM, Cooper PJ, Hansen JW, Rosenstock T, Wollenberg E (2019) Food and earth systems: priorities for climate change adaptation and mitigation for agriculture and food systems. Sustainability 11(5):1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke H, Dearden P (2005) Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environ Conserv 32(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald E, Milfont T, Gavin M (2016) Applying the elaboration likelihood model to increase recall of conservation messages and elaboration by zoo visitors. J Sustain Tour 24(6):866–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKeracher T, Diedrich A, Simpfendorfer CA (2019) Sharks, rays and marine protected areas: a critical evaluation of current perspectives. Fish Fish 20(2):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manejar AJA, Sandoy LMH, Subade RF (2019) Linking marine biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation: a case study in selected rural communities of Sagay Marine Reserve, Negros Occidental. Mar Policy 104:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascia MB, Mills M (2018) When conservation goes viral: the diffusion of innovative biodiversity conservation policies and practices. Conserv Lett 11(3):e12442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnachie MM, Cowling RM (2013) On the accuracy of conservation managers’ beliefs and if they learn from evidence-based knowledge: a preliminary investigation. J Environ Manag 128:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr D (2000) Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. Am Psychol 55(5):531–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myrick JG, Evans SD (2014) Do PSAs take a bite out of shark week? The effects of juxtaposing environmental messages with violent images of shark attacks. Sci Commun 36(5):544–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff C, Hueter R (2013) Science, policy, and the public discourse of shark “attack”: a proposal for reclassifying human–shark interactions. J Environ Stud Sci 3(1):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V, Morcatty T, Smith JH, Atoussi S, Shepherd CR, Siriwat P, Nekaris KAI, Bergin D (2019) Illegal wildlife trade – surveying open animal markets and online platforms to understand the poaching of wild cats. Biodiversity 20(1):58–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2019.1568915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmedo A, Sharif V, Milner‐Gulland EJ (2018) Evaluating the design of behavior change interventions: a case study of rhino horn in Vietnam. Conservation Letters, 11(1), e12365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People in Need (2017) ‘Behaviour Change Toolkit’. Available at: https://www.behaviourchange.net/document/33-behaviour-change-toolkit. Accessed 19 June 2019

  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion. Springer, pp 1–24

  • Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Betts MG, Ceballos G, Courchamp F et al (2019) Are we eating the world’s megafauna to extinction? Conserv Lett:e12627

  • Rittichainuwat B, Nelson R, Rahmafitria F (2018) Applying the perceived probability of risk and bias toward optimism: implications for travel decisions in the face of natural disasters. Tour Manag 66:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2010) Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster

  • Rumelhart DE (2017) Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Routledge, pp 33–58

  • Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KA (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol Conserv 232:8–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders CD (2003) The emerging field of conservation psychology. Hum Ecol Rev:137–149

  • Schultz PW (2011) Conservation means behavior. Conserv Biol 25(6):1080–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW (2014) Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Eur Psychol 19:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 24(2):311–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L (2013) Visitors or visits? An examination of zoo visitor numbers using the case study of Australia. Zoo Biol 32(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe A, Booth R (2003) Assessing the role of zoos in wildlife conservation. Hum Dimens Wildl 8(1):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo D, Bianchessi A, Arrivillaga A, Cadiz FC, Mancao RK (2018) Does it work for biodiversity? Experiences and challenges in the evaluation of social marketing campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24(1):18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WildAid (2017) Rhino Horn Demand. https://wildaid.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Rhino-Horn-Demand-in-Vietnam-2017.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2019

  • Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, de Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell SE, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393(10170):447–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngsteadt E, López-Uribe MM, Sorenson CE (2019) Ecology in the sixth mass extinction: detecting and understanding rare biotic interactions. Ann Entomol Soc Am 112:119–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zint M (2017) ‘My Environmental Education Evaluation Resource Assistant’. Available at: http://meera.snre.umich.edu/about-meera. Accessed 19 June 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Adelaide, Australia

    J. C. Ryan

  2. Conservation Psychology and Applied Animal Behavior Research Group, School of Psychology, Social Work, and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Magill Campus, St Bernards Road, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia

    J. C. Ryan, S. Mellish, B. R. Le Busque & C. A. Litchfield

Authors
  1. J. C. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Mellish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. R. Le Busque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. A. Litchfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Ryan.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryan, J.C., Mellish, S., Le Busque, B.R. et al. Enhancing the impact of conservation marketing using psychology: a research agenda. J Environ Stud Sci 9, 442–448 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00565-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00565-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation