Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics of collaborative, interdisciplinary, and engaged research among graduate students in environmental conservation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Research that is collaborative, interdisciplinary, and engaged with non-university partners has emerged as desirable for training graduate students to address complex issues in natural resource management. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding why researchers may participate in various forms of collaborative research, especially among graduate students in environmental conservation. We explored graduate students’ research experiences and the characteristics and attitudes associated with collaborative research and two specific types of collaboration: interdisciplinary collaboration and engaged research. We surveyed 56 graduate students who were affiliated with University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) program on biodiversity conservation under novel ecosystems. We investigated differences between the different categories of collaborative research with logistic regression and decision tree analysis using the classification and regression tree (CRT) algorithm. Students with more collaborators were more likely to feel supported by an intellectual community and view interdisciplinary research as vital for conservation practice. Students with an interdisciplinary collaboration were more likely to be comfortable collaborating with peers but less likely to view collaboration as contributing to their research. Students engaged with non-academics were less comfortable collaborating with faculty and more concerned that becoming engaged with conservation policy or practice may negatively impact them. Of the ten instances in which variables were significant across the three logistic regressions, eight were also identified in the CRT model. This suggests relatively high agreement between the two statistical approaches. The different forms of collaborative research had different predictors and should not be viewed as interchangeable. Further attention is needed on approaches for enhancing graduate students’ training and experience with collaborative environmental research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other includes all students who identified themselves as two or more races.

References

  • Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Glied SA, Haas J, Gebbie KM (2007) Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv Res 42(1p1):329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A., & Kateri, M. (2011). Categorical data analysis. In International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 206–208). Springer Berlin Heidelberg

  • Baumgärtner S, Becker C, Frank K, Müller B, Quaas M (2008) Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics: the role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter-and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecol Econ 67(3):384–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattachary D (2006) Science communication excellence: survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. Royal Society, RCUK & Wellcome Trust, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden D, Borrego M, Newswander LK (2011) Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. High Educ 62(6):741–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego M, Cutler S (2010) Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculum in engineering and science: an analysis of successful IGERT proposals. J Eng Educ 99(4):355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego M, Newswander LK (2010) Definitions of interdisciplinary research: toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Rev High Educ 34(1):61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer EL (1996) The scholarship of engagement. Bull Am Acad Arts Sci 49(7):18–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F, Luederitz C, Lang DJ, Newig J, Reinert F, Abson DJ, von Wehrden H (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Statistical modeling: the two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Stat Sci 16(3):199–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney J, Martinez A, Dreier J, Neishi K, Parsad A (2011) Evaluation of the National Science Foundation’s Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Program (IGERT): follow-up study of IGERT graduates. final report. Abt Associates

  • Cohen BH (2008) Explaining psychological statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2011) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method--2007 update with new internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudo A (2013) Toward a model of scientists’ public communication activity: the case of biomedical researchers. Sci Commun 35(4):476–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrode SD, O’rourke M, Wulfhorst JD, Althoff DM, Goldberg CS, Merrill K, Morse W, Nielsen-Pincus M, Stephens J, Winowiecki L, Bosque-Pérez NA (2007) Employing philosophical dialogue in collaborative science. AIBS Bull 57(1):55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison J, Eatman TK (2008) Scholarship in public: knowledge creation and tenure policy in the engaged university. Imagining America, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel KC (2001) Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems 4(8):716–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner HE (2007) The synthesizing mind: making sense of the deluge of information, pages 3–18. In: Sorondo MS, Malinvaud E, Léna P (eds) Globalization and Education. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany

  • Graybill JK, Dooling S, Shandas V, Withey J, Greve A, Simon GL (2006) A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: graduate student perspectives. BioScience 56(9):757–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett EJ, Rhoten DR (2009) The snowbird charrette: integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design. Minerva 47(4):407–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TE, Piso Z, Engebretson J, O’Rourke M (2018) Evaluating a dialogue-based approach to teaching about values and policy in graduate transdisciplinary environmental science programs. PLoS One 13(9):e0202948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton SE, Labou SG (2017) Careers in ecology: a fine-scale investigation of national data from the US survey of doctorate recipients. Ecosphere 8(12)

  • Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain DL (1993) Cabbages—and kings: research directions in integrated/interdisciplinary curriculum. J Educ Thought 27(3):312–331

  • Klein JT (2008) Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prev Med 35(2):S116–S123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W (2003) Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med 26(3):172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RJ (2000) An introduction to classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Presented at the 2000 annual meeting of the society for academic emergency medicine. San Francisco. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roger_Lewis6/publication/240719582_An_Introduction_to_Classification_and_Regression_Tree_CART_Analysis/links/0046352d3fb18f1740000000/An-Introduction-to-Classification-and-Regression-Tree-CART-Analysis.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2017.

  • Lin MW, Bozeman B (2006) Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: a “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. J Technol Transf 31(2):269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YY, Yang M, Ramsay M, Li XS, Coid JW (2011) A comparison of logistic regression, classification and regression tree, and neural networks models in predicting violent re-offending. J Quant Criminol 27(4):547–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyall C, Meagher LR (2012) A masterclass in interdisciplinarity: research into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers. Futures 44(6):608–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PE, Umberger BR (2003) Trends in interdisciplinary and integrative graduate training: an NSF IGERT example. Quest 55(1):86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee R, DeLong MJ (2007) Collaborative co-mentored dissertations spanning institutions: influences on student development. CBE Life Sci Educ 6(2):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin G (2000) Pragmatism and self-organization: research collaboration on the individual level. Res Policy 29(1):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moslemi JM, Capps KA, Johnson MS, Maul J, McIntyre PB, Melvin AM, Vadas TM, Vallano DM, Watkins JM, Weiss M (2009) Training tomorrow’s environmental problem solvers: an integrative approach to graduate education. BioScience 59(6):514–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies, Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (2004) Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academy Press, Washington, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2015) National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) program. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=505015. Accessed 15 May 2017

  • National Science Foundation (2018) IGERT: integrative graduate education research and training: mission, history, and impact. Retrieved from http://www.igert.org/public/about/history-and-mission.html Accessed 11 April 2018

  • Nerad M (2004) The PhD in the US: criticisms, facts, and remedies. High Educ Pol 17(2):183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newswander LK, Borrego M (2009) Engagement in two interdisciplinary graduate programs. High Educ 58(4):551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen-Pincus M, Morse WC, Force JE, Wulfhorst JD (2007) Bridges and barriers to developing and conducting interdisciplinary graduate-student team research. Ecol Soc 12(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Barrett GW (1971) Fundamentals of ecology (Vol. 3). Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Perz SG, Brilhante S, Brown IF, Michaelsen AC, Mendoza E, Passos V et al (2010) Crossing boundaries for environmental science and management: combining interdisciplinary, interorganizational and international collaboration. Environ Conserv 37(4):419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters R (2006) Getting what you came for: the smart student’s guide to earning an MA or a Ph.D. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, Union Square West

    Google Scholar 

  • Poliakoff E, Webb TL (2007) What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Sci Commun 29(2):242–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Williams JW, Bateman BL, Burke KD, Carter SK, Childress ES, Cromwell KJ, Gratton C, Hasley AO, Kraemer BM (2015) The rise of novelty in ecosystems. Ecol Appl 25:2051–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoten D, Parker A (2004) Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science 306(5704):2046–2046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoten D, Pfirman S (2007) Women in interdisciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences. Res Policy 36(1):56–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissman AR, Gillon S (2017) Where are ecology and biodiversity in social-ecological systems research? A review of research methods and applied recommendations. Conserv Lett 10(1):86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissman AR, Burke KD, Kramer HAC, Radeloff VC, Schilke PR, Selles OA, Toczydlowski RH, Wardropper CB, Barrow LA, Chandler JL, Geleynse K, L'Roe AW, Lauschman KM, Schomaker AL (2018) Forest management for novelty, persistence, and restoration influenced by policy and society. Front Ecol Environ 16:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocombe DS (1993) Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development. Environ Manag 17(3):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelt EJ, Biemans HJ, Tobi H, Luning PA, Mulder M (2009) Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: a systematic review. Educ Psychol Rev 21(4):365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprain L, Timpson WM (2012) Pedagogy for sustainability science: case-based approaches for interdisciplinary instruction. Environ Commun 6(4):532–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalans LJ, Yarnold PR, Seng M, Olson DE, Repp M (2004) Identifying three types of violent offenders and predicting violent recidivism while on probation: a classification tree analysis. Law Hum Behav 28(3):253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokols D (2006) Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. Am J Community Psychol 38(1–2):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tres G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds) (2005) From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application (Vol. 12). Springer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2005a) Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2005b) Researchers’ experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environ Manag 36(6):792–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2009) Integrative research on environmental and landscape change: PhD students’ motivations and challenges. J Environ Manag 90(9):2921–2929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK (2011) Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Res Policy 40(3):463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijnsoever FJ, Hessels LK, Vandeberg RL (2008) A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Res Policy 37(8):1255–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanstone M, Hibbert K, Kinsella EA, McKenzie P, Pitman A, Lingard L (2013) Interdisciplinary doctoral research supervision: a scoping review. Can J High Educ 43(2):42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner CS, Roessner JD, Bobb K, Klein JT, Boyack KW, Keyton J, Rafols I, Börner K (2011) Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. J Informetr 5(1):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerts DJ, Sandmann LR (2008) Building a two-way street: challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. Rev High Educ 32(1):73–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch-Devine M, Hardy D, Brosius J, Heynen N (2014) A pedagogical model for integrative training in conservation and sustainability. Ecol Soc 19(2):10

  • Whitmer A, Ogden L, Lawton J, Sturner P, Groffman PM, Schneider L, ... & Bettez N (2010) The engaged university: providing a platform for research that transforms society. Front Ecol Environ 8(6): 314–321

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the entire student group, program staff, and faculty of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Novel Ecosystems IGERT Program. We would also like to recognize the work of Camellia Sanford and Rockman et al. for their contribution and expertise in data management and program evaluation.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation Division of Graduate Education award number 1144752.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Adena R. Rissman & Lori Barrow

Authors
  1. Adena R. Rissman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lori Barrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adena R. Rissman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rissman, A.R., Barrow, L. Characteristics of collaborative, interdisciplinary, and engaged research among graduate students in environmental conservation. J Environ Stud Sci 9, 297–310 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00553-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00553-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation